Jean Slaughter -Feb 24, 2004 Shot Data Responsible for physics analysis of shot data Oversees the development of shot data analysis tools Responsible for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paul Chu FRIB Controls Group Leader (Acting) Service-Oriented Architecture for High-level Applications.
Advertisements

Tevatron Beam Diagnostics: Boosting Collider Performance Vladimir Shiltsev, Ron Moore, Andreas Jansson FNAL/Accelerator Division.
JAS in SDA. My Experience My assignment was to use JAS to read SDA data and make plots. –I used OSDA and OSDAphysics to read SDA data. OSDA and OSDAphysics.
Lecture Microsoft Access and Relational Database Basics.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Lee Ann Yasukawa 05/25/99 NLC Archiving Requirements (Preliminary)
Diane Fairley High Level October 24-28, 2005 High Level Physics Applications LCLS Week / FAC October 24-28, 2005.
EE694v-Verification-Lect5-1- Lecture 5 - Verification Tools Automation improves the efficiency and reliability of the verification process Some tools,
Henrik Loos High Level 17 June 2008 High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning Henrik Loos.
Overview of Data Management solutions for the Control and Operation of the CERN Accelerators Database Futures Workshop, CERN June 2011 Zory Zaharieva,
Slide 1 of 9 Presenting 24x7 Scheduler The art of computer automation Press PageDown key or click to advance.
F UEC - 6 Oct 06 Recent FNAL Collider Operations Ron Moore Fermilab – Tevatron Dept.
Vaia Papadimitriou The Supertable (Introducing Supertable II) Run II meeting September 2, 2004 Timofei Bolshakov and Vaia Papadimitriou.
SOFTWARE.
CERN - IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t Monitoring the ATLAS Distributed Data Management System Ricardo Rocha (CERN) on behalf.
ITEC224 Database Programming
Automated Beam Steering Software at FNAL Keith Engell Accelerator Controls.
Introduction to the Requirements Document
F Shot Engineering Accelerator Advisory Committee Elvin Harms Fermilab Beams Division 13 May 2002.
SDA- Shot Data Acquisition and Analysis Example of major applications that use the Java DAE framework Jean Slaughter Controls Review Feb 4, 2004 A success.
Discovering Computers Fundamentals Fifth Edition Chapter 9 Database Management.
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Recycler Status and Plans Shekhar Mishra MID/Beams Division Fermilab AAC Review 2/4/03 Introduction to the Recycler Ring Recycler Improvements and status.
Management System of Event Processing and Data Files Based on XML Software Tools at Belle Ichiro Adachi, Nobu Katayama, Masahiko Yokoyama IPNS, KEK, Tsukuba,
A Monte Carlo Model of Tevatron Operations Elliott McCrory Fermilab/Accelerator Division 13 October 2005.
F 19 August 2002 All Experimenters Meeting Beams Week in Review Continued to work on providing Luminosity L  N p N a /  –Stacking rate –Coalescing efficiency.
Jean Slaughter –April 5, 2004 – all experimenters’ meeting Purposes of SDA Store to store monitoring of performance Long term trends Analysis of specific.
January Tevatron Lifetimes - P. Lebrun1 f On Tevatron Proton Lifetime at 150 December 3 Study vs Store data. Paul Lebrun Fermilab January-December.
All Experimenters' Mtg - Aug. 04, 2003 Week in Review: 07/28/03 –08/03/03 Doug Moehs – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
October 2002 Jean Slaughter SDA – Shot Data Analysis Outline Description of SDA Examples Plans for 2003 SDA is a system for acquiring and analyzing data.
S. Pordes - to part of CD 09/10/031 Introduction to some Beams Division jargon in some order…see how far we get:
April Tevatron Lifetimes - P. Lebrun1 f On Tevatron Lifetimes, Beams, Luminosity & Spot size Paul Lebrun Fermilab April
Application Software System Software.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
How Can Experimenters Help Improve Accelerator Operations? Jean Slaughter UEC Meeting November 22, 2003.
Learning Objectives Understand the concepts of Information systems.
F Beam Instrumentation Department Instrumentation -- present and future (Jean’s title) Bob Webber Accelerator Run II Meeting Thursday, January 8, 2004.
A computer contains two major sets of tools, software and hardware. Software is generally divided into Systems software and Applications software. Systems.
… Work in progress at CTF3 … Davide Gamba 01 July 2013 Study and Implementation of L INEAR F EEDBACK T OOLS for machine study and operation.
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
A Monte Carlo Model of Tevatron Collider Operations Elliott McCrory, BD/(Linac & Integration) 4, 5 December 2003 A phenomenological model of Tevatron Collider.
Status of the Accelerator Complex Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Accelerator Division Fermilab 2009 Fermilab Users’ Meeting.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
F HCP 2007 Performance and Future of the Tevatron Ron Moore Fermilab - Tevatron Dept. Tevatron overview and performance Antiproton source + Recycler overview.
Vladimir Sirotenko, Feb FPD: Runs & hisDB Oracle Databases Goal: access information about FPD experimental setup and accelerator conditions which.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 6 Jan 03 Week in Review: 12/30/02 –1/05/03 Ron Moore – FNAL Store Summary – Best week! > 7 pb -1 Machine Studies/Maintenance.
11/3/2010 CM15 Controls for LARP and LAFS - 1 Terri Lahey LARP/LAFS/CERN and SLAC.
Scientific data storage: How are computers involved in the following?
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC , the State of Michigan.
Software tools for digital LLRF system integration at CERN 04/11/2015 LLRF15, Software tools2 Andy Butterworth Tom Levens, Andrey Pashnin, Anthony Rey.
Feb 4, 2004P L McBride Project Status Meeting1 CD help for AD Note: BEAMS (BD) == ACCELERATOR (AD) Date of Last Report - April 25, 2003 (Division Briefing.
Recycler Pbar Transfer -Gattuso 1 Recycler weekly Summary This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items.
Cons Gattuso 2/23/10 Status/Changes to Pbar Transfer Program.
A Detailed Introduction To Visual Studio.NET CRB Tech ReviewsCRB Tech Reviews introduces you to the world of Visual.
Friday, Feb 12, 2010 Accelerator Status1 Accelerator Week in Review Part I: Regular 9am Scheduling Meeting –Crew Chief Summary –24 hour machine summaries.
Pre-Meeting Meeting Brian Drendel Accelerator Shift Plot.
SDA- Shot Data Analysis Jean Slaughter DOE Review July 21, 2003.
LCLS Commissioning & Operations High Level Software
Automatic emittance measurement in the CERN 1.4 GeV Booster
Summary of first LHC logging DB meeting
Software For Accelerators
LCLS Commissioning & Operations High Level Software
Chapter 12: Automated data collection methods
Chapter 1 Introduction(1.1)
SDLC Phases Systems Design.
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
CHAPTER 6 ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS
High Level Physics Applications Lehman Review February 7 - 9, 2006
Presentation transcript:

