Attachment B Water Quality Duration Curves for the Lower Eel River Watershed.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Applying Conditional Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen Season Flow Applied to classified and unclassified streams found in Appendix A and D of the Water Quality.

Advertisements

WEB-BASED LOAD DURATION CURVE Indrajeet Chaubey Purdue University Presented at the EPA Region 5 TMDL Practitioners.

Middle Eel River Initiative: A collaborative approach for ecological studies.

Application of the Continuous Slope-Area Method for Determining Stream Discharge and Development of Rating Curves in Ephemeral Channels Navajo Nation Hydroclimate.

Truckee River Water Quality: Current Conditions and Trends Relevant to TMDLs and WLAs Prepared for: Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility. City of.

Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality

Investigating Water Quality How do excess nutrients affect dissolved oxygen levels & impact water quality?

Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering.

Limestone Creek at Childers Road Site 1: WWL UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Site 1 GEOMEAN = 984 MPN/100mL Load Duration Curve Precipitation a b ec d a e.

INAFSM Twilight Seminar Compliance with the SWQMP-Part B requirements of Rule 13: Where to begin?

Project Slide Show. This 1893 photograph is of the Prather pump in the Shasta River Canyon about five miles upstream of the mouth of the river. Large.

Historic Flooding of May 7, 2009 for the City of Montgomery, Alabama

WEB-BASED LOAD DURATION CURVE Indrajeet Chaubey Purdue University.

Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.

Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.

Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.

KINEROS (KINematic runoff and EROSion model) Michael Schaffner Senior Service Hydrologist NOAA National Weather Service WFO Binghamton, NY Eastern Region.

Castro Valley Creek Stormwater Quality Monitoring Brake Pad Partnership Meeting June 22, 2005.

West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)

Flow Estimation in the Wood River Sub-Basin. Study Motivation To estimate an historical record at the mouth of the Wood River. –Enables comparison of.

Coordination of Indiana GIS through dissemination of data and data products, education and outreach, adoption of standards, and building partnerships Using.

Science to Sustain At-Risk Terminal Lakes The Walker Project.

ORSANCO Technical Committee Erich Emery USACE Great Lakes & Ohio River Division 11-Oct US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ®

Land use and nutrient patterns in upstream watersheds of St. Martin River Kris Beckert, Thomas Fisher, Roman Jesien, Ben Fertig, Judy O’Neil, Tim Carruthers,

GIS-Hydro Database for Tres Palacios Bay Stephanie Johnson GIS in Water Resources Class Presentation November 21, 2006 Dr. David Maidment – Advisor UT.

Lower Big Blue Watershed Draft Escherichia coli (E. coli) TMDL Stakeholder Meeting May 7, 2014.

Floyds Fork Bacteria TMDL Andrea M. Fredenburg Kentucky Division of Water TMDL Section November 28, 2012.

What is a Drainage Basin? Drainage basin Drainage basin  A drainage system which consists of a surface stream or a body of surface water together with.

Blue Creek -- SR 124 WQ Duration Curve (2004 Monitoring Data) Site: LES Dry Conditions Low Flows High Flows Mid-range Flows Moist Conditions ---

IDEM 205(j) Grant February 27, Who are we? The Upper Wabash River Basin Commission (UWRBC) was established by State Legislature in 2001 (IC ).

Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.

Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)

Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013.

West Fork Whitewater River E. coli Water Quality Duration Curve (all sites) IDEM Water Quality Data & USGS Gage Stream Flow Data Upstream Drainage.

Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality

Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.

BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.

2013 Water Quality Implementation Report Water Quality Management Plan for 2012 Water Year Provo River and Jordanelle & Deer Creek Reservoirs.

Indiana Water Quality Atlas LTHIA Integration February 19,2008.

Findings Is the City of Oberlin a source or a sink for pollutants? Water quality in Plum Creek as a function of urban land cover Jonathan Cummings, Tami.

Lower Putah Creek Community Watershed Management.

Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.

Year Three Review of Water Quality Monitoring on the Upper Strawberry River Project T.R. Brueggen 1 and J.L. Bouldin 1,2 1 Environmental Sciences.

Adem.alabama.gov Tombigbee Basin Up-date July 29, 2015 Mark Sport.

Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.

Water Quality Assessment Cypress Creek Adrian L. Vogl Aquatic Resources Texas State University Jason Pinchback River System Institute Texas State University.

Brian Haggard Director Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC through Beaver Water District.

Lake Anna Civic Association TMDL IP Monitoring October 27, 2012 Kenneth Remmers, LACA Water Quality Chairman.

