October 21, 2011 Teresa Bader & Valrie Edwards Personalized Learning Systems Lessons Learned.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
9/22/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness Chart A Tool for Planning and Self-Assessing
Advertisements

21 st Century Learning Title I Technology Integration Specialists.
Title I Directors Conference October 23-25, 2007 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV Reading the Fine Print Monitoring K-3 Reading Programs Presenter: Pat.
Education Consultant: Cyndi Chancery Planning & Set-Up.
Achieve Benefit from IT Projects. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Achieve Benefits from IT Projects’
Major Incident Process
Using Home Base/Schoolnet to Deliver Assessments CTE Summer Conference July 14, 2014.
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
Teacher Leadership Initiative Trainings
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
Badger Exam 3-8 Roles and Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities A successful administration of the Badger Exam 3-8 is dependent upon school and.
On-Site School Review All-Staff Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
1 Technology Readiness Maryland /2015 Admin Schedule 2 AssessmentOnline/CBT Testing Dates PARCC - PBAMarch 2 – May 8 MSA ScienceApril 13.
Part II: Strategic Planning for a Successful 1:1 Program
Schools’ Data Collection for National Partnerships Agreements (NPA) Educational Measurement and School Accountability Directorate (EMSAD)
Educational Technology Plan Del Mar Union School District.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Updates Assessments available online Resources available Online testing components Testing Coordinator Quick Checklist Technology Coordinator Quick Checklist.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Online Testing TAKS – XL Retest 2008 – 2009 Online Testing Opportunities October 21 st – 24 th 2008 March 3 rd – 6 th 2009 April 28 th –
Fulton Charter System Overview. Fall 2010 Winter Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring – Summer 2012 Conversion to Fulton Charter System 2 Board voted to.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Technology Leadership
ILearnNYC Platform Session Objectives Provide an understanding of overall platform components, how they fit together and associated timelines Explain.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Webcast April 22, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
© 2012 Providence Public School District 1 Raising the Achievement of English Language Learners in the Providence Schools: Report of the Strategic Support.
1 NEEDS BASED TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Aland Russell Director of Technology Escuela Campo Alegre Documents available upon.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Improve Achievement for EACH PreK-12 Student Areas of Focus Preview GREENWICH PUBLIC SCHOOLS October 11, 2007.
Donna Bryant and Mary Beth Singleton Education Technology Resource Teachers.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
1:1 Computing Initiative RttT Fidelity Check Spring 2013.
Roster Verification RV Presentation to School Administrators Spring 2012.
On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
Introduction Who is Girl’s Incorporated? Mission The mission of Girl’s Incorporated is to use new technology to help girls develop higher learning skills.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Rolling Out a Data Warehouse Communication, Coordination and Collaboration for Successful Implementation.
The Role of the Institutional Setting in Teachers’ Development of Ambitious Instructional Practices in Middle-Grades Mathematics Paul Cobb Kara Jackson.
Moodling in Ontario: A Professional Learning Approach Anita Drossis Nathalie Rudner ABEL Professional Learning Lead ABEL School Lead Science and Math Teacher.
1 Archdiocese of New York Academic Initiatives.
Technology Needs Assessment Presentation for Los Fresnos HS
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Assessment of Portal Options Presented to: Technology Committee UMS Board of Trustees May 18, 2010.
Polk County Public Schools. Why do we need a web-based Professional Development System?
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Math Summit II Held on August 11 th, 12 th, and 13 th, 2010 at Baker College.
Training Program Proposal December  Review ~ of The Educational Technology Plan from Donegal’s Strategic Plan  Analysis ~ of Donegal’s School.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Consolidated District Reviews and Monitoring Preparing for Desk Monitoring of Titles I-A, I-D, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2013.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
Learning Sciences International Develops and provides the 21 st Century Teaching & Learning Series for the CFF initiative. Provides the e MBEDDED L EARNING.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
1:1 Learning Scott Drossos :1 Learning2.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Created By: Erin McAlister Christiana Elder Sherene Mayner Freddie Martinez.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Putting it Together. Learning Intentions Participants will recognize the benefits of front-loading collaboration at the district level and plan to apply.
1 Infrastructure Trial Running a Dress Rehearsal.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
MAP Growth Testing Logistics
Training for New District Test Coordinators
Presentation to Project Certification Committee, DoIT August 24, 2008
Presentation transcript:

October 21, 2011 Teresa Bader & Valrie Edwards Personalized Learning Systems Lessons Learned

What Worked Well in Year One 85% of teachers trained before school year began Schools received infrastructure upgrades and hardware prior to beginning of school year Students were more engaged and on task Teacher buy-in increased after training and observing students on task Vendor school-based support was very effective Increased use of electronic whiteboards First Leadership Summit for Principals

Principal Recommendations: Provide funding for curriculum alignment and lesson planning Important to schedule multiple common planning periods Integrating PLS programs require additional time for scheduling for non 1:1 grades/classes that are required to share carts Difficulty releasing SPOC to assist teachers can be alleviated by empowering teachers with troubleshooting strategies Develop communication tool (distribution list/ ARIS/iZone community / newsletter) for dissemination of information and best practices directly to teachers Develop private online community for iZone administrators to discuss best practices The tone of the building is more subdued and respectful since students are engaged and spending more time on task and less time in the halls Use of headphones facilitates a quieter more peaceful learning environment and students who would normally be restless and disruptive are able to focus and achieve success because the content meets their instructional needs

Lessons Learned: Infrastructure and Technical Support DIIT needs to be engaged in the beginning of the process to test and approve software and determine hardware specifications All iZone technicians should receive an overview and troubleshooting tips for all iZone programs and have experience configuring electronic whiteboards, in addition to DIIT infrastructure and hardware expertise Technicians should supervise hardware setup and installation Setup needs to include configuring teacher machines to print All SPOCS (Single Point Of Contact) should be carefully selected and trained prior to implementation SPOCs should be trained to turnkey out of the box PD to teachers, who will in turn train students SPOCS should participate in an overview of all iZone programs and have knowledge of process for adding/deleting user accounts

Lessons Learned: Planning & Implementation Anticipate and plan for all enhancements and websites needed for program implementation and add to device image Principals’ input into program and implementation design is critical at the beginning of the pilot to get their feedback, recommendations, needs, etc. Overview of programs and long term implementation plans should be discussed and shared with all stakeholders (schools, network leaders, DIIT & vendors) Better communication with principals to articulate program, responsibilities and deadlines Train teachers in spring/summer so that they can review programs and plan lessons over the summer Schools should plan time for curriculum alignment in spring/summer Schedule a follow-up session just before school opens, giving teachers usernames, password, names of support coaches, schedule of onsite PD and support, etc.

Lessons Learned: Planning & Implementation (cont’d) DOE needs to manage PD planning and implementation PD schedule to be created for the year and shared with all stakeholders Create a site to communicate with schools and share best practices Plan out-of-the-box session for teachers and students Budget for a 1:1 laptop program and excess machines to swap out Create a one page document with overview of iZone, programs, and school responsibilities for dissemination at the school level Vendor to provide other options to reduce time and printing by schools, such as student workbook Teachers should have 1-2 spare devices turned on and ready for login so they can do a quick swap if device freezes or shuts down unexpectedly to minimize the loss of instructional time

Lessons Learned: Vendor Program Implementation Onsite vendor support is crucial to initial implementation success Process for adding/removing students or teachers in programs should be easy and expedient Strategies for including modifications for special education, ELL, and gifted and talented students should be reviewed and identified Better training of vendor coaches Get teacher’s schedule and common prep time before school year begins from principal to allow for scheduling of PD and push-in support Vendor fingerprinting process should be completed early and prior to the beginning of school Vendors need to collaborate with central and school-based staff to align content to curriculum

Lessons Learned: Initial Assessments Performance Series and Renzulli Profiler training needs to be included in teacher PD and SPOC training Site ID and login Information should be provided during training for SPOCS / Data Specialists Testing modification strategies should be identified and shared Clarity regarding coordinating testing with other alternate assessment tools administered by school Better communication regarding testing participants, dates and protocols