TRENDS FOR SELECTED ITEMS FROM THE EDUCAUSE CORE DATA SERVICE 2006–2010

CORE DATA SERVICE (CDS) RESPONDENTS YearDR EXTDR INTMABA LABA GENAA

IT Reporting Relationships, 2006–2010 Highest academic officer Highest administrative officer President, chancellor, or CEO Highest business officer Percentage of Institutions

executive Cabinet Membership, 2006 – Percentage of Institutions

Centralized IT Staff (Quartiles), 2006–2010 Staff FTEs Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

Centralized Student Worker FTEs (Quartiles), 2006 – 2010 Student Worker FTEs Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

Student FTEs served per centralized it staff ftes (quartiles), 2006 – 2010 Student FTEs Served per Staff FTE Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

Centralized IT Staff as a Percentage of Total IT Staff (Quartiles), 2006 – 2010 Percentage of IT Staff Centralized Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

Separate salary scales for it staff, 2006 – Percentage of Institutions

separate job titles for it staff, 2006 – Percentage of Institutions

Stand-alone and institutional strategic plans, 2006 – 2010 Stand-alone and institutional plans Institutional plan only Stand-alone plan only Percentage of Institutions

Centralized IT funding, adjusted for inflation (quartiles), 2006– 2010 US Dollars (Millions) Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

centralized IT funding per student FTEs, adjusted for inflation (Quartiles), 2006 – 2010 US Dollars per Student FTE Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

operating appropriation, adjusted for inflation (Quartiles), 2006 – 2010 US Dollars (Millions) Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

operating appropriation, adjusted for inflation per student fte (Quartiles), 2006 – Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile. US Dollars per Student FTE

staff compensation as percentage of centralized it funding (Quartiles), 2006 – 2010 Percentage of Centralized IT Funding Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

staff compensation per fte, adjusted for inflation (Quartiles), 2006–2010 US Dollars (Thousands) Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

student worker compensation per fte, adjusted for inflation (Quartiles), 2006–2010 US Dollars (Thousands) Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

Charging of student technology fees, 2006 – Percentage of Institutions

Basis for student technology fee, 2006 – 2010 Flat fee per year, semester, or quarter Flat fee per credit hour or percentage of tuition Percentage of Institutions

computers owned/leased by the institution per student fte (Quartiles), 2006–2010 Computers per Student FTE Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile.

planned replacement cycle for institutional computers, 2006 – 2010 More than four years Four years Less than three years Three to four years Percentage of Institutions

hours of help desk availability (Quartiles), 2006–2010 Hours Note: Bottom of bar = 25 th percentile, line in bar = 50 th percentile/median, top of bar = 75 th percentile

student computer policy, 2006–2010 Recommended for all students Recommended in some departments Required in some departments Required for all students Percentage of Institutions

EDUCAUSE Core Data Service