Working Through Mistakes, Miscues, and Mishaps in Actinide Separations Shane Knockemus US EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL May 4, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Environmental Samples
Advertisements

Anomalous Behavior of TEVA Resin Prepacked Columns: A Technical Update Anil Thakkar November 1st 2004 Cincinnati, OH.
A NALYTICAL S EPARATIONS G ROUP Megan Bennett, Ashlee Crable, Sherry Faye, Narek Gharibyan, Julie Gostic, and Chris Klug Subgroup Leader: Ralf Sudowe.
The Separation of Beryllium from Spectral Interfering Elements in Inductively Coupled Plasma – Atomic Emission Spectroscopic Analysis Daniel R. McAlister.
WEAO2012 Technical Conference USING ONLINE ANALYZER FOR OPTIMIZING CHEMICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROCESS IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT Ottawa, Ontario,
Organic Chemistry Lab 315 Fall, DUE DATES Today –At beginning of lab -- Melting Pt. and Ref. Index Report –At end of lab -- copy of laboratory notebook.
Rapid Actinide Analysis for Large Soil Samples
New Applications of Rapid Column Extraction for Methods at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III Savannah River Site.
Raymond Chang 10th edition Chapter 4
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Samples Henrieta Dulaiova Guebuem Kim Bill Burnett Florida State University and E. Philip Horwitz PG Research.
New Extraction Methods for Urine and Fecal Samples
Technical Updates on UTEVA, TEVA and TRU Resins
Optimizing Radiochemical Methods at SRS
Chem. 31 – 4/22 Lecture. Announcements Lab Reports –Soda Ash report due 4/27 –Will be posting information about Formal Report soon Today’s Lecture –Chapter.
Rapid Separation Methods for Bioassay Samples S. L. Maxwell, III and D. J. Fauth Westinghouse Savannah River Site.
Food analysis (473 PHG).
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall
Spot Tests: Another Qualitative Analysis
Redox Titrations Introduction 1.) Redox Titration
Redox Titrations Introduction 1.) Redox Titration
Determination of Metals
The Determination of 226 Ra in Water Samples Anil H. Thakkar Eichrom Technologies, Inc. eichrom TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Matter Class #3 OB: Principles of separating mixtures, counting atoms in chemical formulas, and the indicators of chemical reactions.
Types of Chemical Reactions
Gravimetric and Volumetric Analysis
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Samples Henrieta Dulaiova Guebuem Kim Bill Burnett Florida State University and E. Philip Horwitz PG Research.
Radioactive Materials Analytical Laboratory Eichrom Technologies Inc. User Group Meeting May 2001 J.M. Giaquinto, L.D. Bible, D.C. Glasgow, J.M. Keller.
Actinide Analysis from Large- Volume Seawater Samples Bill Burnett & Guebuem Kim Department of Oceanography Florida State University and Phil Horwitz PG.
Rapid Actinide Analysis for Large Soil Samples-Update Sherrod L. Maxwell, III Westinghouse Savannah River Company.
Metals, Making Electricity and Corrosion. Metals The job that a metal is used for is determined by its physical and chemical properties. Physical properties.
00J ppt Rapid Extraction Methods for the Process Laboratory S. L. Maxwell, III V. D. Jones S. T. Nichols J. Satkowski M. A. Bernard Westinghouse.
Exp. 16: Volumetric Analysis: Redox Titration Normality = eq wt of solute L solution Acid/bases: #eq = # H + or OH - ionized Redox reactions – transfer.
