The International Linear Collider: Status of International Mega- Project and Proposal of Siting in Dubna Region Y.Budagov, Y.Denisov, I.Meshkov, G.Shirkov,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wednesday July 19 GDE Plenary Global Design Effort 1 Instrumentation Technical System Review Marc Ross.
Advertisements

S.Karyaeva 1, Y.Budagov, A.Dudarev, A.Krasheninnikov 1, E.Petrovskaya 1, G.Shirkov 1 – Moscow Institute of Architecture.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Nick Walker KEK-DESY meeting 7 th March 2005.
Global Design Effort - CFS Damping Ring Baseline Technical Review 1 DAMPING RING BASELINE TECHNICAL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
1 DOE Annual Review -June 15,2005 An Overview of Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) U. S. ILC Civil studies and cost issues for Snowmass Fred.
5 May 06 SLAC SPC 1 ILC Global Activities GDE, FALC Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
3-March-06ILCSC Technical Highights1 ILC Technical Highlights Superconducting RF Main Linac.
1 STATUS REPORT JINR G. Shirkov, ILCW08, November 17, 2008.
3/2011 CFS BTR Global Design Effort 1 Americas Region Civil Design Tom Lackowski.
Global Design Effort 1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Overview A. Enomoto, J-L. Baldy, V. Kuchler GDE.
Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07.
The Linear Collider – accelerator design A particle beam accelerator is a microscope – the resolution is inversely proportional to the energy of the beams.
Global Design Effort - CFS for Asian Single Tunnel Configuration Design Progress Masanobu Miyahara KEK.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Grigori SHIRKOV Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia International Intergovernmental Organization 18.
1 STATUS OF ILC ACTIVITY AT JINR G. Shirkov Session of RAS, Protvino, December 22, 2008.
First Results of Geological Investigations of Dubna Siting of Dubna Siting G.Shirkov.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Joint Institute for Nuclear Research International Intergovernmental Organization JINR and RUSSIA PARTICIPATION in.
CERN, February 25, 2010 ILC-HiGrade Annual Meeting Global Design Effort 1 ILC-HiGrade Scientific and Annual Mtng CERN · Geneva, Switzerland February 25,
JINR Dubna site proposal for ILC G.Trubnikov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Sendai, March 2008.
The International Linear Collider (ILC) – Dubna Siting Leader – JINR Head Engineer G. Shirkov Международный Линейный Коллайдер.
Global Design Effort - CFS CLIC 09 Workshop - WG 5 Technical Systems 1 CLIC 09 WORKSHOP Working Group 5 - Technical Systems ILC REBASELINE ILC.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP Status and Overview.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
LCC Linear Collider Collaboratio ILC - CFS 12 November 2013 LCWS13 Tokyo University 1 Site-specific CF design from TDR LCWS13, 12 November 2013 Atsushi.
Global Design Effort Push-pull studies How to proceed LCWS07 June 1, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi.
Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting V. Kuchler1 of 17 Fermilab R&D Meeting Fermilab R&D Meeting Vic Kuchler Conventional Facilities.
LCFOA Meeting at SLAC Linear Collider Forum of the Americas 1 LINEAR COLLIDER FORUM OF THE AMERICAS CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES OVERVIEW Victor R. Kuchler.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
IR location for the shallow site near Dubna A. Dudarev JINR IWLC 2010, October 20.
November 17, st XFEL / ILC Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL Design Effort The Current ILC Twin Tunnel Design Wilhelm Bialowons and Nicholas Walker · MPY.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Global Design Effort 1 Possible Minimum Machine Studies of Central Region for 2009 Reference, ILC Minimum Machine Study Proposal V1, January 2009 ILC-EDMS.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
27 Nov 07 VM Workshop Global Design Effort 1 ILC – Superconducting Linear Collider Marc Ross, Project Manager GDE Fermilab.
FALC Technology Benefits study P. Grannis Beijing GDE meeting Feb. 7, 2007 FALC = Funding Agencies for Large Colliders is composed of representatives from.
1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central Injector complex.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ILC AD&I MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP UPDATE V.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Report of 2 nd ILC Workshop (Snowmass) Working Group Kiyoshi KUBO references: Slides of the plenary talks in the workshop by P.Tenembaum and.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
Nick Walker – SA meeting KEK Treaty Points and Costing Guidance Nick Walker 1 st System Area Managers Meeting KEK –
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
Meeting of the European Global Design Effort Report from INFN non EU-funded R&D Carlo Pagani University of Milano and INFN DESY, 10 May 2006.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
1 STATUS OF ILC ACTIVITIES AT JINR J.Budagov, A.Dudarev, M.Lyablin, G.Shirkov, G.Trubnikov, A.Sissakian JINR, Dubna, Russia Presented by A.Dudarev.
ILC D RAFT P ROJECT S CHEDULE K LYCLUSTER 500GeV K Foraz & M Gastal ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review and CFS Baseline Technical Review Many thanks to.
ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish GDE 9-March-06.
Goals of the ILC-Asia Meeting at Pohang Fumihiko Takasaki PAL, Feb. 17, 2006.
1 NICA Project Report of The Group I S.L.Bogomolov, A.V.Butenko, A.V.Efremov, E.D.Donets, I.N.Meshkov, V.A.Mikhailov, A.O.Sidorin, A.V.Smirnov, Round Table.
WG3a Sources Update Jim Clarke on behalf of WG3a GDE Meeting, Frascati, December 2005.
LNF Frascati, July 8, 2011 DR Technical Baseline Rev. Global Design Effort 1 DR Technical Baseline Review INFN LNF · Frascati, Italy July 7 and 8, 2011.
The ILC Outlook Barry Barish HEP 2005 Joint ECFA-EPS Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
1 Status of the ILC activity at JINR PAC for Particle Physics 29 January 2009 G.V. Trubnikov.
Plans for JINR’s participation in the International Linear Collider Project G.Shirkov, JINR for Particle Physics PAC 26 th meeting, November
ILC CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES A. Enomoto, V. Kuchler, J. Osborne
ILC CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES A. Enomoto, V. Kuchler, J. Osborne
LCWS11 AWG9 PARALLEL SESSION SUMMARY
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
Accelerator Layout and Parameters
Electron Source Configuration
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Presentation transcript:

The International Linear Collider: Status of International Mega- Project and Proposal of Siting in Dubna Region Y.Budagov, Y.Denisov, I.Meshkov, G.Shirkov, A.Sissakian, and G.Trubnikov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna

Energy – need to reach at least 500 GeV CM as a start Luminosity – need to reach 10^34 level Linear Collider – two main challenges

Luminosity & Beam Size f rep * n b tends to be low in a linear collider The beam-beam tune shift limit is much looser in a linear collider than a storage rings  achieve luminosity with spot size and bunch charge –Small spots mean small emittances and small betas:  x = sqrt (  x  x )

How to get Luminosity To increase probability of direct e + e - collisions (luminosity) and birth of new particles, beam sizes at IP must be very small E.g., ILC beam sizes just before collision (500GeV CM): 500 * 5 * nanometers (x y z) Vertical size is smallest

ILC Parameters Parameter range established to allow for operational optimization

Schematic of the ILC e - (e + ) source and delivery system Damping Ring(s) Ring(s) To Main Linac (RTML system) Main Linac (ML) Beam Delivery System (BDS) Beam Dump (BD)

2 nd stage ILC : 1 TeV - extension of main linac - moving of SR and BC 1st stage ILC : 500 GeV

Beam Delivery System challenges Focus the beam to size of about 500 * 5 nm at IP Provide acceptable detector backgrounds –collimate beam halo Monitor the luminosity spectrum and polarization –diagnostics both upstream and downstream of IP is desired Measure incoming beam properties to allow tuning of the machine Keep the beams in collision & maintain small beam sizes –fast intra-train and slow inter-train feedback Protect detector and beamline components against errant beams Extract disrupted beams and safely transport to beam dumps Minimize cost & ensure Conventional Facilities constructability

Beam Delivery System Requirements: –Focus beams down to very small spot sizes –Collect out-going disrupted beam and transport to the dump –Collimate the incoming beams to limit beam halo –Provide diagnostics and optimize the system and determine the luminosity spectrum for the detector –Switch between IPs

ILC Power Consumption ~ 330MW Sub-Systems 60MW Main Linacs 140MW Cryogenics: 50MW RF: 90MW 65% 78% 60% Beam 22MW Injectors Damping rings Auxiliaries BDS

Definitions ICFA - International Committee for Future Accelerators FALC - Funding Agencies for the Linear Collider ILCSC - International Linear Collider Steering Committee GDE - Global Design Effort RDB - Research and Development Board CCB - Change Control Board DCB - Design Cost Board CFS - Conventional Facilities and Siting BCD - Baseline Configuration Document RDR - Reference Design Report TDR - Technical Design Report WBS - Work Breakdown Structure International Organization

Global Design Effort

International Linear Collider Timeline Global Design EffortProject Baseline configuration Reference Design ILC R&D Program Technical Design Expression of Interest to Host International Mgmt

