AIM Statement The use of reminders to eligible patients in the Resident Clinic to have a mammogram will improve rates of screening. Over a 6 month period,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilizing the Electronic Medical Record to Reduce Inappropriate Medication Use Alan White, PhD – Abt Associates Valerie Weber, MD – Geisinger Health System.
Advertisements

Impact of an antidepressant adherence program in a managed care organization Kara Zivin Bambauer, PhD Stephen Soumerai, ScD Alyce Adams, PhD Fang Zhang,
Generalized Model for Program Planning
Outreach Strategies That Work Nancy Jo Bleier, LCSW, C-ASWCM WISEWOMAN Women's Health Program Coordinator Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium Nancy.
Primary Care Quality Committee Annual Report, Fill in Health Center, SFDPH, Date.
BREAST CANCER SCREENING Anoop Agrawal, M.D.. NEW USPSTF BREAST SCREENING GUIDELINES Published by US Preventative Screening Task Force in November 2009.
1 THE POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF THE MEDICAL STAFF INVOLVED IN THE ORGANIZED CERVICAL CANCER (CC) SCREENING OVER THE RESPONSIVENESS TO THE CENTRALLY ISSUED.
Detecting Cancer Earlier Network Service 2014/15 Includes £40k for opportunistic targeted endorsement of bowel screening.
Trends in the Use of Evidence-Based Treatments for Coronary Artery Disease Among Women and the Elderly Findings From the Get With the Guidelines Quality-
Does It Work? Evaluating Your Program
Linking Multilevel Analysis to Health Policy Interventions Richard B. Warnecke, Sarah Gehlert, Carol Ferrans, Richard Barrett, Julie Darnell, Young Cho,
In the name of Allah. Development and psychometric Testing of a new Instrument to Measure Affecting Factors on Women’s Behaviors to Breast Cancer Prevention:
Gender-based health and weight loss beliefs in knee osteoarthritis patients.
Cost Effectiveness Analysis To Enhance Mammography Use Dave Alvey Paul Moley.
The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility of conducting a prospective cohort study with sufficient follow-up in a population of.
Knowledge, Cancer Fatalism and Spirituality as Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening Practices for African American and Caucasian Women Staci T. Anderson,
Produced by The Alfred Workforce Development Team on behalf of DHS Public Health - Diabetes Prevention and Management Initiative June 2005 Recall and Reminder.
Community Partnerships Make a Difference: Free Cancer Clinics in Wyoming County Cheryl McGovern, Valerie Bell, Regina Allen Partnership History The Wyoming.
Mammography Screening Information for Providers Indian Health Service National GPRA Team.
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
Darren A. DeWalt, MD, MPH Division of General Internal Medicine Maihan B. Vu, Dr.PH, MPH Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention University.
EPIB-591 Screening Jean-François Boivin 29 September
Understanding Why Patients Accept Vaccination: A Socio-Behavioral Approach at the University of Louisville Vaccine and International Health and Travel.
1 Cervical Screening Programme, England, : Graphs.
Macmillan Website Visitor Survey Research & Insight June 2014.
Page 1 External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Monday, March 21, :00 p.m. –2:30 p.m. WELCOME!
ABSTRACT Diabetes is a public health issue of growing magnitude. It currently ranks among the top ten leading causes of death in the United States. To.
Put Prevention Into Practice. Understand the PPIP Program What is Put Prevention Into Practice (PPIP)? What is Put Prevention Into Practice (PPIP)? Why.
Participation by People with Multiple Sclerosis in Health Screening: a General Practice based Audit MacLurg K(1), Hawkins S (2), Reilly P(1) 1. Department.
Statement of Problem: Because of changes in resident staffing, our academic hospitalist Section required a 50% increase (from 12 to 18 FTE) in faculty.
Results Compliance with Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines in the HIV Clinic: A Quality Improvement Tool E. Patrozou M.D., E. Christaki M.D., L. Hicks.
Trends in Cervical & Breast Cancer Screening Practices among Women in Rural & Urban Areas of the United States AcademyHealth 2008 Gender and Health Interest.
Caring For Your Breasts: The second in the series of screening protocol updates Women’s First Health Center Drs. Sylvester, Youngren, Lo and Sansobrino.
Interactions between doctor and pharmaceutical representative in eastern context, Varalak Srinonprasert 2009 Write Workshop Target Journal: JAMA.
Diabetic Retinopathy: A technological and innovative intervention to improve detection of target organ damage S. Naidu, MD, MPH, FAAFP Medical Director.
Incorporating Multiple Evidence Sources for the Assessment of Breast Cancer Policies and Practices J. Jackson-Thompson, Gentry White, Missouri Cancer Registry,
+ Effects of Quality Improvement Strategies on Diabetes Care Presented by: Cali Trepp, Caitlin Dowhie, and Rosa Sanchez.
Cooperative Agreement Number U58/CCU U58DP Spirit Health Education (S.H.E.) Circle Early Detection or Survivorship of Cancer in Underserved.
Audit of outcomes in HIV BHIVA Audit and Standards Sub-Committee E Ong (chair), J Anderson, D Churchill, M Desai, S Edwards, S Ellis, A Freedman, P Gupta,
Effect of process indicators on the episode sensitivity of mammography Tytti Sarkeala, MSc Finnish Cancer Registry Ahti Anttila Matti Hakama Irma Saarenmaa.
The Inflammatory Breast Cancer Cancer Registry Paul H. Levine, M.D. Paul H. Levine, M.D. The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health.
TITLE OF AUDIT Author Date of presentation. Background  Why did you do the audit? eg. high risk / high cost / frequent procedure? Concern that best practice.
The Quality Improvement Project MODULE 2: HOW TO DO A PRACTICE AUDIT? October 2015.