Elution and Mounting Techniques for Americium using Eichrom TRU Resin Mitch Abbate Radiochemistry Technical Director Severn Trent Services St. Louis May.
General Engineering Laboratories Use of Eichrom Resins for Bioassay Pa-231 Bob Timm - GEL Tim Chandler - GEL Bill Burnett - FSU Mike Schultz - PerkinElmer.
Aqueous Equilibria Chapter 16 Solubility Equilibria.
Developments in Environmental Radiochemistry* Environmental Radioactivity Measurement Facility Department of Oceanography Florida State University Tallahassee,
Distribution of radionuclides in soils in surroundings of Bratislava, capital of the Slovak Republic. II. Man-made radionuclides Mátel Ľ., Rosskopfová.
The Determination of 226Ra in Water Samples
Research performed at UNLV on the chemistry of Technetium in the nuclear fuel cycle 1. Separation U/Tc and synthesis of solids form 2. Synthesis and characterization.
Updates from Eichrom’s Tech Support Lab Anil Thakkar May 4 th 2004 Charleston, SC.
New Extraction Methods for Actinides in Urine at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
Chemical Reactions Types of Reactions  Synthesis reactions  Decomposition reactions  Single displacement reactions  Double displacement reactions.
Recent Improvements in Rapid Column Separation Methods at SRS S. L. Maxwell, III, D. J. Fauth, R. C. Henderson, J. J. Smiley, S. R. Johnson Westinghouse.
Th, Pu & U Separation Using TEVA and UTEVA Resin
Recent Improvements in Rapid Column Separation Methods at SRS
Qualitative Analysis Determines only the presence (or absence) of a substance Sometimes referred to as “Wet Chemistry” Involves the identification of ions.
New Fecal Method for Plutonium and Americium at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
Optimizing Peak Separation for Simultaneous Pu and U Measurements Shane Knockemus US EPA / NAREL May 3, 2005.
Lab 4 Chemical reactions. A.Signs of a Chemical Reaction Evolution of heat and light Formation of a gas Formation of a precipitate Color change.
Rapid actinide measurements in environmental samples Dr Phil Warwick Geosciences Advisory Unit Southampton Oceanography Centre.
New Fecal Method for Plutonium and Americium at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
Optimizing Radiochemical Methods at SRS (Ni-63, I-129, Actinides) Sherrod L. Maxwell, III Westinghouse Savannah River Company.
One-Column Separation and Analysis of Isotopic Am and Pu in Soil Samples Nidal M. Jadalla, Eberline Services, Albuquerque, NM Anil Thakkar, Eichrom Technologies,
Pyrosulfate fusion vs. TEVA / TRU forcing the issue Shane Knockemus U.S. EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL November 11, 2002.
An Improved Method for Determination of Ra-228 * Jamie Christoff & Bill Burnett Department of Oceanography Florida State University “The Double-Pass Approach”
Aqueous Equilibria Follow-up
Acids and Alkalis.
Matter, Mixtures, and Separations
Anil H.Thakkar Eichrom Industries, Inc.. Darien, IL
M. Iammarino, D. dell’Oro, N. Bortone, A. E. Chiaravalle*
The Determination of 226Ra in Water Samples
European Metallurgical Conference
Ra in Water using MnO2 Resin: Update
Technical Updates on TRU and TEVA Resins
Rapid Emergency Methods for Actinides and Sr-89/90
Identifying Cations in Solution
CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT: INSPECTIONS, STORAGE, WASTES, AND SECURITY
National Air and Radiation Environmental Lab
Formatting Part 2 Handout 4.
Presentation transcript:

Working Through Mistakes, Miscues, and Mishaps in Actinide Separations Shane Knockemus US EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL May 4, 2004

Goal To give some examples of laboratory goof ups that I have been victim of, and how to salvage a successful analysis without having to rerun the sample from square one. My examples include using the wrong strip solutions, omitting important oxidation/reduction steps, and arranging the cartridges in the wrong order.

TEVA / TRU separation scheme

Goof up scenario #1 What went wrong?….I used the U strip solution (ammonium oxalate) to elute Pu fraction. Result: Pu and U were eluted together. Point of realization? How to salvage usable analyses….If the mistake is realized before it is too late the Pu. and U may be precipitated selectively. It may also be an option to precipitate Pu and U together if both were precipitated in the presence of TiCl 3. Good resolution is a necessity.

Selective Precipitation Scenario Sol’n w/ Pu +4 and U +6 Nd +3, HF filter---save filtrate NdF 3 --Pu Sol’n w/ U +6 reduce volume Nd +3, TiCl 3, HF NdF 3 --U

Clean Pu Spectrum

Clean U Spectrum Precipitating the U fraction from the filtrate of the Pu pptn can diminish the recovery slightly (10-20%), but results are still within acceptable ranges.

Pu and U Together With slightly improved resolution, which may be obtained by counting the sample on a lower shelf, Pu and U could possibly be determined simultaneously.

Goof Up Scenario #2 What went wrong?…ferrous sulfamate was not added to load solution. Result: Pu will remain in the +4 valence, and will be retained and eluted with Th fraction from TEVA. Point of realization?…If the mistake is realized after the Th fraction has already been filtered and counted then the filter must be leached and/or wet ashed to do chemistry that will enable Pu / Th separation. If the mistake is realized prior to the precipitation and filtration of Th, but after the elution of Th (and Pu), the solution containing the Pu / Th mixture may be used for subsequent chemistry.

Pu and Th Together

Th / Pu Separation Scheme Sol’n w/ Th and Pu SO 4 -2, BaCl 2 BaSO 4 (Th, Pu) EDTA Ti +3, KOH Ti(OH) 3 -- (Th, Pu) HClO 4, water, Nd +3 KMnO 4, HF NdF 3 – Th (save filtrate) Filtrate w/ PuO 2 +2 HClO 4, heat Water, Fe +2, Nd +3, HF NdF 3 -- Pu

Pu-less Th Spectrum

Pu Spectrum

Goof Up Scenario #3 What went wrong?….did not oxidize Pu to +4 valence prior to elution of Am from TRU. Result: Pu will remain in +3 valence, and will be eluted with Am fraction. Point of realization?…before or after precipitation. Subsequent chemistry involved in separating Am and Pu will be the same as the Th / Pu chemistry involved in “Goof up scenario #2”, whereas the Am will behave the same as Th.

Pu and Am Together

Pu-less Am Spectrum

Pu Spectrum

Goof Up Scenario #4 What went wrong?….cartridges set up in wrong order (TRU-TEVA rather than TEVA-TRU). Result: Everything retained on TRU. Point of realization?….at the time of disconnecting tandem arrangement. Subsequent chemistry involved in obtaining usable analyses involves a mixture of things already covered.

Spectrum of Everything Retained on TRU Everything stripped from TRU with 0.1 M ammonium oxalate

How to Salvage Usable Analyses Everything on TRU (Am +3, Pu +3, Th +4, U +6 ). Am eluted with 4 M HCl. Pu / Th eluted together with 1 M HCl / 0.1 M oxalic acid. Pu and Th separated by chemistry demonstrated in ‘Goof Up Scenario #2’. U eluted with 0.1 M ammonium oxalate.

Spectra From Goof Up #4

Super Goof Up Scenario What went wrong?….cartridges were arranged in the wrong order, ferrous sulfamate reduction of Pu omitted, sodium nitrite oxidation of Pu omitted, and wrong stripping solutions were used.

How To Fix Super Goof Up Get out of the lab! Sober up. Consider a desk job.

Problems Encountered The behavior and stability of Pu at the +6 valence proved to be hard to predict at times. In scenario # 2, 3, and 4 getting Pu to maintain a +6 valence during the NdF 3 precipitation of both Th and Am proved to be difficult and at times not complete. Don’t co-precipitate samples with CeF 3 in the presence of a strong oxidizer, as it will oxidize the Ce to +4 valence and will render the fluoride precipitation impossible.

Pu Contamination in Th Spectra

Pu Contamination in Am Spectrum

Acknowledgements The chemistry involved in obtaining successful separations was borrowed / learned from David Sill and Steven Bohrer from RESL in Idaho Falls, ID.

Conclusions Mistakes are inevitable as long as humans are involved. Don’t be too quick to dump a sample and start over when a mistake is made. Something can be learned from most mistakes. Successful separations are still quite possible in most situations when mistakes are made.