THE 50 KM LINE

Longitudinal Section EUROPEAN SAMPLE SITE - CERN

EUROPEAN SAMPLE SITE - DESY Longitudinal Section

ASIAN SAMPLE SITE Longitudinal Section

AMERICAS SAMPLE SITE Longitudinal Section

For baseline, developing deep underground (~100 m) layout with 4-5 m diameter tunnels spaced by 5 m. ILC Tunnel Layout

EXTENT OF CONSTRUCTION Main Accelerator Enclosures - 475,000 m 3 Main Accelerator Enclosures - 475,000 m 3 Main Accelerator Support Enclosures - 475,000 m 3 Main Accelerator Support Enclosures - 475,000 m 3 2 Damping Ring Enclosures - 210,000 m 3 2 Damping Ring Enclosures - 210,000 m 3 12 Access Shafts - 70,000 m 3 12 Access Shafts - 70,000 m 3 Beam Delivery Enclosures - 160,000 m 3 Beam Delivery Enclosures - 160,000 m 3 2 Interaction Halls - 800,000 m 3 2 Interaction Halls - 800,000 m 3 Additional Support and Transport Enclosures - 300,000 m 3 Additional Support and Transport Enclosures - 300,000 m 3 Surface Facilities - 85,000 m 2 Surface Facilities - 85,000 m 2

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia International Intergovernmental Organization 18 member states;4 associate members ILC siting and conventional facilities in Dubna region

-The international intergovernmental organization Joint Institute for Nuclear Research - prototype of ILC host institution; -Experienced personal of JINR in accelerators, cryogenics, power supplies and etc. -Infrastructure and workshops of JINR on the first stage of ILC project realization; - The town Dubna provides with all the necessary means of transport to deliver all kinds of the equipment of the accelerator itself and its technological systems: highways, railways, waterways (through Volga river to Black sea, Baltic sea, Polar ocean); - The international airport «Sheremetyevo» is situated at the distance of 100 km from Dubna (1.5 hours by highway); - Developed Internet and satellite communication; - A Special Economic Zone (industrial + scientific) in the Dubna region (Edict of Russian Government, Dec. 2005), provides unique conditions in taxes and custom regulations; - A good position in the European region; - A positive reaction received in preliminary discussions with the interested governmental persons and organizations in Russia. Advantages of Location

Russian Satellite Communications Center

JINR Network communications

0 km 10 km 20 km 30 km 40 km 500 kV power line Volga river Dubna city

Area and Climate There are no any national parks, biological reservations, any religious and historical places an the planned area. There are no new projects planned to develop on the allocated territory. It possible to avoid purchasing land and get the development area for free use without time-limit; like that has been done for the international intergovernmental organization the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research by the existing agreement between the JINR and the Government of the Russian Federation. The area is thinly populated, the path of the accelerator traverses 2 small settlements and a railway with light traffic between Taldom and Kimry. Possible “line” crosses only the railway to Savelovo (of low utilization) and the River Hotcha with a very small flow rate. The climate is temperate-continental. The mean temperature in January is –10.7  С. The mean temperature in July is  С. The mean annual rainfall is 783 mm. The mean wind speed is 3.2 m/s. Strong winds (15 m/s) blow only 8 days/year. According to the climatic parameters, the territory of Dubna is considered to be comfortable.

The area of the proposed location of the accelerator is situated within the Upper Volga lowland. The characteristic feature of this territory is the uniformity, monolithic character of the surface. The existing rises of the relief in the form of single hills and ridges have smoothed shapes, soft outlines and small excesses. The territory of the area is waterlogged. The absolute marks of the surface range from 125 to 135 m with regard to the level of the Baltic Sea. The difference of surface marks is in the range of 10 m only on the base of 50 km. Relief

The area of the proposed location of the accelerator is situated within the Russian plate – a part of the Eastern European ancient platform – a stable, steady structural element of the earth’s crust. The Russian plate, like all the other plates, has a well-defined double-tier structure. The lower tier or structural floor is formed by the ancient – lower Proterozoic and Archaean strata of metamorphic and abyssal rocks, which are more than 1.7 billion of years old. All these strata are welded into a single tough body – the foundation of the platform. The area of the ILC accelerator is located in the southern part of a very gently sloping saucer-shaped structure – the Moscovian syneclise. Alluvial deposits i.e. fine water-saturated sands, 1-5 m of thickness. Below one can find semisolid drift clay of the Moscovian glaciation with exception of detritus and igneous rocks. The thickness of moraine deposits is m. Geology

The ILC linear accelerator is proposed to be placed in the drift clay at the depth of 20 m (at the mark of m) with the idea that below the tunnel there should be impermeable soil preventing from the underlying groundwater inrush. It is possible to construct tunnels of the accelerating complex using tunnel shields with a simultaneous wall timbering by tubing or falsework concreting. Standard tunnel shields in the drift clay provide for daily speed of the drilling progress specified by the Project of the accelerator (it is needed for tunnel approximately 2.5 y’s).

