ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Elements School Improvement District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
Advertisements

What does this mean?. Our school has a high number of students who are eligible for Free and Reduced Price Lunch. – We receive additional federal money.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
1 Shelton School District Title Programs Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2008.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SIP). AYP INDICATORS, COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS  Reading/ELA  Performance: 87% Proficiency Rate  Participation: 95% Participating.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
AYP Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) NCESD Title I/LAP Co-Op Work Session August 26, 2014 Jody Hess, OSPI Title I:
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 17 &
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) 1.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10,
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY Pam Farr, Director of Teaching & Learning Gail Straus, Director of ECE & Federal Programs.
Title I Faculty Presentation (Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation) 1 Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
From the Board Room To the Classroom PDK Panel Discussion September 19, 2002.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
Springs 2006 and 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress Results Potential Challenges with 2008 Annual Measurable Objectives & District Corrective Action.
Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.
No Child Left Behind Title I Newport News Public Schools.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS December 2, 2011 House Education Committee Bob Harmon, Assistant Superintendent
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY BECCA MARSH, DIVISION OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT AND SUPPORT TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©2013.
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Shelton School District
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Adequate Progress Gina LaPlaca Grand Canyon University
Evergreen Elementary School
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Shelton School District SY 11-12
Presentation transcript:

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Elements School Improvement District Improvement 1

AYP ELEMENTS  ALL students “proficient” by 2014  Separate annual proficiency goals in reading and math  1% can be proficient at district level using alternative performance standard  Same Goal on ‘state uniform bar’ for nine groups  All students  Seven Racial/Ethnic Groups  Students with Disabilities (Special Education)  Students with Limited English Proficiency (ELL)  Students from Low-Income Families (Poverty)  95% of students in each group to be assessed  One other indicator  Graduation rate (high schools): 85% (or two percentage point increase)  Unexcused absences (Grades 1-8): 1% (or any decrease) 2

3

Based on Data 1.State Assessments 2. Graduation rate 3.Unexcused absences AYP Professional Development ( PD )School Improvement Plan ( SIP ) + Public School Choice ( PSC) PD + SIP + PSC + Supplemental Ed. Services ( SES ) PD + SIP + PSC + SES + Corrective Action SIP + PSC + SES + Corrective Action + Plan Restructuring Restructured School Operation Year 1Year 2 AYP Step 1 Year 3 Step 2 Year 4 Step 3 Year 5 Step 4 Year 6 Step 5 Year 7 AYP Identified for School Improvement SCHOOLS IN STEPS 1-5 Consequences Apply only to schools that receive Title I A Funds Sanctions District responsibility SBAC Field Testers Based on Same Data 4

Consequences Apply only to districts that receive Title I A Funds District Improvement — STEPS 1& 2 Based on Data 1.State Assessments 2. Graduation rate 3.Unexcused absences AYP Professional Development ( PD ) + District Improvement Plan + Parent Notification + Set Asides + Tech Support PD + Corrective Action Plan + Parent Notification + Set Asides Year 1Year 2 AYP Step 1 Year 3 Identified for District Improvement Step 2 Year 4 AYP Set Aside Title I, Part A Funds Districts that receive Title I, Part A funds and are in a step of improvement — AYP step 1 or 2 — must set aside money from their total allocation for professional development. 5