South Dakota Common Core State Standards Phase II 9-12 ELA Day one: 9:00 to 4:00 Day two: 8:00 to 3:30.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning and Innovation
Advertisements

Formative Assessment Institute Presented by: Dr. Pam Lange.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
SPEARFISH SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM PLANNING DEVELOPMENT By Jennifer Nehl, M. Ed.
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing ISLN March, 2015.
MTSS – What’s That? Session 1 Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 ) – Work we are doing Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)  What is this.
Final Session: Whole Group Please sit together with the other associates from your district (as much as possible) April 27, 2005.
The Research and Practice of Classroom Assessment Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment.
CCSS Mathematics Leadership Team Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
DCPS Teaching and Learning Framework
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Fact or Fiction: Teaching with Historical Fiction
South Dakota Common Core State Standards Phase I - Mathematics July 7, 2011 K
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
South Dakota Common Core State Standards Phase II K - 6 Day one: 9:00 to 4:30 Day two: 8:00 to 3:30.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Math-It’s Elementary February 2013 Investigating strategies that promote highly effective teaching and learning for meeting the Kentucky Core Academic.
Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage I: Engaging Stakeholders.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Idaho State Department of Education Accessing Your ISAT by Smarter Balanced Data Using the Online Reporting System (ORS) Angela Hemingway Director, Assessment.
HOW ASSESSMENT SUPPORTS RTI 2 AND CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP Clinch-Powell Cooperative Presenters:
Second session of the NEPBE I in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 22, 2013.
EngageNY.org Session 1: Building a Change-Focused Culture November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
1 Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting April 15, 2009 Leadership for Assessment Literacy From Paper to Practice.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
NC FALCON: Module III Collecting & Documenting Evidence February 2011 East Elementary.
South Dakota Common Core State Standards Module 2 K – 6 Aberdeen – June 12 and 13 1.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
Copyright © 2008 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Mock Data Retreat Pam Lange TIE/ESA 7. 2 Agenda  Based on school’s need  May be ½ day/ full day/ two days  Work with district to determine needs –
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Leading Formative Instructional Practices January 28 and February 25 Session One: Modules 1, 2, 3 Session Two:
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
 Sign In and find your assigned table  Enjoy breakfast items  You will NOT need a computer until much later  Be ready to share at 9 a.m. a check for.
Learning Environments that Honour Student Voice
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Interventions.
A writer only begins a book. A reader finishes it.” - Samuel Johnson
Based on the work of Assessment FOR Learning by Rick Stiggins October 29, 2007 ASSESSMENT “OF” AND “FOR”: DOES IT REALLY MAKE A DIFFERNCE?
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Curriculum and Gap Analysis Systems Change 2014 Marcia Torgrude & June Preszler TIE.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Instructional Leadership Planning Common Assessments.
Implementing the Common Core Marcia Torgrude Welcome.
Pat Hubert ESA2 Using Student Learning Objectives to Guide Instruction and Student Learning.
REFLECTION ON TEACHING THROUGH VIDEO ANALYSIS. UNDERGRADUATE ELEMENTARY EDUCATION TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
1 St. Joseph School District Paul Numedahl September 29, 2010· St. Joseph MO.
Leadership Session Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
Thinking about assessment…
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Secondary
Analyzing Performance Tasks: Turning Results Into Action
Differentiation in the 21st Century
Assessment and Instructional Planning
Implementation in a Transition Year
Finally! Utilizing Student Involvement to Prepare for Final Exams
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

South Dakota Common Core State Standards Phase II 9-12 ELA Day one: 9:00 to 4:00 Day two: 8:00 to 3:30

Welcome Trainer Introductions: Scott Simpson Be sure to download your mp3 of “Common Core Blues”

Two Kinds of Intelligence There are two kinds of intelligence: one acquired, as a child in school memorizes facts and concepts from books and from what the teacher says, collecting information from the traditional sciences as well as from the new sciences. With such intelligence you rise in the world. You get ranked ahead or behind others in regard to your competence in retaining information. You stroll with this intelligence in and out of fields of knowledge, getting always more marks on your preserving tablets. There is another kind of tablet, one already completed and preserved inside you. A spring overflowing its springbox. A freshness in the center of the chest. This other intelligence does not turn yellow or stagnate. It's fluid, and it doesn't move from outside to inside through the conduits of plumbing-learning. This second knowing is a fountainhead from within you, moving out. --Rumi, from Teaching with Fire Parker Palmer on Inner Authority

Agenda – Comments – Peer Review (30-40 min) 11:30 lunch 4:00 done

Technology Information Be certain your internet connection is working.

Outcomes Review, edit and finalize disaggregated standards. To analyze lessons to ensure alignment to the disaggregated CCSS (KUD). To ensure the lessons meet the cognitive demand of the CCSS. To understand the relationship of summative and formative assessments to CCSS. To evaluate the purposes and uses of assessment.