Surface water and Barton Springs What do we know? –After a storm –The rest of the time Current study objectives TCEQ – USGS study approach Additional research.

Floyds Fork Bacteria TMDL Andrea M. Fredenburg Kentucky Division of Water TMDL Section February 19, 2013.

Pearl River Basin Watershed Conference USGS Gaging Operations in the Pearl River Basin Lower Mississippi Gulf Water Science Center March 17, 2015.

Herb Garn. Pheasant Branch watershed and monitoring locations USGS recording station Citizen Stream Monitoring site

Status of Investigation into Stony Creek Pollution Incident Kyle Ivar Winter, P.E. Deputy Regional Director Department of Environmental Quality Piedmont.

Yahara River Watershed RCPP

Watershed Origins of Sediment Loads

Loading of Phosphorus and Sediment to the South End of Cayuga Lake

Klamath ADR Hydrology Report

Commonwealth of Virginia Flow-Ecology

River Basins and Watersheds

Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference

Highway Drainage: Determining Flow Rates

Quantifying Flow Reduction Benefit of the Miners Ravine Off-Channel Detention Basin Using HEC-HMS

Defining and Targeting High Flows

Update on Monitoring Efforts

Radar Measurement Technologies

State Water Board Order WR95-17: MMWD Compliance Reporting

Indiana Water Quality Atlas LTHIA Integration

Eightmile Creek Barrier Assessment

Study Update Water Quality Modeling

Project Sites CE 365K Spring 2016.

Presentation transcript:

Attachment B Water Quality Duration Curves for the Lower Eel River Watershed

Eel River at SR 67 Bridge Fixed Station Site WQ Duration Curve ( Monitoring Data) Site: #31 (WWE ) 1,208 square milesIDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean of the 2001 Data =

Eel River Including Connelly Ditch WQ Duration Curve (1996 & 2001 Monitoring Data) Site: #14 (WWE ) 1060 square milesIDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean of 2001 Data =

Eel River Including Splunge Creek WQ Duration Curve (2001 Monitoring Data) Site: #4 (WWE ) 998 square milesIDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Birch Cr above Crooked Cr and Brush Cr at SR 46 WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 1996 E. coli Data) Site: #1 (WWE ) 39.2 square milesIDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load

Birch Cr below Crooked Cr and Brush Cr at CR300S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #2 (WWE ) 64.8 square milesIDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Splunge Cr at mouth on CR535W-CR550W WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 1996 E. coli Data) Site: #3 (WWE ) 46.1 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load

Unnamed Trib. #1 to Connelly Ditch WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #05 (WWE ) 3.12 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Unnamed Trib. #2 to Connelly Ditch at CR500S & CR100E WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #06 (WWE ) 1.56 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Connelly Ditch at CR50E WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #07 (WWE ) 6.24 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Connelly Ditch at CR600S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #08 (WWE ) square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Connelly Ditch upstream of Clay City Trib. on SR 246 WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #09 (WWE ) 15.6 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean = 63.90

Connelly Ditch at CR1100S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #11 (WWE ) square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean = 85.50

Connelly Ditch near mouth at CR1200S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 1996 & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #12&13 (WWE & WWE ) 31.2 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean of 1996 Data =

Connelly Ditch at CR400S near River Road WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #15 (WWE ) 4.68 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

White Oak Cr at CR1250S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #16 (WWE ) 9.6 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Lagoon Creek at CR850S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #21 (WWE ) 23.9 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Eel River Above Turkey Creek at SR 157 WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data) Site: #23 (WWE ) 1,131 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Lick Creek at CR150S, East of Bond Rd WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #24 (WWE ) 8.16 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Lick Creek at CR300S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #25 (WWE ) square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Hauser Creek a Trib. of Lick Creek at CR350S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #26 (WWE ) square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Lick Creek at CR450S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #27 (WWE ) 32.2 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Lick Creek above Beech Creek (Need Ditch-Beach Creek) at CR750S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 1996 E. coli Data) Site: #28 (WWE ) 38.8 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load

Beech Creek (Need Ditch-Beach Creek) on Arney Rd WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #29 (WWE ) 6.01 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =

Brush Creek at CR700S WQ Duration Curve ( Flow Data & 2001 E. coli Data) Site: #30 (WWE ) 3.09 square miles IDEM Data & USGS Gage Duration Interval High Flows Moist Conditions Mid-range Flows Dry Conditions Low Flows Office of Water Quality Total Maximum Daily Load Geometric Mean =