Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION UPDATE DECEMBER 7, 2011 AYP DETERMINATIONS ESEA WAIVER.
Advertisements

March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
States Leading the Way: New Accountability Models & ESEA Reauthorization Gene Wilhoit September 8, 2011.
BIE Flexibility Request Summary of Key Provisions Bureau of Indian Education U.S. Department of the Interior.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,
PLAN 2020 Priorities ALABAMA’S 2020 LEARNERS ALABAMA’S 2020 PROFESSIONALS ALABAMA’S 2020 SUPPORT SYSTEMS ALABAMA’S 2020 SCHOOLS/SYSTEMS Alabama State Board.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Quick facts about the Washington State ESEA waiver.
ESEA Waiver Update Principles 1 & 2 State Board of Education 1 June 6, 2012 Penny MacCormack Ed.D. NJDOE Assistant Commissioner/ Chief Academic Officer.
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: ADDRESSING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND ENGLISH LEARNERS January 11, 2012.
Title III March 13 th, :00 a.m. – 10:20 a.m.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
January 19, :00 – 10:00 a.m. ET 1. Changes to Kentucky’s ESEA Waiver Request Required by USDOE Affecting 703 KAR 5:222, Categories for Recognition,
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education SECRETARY OF EDUCATION’S PRIORITIES.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
ESEA FLEXIBILITY REQUEST September 26, 2012 Educational Service District 113 Andy Kelly, Assistant Superintendent, Travis Campbell, Director K12 Office.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Florida’s Proposal November 14,
ESEA Renewal What does it Mean for Title I? Program Improvement and Family Support Branch Title I Administrative Meeting September 17, 2015.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
Brad Neuenswander, KSDE October 8-9,  To move away from the narrowly defined accountability system in NCLB  To have a new accountability system.
Pennsylvania’s ESEA Flexibility Proposal May 23, >
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
December 11, 2012 Embassy Suites, Charleston, WV Federal Program Directors’ Meeting.
Edit the text with your own short phrases. To change the sample image, select the picture and delete it. Now click the Pictures icon in the placeholder.
No Child Left Behind Waivers: Promising Ideas from Second Round Applications By Jeremy Ayers and Isabel Owen with Glenda Partee and Theodora Chang.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
March 30, 2012 Marriott Hotel- Charleston, WV Committee of Practitioners Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Title I Community Meeting School Name. Why are we here? The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) requires that each Title I school.
July 26,  To move away from the narrowly defined accountability system in NCLB  To have a new accountability system that uses multiple measures.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
Indiana ESEA Flexibility Waiver. Background -Indiana was a part of cohort 1 -Why cohort 1? -USED Approval February Approval through School.
ESEA Flexibility Designation Overview Index Targets and Proficiency-based Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs)
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education Tuesday, October 23, 2012 Michael Yudin and Deb Delisle.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS December 2, 2011 House Education Committee Bob Harmon, Assistant Superintendent
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): Overview and Implications for New Jersey Peter Shulman & Jill Hulnick Deputy Commissioner.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
NORTH CAROLINA ESEA Flexibility Request Globally Competitive Students (GCS 1) 1Wednesday, February 1, 2012.
1 1 Assessment and Accountability Tuesday, November 1, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Preston County Schools
Harrison County Elementary Strategic Planning
Federal Program Directors Spring Meeting
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Inaugural Meeting - September 14, 2012
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Presentation transcript:

Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs

 Well-designed curriculum, assessments and instructional materials aligned to standards  High-quality instructional practice  Strong school leadership -Tony Wagner, Change Leadership Group – Harvard Graduate School of Education 12/6/2012

ESEA Flexibility Principle 1 College and Career Ready Expectations for All Students Principle 2 State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Principle 3 Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership 12/6/2012

Principle 1: College- and Career- Ready Expectations for All Students Support Resources/Funding Sources 1.AAdopt college-and career-ready standards -Next Generation Standards PD Training -Common Core Resources PD Training -Employment of Academic -Software that assists in ongoing formative assessments and benchmarks 1.BTransition to college- and career- ready standards 1.CDevelop and administer annual, statewide, aligned, high-quality assessments that measure student growth

