1 Motivation Motivation SST analysis products at NCDC SST analysis products at NCDC  Extended Reconstruction SST (ERSST) v.3b  Daily Optimum Interpolation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experiments with Monthly Satellite Ocean Color Fields in a NCEP Operational Ocean Forecast System PI: Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Co-I: David Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC/GCWMB.
Advertisements

Medspiration user meeting, dec 4-6 Use of Medspiration and GHRSST data in the Northern Seas Jacob L. Høyer & Søren Andersen Center for Ocean and Ice, Danish.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder SST field, Versions 5 & 6 Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’ RSMAS Nov 8, 2010 with.
1 High Resolution Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis Errors Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University)
Climate and Food Security Thank you to the Yaqui Valley and Indonesian Food Security Teams at Stanford 1.Seasonal Climate Forecasts 2.Natural cycles of.
Uncertainty of sea level rise, rankings etc. First some results on the temperature hiatus.
NOAA Climate Obs 4th Annual Review Silver Spring, MD May 10-12, NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center 1.SSTs for Daily SST OI NOAA’s National.
1 Improved Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analyses for Climate NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Thomas M. Smith Richard W. Reynolds Kenneth.
1 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center April 2005 Climate Observation Program Blended SST Analysis Changes and Implications for the Buoy Network 1.Plans.
1 Sea Surface Temperature Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds.
Improved NCEP SST Analysis
1 Assessment of the CFSv2 real-time seasonal forecasts for Wanqiu Wang, Mingyue Chen, and Arun Kumar CPC/NCEP/NOAA.
(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Observed Surface & Atmosphere (from IPCC WG-I, Chapter 3) Observed Changes in Surface and Atmosphere Climate.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 POES-GOES Blended SST Analysis.
Statistical Analyses of Historical Monthly Precipitation Anomalies Beginning 1900 Phil Arkin, Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites Earth System.
CPC Unified Gauge – Satellite Merged Precipitation Analysis for Improved Monitoring and Assessments of Global Climate Pingping Xie, Soo-Hyun Yoo,
December 2002 Section 2 Past Changes in Climate. Global surface temperatures are rising Relative to average temperature.
Experimental seasonal hydrologic forecasting for the Western U.S. Dennis P. Lettenmaier Andrew W. Wood, Alan F. Hamlet Climate Impacts Group University.
The La Niña Influence on Central Alabama Rainfall Patterns.
EUROBRISA Workshop – Beyond seasonal forecastingBarcelona, 14 December 2010 INSTITUT CATALÀ DE CIÈNCIES DEL CLIMA Beyond seasonal forecasting F. J. Doblas-Reyes,
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS J28 Earth Science for National Action on Climate Change Canada Water Accounts AET estimates for.
Page 1 © Crown copyright 2004 Modern biases in in situ SST measurements John Kennedy, Nick Rayner, Philip Brohan, David Parker, Chris Folland, et al.
Reanalysis: When observations meet models
ENSO Variability in SODA: SULAGNA RAY BENJAMIN GIESE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY WCRP 2010, Paris, Nov
AN ENHANCED SST COMPOSITE FOR WEATHER FORECASTING AND REGIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES Gary Jedlovec 1, Jorge Vazquez 2, and Ed Armstrong 2 1NASA/MSFC Earth Science.
Meeting of the CCl/OPACE2 Task Team on National Climate Monitoring Products How might NCMPs contribute in future IPCC reports ? Fatima Driouech TT on national.
Page 1© Crown copyright HadISST2: progress and plans Nick Rayner, 14 th March 2007.
Combining CMORPH with Gauge Analysis over
Analyzed Data Products Available from NCAR that Support Marine Climate Research JCOMM ETMC-III 9-12 February 2010 Steven Worley Doug Schuster.
Verification of IRI Forecasts Tony Barnston and Shuhua Li.
Cooperative Research Programs (CoRP) Satellite Climate Studies Branch (SCSB) 1 1 Reconstruction of Near-Global Precipitation Variations Thomas Smith 1.
1 Climate Test Bed Seminar Series 24 June 2009 Bias Correction & Forecast Skill of NCEP GFS Ensemble Week 1 & Week 2 Precipitation & Soil Moisture Forecasts.
1 Agenda Review Issues Melbourne, May 2007 Kenneth S. Casey NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center May 2007 Gary Wick, Rapporteur GHRSST-8 Session-8 Reanalysis.
2nd GODAE Observing System Evaluation Workshop - June Ocean state estimates from the observations Contributions and complementarities of Argo,
1 AISC Workshop May 16-18, 2006 Lesson Learned from CCSP 1.1: Temperature Trends in the Atmosphere Lesson Learned from CCSP 1.1 Temperature Trends in the.
Statistical Analyses of Historical Monthly Precipitation Anomalies Beginning 1900 Phil Arkin, Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites Earth System.
NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Climate Service Partnership Activities At NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Tim Owen Climate Prediction Applications.
“Comparison of model data based ENSO composites and the actual prediction by these models for winter 2015/16.” Model composites (method etc) 6 slides Comparison.
Exploring the Possibility to Forecast Annual Mean Temperature with IPCC and AMIP Runs Peitao Peng Arun Kumar CPC/NCEP/NWS/NOAA Acknowledgements: Bhaskar.
WCRP Extremes Workshop Sept 2010 Detecting human influence on extreme daily temperature at regional scales Photo: F. Zwiers (Long-tailed Jaeger)
1 Daily OI Analysis for Sea Surface Temperature NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, NCDC) Thomas M. Smith (NOAA,
Of what use is a statistician in climate modeling? Peter Guttorp University of Washington Norwegian Computing Center
Impact of TAO observations on Impact of TAO observations on Operational Analysis for Tropical Pacific Yan Xue Climate Prediction Center NCEP Ocean Climate.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
NOAA Climate Observation Annual Review Silver, Spring, MD Sept. 3-5, Intercomparisons Among Global Daily SST Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data.
Testing for equal variance Scale family: Y = sX G(x) = P(sX ≤ x) = F(x/s) To compute inverse, let y = G(x) = F(x/s) so x/s = F -1 (y) x = G -1 (y) = sF.
To clarify, coordinate and synthesize research devoted to achieve a better understanding of ENSO diversity, including: surface and sub-surface characteristics,
Status / Progress Report for GPC Tokyo Takayuki Tokuhiro Climate Prediction Division, JMA
Cooperative Research Programs (CoRP) Satellite Climate Studies Branch (SCSB) 1 1 Reconstruction of Near-Global Precipitation Variations Based on Gauges.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE TEACHERS’ CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE TEACHERS’ CONFERENCE, Borki Molo, Poland, 7-10 February 2007 Extreme Climatic and atmospheric.
Cooperative Research Programs (CoRP) Satellite Climate Studies Branch (SCSB) 1 1 Reconstruction of Near-Global Precipitation Variations Based on Gauges.
Cooperative Research Programs (CoRP) Satellite Climate Studies Branch (SCSB) 1 1 Reconstruction of Near-Global Precipitation Variations Based on Gauges.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
Understanding and Improving Marine Air Temperatures David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent National Oceanography Centre, Southampton
GHRSST-9 Perros-Guirec, France 9-13 June Intercomparisons Among Global Daily SST Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC, USA.
1 Objective Determination of Feature Resolution in an SST Analysis Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University) Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dimitris.
Coupled Initialization Experiments in the COLA Anomaly Coupled Model
Improved Historical Reconstructions of SST and Marine Precipitation Variations Thomas M. Smith1 Richard W. Reynolds2 Phillip A. Arkin3 Viva Banzon2 1.
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
Progress in Seasonal Forecasting at NCEP
A. Wood, A.F. Hamlet, M. McGuire, S. Babu and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
IRI forecast April 2010 SASCOF-1
Atlantic Ocean Forcing of North American and European Summer Climate
Forecast system development activities
Decadal Climate Prediction at BSC
Thomas Smith1 Phillip A. Arkin2 George J. Huffman3 John J. Bates1
Exponential Smoothing
Presentation transcript:

1 Motivation Motivation SST analysis products at NCDC SST analysis products at NCDC  Extended Reconstruction SST (ERSST) v.3b  Daily Optimum Interpolation SST (OISST) v.2 Error computations Error computations Use of SST for Operational Climate activities Use of SST for Operational Climate activities  Warming trend  El Nino  Modelling (not this talk)

2 What are operational uses of SST for climate applications? What are operational uses of SST for climate applications? What are the uses of SST ? What are the uses of SST ? Are SST error fields used in their operations? Are SST error fields used in their operations? Why is there minimal use? Why is there minimal use?

3 Provides historical context for modern measurements Provides historical context for modern measurements Produced monthly on 2 ° grid from 1854 to present Produced monthly on 2 ° grid from 1854 to present Input: in situ data only Input: in situ data only NetCDF 3 Gridded Products NetCDF 3 Gridded Products o Full SST o SST anomaly (wrt climatology) o Total error variance

4 Daily, 1/4 ° grid Daily, 1/4 ° grid Based on satellite and in situ data Based on satellite and in situ data o AVHRR-only (from 1981) o AVHRR+AMSR (from 2002) 3 Gridded Products 3 Gridded Products o Full SST o Random and sampling error variance o Bias error variance X OISST with AVHRR 17 & 18 May 15, 2010 Bias error Random and sampling error

5 SourceERSSTOISST Random Small due to filtering and smoothing Lumped with sampling Sampling Low (decadal) frequency wrt model output High frequency wrt detrended OI Expected OI increment variance reduced by observations used Bias Methodology changes (e.g., bucket types, engine intake) Ship adjusted to buoys from 1970’s Depends on expected variance for each mode, and which modes are used for bias correction per satellite dataset Error estimation requires a reference or expected value. Analysis steps defined how error is computed.