Jean Slaughter -Feb 24, 2004 Shot Data Responsible for physics analysis of shot data Oversees the development of shot data analysis tools Responsible for the integrity of shot data Operational Model Responsible for the operational model of the accelerator complex Develops guidelines for shot strategy based on SDA data Shares responsibility for handling unusual operational situations Responsibilities Shot Data Analysis Group in Integration Dept.

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review2Organization  SDA group in Integration Department  K. Gounder, E. McCrory, V. Papadimitriou, J. Slaughter  Phenomenological Model, reliability analysis Elliott McCrory Mentioned in plenary talk  Controls Department  T. Bolshakov, M. McCusker, K. Cahill, B. Hendricks, J. Patrick and others  Infrastructure and applications  Computing Division  K. Genser, P. Lebrun, S. Panacek  Analysis and applications

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review3 Two Aspects of Shot Data Analysis  Acquiring and archiving the data  “stores” are HEP stores – (Pbar and/or Recycler) + Tev Transfers among Accumulator, MI, Recycler in various combinations  SDA - sequenced data acquisition - main source of information sequencer driven processes that collect a defined set of information from multiple sources at specific times during a “store”.  Data loggers Not “store” oriented  Analyzing the data  Standard tables and plots built automatically  Browsers  Special purpose studies

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review4 Instruments Other Devices DAE jobs Database Derived Tables, Store Checker Java API - OSDA Osdaphysics API (DAE jobs) Files EXCEL, etc. Scalar, Plot Viewers SDAEdit what devices to record when SDA OACs Sequencers Report Writer (time in store) (data) (source, item) User Programs SDA acquisition Analysis Data Acquisition and Analysis Tools Diagram (What) Supertable, mini-tables Data Loggers

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review5 Coordination of Shot Data Analysis  Inputs - are we saving all the the relevant information?  Inputs - is the instrumentation working and understood?  Is data acquisition reliable?  Adequate for current load  Do we have adequate tools for using the data?  Operations  Special studies

