Moderated by: Dr. Ramesh Kumar Presented by: Dr Manoj REVIEW ARTICLE Year : 2013 | Volume : 57 | Issue : 4 | Page : 339-344 One lung ventilation strategies for infants and children undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic surgery Teddy Suratos Fabila, Shahani Jagdish Menghraj Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Kandang Kerbau Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, SingaporeDate of Web Publication 20-Sep-2013 Moderated by: Dr. Ramesh Kumar Presented by: Dr Manoj

Introduction Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a less invasive approach for thoracoscopic surgery. It renders less postoperative pain, fewer operative complications, and shortened hospital stay. This makes VATS favourable for paediatric patients. Over the years, the indications for VATS in children have increased exponentially. The American Thoracic Society has suggested the use of VATS for stage II pulmonary empyema. However, a successful VATS requires well-executed one-lung ventilation (OLV).

Currently, lung isolation in infants and children includes: single lumen endotracheal tube (ETT) balloon-tipped bronchial blockers (BB) such as Fogarty embolectomy catheter and Arndt Endobronchial Blocker double lumen endobronchial tubes (EBT) and Univent tubes. Need for: (1) a 'quiet' surgical field with adequate exposure, (2) avoidance of contamination of the normal lung, and (3) prevention of detrimental complications for the young patients such as hypoxemia.

Respiratory insult during OLV: Adults vs. Children Ventilation and perfusion are highest on the most dependent portion of the lungs for adults and children. This is due to pressure gradient and gravitational pull. Both V and Q should be well matched. However, during one lung ventilation during VATS, there are factors that can increase V/Q mismatch because of a decrease in FRC and TV. Factors that contribute to V/Q mismatch: General anaesthesia, suboptimal patient positioning, surgical retraction and mechanical ventilation

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction minimize V/Q mismatch by diverting blood flow away from atelectatic underventilated lung. The HPV response is maximal at normal and decreased at either high or low pulmonary vascular pressure. one can attain maximal HPV when partial pressure in venous blood (PvO 2 ) is normal and decreased response when either high or low PvO 2 . Therefore, the use of inhalational anaesthetic agents and other vasodilating drugs, together with high or low fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) will diminish HPV response.

The impact of lateral decubitus position on V/Q mismatch on the other hand is different in infants as compared with teens and adults. Placing an adult in a lateral position with the healthy lung on the dependent position causes optimal oxygenation due to hydrostatic pressure gradient between the two lungs and gravitational pull. On the other hand, infants have soft, easily compressible lungs. Their residual volume is closer to functional residual capacity. As such, ventilating the dependent healthy lung, infants can easily have decrease in lung compliance and increase in airway closure even during tidal breathing.

Furthermore, the infant's small size results in the decrease in hydrostatic pressure gradient between dependent and nondependent lung. Therefore, there is a loss of the favourable response of increasing perfusion to the dependent ventilated side while reducing the perfusion in the pathologic lung, leaving infants susceptible to hypoxia during one lung ventilation while placed in lateral decubitus position. With this in mind, access for ventilating and providing oxygen on the pathologic side must be maintained during OLV, in the midst of significant oxygen desaturation during operation.

One lung ventilation techniques in infants and children Single-lumen endotracheal tube ETT provides the simplest means of lung isolation. Tube size selection and depth of insertion follow the standard computation based from age; supported by auscultation for breath sounds. After tracheal intubation, the ETT can deliberately be advanced into bronchus to isolate the lungs. Difficulties arise when the left bronchus is to be intubated. suggested techniques are using a stylet to curve the distal end of the tracheal tube to the left and using a distally curved rubber bougie that is directed blindly to the left bronchus, followed by railroading the tube over the bougie.

Another technique for left lung intubation is when the bevel of the tube is rotated 180° while the head is turned to the right. The ETT is advanced into the bronchus until the right breath sound disappears. Single lumen ETT is preferred for emergencies such as contralateral tension pneumothorax. Disadvantage: inadequacy to provide a good seal in the bronchus. As a result, it may not be able to provide a collapsed lung for the operative site, or protect the normal lungs from contamination. can cause hypoxemia if the short right side bronchus is intubated leading to upper lobe bronchus obstruction. converting to two lung ventilation is risky and technically difficult.

Double-lumen endobronchial tubes advantages in executing successful one lung ventilation. The ease of positioning and securing the device can give reassurance especially for the general anaesthetists doing OLV. In addition, either side of the lung can be suctioned individually. The operated side of the lung can be easily ventilated as the need arises. The bronchial cuff's high volume/low pressure properties reduce the risk of ischemic pressure damage to airway.

limitations presence of an anomalous right upper lobe take-off from the trachea, incidence: 1 in 250 cases. The technique for insertion The bronchoscopy-guided technique is recommended for placement and positioning of either right or left double lumen EBT. After placing the double-lumen EBT at the trachea, under direct laryngoscopy, the double lumen EBT will be advanced only to the point where the tracheal cuff is at the level just beyond the vocal cords. The tube is then rotated 90° to the indicated side. Then a fiberoptic bronchoscope with an outside diameter (OD) small enough to fit in the tube is used to guide the EBT lumen until it is seated at the appropriate depth.

size for double-lumen EBT for children. direct measurement of the bronchial width by chest radiograph. by computing the diameter of the left bronchus (WLB) via known tracheal width (WT) using the formula WLB = (0.4 × WT) + 3.3. In adults, studies have shown that smaller 35-37 F has no associated clinical intraoperative outcome compared to larger 39-41 F double lumen EBT. Currently, the smallest size available is 26 F (Rusch, Duluth, GA. USA) which can be used for children 8 years old and above.