Power and energetic The northern part of Moscow region and the neighboring regions have a developed system of objects of generation and transmission of electrical energy. There are first-rate generating stations: the Konakovo EPS (electric power station, ~30 km from Dubna) and the Udomlia APP (atomic power plant, ~100 km from Dubna). Two trunk transmission lines with the voltage 220 kV and 500 kV pass through the territory of Dubna. The investigation of possibilities of the power supply for the accelerator and its infrastructure with the total power up to 300 MW gives the following variant: Construction of the power line-220 kV, 35÷40 km long, directly from the center of generation – the Konakovo EPS to the Central Experimental Zone of the accelerator with a head step-down substations 220/110 kV. It will require the investment in larger amount but the cost of power obtained directly from the centers of generation will be lower for 40÷50 % (from 0.05$ per 1kWh down to $ per 1kWh in prices of 2006).

BCD document (Conventional Facilities part) Documentation and Cost Estimation Site Assessment Matrix First official document from Russian State Project Institute with estimations on: Conventional facilities cost Siting (tunnel, land acquisition) cost and time schedule Energetic and power cost Operational cost Labor cost JINR prepared and filled the following Documents for the possible hosting ILC: The overall value on consolidated estimated calculations in the prices of year 2006 for civil engineering work, underground and surface objects of the main construction gives the sum in order of 2,3 B$, including 1 B$ of costs of the tunnels construction for linear accelerator, all its technological systems and mines. Cost of power supply objects which will provide electric power directly from generator sources with special (favorable) cost of energy (tariff) is of order of 170 M$.

Structure JINR participation in ILC Accelerator physics & techniques Detectors Particle Physics Detector concepts R&D Experiments &Tests Program for new physics & experiments R&D Test facilities Infrastructure Siting Safety Scientific Council of JINR ( ): encourages JINR to be involved in the ILC design effort and to invest appropriate resources in scientific and technological developments to support its ability to play a leading role in the ILC project; supports the intention of JINR to participate actively in the ILC project and the possible interest of JINR to host the ILC JINR Committee of Plenipotentiaries approved this recommendation on The Committee of Plenipotentiary Representatives of the Governments of the Member States is the supreme body governing the Institute.Committee of Plenipotentiary Representatives

1.Creation of the ILC injection complex prototype. Development and study of electron sources on the base of photocathode and control laser system. Creation and launching of the electron injector prototype with RF or DC gun. 2.Development and creation of the test facility on base of the electron linear accelerator LINAC-800 for testing with high-energy electron beam of accelerating RF resonators, beam parameter diagnostics and transportation channels prototypes for ILC. Creation of the free electron laser on the base of photo-injector and linac LINAC-800. Development and testing of RF system elements of the linear accelerator. 3.Researches on possible creation of high-precise metrological laser complex with extended coordinate length up to 20 km. 4.Development and creation of cryogenic modules for the acceleration system of linac. Participation in creation of design documentation (work drawings) in ANSYS standard for manufacturing at ZANON (Milano) plant the first cryostat prototypes for ILC.

5. Preparation of design documentation on creation of hardware-software complex and facility for study of cryomodules, with the goal of further transition to production of documentation for mass cryostats fabrication and/or their element with referring to technologies and standard group of of the work performers. 6. Theoretical study of electron beam dynamics in transportation channels using software packages, calculation of electric and magnetic fields in accelerating structures, transportation systems and systems of e - /e + beam formation. 7. Preparation of the project of hardware-software complex for studies of radiation stability of superconductive materials using powerful , e, n beams 8. Engineering studies and design works with purpose of the study and preparing the possible hosting of ILC in the region near Dubna. 9. Development of the magnetic systems of ILC. Calculation on choosing parameters of electromagnetic elements for Damping Rings (DR). Development and creation of the magnetic systems on base of superconducting and warm electromagnets, also for constant magnet variant.

LHE ground Machinery Hall # 2: Possible place for location of the Test Bench for experiments on superconducting RF cavities. Adv: Large hall, Power supply, Water supply, very close to systems for liquid Helium and other cryogenics

LNP ground Building 118 Location of constructed LINAC-800. Test of RF accelerator sections and cryo modules LINAC with super- conducting RF cavity (power,water,... LINAC-800 – first electron beam on

LNP ground Building 108 (LEPTA project) 2 experimental Halls (water, power, …) Test Bench for Photo Injector

Welcome to JINR (Dubna)