Stanford High Power Laser Lab Status of high power laser development for LIGO at Stanford Shally Saraf*, Supriyo Sinha, Arun Kumar Sridharan and Robert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
III. Feedback control The laser dynamics can be modelled by a system of linked rate equations introduced by Roy et al. (1993) Based on the model it was.
Advertisements

Optical sources Lecture 5.
Thermal properties of laser crystal Rui Zhang ACCL Division V, RF-Gun Group Feb 20, 2015 SuperKEKB Injector Laser RF Gun Review.
Status of High-Power Laser Development at Stanford Shally Saraf*, Supriyo Sinha, Arun Kumar Sridharan and Robert L. Byer E. L. Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford.
A Scalable Design for a High Energy, High Repetition Rate, Diode-Pumped Solid State Laser (DPSSL) Amplifier Paul Mason, Klaus Ertel, Saumyabrata Banerjee,
CAVITY RING DOWN SPECTROSCOPY
Present status of the laser system for KAGRA Univ. of Tokyo Mio Lab. Photon Science Center SUZUKI, Ken-ichiro.
Self-Guided Operation of Green-Pumped Singly Resonant
10W Injection-Locked CW Nd:YAG laser
Adaptive Optics for Wavefront Correction of High Average Power Lasers Justin Mansell, Supriyo Sinha, Todd Rutherford, Eric Gustafson, Martin Fejer and.
Jan 29, 2007 LIGO Excomm, G R 1 Goal: Experimental Demonstration of a Squeezing-Enhanced Laser-Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector in.
LIGO-G W 1 Increasing the laser power incident on the recycling mirrors Doug Cook and Rick Savage LIGO commissioning meeting Dec. 22, 2003 Ref.
LIGO-G W LIGO II Pre-stabilized Laser System Design Requirements and Conceptual Design David Ottaway, Todd Rutherford, Rick Savage, Peter Veitch,
Measurement of the laser beam profile at PSL to Mode Cleaner interface for the 40 Meter Prototype Interferometer A table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1.
Stanford Laser Amplifiers for LIGO
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
LSU Amplifier Experiments Rupal S. Amin (LSU) J. Giaime (LSU), D. Hosken (Uni. Adelaide), D. Ottaway (MIT) LSC/VIRGO Meeting March 2007 Lasers Working.
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
October 16-18, 2012Working Group on Space-based Lidar Winds 1 AEOLUS STATUS Part 1: Design Overview.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
LIGO-G Z Gaussian to Super- Gaussian Diffractive Optical Elements Patrick Lu Advisor: Prof. Robert Byer Stanford University March 23, 2005.
Overview of Research in the Optics Working Group Gregory Harry, on behalf of the OWG Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 25, 2007 LSC Meeting –
Status of the advanced LIGO laser O. Puncken, L. Winkelmann, C. Veltkamp, B. Schulz, S. Wagner, P. Weßels, M. Frede, D. Kracht.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
High Precision Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy of 12 C 16 O 2 : Progress Report Speaker: Wei-Jo Ting Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
R·I·TR·I·T Rochester Institute of Technology -Proposal to join the LSC- Shally Saraf Rochester Institute of Technology Quantum Electronics Group (RITQEG)
B. Willke, Mar 01 LIGO-G Z Laser Developement for Advanced LIGO Benno Willke LSC meeting LIGO-Livingston Site, Mar 2001.
1 Large Aperture Dielectric Gratings for High Power LIGO Interferometry LSC/Virgo Meeting, Baton Rouge March 19-22, 2007 Optics Working Group Jerald A.
©LZH M.Frede Aug.02 G Z Status of Laser Zentrum Hannover Laser Program Maik Frede Martina Brendel, Carsten Fallnich, Renê Gau, Philipp Huke, Ralf.