[Title of QI Project] Resident name: Faculty Advisor: Start date: End date:
NHS Cervical Screening Programme, England, : Graphs.
Improving the Quality of Prenatal Care at the WMed FM Residency Clinic Susan Jevert, DO Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine Department of Family and Community.
THREE VILLAGES MEDICAL PRACTICE PATIENT SURVEY 2013 Review of Results Discussion Action Plan for October 2013.
Quality & Sustainability in Cancer Control: A System Performance Spotlight Report To use a hyperlink, right click on it and select ‘Open Hyperlink’, or.
Mother’s Wisdom Breast Health Program ( ) Final Enrollment Five participating health clinics 579 AI/AN women enrolled 98 Talking Circles Completed.
References 1.Buse JB, Ginsberg HN, Bakris GL, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in people with diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 From: Effects of Mammography Screening Under Different Screening Schedules: Model Estimates of Potential Benefits and Harms.
Collaboration with Community Partners to Provide Breast and Cervical Cancer Services to the Underserved University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Tyler.
Evaluation of the Community Patient Navigation Program within the Community Education and Outreach Initiative (CEOI) Patient Navigation is one strategy.
Effectiveness of Patient Navigation on Diagnostic Interval, Anxiety, and Satisfaction of Minority Women with Abnormal Mammograms: a Randomized Controlled.
Phase II: Targeting Non-Adherence with Colorectal Cancer Pre- Screening Appointments and Colonoscopies using Nurse Navigation, Gretchen Junko DO, Gabriel.
Breast Cancer Screening 1. 2 Methods 3 Mammography.
COLLABORATION WITH COMMUNITY PARTNERS TO PROVIDE BREAST AND CERVICAL CANCER SERVICES TO THE UNDERSERVED Patti Olusola, M.D. 1, Sarah Low, M.D. 1, Michelle.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services Policy and Management 1 Women’s Cancer Screening Services Utilization Versus Their Insurance Source Presenter:
Date of download: 7/1/2016 From: Does Utilization of Screening Mammography Explain Racial and Ethnic Differences in Breast Cancer? Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):
Lower Mammography Use is Associated with the Geographic Clustering of Late-stage Breast Cancer in Saint Louis City Min Lian, Donna B. Jeffe, Mario Schootman.
Fall Improvement Team, Veterans Health Unit
Strategies to Improve AAA Screening Rates in Primary Care
The communication of benign biopsy results in breast cancer screening
Spartanburg Family Medicine Residency
Using Intervention Mapping to Adapt Evidence-Based Interventions: IM Adapt with Linda Highfield, Marieke A. Hartman, Patricia Dolan Mullen, and Joanne.
Dawn Drahnak, DNP, RN, CCNS, CCRN, Courtney Boast, BS
Research Questions Does integration of behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location, improve patient-centered outcomes in.
COLPOSCOPY Improving Patient Adherence and Understanding
SAMPLE – Preliminary Results
[Title of project] Research Club [date].
Presentation transcript:

AIM Statement The use of reminders to eligible patients in the Resident Clinic to have a mammogram will improve rates of screening. Over a 6 month period, compliance with screening in women > 50 will improve from 37% to 50%. Background Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in women. Screening with mammography has been shown to decrease mortality from breast cancer. To increase breast cancer screening rates, several interventions have focused on increasing the rate at which physicians offer mammography. These interventions have targeted various types of reminders including phone calls and letters. One study showed a 15.3% increase in adherence to mammograms when patients were contacted through calls and reminders. Other studies found that a recommendation by a physician is a strong determinant of whether a woman receives a mammogram. Purpose To increase the percentage of mammogram screenings in women for whom screening is recommended in an internal medicine residency ambulatory clinic. Conclusions and Next Steps:  A multi-reminder program that incorporated automated telephone calls improved mammography screening by at least 15%.  These findings may suggest that the use of reminders may increase mammography screening rates in similar clinic settings. What You Learned: Residents in an Internal Medicine Residency clinic can improve patient care through the implementation of basic quality improvement principles. Despite improvements, we are still not at goal screening rates and will need to explore additional ideas and continue to refine our interventiion to make the results last. Methods: There was a two phase QI project- phase 1 was June-July 2012, and phase 2 was January-February In phase one of this project a protocol was constructed and implemented for which all the residents in ambulatory clinic were to follow an audit tool (Figure 1) to see if the female patients in their panel had up-to-date mammogram screenings. They were to contact their patients about mammography screening and write the names of the females >50 year old contacted onto a worksheet along with the date of previous mammograms. In Phases one and two, patients were reminded through phone calls and reminders to get their mammograms. Results:  At the beginning of the study, there were 93 of 250 = 37.2% female patients over age 50 that were up to date on their mammograms.  After the intervention, there were 179 of 340 = 52.6% female patients up to date on their mammograms after reminder calls/ letters. This difference in compliance rates was significant. (Table 1) Project Status: It was completed, and submitted to Academic Excellence Day. It was accepted as a poster and displayed at that conference. Phase 1Phase 2 p % up to date mammogram 66/176 (37.5%) 120/211 (56.9%) < Phase 1Phase 2 p % up to date mammogram 93/250 (37.2%) 179/340 (52.6%) < Barriers /Setbacks: We only had one “pre” period. It would have been beneficial to have multiple “pre” periods to know if the intervention affected the trend in previous rates. Since some residents were included in phase 1 data only, and some included in phase 2 data only (due to clinic schedules), a separate analysis was done comparing rates between phase 1 and phase 2 only for residents who had clinic patients during both phases. These two proportions (37.5% in phase 1 and 56.9% in phase 2) were also significantly different from each other (Table 2) Table 1 : Analysis of all residents Table 2: Analysis of residents participating in both phases