A District Coordinator’s Guide WHAT TO EXPECT DURING CONSOLIDATED MONITORING David Millanti Audit and Compliance Branch Manager Kentucky Department of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title One Parent Involvement
Advertisements

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Preparing for an NCLB Monitoring Visit NCLB Regional Meetings Roundtable Discussion April 2007.
Forsyth County Schools
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction  Federal law requires DPI to monitor programming and implementation of the ESEA requirements, Title specific.
1 Workshop Part I: Federal Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Finance Officer Certification
Welcome to the Annual Meeting for Parents in a Title I Building.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Parental Involvement Requirements A Focused Look at Compliance Spring 2009.
FY12 Title I Common Program Review Findings Title I Technical Assistance Session May 11, 2012.
Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.
The Educational system Principles of Teaching Ag Ed.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
Title I, Part A Parental Involvement August 14, 2012 Anna Moore Florida Department of Education.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
VIRTUAL monitoring What is Virtual Monitoring EXAMPLES:  STAR SYSTEM – Vehicles Cell Phones – I phones or Smart Phones used as a security system detector.
WELCOME TO THE ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING FOR PARENTS PLEASE SIGN-IN.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Bureau of Federal Educational Programs Updates _________________________________.
Coordinators’ Academy Friday, July 24, :15-10:30 a.m. & 10:45-12 p.m. Shared Responsibilities for Title I, Part A, Grant Management at the School.
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Office.
Consolidated District Reviews and Monitoring Preparing for Desk Monitoring of Titles I-A, I-D, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2013.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Title I, Part A Updates KASBO Fall 2014 David Millanti Audit and Compliance Branch Manager, Division of Consolidated Plans and Audits
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training Parent Involvement
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
BAGGETT ELEMENTARY Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Baggett Elementary September 16, 2015.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2011–2012 Federal Program Monitoring English Learner Accountability.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I Administrative Meeting April 13, Title I Program Review Top Ten Jim Newkirk Program Improvement and Family Support Branch Division.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
What is Title 1? How Can I Be Involved? Required Annual Parent Meeting Fall 2016.
Parental Involvement Requirements
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Resource Allocation Strategy & Planning August 2017
Annual Title I, Part A Meeting
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Title I, Part A Parental Involvement
Annual Title I Meeting School Name Date.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Presentation transcript:

A District Coordinator’s Guide WHAT TO EXPECT DURING CONSOLIDATED MONITORING David Millanti Audit and Compliance Branch Manager Kentucky Department of Education 500 Mero Street, 8 th Floor CPT Frankfort, KY

 Become familiar with the process to select districts for monitoring;  Understand monitoring timelines;  Understand the district’s and state’s role in the monitoring process;  Distinguish between the program report and the consolidated report;  Examine common Title I, Part A findings;  Get answers to your questions; and  Give me project feedback. OUTCOMES

1.Random draw of district; Commissioner Holliday recommendation 2.Selected districts run through the selection flowchartselection flowchart 3.Districts are drawn until there are 14 selected for monitoring. SELECTING DISTRICTS

ActivityTimeframe Selection of districts to be monitored Directly after the release of accountability data Notification to the district from Commissioner Holliday Beginning to mid- November Task opens in ASSIST for uploading evidence for each program to be monitored About a month prior to the on-site visit GENERAL TIMELINE OF MONITORING

ActivityTimeframe District uploads evidence in ASSIST for each program to be monitored **Prior to on-site visit** Follow up report for each program sent to district Within 2 weeks of the Friday of the monitoring visit week Consolidated report sent to district Within 4 weeks after the program follow up period GENERAL TIMELINE OF MONITORING

DistrictState Assign points of contact for each program to be monitored Participate in AdvancEd training on how to use the monitoring platform within ASSIST Assign staff to conduct visits for each program Participate in AdvancEd training on how to use the monitoring platform within ASSIST RESPONSIBILITIES—PRIOR TO VISIT

DistrictState Create a schedule to accommodate district and state staff in the completion of the visit Upload documentation for each program Ensure schedule will allow for efficient and effective visit Review documentation provided and formulate questions RESPONSIBILITIES—PRIOR TO VISIT

DistrictState Participate in interviews as requested by state staff Conduct introductory meeting for district staff (1 large group) Facilitate interviews Conduct exit meeting for district staff (separate meeting for each program) RESPONSIBILITIES—DURING VISIT

DistrictState Ensure timely and appropriate follow up actions to any findings RESPONSIBILITIES—AFTER VISIT

Program ReportConsolidated Report Program-specific: monitoring indicators, language, required documentation. May include program- specific recommendations. Required actions for findings. One report per program General snapshot of cross- cutting issues and effective practices. Includes recommendations to help district tackle cross- cutting issues. No findings or required actions. One report, all programs. MONITORING REPORTS

QUESTIONS?

 Eligible Schools and Allocations: 2 (2.4%)  Homeless Programs: 10 (12%)  Parent Involvement: 45 (54.2%)  Highly Qualified Staff: 3 (3.6%)  District Program Design and Effectiveness: 1 (1.2%)  Services to Private Schools: 6 (7.2%)  Fiscal Management: 7 (8.4%)  School Needs Assessment: 1 (1.2%)  School Program Design and Effectiveness: 6 (7.2%)  TOTAL = 83 Note: Totals of percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding TITLE I, PART A FINDINGS

Homeless  Funds were reserved but not spent.  Lack of notification of rights of homeless students and families and services that could be provided.  Lack of practices that reduce barriers for homeless students. COMMON FINDINGS, SELECTED AREAS

Parent Involvement  Parents not involved in the design, evaluation, and revision of parent involvement policies, activities, school compacts.  Only SBDM representatives had opportunities  Policies, compacts did not exist or were not reviewed annually.  Activities were not evaluated annually and revised to meet emerging needs.  Annual meeting to inform parents of school participation in Title I, Part A was not held. COMMON FINDINGS, SELECTED AREAS

Fiscal Management  Use of allowable codes.  MUNIS did not match Ranking Report.  Processes related to finance.  Costs not allowable. COMMON FINDINGS, SELECTED AREAS

Review the Title I, Part A monitoring checklist.  Indicators  Examples of evidence  On-site expectations  District and school level  Title I, Part A Webpage Title I, Part A Webpage  Prior years’ monitoring reports Prior years’ monitoring reports RECOMMENDATION

QUESTIONS?