6 AMSR reduces sampling error but not bias AVHRR+AMSR AVHRR-only X

7 After 1940s, the average trend is ~0.1°C/decade After 1940s, the average trend is ~0.1°C/decade Global errors must be < 0.5°C/100 yrs or 0.05°C/10 yrs Global errors must be < 0.5°C/100 yrs or 0.05°C/10 yrs Regional error requirements can differ Regional error requirements can differ 1941)

8 Monthly ERSST Daily OISST (AVHRR-only) Daily OISST (AVHRR&AMSR) Remote Sensing & Applications Division Climate Services Division: Climate Monitoring Branch Monthly State of the Climate Assessment Yearly State of the Climate Report NCEP NCDC Seasonal Ocean Forecast Global Data Assimilation System Weekly OISST (AVHRR-only) Climate Prediction Center El Nino Monthly Discussion MergedLandOcean Temperature

9 SST is merged with Land temperatures for global map. Gridpoints with high error are masked out. Emphasis on departure from normal

10 Values with high errors excluded from averages Values with high errors excluded from averages With global warming, all recent years are above normal With global warming, all recent years are above normal Thus, emphasis on rankings Thus, emphasis on rankings

11 “Tie” reflects rounding off NOT significance testing “Tie” reflects rounding off NOT significance testing Errors could also be used to define 95% CI Errors could also be used to define 95% CI Allow comparison among months and between years, rather than wrt normal Allow comparison among months and between years, rather than wrt normal

12 Fig % confidence range of decadal average temperatures for the HadCRUT3 temperature analysis (see Brohan et al for the error model derivation). 95% CI shown by MetOffice, while also showing departure from normal Global warming skepticism needs to be addressed Most recent 3 decades progressively warmer

13 Emphasis on use of multiple indicators and ensemble presentations Emphasis on use of multiple indicators and ensemble presentations Avoids problem of deciding whether error estimates are equivalent Avoids problem of deciding whether error estimates are equivalent

14 Index=Sum of SST anomalies in specific region Among teleconnection phenomena, El Nino is the only one with an SST- based index CPC uses weekly OISST for diagnostics and forecast; ERSST for historical context Concern: public confused why 2 SST products?

15 Daily OISST Monthly ERSST SST products will not be exactly the same SST products will not be exactly the same 95% CI indicates OISST is better for forecasting 95% CI indicates OISST is better for forecasting

16 NCDC SST analysis products are distributed with error fields NCDC SST analysis products are distributed with error fields For operational climate assessments, errors not used routinely For operational climate assessments, errors not used routinely  Error fields used only when producer is involved  Users need time and resources to evaluate and incorporate into routine operations  Effective communication to public a major issue Producers need to give recommendations and help develop protocols Producers need to give recommendations and help develop protocols

17

18 WMO has requested presentation be changed to terciles (above, below and normal) to relate more easily to forecasts WMO has requested presentation be changed to terciles (above, below and normal) to relate more easily to forecasts But what is normal? But what is normal?

19

20 RANDOM ERROR: caused by natural variations when measurement is repeated RANDOM ERROR: caused by natural variations when measurement is repeated SAMPLING ERROR: if SST estimate affected by distribution and density SAMPLING ERROR: if SST estimate affected by distribution and density BIAS error: if SST obs offset from true value by measurement method or analysis BIAS error: if SST obs offset from true value by measurement method or analysis

21 Sampling and Random error Sampling and Random error  Equal to OI analysis increment SD if there are no obs  Reduced proportionally by (OI wt*source error)  SNR ratio= 1.94 ship; 0.5 buoy&AVHRR; 0.35 AMSR Bias error (systematic to measurement methodology or analysis method) Bias error (systematic to measurement methodology or analysis method)  Depends on number of EOT modes used, and number of data sources

22 Random Random  Assumed very small due to smoothing Sampling Sampling  LF : based on annual sampling over 5X5 grid; damping ; truth=low-pass filtereds CGCM SST anomalies  HF: mode variance and how many modes resolved; truth= detrended variance of OI anomalies v2 ( ) Bias Bias  Pre-1940: night air temp comparison  assumed to be constant after 1940

s: warmest decade (at the time). Every year of 1990s warmer than 1980s average. Every year of 2000s warmer than 1990s average. 1990s: warmest decade (at the time).