NSF 60 Revisions Purkiss December 4, 2013. Update on Chlorate SPAC established in NSF 60 – 2012 = 200 ppb. SPAC calculation did not utilize all sig figs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemical Analysis of Water
Advertisements

Appeal of NSF/ANSI 60 Drinking Water Additives Treatment Chemicals Chlorate SPAC JOINT COMMITTEE - DRINKING WATER ADDITIVES, TREATMENT CHEMICALS MEETING.
EPA Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, 10 & 20 Corrections to May 15, 2006 Final Rule That Updated the Methods That Updated the Methods Foston Curtis US EPA.
Drinking Water Regulation Revisions June Overview Regulation revisions are only to the state portion of the regulations No new federal rules are.
Statistical Decision Making Analysts must often make decisions about some condition in the real world. Assume that you have finished your BA in Political.
EPA EMS General Awareness Training Presented by David Guest, Esq. U.S. EPA Washington, D.C.
NSF 60 - Purkiss December 2, Bromide Levels in Sodium Chloride AWWA / WRF Research Project conducted by the Southern Nevada Water Authority. –Surveyed.
CO ‑ STAR: Colorado Strategy for Arsenic Reduction A Five Phase Compliance Assistance Program 1. Evaluate 2. Sample 3.Engineer4. Finance 5. Implement.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
NSF/ANSI 61 Drinking Water System Components - Health Effects Acceptance criteria….. Regulated contaminants: Includes USEPA and Health Canada regulated.
Overview of the New Content and Format Requirements for Prescription Drug Labeling.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
Slide 1 Presented by: Insert name MEMIC Safety Management Consultant Hazard Communication Standard and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) Overview.
Chemical Measurements in Drinking Water: Their Use in Monitoring Disinfection and its Consequences Kusum Perera, Ph.D.
NSF 60 - Purkiss November 30, Product Labeling Information Current Requirements of Section 3.5 The product container shall be clearly identified.
No Lead Laws & Regulations Tampa Bay Area Coop Meeting March 27, 2013.
MassDEP Drinking Water Program 2014 An Overview Yvette DePeiza, Director Drinking Water Program CERO - 7/29/2014.
Mississippi State Department of Health
Revisions to NAAQS –Data Handling and Interpretation NO 2 /SO 2 Update AQS Conference Colorado Springs June 2010 Rhonda Thompson US EPA, Office of Air.
WASH cholera / AWD EP&R training Key responses – Water Water treatment and Priorities in Different Settings Session 3.2 WASH Cholera / AWD EP&R training.
Understanding Bleach Degradation
$200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 MCLsMonitoring RulesReporting.
State of Alaska Implementation of MBDP Rules Carrie Bohan Environmental Program Specialist ADEC DW Program.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
OVERVIEW OF ENGINEERING MANUAL, Part 1 Susan Hoyler TIA, Director Standards Development and Promotion.
Issues Arising from The Quality of Drinking Water In Ireland Report Brendan Wall Senior Inspector Environmental Protection Agency.
Protecting Drinking Water: The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 16 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
MORRIS MILL PROPOSED URBAN SERVICES DISTRICT Presentation to County Council September 17, 2013.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Inspection Directions: An EMS Approach to Inspecting for Section 608 and 609 Compliance.
NSF 61 - Purkiss December 1, Diluted Surface Area- Section 3 Current Requirements of Section 3.2 require 100% complete formulation information for.
All About Sanitary Surveys David Edmunds Environmental Program Specialist ADEC Drinking Water Program Sustained Compliance: What It Means to Public Water.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
PSPC and the BW Convention Tokyo Tripartite Meeting, 2010.
Minimum sample count & protocol to address variability Pb release under Section 8 Peter Greiner, NSF International DWAJC Meeting - December, 2013 Tab 8:
ROPES & GRAY LLP Chemical Policy Reform: State/Federal Approaches Mark Greenwood.
Adem.alabama.gov Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) AWWA Alabama-Mississippi Section ADEM Regulation Update February 26, 2014 George Cox (334)
Dublin City Council Environment SPC: Lead Briefing 24 th June 2015.
Jeff Hebenstreit - UL 12/4/2013. Background Standard was revised: Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite for Chlorate SPAC = 200 ppb UL began evaluating samples.
Chair - Jeff Hebenstreit - UL 12/4/2013. Background Previous presentation – Evaluation of gases to Method E 12/2/2009 Background Utility contacted UL.
June Initially developed in 1983 to give employees a “right to know” Required a comprehensive hazard evaluation and communication process Chemical.
Ch 5 How to take measurements and make proper calculations We will deal with many types of measurements and calculations throughout the year. The types.
Chapter 9, Part E. VII. Calculating the Probability of Type II Errors A common decision in business is whether to accept a shipment or not, based upon.
Water Treatment: Disinfection Processes Current Technology vs. Alternatives.
Metrology Regulatory and Obsolescence Strategy Andrea DavisBridget Berardinelli.
Introduction Results & Discussion At present, disinfection of wells and drinking water pipelines is carried out by treating with chlorine- containing reagents.
Use of sodium bromide in swimming pools resulting in exposure to bromate Kevin Cox Senior Research Toxicologist NSF International.
Lead and Copper Rule (LCR)
BACKFLOW MANAGEMENT INC
Significant figures.
Combining NSF/ANSI Standards 60/61 Annex D and Annex E
Regen Media Filter & Filter Media Task Group Update
Treatment – Chlorine Disinfection
. 1.
Significant Figure Review
EPA’s 2014 Draft RIA EPA’s 2104 Draft RIA continues to rely heavily on PM2.5 co-benefits:
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
OHWARN Workshop Disruption of Service Rule Update
Treatment – Chlorine Dioxide
Purpose Reflect changes in scientific understanding since 1994
How many sig figs are in each of the
J. Alan Roberson, P.E. ASDWA Executive Director
Flint Water.
SAE battery safety standards committee UPDATE January 23, 2019
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
THE NATIONAL TREASURY FEEDBACK WORKSHOP ON THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FINANCIAL YEAR 2017/2018.
PFAS Background and Action Plan
Convert to scientific notation
Significance Tests: The Basics
Rounding and estimating: Upper and Lower Bounds (sig figs)
Presentation transcript:

NSF 60 Revisions Purkiss December 4, 2013

Update on Chlorate SPAC established in NSF 60 – 2012 = 200 ppb. SPAC calculation did not utilize all sig figs of MAC risk assessment which would have resulted in a SPAC of 300 ppb. Rounding rules have now been clarified in NSF 60. Ballot to correct SPAC passed the NSF 60 JC but failed the CPHC by 3 votes.

Update on Chlorate Correct derivation of SPAC based on 4 sources of chlorate source water hypochlorite chlorine dioxide or ozone one unknown source SPAC = 1.12 mg/L = 0.28 mg/L = 0.3 mg/L (rounded) 4

Update on Chlorate NSF International has tested 127 hypochlorite samples from Jan-Oct samples passed 200 ppb limit. –65 Mfrs and 20 Repackagers. 42 samples failed 200 ppb limit. –9 Mfrs and 33 Repackagers. 33% of samples failed for chlorate 12% of samples from manufacturers failed. 62% of samples from repackagers failed.

Update on Chlorate 18 failures are between ppb. 12 failures are between ppb. 5 failures are between ppb. 2 failures are between ppb. 4 failures are between ppb. 1 failure is between ppb. 43% of failed samples are in disputed range of ppb.

Reduction in Max Use Level in terms of ppm total chlorine Most hypochlorite products are listed at a MUL that equates to a total dose of 10 ppm chlorine. Reducing MUL for products failing for chlorine would result in the following: # ProductsChlorate ppb Reduced Chlorine MUL ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm

Chlorate SPAC If the chlorate SPAC was properly set at 300ppb it would reduce the failures from 42 (33%) to 24 (19%). Resulting MUL reductions as follows: # ProductsChlorate ppb Reduced Chlorine MUL ppm ppm ppm ppm

Chlorate SPAC Chlorate formation continues at significant levels in distribution, storage and handling to point of use. Compliance with the chlorate standard has to be a shared responsibility between producers, distributors and end users. AWWA standard provides recommendations to control chlorate levels through temperature control, dilution on receipt, inventory turns, etc. Therefore control should be focused on user practices as AWWA recommends.

Chlorate SPAC 2013 data indicates that implementation of the current SPAC for chlorate could severely impact the user population. Recommend to re-ballot SPAC correction to 300 ppb.

Bromate and NSF 60

Bromate SPAC Table D1: the drinking water regulated level (MCL/MAC) for bromate should be changed from 0.01 mg/L to mg/L to conform to the number of significant figures reported by the US EPA in the derivation of the MCL. The SPAC for bromate should consequently be changed from mg/L (5 ppb) to mg/L (3.3 ppb) based on the mg/L MCL and derivation per Annex G and rounding rules.

Bromate SPAC The SPAC for bromate referenced in should be reduced from 5 ppb to 3.3 ppb as noted above. The SPAC for “low bromate” in should be lowered from 3 ppb to 1.0 ppb. Alternatively “low bromate” could be removed from the standard. Annex G should be deleted, as it announced the lowering of the SPAC for bromate effective January 1, 2013, and so is no longer needed. Replace with a note describing what it addressed.

Hypochlorite Literature Requirements If the MUL for a hypochlorite product is lowered due to a bromate failure section of the standard currently requires a statement in manufacturer’s literature stating that the MUL has been lowered and why. NSF 60 does not require this for any other product or contaminant other than bromate in hypochlorite. It also goes above and beyond product requirements and is addressing a certification practice. Therefore this should be removed from the standard.

Hypochlorite Literature Requirements Section contains requirements for manufacturer’s literature regarding the use of hypochlorite with respect to controlling the amount of chlorate and perchlorate. This requirement should be restricted to literature that references NSF 60, and not all literature that might accompany a shipment.