Balloon-tipped bronchial blockers 'technique of choice' in paediatric patients, under the age of 6 years. This is because Univent 3.5 uncuffed version tube (recommended for 6-8 years old) and double-lumen EBT (recommended for 8-10 years old) diameters are big for this age group. Balloon-tipped BB can advance down or alongside the single lumen ETT. This is done with the use of a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) and checked by auscultation. balloon-tipped bronchial blockers are also favoured for the use in an intubated patient and patients with tracheostomy with sufficient internal diameter.

Tan and Tan-Kendrick, measured right and left bronchus of 250 children aged 2 days to 16 years old using CT of the thorax and correlated it with the patient's age and weight, in order to create a guide to size selection of the Fogarty catheter. From this study, they found out that the age, but not the weight, of the patient is a good predictor of the main bronchial diameters. They recommended the use of a 3 Fr Fogarty catheter up to the age of 4 years and a 5 Fr catheter for 5-12 years. Their decision to use a size 5 Fr Fogarty instead of 4 Fr as a bronchial blocker for children older than 4 years old is due to small (1 mm) difference in maximum diameter between the two (5 Fr and 4 Fr). In addition to this, they perceived that the balloon pressure exerted by the larger catheter on the bronchial wall might be lower.

The Arndt Endobronchial Blocker contains a flexible wire loop that passes from the proximal end and exits at the distal end. A special three-part swivel adaptor allows introduction of the FOB in one port, a balloon-tipped BB through the second port and a third port for ventilation circuit. first step is to insert endobronchial blocker through the blocker port of the Arndt Multiport Adapter. Advancing it until the guide loop is within the body of the adapter. Following it is the insertion of FOB through the bronchoscopy port until it passes through the loop. Then the coupled FOB and endobronchial blocker is advanced to the side of the lung to be blocked.

After correct identification of bronchus to be blocked, the FOB is distally pushed further, enough such that the Arndt Endobronchial Blocker® enters the bronchus. Once it is certain that the blocker is in position, the FOB is slowly withdrawn. Then the cuff will be inflated under direct FOB visualization with incremental introduction of air appropriate for the size of the bronchial blocker. This is done until total bronchial blockade is achieved. Lung exclusion is confirmed by direct vision of the inflated balloon into the bronchus and auscultation of lung separation. Then the fiberoptic scope is removed before the bronchial scope port tightened to permit correct ventilation.

In the randomized trial of three bronchial blockers (Arndt, Cohen, and Fuji) versus double-lumen tubes by Narayanaswamy, he concluded that among the bronchial blockers, the Arndt Endobronchial Blocker® needed to be repositioned more often. For children, the Arndt Endobronchial Blocker® is only suitable if the ETT to be used is greater than 4.5 mm internal diameter, as the available 5 Fr catheter has a diameter of 2.5 mm and requires a small bronchoscope of at least 2.2 mm for positioning.

Univent tube The Univent tubes with movable bronchial blockers have an advantage of technical ease in positioning and placement when used to facilitate one lung ventilation. Method of insertion: 1. inserting the tube orotracheally as with a conventional ETT and rotating it 90° so that the blocker lumen is on the thoracotomy side. After inflating the balloon and securing the tube, the bronchial blocker shaft will be pushed out of the tracheal tube pocket. 2. FOB assisted, where in the bronchial blocker shaft will be pushed away under direct vision.

Advantages: manual auscultation method for Univent intubation are feasible, less time consuming and relatively easy. In a difficult airway, lighted stylet-guided Univent tube placement takes less time for correct placement. compared to double-lumen EBT, Univent tubes may reduce the airway injury and improve the compliance during OLV. Disadvantage: higher incidence of intraoperative malposition. The univent tube with a 3.5 mm internal diameter has an external size of 7.5-8.0 mm while univent tube size 4.5 mm internal diameter has an outer diameter of 8.5-9 mm. Thus, the 3.5 mm tube can only be used for older children whose airway is small for the smallest double lumen tubes.

Conclusion To overcome the challenges of rendering one lung ventilation technique in infants and children coming for VATS, one must be mindful of the respiratory insult caused by OLV under general anaesthesia, and positioning during operation. Although it is prudent to use a device one is technically familiar with, the anaesthetists must also be aware whether if it is appropriate for the patients' age and weight. Furthermore, if the device is equipped with safety features such as ventilating both lungs in the event of hypoxia, and if it can provide efficient lung isolation intraoperatively.