LONG-LIVED QUANTUM MEMORY USING NUCLEAR SPINS A. Sinatra, G. Reinaudi, F. Laloë (ENS, Paris) Laboratoire Kastler Brossel A. Dantan, E. Giacobino, M. Pinard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paraty, September 2009 A. Lezama Instituto de Física, Facultad de Ingeniería, Casilla de Correo 30, 11000, Montevideo, Uruguay Quantum.
Advertisements

Femtosecond lasers István Robel
MR TRACKING METHODS Dr. Dan Gamliel, Dept. of Medical Physics,
Zero-Phonon Line: transition without creation or destruction of phonons Phonon Wing: at T = 0 K, creation of one or more phonons 7. Optical Spectroscopy.
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 8. Semiclassical Radiation Theory 8.1 Introduction Semiclassical theory of light-matter interaction (Ch. 6-7)
Space-time positioning at the quantum limit with optical frequency combs Workshop OHP September 2013 Valérian THIEL, Pu JIAN, Jonathan ROSLUND, Roman SCHMEISSNER,
Non-equilibrium dynamics in the Dicke model Izabella Lovas Supervisor: Balázs Dóra Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Memory must be able to store independently prepared states of light The state of light must be mapped onto the memory with the fidelity higher than the.
Stimulated Raman Adiabatic Passage into continuum
Generation of short pulses
Quantum Computing with Trapped Ion Hyperfine Qubits.
Cavity decay rate in presence of a Slow-Light medium
Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen University Eugene PolzikLECTURE 3.
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
Characterization and optimization of entangled states produced by a self-phase-locked OPO J. Laurat, G. Keller, J.A.O. Huguenin T. Coudreau, N. Treps,
Entanglement of Collective Quantum Variables for Quantum Memory and Teleportation N. P. Bigelow The Center for Quantum Information The University of Rochester.
Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen University Eugene PolzikLECTURE 5.
Light-Matter Quantum Interface
Cavity QED as a Deterministic Photon Source Gary Howell Feb. 9, 2007.
Guillermina Ramirez San Juan
Quantum Computation Using Optical Lattices Ben Zaks Victor Acosta Physics 191 Prof. Whaley UC-Berkeley.
PG lectures Spontaneous emission. Outline Lectures 1-2 Introduction What is it? Why does it happen? Deriving the A coefficient. Full quantum description.
Optical control of electrons in single quantum dots Semion K. Saikin University of California, San Diego.
A quantum optical beam n Classically an optical beam can have well defined amplitude AND phase simultaneously. n Quantum mechanics however imposes an uncertainty.
Coherence in Spontaneous Emission Creston Herold July 8, 2013 JQI Summer School (1 st annual!)
Single atom lasing of a dressed flux qubit
Quantum Devices (or, How to Build Your Own Quantum Computer)
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Studying dipolar effects in degenerate quantum gases of chromium atoms G. Bismut 1, B. Pasquiou 1, Q. Beaufils 1, R. Chicireanu 2, T. Zanon 3, B. Laburthe-Tolra.
Theory of Intersubband Antipolaritons Mauro F
Laser-microwave double resonance method in superfluid helium for the measurement of nuclear moments Takeshi Furukawa Department of Physics, Graduate School.
B.SC.II PAPER-B (OPTICS and LASERS)
Christine Muschik and J. Ignacio Cirac Entanglement generated by Dissipation Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik Hanna Krauter, Kasper Jensen, Jonas Meyer.
Motivation Polarized 3 He gas target Solenoid design and test 3 He feasibility test Summary and outlook Johannes Gutenberg-Universit ä t Mainz Institut.
Experiments with ultracold RbCs molecules Peter Molony Cs Rb.
Plasma diagnostics using spectroscopic techniques
Wave Packet Echo in Optical Lattice and Decoherence Time Chao Zhuang U(t) Aug. 15, 2006 CQISC2006 University of Toronto.
Meet the transmon and his friends
Elastic collisions. Spin exchange. Magnetization is conserved. Inelastic collisions. Magnetization is free. Magnetic properties of a dipolar BEC loaded.
Centre for Quantum Physics & Technology, Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford. Karl Surmacz (University of Oxford, UK) Efficient Unitary Quantum.
Strong light-matter coupling: coherent parametric interactions in a cavity and free space Strong light-matter coupling: coherent parametric interactions.
Trap loss of spin-polarized 4 He* & He* Feshbach resonances Joe Borbely ( ) Rob van Rooij, Steven Knoop, Wim Vassen.
Collaborations: L. Santos (Hannover) Former members: R. Chicireanu, Q. Beaufils, B. Pasquiou, G. Bismut A.de Paz (PhD), A. Sharma (post-doc), A. Chotia.
Resonant dipole-dipole energy transfer from 300 K to 300μK, from gas phase collisions to the frozen Rydberg gas K. A. Safinya D. S. Thomson R. C. Stoneman.
Generation of continuous variable entangled light Department of Physics Dalian University of Technology Dalian, , the People's Republic of China.
Copenhagen interpretation Entanglement - qubits 2 quantum coins 2 spins ( spin “up” or spin “down”) Entangled state many qubits: Entangled state:
The Theory of Effective Hamiltonians for Detuned Systems
Pablo Barberis Blostein y Marc Bienert
Spatial distributions in a cold strontium Rydberg gas Graham Lochead.
Quantum teleportation between light and matter
R Wyllie, R Wakai, T G Walker University of Wisconsin, Madison Spin-Exchange Relaxation Free Heart signal frequency spectrum from DC-100Hz Adult heart.
Optical Pumping Simulation of Copper for Beta-NMR Experiment Julie Hammond Boston University ISOLDE, CERN
PONDEROMOTIVE ROTATOR: REQUIREMENTS Zach Korth (Caltech) – GWADW ‘12 – Waikoloa, HI.
Spatial distributions in a cold strontium Rydberg gas Graham Lochead.
Dipolar relaxation in a Chromium Bose Einstein Condensate Benjamin Pasquiou Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers Université Paris Nord Villetaneuse - France.
Carmen Porto Supervisor: Prof. Simone Cialdi Co-Supervisor: Prof. Matteo Paris PhD school of Physics.
Violation of a Bell’s inequality in time with weak measurement SPEC CEA-Saclay IRFU, CEA, Jan A.Korotkov University of California, Riverside A. Palacios-Laloy.
Raman Effect The Scattering of electromagnetic radiation by matter with a change of frequency.
Quantum optics Eyal Freiberg.
Pulse Propagation. Chapter 4.
A. Bramati M. Romanelli E. Giacobino
dark matter Properties stable non-relativistic non-baryonic
Lasers and effects of magnetic field
The Grand Unified Theory of Quantum Metrology
Decoherence at optimal point: beyond the Bloch equations
Strong Coupling of a Spin Ensemble to a Superconducting Resonator
Advanced Optical Sensing
Norm Moulton LPS 15 October, 1999
by Justin G. Bohnet, Brian C. Sawyer, Joseph W. Britton, Michael L
Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian
Presentation transcript:

LONG-LIVED QUANTUM MEMORY USING NUCLEAR SPINS A. Sinatra, G. Reinaudi, F. Laloë (ENS, Paris) Laboratoire Kastler Brossel A. Dantan, E. Giacobino, M. Pinard (UPMC, Paris)

NUCLEAR SPINS HAVE LONG RELAXATION TIMES Spin 1/2  No electric quadrupole moment coupling T 1 relaxation can reach 5 days in cesium-cotated cells and 14 days in sol-gel coated cells T 2 is usually limited by magnetic field inhomogeneity In practice Ground state He3 has a purely nuclear spin ½ Nuclear magnetic moments are small  Weak magnetic couplings  dipole-dipole interaction contributes for T 1 ≃ 10 9 s (1mbar)

Examples of Relaxation times in 3 He T 1 =344 h T 2 =1.33 h 0.Moreau et al. J.Phys III (1997) Magnetometer with polarized 3 He Ming F. Hsu et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. (2000) Sol-gel coated glass cells

3 He NUCLEAR SPINS FOR Q-INFORMATION ? Quantum information with continuous variables Squeezed light Spin Squeezed atoms Quantum memory

SQUEEZING OF LIGHT AND SQUEEZING OF SPINS N spins 1/2 Coherent spin state CSS (uncorrelated spins) Projection noise in atomic clocks S x = S y = | |/2  X >1  Y <1 Squeezed state  S x 2 < N/4 S y 2 > N/4 One mode of the EM field X=(a+a † ) Y=i(a † -a) Coherent state X = Y=1

How to access the ground state of 3 He ? 11S011S0 23S123S1 23P23P 20 eV metastable ground Metastability exchange collisions During a collision the metastable and the ground state atoms exchange their electronic variables He* + He -----> He + He* Colegrove, Schearer, Walters (1963) 1.08  m Laser transition R.F. discharge

Typical parameters for 3He optical pumping Metastables : n = at/cm 3 n / N =10 -6 Metastable / ground : Laser Power for optical pumping P L = 5 W An optical pumping cell filled with ≈ mbar pure 3 He The ground state gas can be polarized to 85 % in good conditions

A SIMPLIFIED MODEL : SPIN ½ METASTABLE STATE S = s i I = i n N Rates Partridge and Series (1966) d /dt = - + Heisenberg Langevin equations Langevin forces = D ab (t-t’) dS /dt = - S + I + f s dI /dt = - I + S + f i

PREPARATION OF A COHERENT SPIN STATE This state is stationary for metastability exchange collisions Atoms prepared in the fully polarized CSS by optical pumping ↓↑ Spin quadratures S x =(S 21 +S 12 )/2 ; S y =i (S 12 - S 21 )/2 S x = S y = n/4 I x = I y = N/4