Norms Revisited  Listen with Engagement  Honor Each Other’s Thinking  Honor Private Think Time  Everyone has a Voice  Be Respectful of all Comments  Participation is Expected  Limit Side Conversation  Take Care of Your Needs  Turn Cell Phones Off or Vibrate

Google Site

Disaggregated Standards Find your group’s disaggregated standards on the Google Site: As a group, review all comments (don’t resolve yet) As a group, edit your disaggregated standards based on the comments you received – You may or may not make all the changes suggested – this is completely up to you

Disaggregated Standards

Peer Review

Final Peer Review: First Round – Within your table group, assign everyone to a standard that you worked with Write your assigned standard on the top of your peer review template – Create groups of three should be individuals you have not worked with yet – Exchange standards within your triad Everyone should have a new standard to review – Individually peer review your new standard Use template provided

Final Peer Review: Guiding Questions The focus should include: Ensuring the KUDs provide a complete reflection of the standard. Rigor is embedded in and reflects the intent of the disaggregated standard.

Final Peer Review: Second Round – Exchange standards and completed peer review template within your triad Everyone should have a new standard to review Everyone should have a completed template in which to add additional comments – Individually peer review your new standard Add to completed template

Final Edit – Form original groups – Review feedback from peer review process – Make final edits to disaggregated standards on Google Documents

Delete Comments Last Step: “Resolve” all comments from your disaggregated standards. You must complete this for each comment.

Lunch! We’ll start again at 12:30

Steps 1 & 2

Lesson Descriptions Determine which disaggregated standard you will work with for the first round. Examine ONE series of lessons from each participant in the group. Determine which series of lessons you will use for first go round.

Lesson Descriptions

Discussion Questions: With which standard do the series of lessons align? Why would you use this series of lessons? What do you expect students to learn from this series of lessons? Lesson Descriptions

Step 3

KUD Coverage Using your disaggregated standard template, determine which Know, Understand and Do (KUD) components are aligned to this series of lessons. Write lesson number/description. Determine the appropriate KUD from disaggregated standard template that aligns with each lesson. – You may have multiple KUDs aligned with each lesson.

KUD Coverage

Theme Worksheet

Brainstorm Lesson

Theme of Stargirl

KUD Coverage

Discussion Questions What did you learn about your current lessons? How did this process help discover standard coverage? What are the gaps between what you are currently doing and what is required in the CCSS?

Step 4

Why Webb? SMARTER Balance – Assessments in 2015 will be based on Webb leveling

DOK Reflection Directions:  Find completed graphic organizer

DOK Reflection Discussion within your group: Two things you learned from reading DOK article and completing graphic organizer One question you still have concerning DOK Whole group discussion

Card Sort Webb Leveling Determine the Webb Level for each activity.

Webb Level Webb Level Student Performance Utilizing the list of provided activities, determine Webb Level of each activity and provide rationale for determined Webb Level Worksheet activity

Webb Level Webb Level of Lessons Summarize each component of lesson under correct Webb Level Column (ex: Vocab) Determine the rationale as to why it meets the selected Webb Level

Webb Level

Discussion Questions What did you learn about your current lessons compared to the cognitive demand of the standard? What are the gaps between what you are currently doing and what is required in the CCSS?

Step 5

Why Is Assessment Important?

We may want to assess where a student is.

We may want to assess where a student is… going.

We may want to assess what a student has learned.

But ultimately we want to know what to do next in order to close the gap.

Assessment Activity Directions:  At your table, use your sticky notes  Write as many different types of assessments that you can think of in the next four minutes (one per sticky note)  Place in the middle of the table

50 Thinking About Assessment Conversation about online Stiggins’ work.

51 Thinking About Assessment 80 percent of assessments given in classrooms are geared toward low-level thinking. Decisions about assessment happen about every three to four minutes. What do assessments tell us? How are we using assessments?

Summative and Formative Assessment Summative Assessment: How much have students learned at a particular point in time? Formative Assessment: How can we use assessments to help students learn more?

Summative Assessment The purpose is:  to measure student achievement at a particular point in time for reporting and accountability;  to sort students in rank order; and  to maximize student learning through standardized tests.

Formative Assessment The reason/purpose is:  to promote further improvement of student learning during the learning process and  to involve students in the ongoing assessment of their own achievement.

55 Formative Assessments Results are used primarily by students, educators, and parents. Results are used for:  helping students see and hit the target(s) and  identifying student needs.

56 Directions:  Each table needs a piece of chart paper  Create T-Chart: Summative/Formative  Using your assessments listed on sticky notes, determine which category each assessment fits into  If you get stuck, place it on the middle line Assessment Activity

It isn’t the method that determines whether the assessment is summative or formative… …it is how the results are used.

Target Method Match Assessment Methods

Target Method Match

61 Each group receives laminated Target Method Match matrix Using the assessment descriptions, determine: – Appropriate Assessment Method, and – Appropriate DOK Level – Place in appropriate box on laminated sheet Target Method Match

62 Discussion: How important is it to utilize multiple assessment methods? What big “ah-has” did your team have when determining DOK levels? Target Method Match

63 Determine types of assessment to use for series of lessons/standard – summative and formative Consider how assessment is aligned to KUD of standard Determine Depth of Knowledge Level and Assessment Methods for summative assessments. Assessment Practices

Step 6

Lesson Reflection What strengths did you find in the analysis? What are some areas that might need improvement? List revisions that might need to be made.

Good Luck!