Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(your state) Master Farmer Program
Advertisements

Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
ALLEN BERTHOLD TEXAS WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE Water Quality and Copano Bay Watershed Efforts.
Presented by Melanie Williams. Plan Schedule Water Quality Status Trends Chain of Lakes Basinwide Issues Recommendations & goals Public Review Comments.
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
Fecal Coliform “Hot Spots” Monitoring Stacie Greco Senior Environmental Specialist Alachua County Environmental Protection Department.
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Fecal Colform Bacteria Contamination during Rain Events in Sayler’s Creek, Virginia Blake N. Robertson Senior Honors Research Under the Supervision of.
Ballston Lake & Watershed In Crisis Issues and Observations Ballston Lake Improvement Association August 11, 2014 eColi toxic algae.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
TMDL – Fecal coliform Frank Henning UGA Watershed Extension Agent.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
BACTERIAL CONCENTRATIONS IN BULL CREEK AUSTIN, TEXAS Patrick Sejkora.
Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality Section N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Chapter 22: How We Pollute and Clean Water. Water Pollution Refers to degradation of water quality. –Generally look at the intended use of the water –How.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
TMDL – Fecal coliform Frank Henning UGA Watershed Extension Agent.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Hillsborough River Fecal Coliform BMAP Process Oct. 22, 2008.
Sandy Wingert February 25, 2010.
Fecal Coliform Aquatic Ecology.
Chowan River TMDL Development Tidewater Area 08/26/04.
Deployment of Microbial Source Tracking to Identify Sources of Fecal Pollution in Water C. Hagedorn, A. Hassall, M. Saluta, J. Dickerson, and T. Wade 1.
Restoring Water Quality: Using Nonpoint Source Funding to Improve Water Quality for Recreation Brooke Shireman Kentucky Division of Water.
Understanding the TMDL and I-Plan process Austin’s water quality & possible solutions Improving Austin Streams process and your involvement Welcome!
Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Critique of North Branch of Sunrise River TMDL Nate Topie and Taylor Hoffman.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.
Floyds Fork Bacteria TMDL Andrea M. Fredenburg Kentucky Division of Water TMDL Section February 19, 2013.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Eric Ferguson King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks November 4, 2015 Existing Conditions Assessment.
Volunteer/State Partnerships Inspire Grassroots Action Cheryl Snyder Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
St. Johns County Water Quality Program Update March 15,
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Water Pollution: Pollutant Transport Mechanisms
Mulberry River Watershed
XVI World Water Congress May 31, 2017 Cancun, Mexico
Module 24 Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria
Water Pollution.
Water Pollution.
Total Maximum Daily Loads Development for Holdens Creek and Tributaries, and Pettit Branch Public Meeting March 26, 2008.
Infectious Agent : Pathogens
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model:
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
An Overview of Bacterial Source Tracking - Methods and Applications
Water Pollution.
Water Pollution.
Presentation transcript:

Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau May 29, 2007

Meeting Objectives: Introductions Introductions E. coli 101 E. coli 101 Michigan’s Water Quality Standard Michigan’s Water Quality Standard 2005 E. coli sampling data review 2005 E. coli sampling data review Section 303(d) impaired listing for Pine and Mill Creeks Section 303(d) impaired listing for Pine and Mill Creeks TMDL development schedule TMDL development schedule Proposed DEQ sampling plan for Pine and Mill Creeks Proposed DEQ sampling plan for Pine and Mill Creeks

What is E. coli?

The Basics… Escherichia coli is a sub- set of fecal coliforms whose presence indicates fecal contamination. Escherichia coli is a sub- set of fecal coliforms whose presence indicates fecal contamination. It is associated with the fecal material of warm- blooded animals and is an indicator organism used to predict the presence of other harmful microorganisms. It is associated with the fecal material of warm- blooded animals and is an indicator organism used to predict the presence of other harmful microorganisms.

What are the impacts associated with E. coli? E. coli and associated microorganisms when taken into the body can cause severe sickness. E. coli and associated microorganisms when taken into the body can cause severe sickness. Bacterial infections - Cholera, salmonellosis Bacterial infections - Cholera, salmonellosis Viral infections - hepatitits, gastoenteritis Viral infections - hepatitits, gastoenteritis Protozoa infections – cryptosporidiosis, giardiasis Protozoa infections – cryptosporidiosis, giardiasis Once these pathogens are in a stream or lake, they can infect humans through ingestion, skin contact or contaminated fish. Once these pathogens are in a stream or lake, they can infect humans through ingestion, skin contact or contaminated fish.

