April 9, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHRM Survey Findings: 2014 Strategic Benefits— Flexible Work Arrangements January 22, 2015.
Advertisements

SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Professional Services Industry September 25, 2013.
June 23, 2011 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
SHRM Poll: 2012 Holiday Schedules ©SHRM 2011 November 30, 2011 SHRM Poll: 2012 Holiday Schedules.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Flexible Work Arrangements December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Vacation’s Impact on the Workplace In collaboration with and commissioned by November 12, 2013.
SHRM/Globoforce Survey: Employee Recognition Programs, Fall ©SHRM 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Fall 2012 In collaboration.
SHRM Survey Findings: Social Networking Websites and Recruiting/Selection April 11, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Paid Leave in the Workplace
The Use of Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Decisions ©SHRM 2012 July 19, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Background Checking—The Use of Criminal Background.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Communicating Benefits January 10, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Communicating Benefits December 18, 2013.
June 13, 2011 SHRM Poll: Relief Efforts for Victims of the Japan Earthquake and Tsunami.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Communicating Benefits April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California— Flexible Work Arrangements April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: Hiring 2013 College Graduates June 11, 2013.
April 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Winter 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
July 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Work/Life Balance Policies.
July 12, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Technology and Its Impact on Employees During Nonworking Hours.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—High-Tech Industry September 25, 2013.
February 2012 SHRM Poll: Smoking Policies in the Workplace.
SHRM Survey Findings: Virtual Teams July 13, 2012.
May 9, 2011 SHRM Poll: Staff Levels and the Use of Contingent and Part-time Workers.
August 31, 2011 SHRM Poll: Disaster Planning in Organizations 10 Years After the Sept. 11 Terrorist Attacks.
SHRM Survey Findings: 2014 Older Workers Survey In collaboration with and commissioned by the Sloan Foundation September xx, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Use of Office Pools April 25, 2013.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—High-Tech Industry July 31, 2012.
January 24, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: Financial Education Initiatives in the Workplace.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Federal Government September 25, 2013.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Health Industry August 28, 2012.
Sponsored by AETNA June 29, 2011 SHRM Poll: The State of Consumer-Directed Health Plans in the Workplace.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Manufacturing Industry September 25, 2013.
SHRM Poll: Employee Discount Programs February 15, 2012.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Recruiting and Skill Gaps November 7, 2011.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Health Industry September 25, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Finance Industry September 25, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Aging Workforce— State of Older Workers in U.S. Organizations Funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation January 12, 2015.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—State and Local Government September 25, 2013.
August 16, 2011 SHRM Poll: Managing Employee Absences.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Construction, Mining, Oil and Gas Industry September 25, 2013.
November 17, 2010 SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning Poll.
SHRM/DATIA Poll: Drug Testing Efficacy ©SHRM 2011 September 7, 2011 SHRM Poll: Drug Testing Efficacy In collaboration with and commissioned by the Drug.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees January 10, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: 2014 Holiday Schedules October 15, 2013.
June 6, 2011 SHRM Poll: Succession Planning. Succession Planning ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  What percentage of organizations currently have succession.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees January 10, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Health Care April
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Wellness Initiatives December 18, 2013.
December 1, 2011 SHRM Poll: 2011Holiday Parties Holiday Parties ©SHRM 2011 Key Findings 2  Do organizations plan to have a 2011 end-of-year or.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California— Wellness Initiatives April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: Virtual Teams
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning
SHRM Poll: Managing Employee Absences
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Holiday/Year-End Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2012 Holiday/Year-End Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Communicating Benefits January 10, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Winter 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce April 12, 2012.
SHRM Poll: Smoking Policies in the Workplace
SHRM Poll: Disaster Planning in Organizations 10 Years After the Sept
SHRM Survey Findings: Background Checking—The Use of Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Decisions July 19, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Wellness Initiatives December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Violence
SHRM Survey Findings: Technology and Its Impact on Employees During Nonworking Hours July 16, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Hiring of 2012 University/College Undergraduates and Postgraduates July xx, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees April 23, 2014.
SHRM Survey Findings: The Hiring of 2012 University/College Undergraduates and Postgraduates July 12, 2012.
SHRM Survey Findings: State of Employee Benefits in the Workplace—Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees December 18, 2013.
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Benefits in California—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees April 23, 2014.
Presentation transcript:

April 9, 2012 SHRM Survey Findings: SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Definitions 2  Strategic workforce planning assessment: Evaluating an organization’s current and future critical talent needs using workforce modeling and scenario planning to identify potential skills gaps and talent shortages.  Older workers: Employees at an organization that are age 50 or older.  Younger workers: Employees at an organization that are age 31 and younger.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Key Findings 3  Have organizations conducted strategic workforce planning assessments to evaluate their current and future critical talent needs? Two-fifths of organizations (40%) have conducted strategic workforce planning assessments to identify their future workforce needs for the next 5 years. About one-third of organizations have identified their potential skills gaps for the next 5 years (36%). Twenty-nine percent of organizations have analyzed the impact of workers age 50 and over leaving their organizations.  Are organizations preparing for a potential shortage of talent when older workers begin to retire in greater numbers and leave the workforce? Although many organizations are at the initial stages of the preparation process, there has been a slight increase in awareness of a potential shortage of younger workers with the requisite skills needed to replace older workers who are retiring. More than one-quarter (27%) of organizations indicated they are becoming aware of the issue, an increase of nine percentage points from 2010 (18%). Thirty-nine percent of organizations are beginning to examine internal policies and management practices to address this issue (e.g., succession planning, phased retirement, etc.), showing no difference from Additionally, roughly one-fifth of organizations (18%) indicated that no changes were necessary after their evaluation, a decrease of 12 percentage points from 2010 (30%).  How much of an issue are the potential losses of talent for organizations and industries as older workers retire or leave their organizations over the next decade? Approximately one-half (46%) of organizations believe that potential loss of talent over the next decade is a potential problem for their organization while 27% indicated that it is not a concern. As older workers exit the workforce over the next decade, 39% of organizations believe that this will cause potential problems for their industry; however, approximately one- quarter (24%) do not foresee problems for their industry.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Key Findings 4  Which basic and applied skills do older workers have an advantage in compared with younger workers? Approximately one-half of organizations (51%) indicated that writing in English (grammar, spelling, etc.) was the top basic skill observed among older workers that is not readily seen among younger workers. Fifty-two percent of organizations reported professionalism/work ethic as the top applied skill that younger workers are less likely to exhibit.  Which steps are organizations taking to retain and recruit older workers in order to prepare for the potential skill gaps that may occur as younger workers enter and older workers exit the workforce? Nearly one-half of organizations (45%) have increased training and cross-training efforts. Roughly one-third (38%) of organizations have also developed succession plans and/or hired retired employees as consultants or temporary workers (30%). Organizations are also offering flexible work arrangements (27%) and offering part-time positions to older workers (24%).

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Has your organization conducted a strategic workforce planning assessment to…? 5 Note: n = Percentages shown indicate only the respondents who answered “Yes” to this question.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Has your organization conducted a strategic workforce planning assessment to…? Comparisons by Organization Sector Publicly owned for-profit (50%)>Privately owned for-profit (30%) 6 Comparisons by organization sector Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to have conducted a strategic workforce planning assessment to identify potential skills gaps over the next 5 years. Comparisons by organization staff size Organizations with 25,000 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 2,499 employees to have conducted a strategic workforce planning assessment to identify future workforce needs over the next 5 years. Comparisons by Organization Staff Size 25,000 or more employees (66%)> 1 to 99 employees (25%) 100 to 499 employees (36%) 500 to 2,499 employees (36%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Has your organization conducted a strategic workforce planning assessment to…? 7 Comparisons by organization staff size (continued) Organizations with 2,500 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 499 employees to have conducted a strategic workforce planning assessment to analyze the impact of older workers leaving the organization. Comparisons by Organization Staff Size 2,500 to 24,999 employees (47%) 25,000 or more employees (49%) > 1 to 99 employees (22%) 100 to 499 employees (22%) Organizations with 25,000 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 2,499 employees to have conducted a strategic workforce planning assessment to identify potential skills gaps over the next 5 years. Comparisons by Organization Staff Size 25,000 or more employees (63%)> 1 to 99 employees (23%) 100 to 499 employees (33%) 500 to 2,499 employees (33%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 There may be a shortage of younger workers with the skills and qualifications necessary to replace the older workers who are preparing to retire. Which of the following best describes your organization’s preparation for this change? 8 Note: Respondents who answered “Don’t know” were excluded from this analysis.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Overall, how would you describe your organization’s and industry’s potential loss of talent as a result of the possibility of the older workers retiring, or leaving the organization for other reasons, over the next decade? 9 Note: Respondents who answered “Don’t know” were excluded from this analysis. It is a crisisIt is a problemIt is a potential problem It is not a problem Organization (2012; n = 407) 1%26%46%27% Organization (2010; n = 369) 2%20%45%33% It is a crisisIt is a problemIt is a potential problem It is not a problem Industry (2012; n = 374) 7%30%39%24% Industry (2010; n = 317) 3%29%47%21%