50 W Laser Concepts for Initial LIGO Lutz Winkelmann, Maik Frede, Ralf Wilhelm, Dietmar Kracht Laser Zentrum Hannover LSC March 05 Livingston G Z.
LIGO-G D LIGO and Industry Capability/ProductCompany Ultra-high Vacuum TechnologyCB&I Passive Seismic IsolationHytec Inc. Active Seismic IsolationBarry.
©LZH Livingston, La.; LIGO-G Status of 100 W Rod System at LZH Laserzentrum Hannover e. V. Hollerithallee 8 D Hannover Germany.
Min Hyeong KIM High-Speed Circuits and Systems Laboratory E.E. Engineering at YONSEI UNIVERITY
1 Intensity Stabilization in Advanced LIGO David Ottaway (Jamie Rollins Viewgraphs) Massachusetts Institute of Technology March, 2004 LSC Livingston Meeting.
V. Sonnenschein, I. D. Moore, M. Reponen, S. Rothe, K.Wendt.
©LZH ZA GEO 600 Laser System as in the optics lab of Callinstraße 38 at LIGO-G D.
Development of high-power and stable laser for gravitational wave detection Mio Laboratory Kohei Takeno.
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC meeting, Baton Rouge March 2007 G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
Status of High-Power Laser Development at Stanford Todd S. Rutherford*, Shailendhar Saraf, Karel Urbanek, Justin Mansell, Eric K. Gustafson, and Robert.
Yb:YAG Regenerative Amplifier for A1 Ground Laser Hut Rui Zhang ACCL Division V, RF-Gun Group Nov 20, 2015 SuperKEKB Injector Laser RF Gun Review.
LIGO-G09xxxxx-v1 Form F v1 Development of a Low Noise External Cavity Diode Laser in the Littrow Configuration Chloe Ling LIGO SURF 2013 Mentors:
We have experimentally observed a similar qualitative behavior by measuring the ratio between the CW and ML intra-cavity powers as a function of Z for.
Laser system for LCGT Norikatsu MIO.
Studies of Thermal Loading in Pre-Modecleaners for Advanced LIGO Amber Bullington Stanford University LSC/Virgo March 2007 Meeting Optics Working Group.
AdvLIGO Laser Status Lutz Winkelmann, Maik Frede, Oliver Puncken, Bastian Schulz Ralf Wilhelm, and Dietmar Kracht Laser Zentrum Hannover Frank Seifert,
Ultra-stable, high-power laser systems Patrick Kwee on behalf of AEI Hannover and LZH Advanced detectors session, 26. March 2011 Albert-Einstein-Institut.
GEO Status and Prospects Harald Lück ILIAS / ETmeeting Cascina November 2008.
L. Corner and T. Hird John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science, Oxford University, UK 1AAC, USA, 2016 The efficient generation of radially polarised.
Yb:YAG Regenerative Amplifier for A1 Ground Laser Hut Rui Zhang ACCL Division V, RF-Gun Group Nov 20, 2015 SuperKEKB Injector Laser RF Gun Review.
NSF Annual Review of the LIGO Laboratory
Mingyun Li & Kevin Lehmann Department of Chemistry and Physics
Current Situation of Yb:YAG Laser at A1 Ground Laser Hut
Quantum noise reduction using squeezed states in LIGO
Single and dual wavelength Er:Yb double clad fiber lasers
Fiber lasers for GW detectors
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
High power high energy ultrafast fiber amplifiers
The High Power Light Source for LCGT
Update on the Advanced LIGO PSL Program
J. Kovalik, LIGO Livingston Observatory
A. Bramati M. Romanelli E. Giacobino
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Lasers for Advanced Interferometers
Present status of the laser system for KAGRA
Advanced LIGO Quantum noise everywhere
Development of Optical Resonant Cavities for laser-Compton Scattering
Self-injection linear polarization locking of a fiber laser
Synthetic Sapphire Absorbance at 1064 nm
Photon Physics ‘08/’09 Thijs Besseling
Presentation transcript:

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Status of high power laser development for LIGO at Stanford Shally Saraf*, Supriyo Sinha, Arun Kumar Sridharan and Robert L. Byer E. L. Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University LSC2003 Hannover, Germany August 18-21, 2003 LIGO-G Z

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Outline Stanford approach to power scaling. Experimental setup. 100W demonstration results. Scaling to 200W. Future work.

Stanford High Power Laser Lab MOPA vs OSCILLATOR LOW POWER, ULTRA STABLE MASTER OSCILLATOR PRE-AMP POWER-AMP Rugged Scalable Single frequency Power available despite element failure. Less efficient. Difficult to control Single frequency operation involves injection locking. Element failure usually means zero power. More efficient. MOPA OSCILLATOR

Stanford High Power Laser Lab P pump = 180 W ISOLA TOR Mode-matching optics 20 W Amplifier Lightwave electronics edge pumped slab 10W LIGO MOPA System Experimental setup presented at LSC Livingston end pumped slab P pump = 430 W PMCPMC OC PM TEM 00 power

Stanford High Power Laser Lab 808nm Pump 0.6% Nd:YAG undoped end 808nm Pump signal IN signal OUT 1.5 cm 3.33 cm 1.5 cm End pumped slab geometry* Motivation -> Higher efficiency Near total absorption of pump light. Confinement of pump radiation leads to better mode overlap 1.1 mm X 0.9 mm * Similar to TRW Hagop Injeyan, et. al.

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Results of MOPA experiment Single Pass Power output ~ 65 W (M 2 < 1.1) Depolarization ~ 1.5%. P-P intensity fluctuations ~ 7% COLD SLAB OUTPUT 30 W PUMPED SLAB OUTPUT 65 W

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Mode content of 65 W beam FSR of PMC TEM00 *** 74 % mode content in TEM 00 *** P-P intensity fluctuations ~ 2% after PMC

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Double pass setup for MOPA experiment *** 104 W demonstrated at M 2 < 1.2 ***

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Slab Issues for scaling to 200W Question: Why is the small signal gain of the end pumped slab much lower than expected? Answer: % pump scattered in undoped region. Rough surfaces (left & right) Pump light leakage. TIR surfaces (top & bottom) 808nm Pump

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Solutions towards improved pump confinement UD ROUGHEN TIR surfaces (top & bottom) D POLISH ++ Small signal gain improved. -Vendor damaged coating during sand blast procedure for roughening up the doped region. coating damaged 1. POLISH UNDOPED SIDES AND ROUGH UP THE DOPED REGION.

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Measurements on fully polished slab. POLISH UD POLISH TIR surfaces (top & bottom) D POLISH ++ Pump light guiding improved to 75-80% Parasitic kicks in immediately and clamps the gain. 2. POLISH THE TWO PREVIOUSLY ROUGH SIDES OF SLAB.

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Measurements on beveled slab + Parasitic threshold increased. --Parasitic still kicking in well before reasonable gain achieved. UD POLISH TIR surfaces (top & bottom) D POLISH 8985 cross section POLISH 3.POLISH AND BEVEL THE TWO SIDES OF THE SLAB TO KICK OUT THE PARASITIC.

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Slab with cladding 33 UD POLISH TIR surfaces (top & bottom) D POLISH POLISH + APPLY CLADDING + ROUGHEN CLADDING USED: Norland 61 optical epoxy n = 1.56 PARASITIC LEAKS INTO CLADDING AND IS SCATTERED OUT 4. APPLY CLADDING ON DOPED REGION OF SLAB TO SPOIL TIR ANGLE FOR TRANSVERSE PARASITIC. YAG AIRYAG AIR

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Measurements on slabs with cladding +++ Cladding approach works well for suppressing parasitics. - Slabs cracked from possible contamination and stresses during polishing.

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Parasitic control summary

Stanford High Power Laser Lab P pump = 120 W ISOLA TOR Mode-matching optics 20 W Amplifier Lightwave end pumped slab #1 10W LIGO MOPA System Scaling to 200 W : Experimental Plan end pumped slab #2 P slab1 = 60 W P pump = 430 W P slab2 = 200 W PMCPMC TEM 00 Power ~ 160 W

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Saturated amplifier noise experiment tentative setup + - Balanced detection RF spectrum analyzer 2 high power beam dump High finesse cavity Low finesse cavity 222 NPRO end pumped slab

Stanford High Power Laser Lab Future Work Get mode content and noise measurements of 100 W beam. Power scale to 200 W using 2 end pumped slabs. - Build 2 new slabs with parasitic control cladding. - Set up pumping scheme for slab #1 (preamplifier). - Measure mode and noise characteristics of 200 W beam. Complete saturated amplifier noise experiment.