Foundations of Australian Law Fourth Edition Copyright © 2013 Tilde Publishing and Distribution Chapter 4 How courts make laws.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit 3 AoS 3 Revision DP 1: The ability of judges and courts to make law DP 2: The operation of the doctrine of precedent.
Advertisements

Unit 3 AoS 3 Revision DP 5: Strengths and weaknesses of law making through the courts DP 6: The relationship between parliament and the courts in law making.
Unit 3 Legal Studies Revision
Key knowledge: Unit 3 Area of Study 3
Unit 3 AOS 3 The Role of the Courts in law-making
Outcome 3: SAC Preparation Wednesday 5 June 2013.
Our Precedential Court System
The hierarchy of courts
 Judges may not always have to follow a previous precedent and in some cases, may be free to create new precedents. Apart from following a binding precedent,
Basic notions and sources of law
BASICS OF THE AUSTRALIAN LEGAL SYSTEM FIRST YEAR SEMINAR 2013 JO MITCHELL.
 Following the development of legal principles through the decisions of judges in earlier cases can be difficult.  Determining which precedent, if any,
The Doctrine of Precedent
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Legal Foundations.
Overview, Binding and Persuasive predent
UNIT 3 LEGAL STUDIES AO3- THE ROLE OF THE COURTS
Judicial Precedent by Lisa Incledon.
English Legal System Judicial Precedent
Precedent in INDIAN LAW by Gunjan Pathak. Precedent A principle of Jurisprudence or policy of Courts by which the Courts and Authorities are required.
Business Law 1 Case Law The hierarchy of the courts.
Doctrine of Precedent.
Doctrine Of Precedent Group Members Saumya kaushik Samridhi Sikha Das Sana Jahan Satyam Kharbanda Rumani Dutta.
Precedent Topic 7.
Statutory Interpretation When judges decide on the meaning and application of the words or terms in an Act to resolve a dispute before the court.
Judicial Precedent.
The Doctrine of Precedent
Statutory Interpretation When judges decide on the meaning and application of the words or terms in an Act to resolve a dispute before the court.
Common Law Legal Studies 3C.
A bit of revision.
1.  How does someone become a judge? What qualifications are necessary? Do some online search on any of the justices of the High Court and find out about.
Doctrine of Judicial Precedent Produced by Dr Peter Jepson applying ‘The English Legal System’ by J Martin (5th edition). Précis Notes will be checked.
COMMON LAW, CASE LAW AND PRECEDENT
Political & Legal Studies TEE Revision Format  Section 1- Short Answer  3 out of 4 to be completed  Section 2- Source Analysis  1 out of 2 to.
Copyright Guy Harley 2004 Introductory & Contract Law Week 3.
4.2 – Role of Judges in Common Law 1. The main role of courts  decide the facts of the case (that is, what happened)  decide what law applies  apply.
Doctrine of Judicial Precedent Précis Notes will be checked Prior to these lessons you should have read and précised chapter 3 of “The English Legal System”
2-1 Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd PPTs to accompany Barron, Fundamentals of Business Law 7Rev This is the prescribed textbook.
The Doctrine of Precedent. Common law Common law is also known as judge-made law, case, law or precedent law.
TOPIC 4 UNDERSTANDING CASE LAW Mr. Mahyuddin Daud Department of Laws, CFSIIUM.
Lesson Objective: To revise some, and become familiar with other, necessary terminology for judicial precedent.
YR 12 LEGAL STUDIES How courts make law. Chapter overview This chapter looks at the concepts of Common law Doctrine of precedent Judgments and precedents.
Fundamentals of Law (BL502) Week 2 Part 1 Court Judgements.
Judicial reasoning and the doctrine of Precedent Susan Carter.
Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd. PPTs t/a Fundamentals of Business Law 4e by Barron & Fletcher. Slides prepared by Kay Fanning. Copyright.
Judicial Precedent The Doctrine of Precedent: the hierarchy of the courts; stare decisis, ratio decidendi and obiter dicta; law reporting. The operation.
Common Law. * Before the time of Henry II (1154 – 1189) local customs AND local laws varied from place to place * There was no record of what decisions.
THE ABILITY OF JUDGES TO MAKE LAW. INTRODUCTION: COMMON LAW  Common law – founded in England, adopted by Australia  It is law developed through the.
The Role of the Courts. What is Common Law? Common Law is law developed through the courts. Also known as Judge-made law and case law. It is created when.
Corporate and Business Law (ENG). 2 Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section A: Essential elements of the legal system A1. Court structure.
CHAPTER 2 LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
The role of the courts as law-makers
Common Law Legal Studies 3C.
The Doctrine of Precedent
Week 6 – How legal rules are created by precedent
Analogizing and Distinguishing Cases
NIGERIAN LEGAL SYSTEM PUL112
Understanding Law making
BANKSTOWN COLLEGE OF TAFE HSC LEGAL STUDIES
Peter F Hughes Legal Studies 2017 Robinvale College
UNIT 8 THE HIERARCHY OF COURTS AND THE DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT
Peter F Hughes Legal Studies 2017 Robinvale College
Common Law: Law making through the courts:
Sources of Law 1 The common law
BANKSTOWN COLLEGE OF TAFE HSC LEGAL STUDIES
Precedent Key points.
RATIO DECIDENDI MEANING:- REASON OF THE DECISION
English for Lawyers 2 Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević
The Role of the Courts in Law-Making
Precedent.
Precedent….
Presentation transcript:

Foundations of Australian Law Fourth Edition Copyright © 2013 Tilde Publishing and Distribution Chapter 4 How courts make laws

Chapter overview This chapter looks at the concepts of  Common law  Doctrine of precedent  Judgments and precedents  Statutory interpretation

Common Law Developed in England under the Westminster system Comprised of a collection of past decisions of judges and the facts of cases Past decisions of judges are called precedents and are recorded in law reports

Precedents Set by Australian Federal Courts can be found in Commonwealth Law Reports (CLRs) Set by state courts can be found in the relevant state law reports

Doctrine of precedent Process of deciding a case

… Persuasive precedents  Decisions made by lower court levels  Decisions made by courts in the same hierarchy  Decisions referred to by courts in other court hierarchies

Binding and Persuasive Precedents in the Australian Court Hierarchy High Court of Australia

... Changing and updating precedents  Overruling  Reversing  Distinguishing  Disapproving Cornerstones of Australian Law: Chapter 4

… Judgements and precedents  Parts of a judgement: Table 4.1

...  Precedents: Figure 4.7

Ratio decidendi Binding part of the precedent Judge's legal reasoning for reaching his/her decision Lower courts must follow the ratio decidendi established in higher courts Difficult to identify as it found throughout a judgment

Obiter dictum Persuasive part of a precedent Comments, opinions and observations made by the judge throughout the judgment Often referred to as ‘a statement or statements said by the way’

 Summary of ratio decidendi and obiter dictum: Table 4.2

Statutory interpretation Common law rules  Literal rule  Golden rule  Purposive approach rule  Class rule (maxim of ‘ejusdem generis’)

... Statutory interpretation: Figure 4.8 Cornerstones of Australian Law: Chapter 4

... Interpreting Acts  Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) -Section 15AA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth)  State legislation Problems associated with statutory interpretation Cornerstones of Australian Law: Chapter 4

Chapter review In this chapter you have looked at  Common law  Doctrine of precedent  Judgments and precedents  Statutory interpretation