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 In your opinion, what is/are the greatest basic skills gap between older workers and younger workers? 10 Note: n = 421. Respondents who answered “Don’t know” were excluded from this analysis. Respondents were asked to select their top two choices. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Basic skills for which older workers are perceived as having the advantage Percentage Writing in English (grammar, spelling, etc.)51% Technical (computer, engineering, mechanical, etc.)33% Mathematics (computation)16% Reading comprehension (in English)13% English language (spoken)12% Government/economics10% History/geography6% Science5% Foreign languages3% Humanities/arts1% Other9%

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 In your opinion, what is/are the greatest basic skills gap between older workers and younger workers? Comparisons by Organization Sector Government agencies (23%)> Privately owned for-profit (8%) Publicly owned for-profit (5%) 11 Comparisons by organization sector Government agencies are more likely than privately owned and publicly owned for-profit organizations to believe that government/economics is the greatest basic skills gap that younger workers have when compared with older workers. Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 In your opinion, what is/are the greatest applied skills gap between older workers and younger workers? 12 Note: n = 421. Respondents who answered “Don’t know” were excluded from this analysis. Respondents were asked to select their top two choices. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Applied skills for which older workers are perceived as having the advantage Percentage Professionalism/work ethic52% Critical thinking/problem solving27% Written communications16% Lifelong learning/self-direction16% Leadership15% Oral communications12% Ethics/social responsibility12% Information technology application11% Teamwork/collaboration10% Creativity/innovation4% Diversity2% Other2%

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Has your organization taken any of the steps below to prepare for potential skill gaps and/or retain and recruit older workers? 13 n = 415 YesNo Increased training and cross-training efforts45%55% Developed succession plans38%62% Hired retired employees as consultants or temporary workers30%70% Offered flexible work arrangements (e.g., job sharing, telework, etc.)27%73% Offered part-time positions to older workers24%76% Offered retirement planning programs23%77% Developed processes to capture institutional memory/organizational knowledge from employees close to retirement 17%83% Increased recruiting efforts to replace retiring employees17%83% Offered financial planning programs16%84% Offered wellness programs that are attractive to older workers14%86% Provided training to upgrade skills of older workers13%87% Encouraged older workers to work past traditional retirement age12%88%

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Has your organization taken any of the steps below to prepare for potential skill gaps and/or retain and recruit older workers? (continued) 14 n = 415 YesNo Tailored benefits offerings to encourage older workers to stay with organization 11%89% Increased automated processes (e.g., use of robotics)9%91% Created new roles within your organization, specifically designed to bridge a skills or knowledge gap 9%91% Provided opportunities for older workers to transfer to jobs with reduced pay and responsibilities 8%92% Asked older workers for feedback via survey or other mechanism about what would encourage them to stay with the organization 4%96% Established alternative career tracks for older workers3%97% Other5%95%

