Jenny Scott FDA/CFSAN U.S. Delegate – Codex Committee on Food Hygiene

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulatory View of Microwave Pasteurization Gregory J. Fleischman, Ph.D. Institute for Food Safety and Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Advertisements

Differences and similarities between HACCP and Risk Analysis
EVALUATING THE EQUIVALENCE OF FOREIGN MEAT AND POULTRY FOOD REGULATORY SYSTEMS EVALUATING THE EQUIVALENCE OF FOREIGN MEAT AND POULTRY FOOD REGULATORY SYSTEMS.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Control of Nonconforming Product.
Susan Best, NRL, Australia WHO post-market surveillance for In Vitro Diagnostic Devices (IVD)
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
Microbiological Criterion to Assess the Acceptability of a Food Lot Jenny Scott FDA/CFSAN U.S. Delegate – Codex Committee on Food Hygiene.
1 MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (ERT 455) HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM Munira Mohamed Nazari School.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
Principles of Statistical Design for Microbiological Sampling
Food Microbiology Risk Reduction Program for Rutgers Dining Halls.
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
Introduction The main objective of the HACCP system is to provide a high degree (close to 100%) of assurance that a food ready to be consumed will be.
Microbiological Criteria - an introduction Jens Kirk Andersen The National Food Institute Technical University of Denmark.
(H.L.) HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
WHO FOOD COURSE SAFE FOOD PRODUCTION: HACCP HACCP and food regulators.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Corrective Action.
BRC Food Safety Quality Management System Training Guide
Perspectives on Pathogen Performance Standards Richard C. Whiting FDA, CFSAN College Park, MD December 10, SRA Annual Meeting.
DENNIS CRYER Veterinary Meat Hygiene Adviser Food Standards Agency
Supplier Overview of Johnson & Johnson MD&D Supplier Quality Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Receiving Inspection Process for Components and Finished.
Understanding ISO 22000:2005 TCISys.com.
Creating a Risk-Based CAPA Process
Example 5b: Operationalising a Performance Objective with a Microbiological Criterion for a Risk-Based Approach Kerry L. Dearfield, Ph.D. Scientific Advisor.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Product Contamination Control.
“The HACCP Approach to Analyzing and Managing Food Safety” January 10, 2008.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service FSIS Foodborne Illness Investigations: Current Thinking Scott A. Seys, MPH Chief,
Food Safety Assurance August Scope of food quality & food safety The term “food” covers any unprocessed, semi- processed, or processed item that.
Part 4: Corrective Actions Lisa Olsen Specialist Adviser, NZ Standards.
Example 1: GHP-based microbiological criteria Rosa M. Peran i Sala European Commission on behalf of the drafting team New Orleans, 11 th November 2012.
BASELINE software tool for calculation of microbiological criteria and risk management metrics for selected foods and hazards WP6 Model Development Final.
E. coli O157:H7 FSIS Actions Directive 10,010.1 Rev. 1 In-Plant Control Transit.
Example (5A) Operationalising a Performance Objective with a Microbiological Criterion for a Risk-Based Approach.
Important informations
Prime Responsibility for Radiation Safety
Lessons Learned from the Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein Incident Jenny Scott FDA CFSAN Office of Food Safety.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
Analyzing the Power and Error of Listeria monocytogenes Growth Challenge Studies Mark Powell U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington, DC IAFP 2009, Grapevine,
Example (5A) Operationalising a Performance Objective with a Microbiological Criterion for a Risk-Based Approach.
Presentation of Example 3A: MC for verifying the performance of a HACCP system by the FBO Drafting team: Claus Heggum (IDF) Jorge J. Guerrero Vallejos.
The Second Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress Presented by J. Glenn George Thursday, March 29, 2007 Day II – Track.
WHO FOOD LAW COURSE UK EXPERIENCE OF FOOD LAW DEVELOPMENT AND ENFORCEMENT.
1 OIE standards: Ante- and post-mortem meat inspection Stuart A. Slorach Chair, Animal Production Food Safety Working Group Regional Seminar for OIE National.
 This notice provides new instructions to Enforcement Investigations and Analysis Officers (EIAOs) and Public Health Veterinarians who were trained in.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
Presentation of Example 3A: MC for verifying the performance of a HACCP system by the FBO Drafting team: Claus Heggum (IDF) Jorge J. Guerrero Vallejos.
Purpose (what is intended to be achieved) To extend beyond the establishment and application of MC from GHP-based and HACCP- based (particularly lot acceptance.
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
Experiences with Controlling Listeria monocytogenes in Ready- to-Eat Food Processes W. Payton Pruett, Jr., Ph.D. ConAgra Refrigerated Foods USDA Listeria.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
© Food – a fact of life 2009 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) HACCP is a system which looks for and prevents potential problems before they.
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS. Prerequisite Programs Support the HACCP Plan.
HACCP Principle 3 – Establish Critical Limits
Warm-Up In your journal, write a minimum, 5 sentence paragraph that describes what you just watched in the video.
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP).
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Food Production Systems
Microbiological Sampling of Dairy Products
Regional Seminar for OIE National Focal Points on Animal Production Food Safety Importance of collaboration between the Veterinary Services and industry.
H A C C P HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS 1 December 2018
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
HACCP HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Presentation transcript:

Jenny Scott FDA/CFSAN U.S. Delegate – Codex Committee on Food Hygiene Microbiological Criterion to Assess the Acceptability of a Food Lot -Example 2 Jenny Scott FDA/CFSAN U.S. Delegate – Codex Committee on Food Hygiene

Working Group Members Argentina Thailand Uruguay United States Josefina Cabrera Marité Carullo Thailand Virachnee Lohachoompol Uruguay Inés Martinez United States Jenny Scott (Chair) John Bowers Philip Bronstein Kerry Dearfield Emily Mathusa Mark Powell Al Rainosek

Purpose The purpose of these microbiological criteria is to assess the acceptability of a milk powder lot intended for direct consumption. (Milk powder will be consumed without further treatment to inactivate microorganisms.)