SQUEEZING TRANSFER TO FROM FIELD TO ATOMS Linearization of optical Bloch equations for quantum fluctuations around the fully polarized initial state Control classical field of Rabi freqency Raman configuration >, A, A † cavity mode squeezed vaccum H= g (S 32 A + h.c.) 12 3 ↓ ↑ Exchange collisions

SQUEEZING TRANSFER TO METASTABLE ATOMS 1 Linear coupling for quantum fluctuations between the cavity field and metastable atoms coherence S 21 Dantan et al. Phys. Rev. A (2004) 2 3 A Adiabatic elimination of S 23 shiftcoupling Two photon detuning Resonant coupling condition : +shift = 0

SQUEEZING TRANSFER TO GROUND STATE ATOMS The metastable coherence S 12 evolves at the frequency Resonant coupling in both metastable and ground state is Possible in a magnetic field such that the Zeemann effect in the metastable compensates the light shift of level 1 2 ↑ 1 3 A ↓ Exchange collisions give a linear coupling beween S 12 and I ↑↓ Resonant coupling condition : E ↑ –E ↓ =

SQUEEZING TRANSFER TO GROUND STATE ATOMS Resonance conditions in a magnetic field ↓↑ Zeeman effect : E 2 -E 1 = 1. 8 MHz/G E ↑ –E ↓ = 3.2 kHz/G ↓↑ A

GROUND AND METASTABLE SPIN VARIANCES Pumping parameter Strong pumping the squeezing goes to metastables Slow pumping the squeezing goes to ground state Cooperativity ≃ 100 When polarization and cavity field are adiabatically eliminated

GROUND AND METASTABLE SPIN VARIANCES

EXCHANGE COLLISIONS AND CORRELATIONS When exchange is dominant, and for A weak squeezing in metastable maintains strong squeezing in the ground state Exchange collisions tend to equalize the correlation function

WRITING TIME OF THE MEMORY Build-up of the spin squeezing in the metastable state Build-up of the spin squeezing in the ground state

TIME EVOLUTION OF SPIN VARIANCES css t(s) The writing time is limited by (density of metstables)

READ OUT OF THE NUCLEAR SPIN MEMORY 1 2 ↓↑ 3 Pumping 10 s 1 ↓ 2 ↑ 3 Storage hours 1 2 ↓↑ 3 Writing 1 s 1 ↓ 2 ↑ 3 Reading 1 s By lighting up only the coherent control field, in the same conditions as for writing, one retrieves transient squeezing in the output field from the cavity

READ OUT OF THE NUCLEAR SPIN MEMORY A in A out P(t 0 ) = E LO (t) E LO (t’) Fourier-Limited Spectrum Analyzer Temporally matched local oscillator Read-out function for

REALISTIC MODEL FOR HELIUM 3 Real atomic structure of 3He Exchange Collisions 11S011S0 23S123S1 23P023P0 AA F=3/2 F=1/2

REALISTIC MODEL FOR HELIUM 3 Real atomic structure of 3He Lifetime of metastable state coherence: =10 3 s -1 (1torr) 11S011S0 23S123S1 23P023P0 Exchange Collisions AA F=3/2 F=1/2

NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS We find the same analytic expressions as for the simple model if the field and optical coherences are adiabatically eliminated Effect of Adiabatic elimination not justified 1 mbarr T=300K

EFFECT OF A FREQUENCY MISMATCH IN GROUND STATE We have assumed resonance conditions in a magnetic field E 4 - E 3 + = E ↑ – E ↓ = E 4 - E 3 ≃ 1. 8 MHz/G What is the effect of a magnetic field inhomogeneity ? De-phasing between the squeezed field and the ground state coherence during the squeezing build-up time E ↑ –E ↓ = 3.2 kHz/G e -2r e 2r 1

HOMOGENEITY REQUIREMENTS ON THE MAGNETIC FIELD Example of working point : B B = 5x E-71E-61E-51E-41E B=0

LONG-LIVED NON LOCAL CORRELATIONS BETWEEN TWO MACROSCOPIC SAMPLES Correlated macroscopic spins (10 18 atoms) ? OPO correlated beams Julsgaard et al., Nature (2001) : atoms =0.5ms

INSEPARABILITY CRITERION Two modes of the EM field Quadratures Two collective spins Duan et al. PRL 84 (2000), Simon PRL 84(2000)

LONG-LIVED NON LOCAL CORRELATIONS BETWEEN TWO MACROSCOPIC SAMPLES OPO 12 3 ↓ ↑ 12 3 ↓ ↑ correlated beams coupling

LONG-LIVED NON LOCAL CORRELATIONS BETWEEN TWO MACROSCOPIC SAMPLES In terms of inseparability criterion of Duan and Simon noise from Exchange collisions coupling Spontaneous Emission noise