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Has your organization taken any of the steps below to prepare for potential skill gaps and/or retain and recruit older workers? Comparison by Organization Sector Publicly owned for-profit (56%)> Privately owned for-profit (37%) Nonprofit (31%) Government (26%) 15 Comparisons by organization sector Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit, nonprofit and government organizations to have developed succession plans in preparation for potential skills gaps that may occur as younger workers enter and older workers exit the workforce. Government agencies are more likely than publicly owned for-profit organizations to have encouraged older workers to work past traditional retirement age in preparation for potential skills gaps that may occur as younger workers enter and older workers exit the workforce.. Comparison by Organization Sector Government (32%)>Publicly owned for-profit (9%) Government agencies are more likely than publicly owned for-profit organizations to have developed processes to capture institutional memory/organizational knowledge from employees close to retirement to retain and recruit older workers in preparation for potential skills gaps that may occur as younger workers enter and older workers exit the workforce. Comparison by Organization Sector Government (26%)>Publicly owned for-profit (7%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Has your organization taken any of the steps below to prepare for potential skill gaps and/or retain and recruit older workers? Comparisons by Organization Sector Government (51%)> Publicly owned for-profit (24%) Privately owned for-profit (22%) 16 Comparisons by organization sector (continued) Government agencies are more likely than publicly owned for-profit or privately owned for-profit organizations to have hired retired employees as consultants or temporary workers in preparation for potential skills gaps that may occur as younger workers enter and older workers exit the workforce.. Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Has your organization taken any of the steps below to prepare for potential skill gaps and/or retain and recruit older workers? 17 Comparisons by organization staff size Organizations with 25,000 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 2,499 employees to identify future workforce needs over the next 5 years in preparation for potential skills gaps that may occur as younger workers enter and older workers exit the workforce. Comparisons by Organization Staff Size 25,000 or more employees (66%)> 1 to 99 employees (25%) 100 to 499 employees (36%) 500 to 2,499 employees (36%) Organizations with 2,500 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 499 employees to have developed succession plans in preparation for potential skills gaps that may occur as younger workers enter and older workers exit the workforce. Comparisons by Organization Staff Size 2,500 to 24,999 employees (58%) 25,000 or more employees (66%) > 1 to 99 employees (27%) 100 to 499 employees (31%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Has your organization taken any of the steps below to prepare for potential skill gaps and/or retain and recruit older workers? 18 Comparisons by organization size (continued) Organizations with 25,000 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 499 employees to have increased recruiting efforts to replace retiring employees in preparation for potential skills gaps that may occur as younger workers enter and older workers exit the workforce. Comparisons by Organization Size 25,000 or more employees (37%)> 1 to 99 employees (12%) 100 to 499 employees (14%) Organizations with 500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to have hired retired employees as consultants or temporary workers in preparation for potential skills gaps that may occur as younger workers enter and older workers exit the workforce. Comparisons by Organization Size 500 to 2,499 employees (38%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (42%) >1 to 99 employees (16%) Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to have offered financial planning programs in preparation for potential skills gaps that may occur as younger workers enter and older workers exit the workforce. Comparisons by Organization Size 500 to 2,499 employees (23%)>1 to 99 employees (7%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 How effective has the step(s) your organization has taken been in preparing for potential skill gaps and/or retaining and recruiting older workers? 19 Note: Response options were only rated by respondents who indicated that their organization had taken the specified step to prepare for potential skill gaps and/or retain and recruit older workers. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Too soon to evaluate Not at all effective Somewhat effective Very effective Developed succession plans (n = 157)27%3%52%17% Created new roles within your organization, specifically designed to bridge a skills or knowledge gap (n = 35) 26%6%37%31% Increased training and cross-training efforts (n = 179)24%1%50%26% Developed processes to capture institutional memory/organizational knowledge from employees close to retirement (n = 68) 22%1%56%21% Offered wellness programs that are attractive to older workers (n = 58) 17%5%53%24% Offered financial planning programs (n = 66)17%3%52%29% Increased recruiting efforts to replace retiring employees (n = 71) 15%4%62%18% Offered part-time positions to older workers (n = 99)15%3%38%43%