Principle 2: State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Support Resources/Funding Sources 2.ADevelop and implement a State-based system of differentiated recognition, accountability, and support -SPL -Next Generation Standards PD Training -Common Core Resources PD Training -TLI -Extended Day/Year Activities -Transition Activities -Parent Involvement -PLC(s)/Collaborative Teams -Students Setting Academic Goals 2.BSet ambitious but achievable annual measurable objectives 2.CReward schools 2.DPriority schools – Low Performing based on index 2.EFocus schools – Low performing based on largest gaps 2.FProvide incentives and supports for other Title I schools – Schools that still need support 2.GBuild SEA, LEA, and school capacity to improve student learning -Parent Involvement -Academic Coach -Administrative Coach Principle 3: Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership Support Resources/Funding Sources 3.ADevelop and adopt guidelines for local teacher and principal evaluation and support systems -Instructional Coaches -Improvement Specialist 3.BEnsure LEAs implement teacher and principal evaluation and support systems 12/6/2012

Participation Rates Attendance/ Graduation Rates Annual Measurable Objectives (Proficiency Rates) 12/6/2012

100% Effective Schools 12/6/2012

Differentiated Recognition, Accountability & Support All Schools 2G Priority lowest achieving 2D Focus Largest Gaps 2E Other Title I Schools 2F Reward Schools: 2C

KEY IMPLICATIONS Shift from large number of schools annually NOT making AYP to reduced number with ongoing targeted support Redirecting federal funding to support school improvement Stronger focus on LEAs responsibility for school improvement Shift from “compliance-driven” to “outcome focused technical assistance” 12/6/2012

2.C Reward Schools – Meaningful recognition and rewards Both High Achieving and High Progress Proposed recognition: – Public recognition – Special professional development opportunities – Representation on state-level stakeholder committees Reward Schools

2.D Priority Schools – Required to Identify a minimum of 18 Low Performing schools: ESEA funding flexibility 3 year school improvement process Research based state models (high quality standards, diagnostics, leadership team support) Priority lowest achieving Federal Programs Resources and Suggestions: SPL Implementation/Training  Next Generation Standards PD Training  Common Core Resources PD Training  TLI  Extended Day Activities – Title I  Transition Activities  Parent Involvement – Title I  PLC/s/Collaborative Teams – Title I, Title II  Academic Coaches – Title I  Administrative Coaches - Title I  Parent Involvement – Title I

2.E Focus Schools – Required to Identify a minimum of 36 High GAP (struggling subgroups) schools: School self-assessment/diagnostic Revise strategic plan ESEA funding flexibility RESA TA teams focused on addressing GAPs Focus Largest Gaps Federal Programs Resources and Suggestions: SPL Implementation/Training  Next Generation Standards PD Training  Common Core Resources PD Training  TLI  Extended Day Activities – Title I  Transition Activities – Title I  Parent Involvement – Title I  PLC/s/Collaborative Teams – Title I, Title II  Strategic Plan Revision  Title I Technical Assistance

2.F Other Struggling Title I Schools No requirement to identify specific number: Alignment of School/District Strategic Plans & funding resources to address low-performance Availability of technical assistance from SEA, Regional and LEA levels Other Title I Schools Federal Programs Resources and Suggestions: SPL Implementation/Training  Next Generation Standards PD Training  Common Core Resources PD Training  TLI  Extended Day Activities – Title I  Transition Activities – Title I  Parent Involvement – Title I  PLC/s/Collaborative Teams – Title I, Title II  Strategic Plan Revision  Title I Technical Assistance

2.G Build SEA, LEA & School Capacity to Improve Student Learning in ALL schools Coordinated approach to Principles 1, 2, 3 Systemic capacity building ALL Schools Federal Programs Resources and Suggestions: Extended Day Activities – Title I  Parent Involvement – Title I  Strategic Plan Revision  SEA Technical Assistance  Academic Coach – Title I  Administrative Coach- Title I

12/6/2012 Student Achievement Principle 2 Improve Teacher Quality Principle 3 School Based Leadership Principle 2 College & Career Ready Standards Principle 1 Increase Parent & Community Involvement Principle 2 Support for Personalized Learning Expected Behaviors Please note: This is not an official WVDE representation of the Flexibility Waiver.

Thank You Questions? Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs 12/6/2012