Who should establish and who should apply? Established by: Competent authorities or food business operators Applied by: Competent authorities or food business operators

Food or food process (point in food chain where the MC is applied) Milk powder at the manufacturing facility or in commerce for verification of lot acceptability by competent authorities as part of domestic food control procedures Milk powder received for import/export inspection by competent authorities Milk powder for lot acceptance by food business operators purchasing from a supplier Milk powder at point of manufacture as a verification of process control

Organisms of concern Hygiene Criteria: Food Safety Criterion Mesophilic Aerobic Microorganisms Enterobacteriaceae Food Safety Criterion Salmonella spp.

Rationale for the organisms selected (food safety) Epidemiological data suggest that the only significant hazard to be controlled during manufacturing of dried products is Salmonella. Staphylococcus aureus or Bacillus cereus are only present sporadically at very low levels or occur as a result of major breakdowns of GHP. ICMSF Book 8

Rationale for the organisms selected (food hygiene) Mesophilic Aerobic Microorganisms - indicators of general contamination, shelf life or spoilage; not usually related to a health hazard Enterobacteriaceae – high numbers frequently indicate inadequacy of general hygiene ICMSF Book 2

Sampling plans Organism Analytical unit n c m M Mesophilic Aerobic Microorganisms 10 g 5 2 104 CFU/g 105 Enterobacteria-ceae < 3 MPN/g 9.4 MPN/g Salmonella spp. 25 g 10 Not detected in 25 g

Performance Characteristics of the Sampling Plans Enterobacteriaceae n c m M Pa Log CFU/g* 5 2 <3 MPN/g (<0.48 log CFU/g) 9.4 MPN/g (0.97 log CFU/g) 0.05 0.68 * std. dev. assumed to be 0.25 log CFU/g Assuming a log normal distribution, this sampling plan will provide 95% probability that a lot of food containing a geometric mean of 0.68 log CFU/g (4.79 CFU) and a std. dev. of 0.25 log CFU/g will not be accepted.

Performance Characteristics of the Sampling Plans Salmonella n c m Pa Log CFU/g* 10 Absence in 25 g 0.05 -1.97 * std. dev. assumed to be 0.25 log CFU/g Assuming a Poisson-log normal distribution, this sampling plan will provide 95% probability that a lot of food containing a geometric mean concentration of -1.97 log CFU/g (0.011 CFU/g) and a std. dev. of 0.25 log CFU/g will be detected and rejected if any of the 10 analytical units are positive for Salmonella.

Method(s) of analysis Mesophilic aerobic colony count: ISO 4833 Enterobacteriaceae: ISO 21528-1 (MPN technique) Salmonella spp.: ISO 6785 (Milk and milk products -- Detection of Salmonella spp.) or ISO 6579 (Horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp.)

Interpretation of results Salmonella Satisfactory if all values observed indicate the absence of the bacterium; the lot is accepted Unsatisfactory if the presence of the bacterium is detected in any of the sample units; the lot is rejected

Interpretation of results Mesophilic aerobic colony count and/or Enterobacteriaceae Satisfactory, if all the values observed are ≤ m; the lot is accepted Acceptable, if a maximum of c units (2) have values that are between m and M and the rest of the values observed are ≤ m; the lot is accepted Unsatisfactory if one or more of the values observed is > M or more than c units (2) are between m and M; the lot is rejected

Actions in case of non-conformance – food business operators Salmonella criterion Food business operators purchasing from a supplier: (1) Notify the supplier; (2) do not use the milk powder, or if the milk powder has been used do not ship the product; (3) if product has been shipped, recall the product; and (4) determine appropriate steps with respect to the supplier. Food business operators manufacturing the milk powder: (1) prevent the affected lot from being released for human consumption; (2) recall the product if it has been released for human consumption; and (3) determine and correct the root cause of the failure.

Actions in case of non-conformance – competent authorities Salmonella criterion Prevent the affected lot from being released for human consumption; Ensure recall of product by the food business operator if it has been released for human consumption; Reject lot at port of entry.

Actions in case of non-conformance – food business operators Mesophilic aerobic microorganisms and/or Enterobacteriaceae Food business operators purchasing from a supplier: (1) Notify the supplier; (2) determine appropriate disposition of the non-conforming lot (e.g., refuse lot or accept marginal quality lot, depending on business contractual arrangements) Food business operators manufacturing the milk powder: (1) Check on the efficacy of heat treatment and controls for prevention of recontamination, (2) determine and correct the root cause of the failure (3) as appropriate, review and revise monitoring procedures, environmental surveillance and prerequisite programs, and (4) determine disposition of the lot.

Actions in case of non-conformance – competent authorities Mesophilic aerobic microorganisms and/or Enterobacteriaceae Determine whether to reject lot at port of entry (e.g., destroy at port of entry or return to country of origin) notify the manufacturing facility to take corrective actions with respect to hygiene practices and to verify the efficacy of heat treatment and procedures to prevent recontamination reject lot as part of domestic food control procedures; determine disposition of the lot (e.g., require destruction, allow reconditioning of the lot or use of the lot for other purposes)