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review6 Inputs to SDA  Intensities  Beam sigmas and transverse emittances  Bunch lengths and longitudinal emittances  BPM orbits  Luminosities, losses, beam positions from CDF/DO  Magnet settings, readbacks  Misc. devices like RF control signals  Fast Time plots of intensity devices and control settings  Tevatron tunes  Beams Division Documents 691, 692, 703, 705  Never ending task to keep on top of this

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review7Instrumentation  “Garbage in – garbage out”  Relative calibrations between devices  DCCTs versus wall monitors versus fast bunch integrators for intensity  Flying wires versus synchrotron light  Calibration between different machines  Bunch length in MI versus bunch length in Tevatron  Systematic and statistical errors  Day to day monitoring – did something break?

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review8 Instrumentation - II Instrumentation - II  Interpretation of measurements  Measure transverse and longitudinal beam sizes  Conversion to emittances and dp/p is non-trivial Coupled machine Knowledge of lattice  Instrumentation/beam physics working group  Transverse emittances and longitudinal emittances  Tune measurements  Intensities and efficiencies  People from systems and instrumentation departments, beam physics group in the integration department

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review9 Analysis Tools  Browser and Report Writer for quick studies  Tables built automatically every store –Supertable and EXCEL package –Derived tables and associated plotting tools –Short summary tables –Tables use corrected values  Shots scrapbook  OSDA (Offline Shot Data Analysis) - Suite of Java classes for user programs to directly access the data, apply corrections and calculate generally useful quantities like lifetimes

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review10Supertable  One line per store  Built automatically every store  130+ quantities of general interest  Dates, time on helix, length of store, how store ended  Luminosities, intensities, lifetimes, efficiencies, emittances at various steps in store  Web Accessible – HTML, EXCEL  analysis with plots, tables also on Web  Standard source of performance data

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review11 Edited Excerpt from Super Table 0 Store #1 Date started shot set up 7 store length (hours) 8 how store ended10 start stack11 unstacking fraction 12 amount unstacke d 32282/12/ Not Completed /10/ Normal /8/ Normal /7/ Normal /5/ Normal /3/ Normal /2/ Normal /31/ Normal /30/ Normal /29/ TevQuench /27/ Normal /26/ Abort /25/ Abort /23/ Normal /22/ Normal /21/ Normal /19/ Normal /17/ Normal /16/ Normal /15/ Normal

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review12 Derived Tables- Bunch by Bunch Information  Table per store – built automatically  All 6 emittances  Intensities  Average and bunch by bunch information  Use best algorithms to get physics quantities  Not always available directly from front-end.  Interactive plotting interface

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review13 Integrated Luminosity Table and Plot

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review14 Monitoring SDA itself  Complex system – lots of places for things to go wrong  Front ends – instrumentation, MADCs, break  DAQ process itself  Problems in the access to the data  Problems in the analysis code  Needs constant monitoring  Error logs from SDA Data Acquisition processes  Store checker  User complaints  Responsibility of SDA AID group

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review15 Store Checker  Purpose  Monitor instrumentation and DAQ  Monitor accelerator performance – soon  Checks SDA data for specified cases/sets  Min < device value < max  Min < ( difference in time of 2 devices ) < max  Min < ( difference in value of 2 devices) < max  Jobs run automatically every store  “Standard” and “private” lists  Results on WWW for “standard” list  Lists on WWW  Used to give notification of initial luminosities

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review16Summary  Basic SDA organization in place  More sophisticated analysis will be needed as luminosities increase  Continual job to keep the system going  Operational model has provided much insight into optimizing integrated luminosity.  Tools, information can be applied to reliability analysis – E. McCrory’s talk.  Other activities  Liaison with experiments to use luminosity and interaction region data to optimize luminosity and understand machine performance  Run ii meetings (V. Lebedev), Acceleration Physics Lectures (M. Syphers)

SDA- Jean Slaughter – Feb 24, 2004 – Lehman Review17 Jobs for (From DOE October, 2002 Talk)  Finish and then maintain SDA infrastructure  Still some DAQ errors – Maintenance  More flexible user access to data - Better, but…  Physics classes in Java tool kit - Maintenance  Finish reviewing inputs – Maintenance  Study instrumentation – lots of progress  Standard plots and tables – Maintenance Emittances Automated shots log Automated summary spreadsheets  User requests and education – ongoing  Long term archiving of (non-SDA) data logger data - Done