How much is too much? Michigan’s WQS for total body contact for E. coli is 130 E. coli per 100 ml (as a 30-day geometric mean) or 300 E. coli per 100 ml (during the same sampling event) Michigan’s WQS for total body contact for E. coli is 130 E. coli per 100 ml (as a 30-day geometric mean) or 300 E. coli per 100 ml (during the same sampling event) Total body contact recreation May 1 to October 31 Total body contact recreation May 1 to October 31 Risk based number Risk based number

What are the sources of E. coli? Two major ones: Point and non-point sources. Two major ones: Point and non-point sources. Point sources directly discharge to a waterbody via a pipe (WWTP or CSO). Point sources directly discharge to a waterbody via a pipe (WWTP or CSO).

Non-point sources: Non-point sources: illicit connections illicit connections

Run-off

Agricultural inputs

2005 Monitoring – Pine Creek Sampled 5 locations weekly from July – September Sampled 5 locations weekly from July – September 12 weeks of data 12 weeks of data

Figure 1. Pine Creek E. coli sampling locations, vicinity of Hartford, Michigan, 2005.

Data Summary Pine Creek Pine Creek With exception of one day, E. coli concentrations exceeded daily maximum and 30-geometric mean 100% of the time With exception of one day, E. coli concentrations exceeded daily maximum and 30-geometric mean 100% of the time Daily maximums ranged from 290 E. coli per 100 ml at 64 th St. to > 3 million E. coli per 100 ml at Red Arrow Hwy. Daily maximums ranged from 290 E. coli per 100 ml at 64 th St. to > 3 million E. coli per 100 ml at Red Arrow Hwy. 30-day geometric mean E. coli concentrations ranged from 386 E. coli per 100 ml at 64 th St. to >6,000 E. coli per 100 ml at Red Arrow Hwy. 30-day geometric mean E. coli concentrations ranged from 386 E. coli per 100 ml at 64 th St. to >6,000 E. coli per 100 ml at Red Arrow Hwy.

E. coli/100 ml Figure 2. Daily maximum E. coli in Pine Creek, Van Buren County, Michigan, 2005.

E. coli/100 ml Figure day Geometric mean E. coli Pine Creek, Van Buren County, Michigan, 2005.

Figure 4. Mill Creek E. coli sampling locations, vicinity of Watervliet, Michigan, 2005.

Data Summary Mill Creek Mill Creek E. coli concentrations exceeded the daily maximum and 30- geometric means 100% of the time E. coli concentrations exceeded the daily maximum and 30- geometric means 100% of the time Daily maximums ranged from 576 E. coli per 100 ml at Hill Rd. to > 17,000 E. coli per 100 ml at 67 th Ave. Daily maximums ranged from 576 E. coli per 100 ml at Hill Rd. to > 17,000 E. coli per 100 ml at 67 th Ave. 30-day geometric mean E. coli concentrations ranged from 845 E. coli per 100 ml at Hill Rd. to 4,480 E. coli per 100 ml at 77 th Ave.. 30-day geometric mean E. coli concentrations ranged from 845 E. coli per 100 ml at Hill Rd. to 4,480 E. coli per 100 ml at 77 th Ave..

Figure 5. Daily Maximum E. coli in Mill Creek, Van Buren/Berrien Counties, Michigan, E. coli/100 ml

Figure day Geometric mean E. coli in Mill Creek, Van Buren/Berrien Counties, Michigan, E. coli/100 ml

Section 303(d) listing DEQ determined there was enough data to justify listing both water bodies as impaired for total body contact DEQ determined there was enough data to justify listing both water bodies as impaired for total body contact Requires the development of a Total Maximum Daily Load Requires the development of a Total Maximum Daily Load TMDL currently scheduled for development in 2008 TMDL currently scheduled for development in 2008 Schedule may be adjusted due to budget situation Schedule may be adjusted due to budget situation

What is a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)? Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires development of TMDLs for waterbodies that are not meeting designated uses. TMDLs can cover variety of pollutants.

How will the TMDL process work? The TMDL establishes allowable loading of pollutants to meet WQS based on pollution sources and in-stream conditions. The process allows the DEQ to establish controls to reduce pollution and restore the quality of the resource.

Proposed DEQ study Extensive field reconnaissance of watersheds Extensive field reconnaissance of watersheds Recognized multiple sources of E. coli Recognized multiple sources of E. coli Use field information to aid in sampling location ID Use field information to aid in sampling location ID E. coli sampling E. coli sampling ambient (routine) monitoring ambient (routine) monitoring wet weather wet weather TMDL TMDL Bacterial source tracking sampling Bacterial source tracking sampling collecting continuous flow data collecting continuous flow data

Status of the Study On hold due to State budget problems On hold due to State budget problems Study design may change depending on financial resources available Study design may change depending on financial resources available

MDEQ Information District contact: Scott Miller District contact: Scott Miller or or TMDL contact: Christine Alexander TMDL contact: Christine Alexander or or