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 How effective has the step(s) your organization has taken been in preparing for potential skill gaps and/or retaining and recruiting older workers? (continued) 20 Note: Response options were only rated by respondents who indicated that their organization had taken the specified step to prepare for potential skill gaps and/or retain and recruit older workers. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Too soon to evaluate Not at all effective Somewhat effective Very effective Offered flexible work arrangements (e.g., job sharing, telework, etc.) (n = 111) 14%2%50%35% Tailored benefits offerings to encourage older workers to stay with organization (n = 44) 11%7%55%27% Increased automated processes (e.g., use of robotics) (n = 35) 11%0%63%26% Provided training to upgrade skills of older workers (n = 53) 11%2%64%23% Offered retirement planning programs (n = 95)11%7%51%32% Provided opportunities for older workers to transfer to jobs with reduced pay and responsibilities (n = 32) 9% 59%22% Encouraged older workers to work past traditional retirement age (n = 50) 8%6%52%34% Hired retired employees as consultants or temporary workers (n = 123) 4% 49%43%

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 To the best of your knowledge, what percent of employees, full-time and part- time, at your work location are age 50 or older? 21

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 To the best of your knowledge, what percent of employees, full-time and part- time, at your work location are age 50 or older? Comparisons by Organization Sector Privately owned for-profit (33%)>Government (9%) 22 Comparisons by organization sector Privately owned for-profit organizations are more likely than government agencies to have 1% to 19% of their staff age 50 or older. Comparisons by Organization Sector Government (40%)>Privately owned for-profit (19%) Government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to have 40% to 59% of their staff age 50 or older. Comparisons by organization staff size Organizations with 100 to 499 employees are more likely than organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees to have 1% to 19% of their staff age 50 or older. Comparisons by Organization Staff Size 100 to 499 employees (34%)>2,500 to 24,999 employees (12%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Demographics: Organization Industry 23 Percentage Manufacturing19% Health care and social assistance18% Professional, scientific and technical services18% Public administration12% Finance and insurance10% Education services8% Transportation and warehousing8% Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services6% Information, publishing industries5% Utilities5% Accommodation and food services4% Construction4% Note: n = 399. Percentages may not equal 100% due to multiple response options.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Demographics: Organization Industry (continued) 24 Note: n = 399. Percentages may not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Percentage Religious, grant-making, civic, professional and similar organizations4% Retail trade4% Repair and maintenance3% Wholesale trade3% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting2% Arts, entertainment and recreation2% Mining2% Real estate and rental and leasing2% Personal and laundry services1% Other9%

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Demographics: Organization Sector 25 Note: n = 398. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding.

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Demographics: Organization Staff Size 26 n = 390

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012 Demographics: Other 27 Does your organization have U.S.-based operations (business units) only or does it operate multinationally? U.S.-based operations only70% Multinational operations30% n = 407 Is your organization a single-unit organization or a multi- unit organization? Single-unit organization: An organization in which the location and the organization are one and the same 32% Multi-unit organization: An organization that has more than one location 68% n = 404 For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and practices determined by the multi-unit headquarters, by each work location or both? Multi-unit headquarters determines HR policies and practices 50% Each work location determines HR policies and practices 3% A combination of both the work location and the multi-unit headquarters determine HR policies and practices 48% Note: n = 282. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Which HR department/function was responded about throughout this survey? Corporate (companywide)69% Business unit/division17% Facility/location14% n = 282

SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning ©SHRM 2012  Response rate = 15%  Sample composed of 430 randomly selected HR professionals from SHRM’s membership  Margin of error +/- 5%  Survey fielded February 13, 2012 – March 12, Methodology For more survey findings, visit Follow us on Twitter: For more survey findings, visit Follow us on Twitter: SHRM-AARP Strategic Workforce Planning Project leader: Christina Lee, SHRM Research Project contributors: Jean Setzfand, vice president, Financial Security, AARP Ed Redfern, Jr., senior Issue specialist, Financial Security, AARP Mark Schmit, Ph.D., SPHR, vice president, SHRM Research Fred Emmert, Senior Speechwriter & Speakers Bureau Manager, SHRM Evren Esen, manager, SHRM Survey Research Center