16 - 20 Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 1 ARTIFICIAL WETLAND MODELLING FOR PESTICIDES FATE AND TRANSPORT USING A 2D MIXED HYBRID FINITE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fluidyn -FLOWSOL March D numerical simulation of surface flows.
Advertisements

Subsurface Fate and Transport of Contaminants
1 A new iterative technique for solving nonlinear coupled equations arising from nuclear waste transport processes H. HOTEIT 1,2, Ph. ACKERER 2, R. MOSE.
1 Modélisation et simulation appliquées au suivi de pollution des nappes phréatiques Jocelyne Erhel Équipe Sage, INRIA Rennes Mesures, Modélisation et.
A modified Lagrangian-volumes method to simulate nonlinearly and kinetically adsorbing solute transport in heterogeneous media J.-R. de Dreuzy, Ph. Davy,
Features of POLLUSOL Flow model Flow model Homogeneous, Isotropic, Heterogeneous and Anisotropic medium Homogeneous, Isotropic, Heterogeneous and Anisotropic.
2L 2aL s h T Introduction Zach Frye, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Faculty Advisors: Mohamed Elgindi, and John Drost, Department of Mathematics Funded.
Dynamics I 23. Nov.: circulation, thermal wind, vorticity 30. Nov.: shallow water theory, waves 7. December: numerics: diffusion-advection 14. December:
Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for the PHAST Simulator Ken Kipp and David Parkhurst.
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
Enhancement of Pollutant Removal in Bioretention Cells by Soil Amendment Glenn O. Brown, Professor, PE, Ph.D., D.WRE Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering.
Chapter 3 Steady-State Conduction Multiple Dimensions
Peyman Mostaghimi, Martin Blunt, Branko Bijeljic 11 th January 2010, Pore-scale project meeting Direct Numerical Simulation of Transport Phenomena on Pore-space.
Numerical Porous Media KAUST SRI Center Modeling and simulation of multiscale problems N Ahmed, VM Calo, Y Efendiev, H Fayed, O Iliev, Z.Lakdawala, K.Leonard,
Conservative and Reactive Solutes Conservative do not react with soil / groundwater Chloride is a good example Sorbed onto mineral grains as well as organic.
REVIEW. What processes are represented in the governing equation that we use to represent solute transport through porous media? Advection, dispersion,
Reactors . ä Reactor: a “container” where a reaction occurs ä Examples: ä Clear well at water treatment plant (chlorine contact) ä Activated sludge tank.
National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics Modeling physical and ecological dynamics of channel systems that shape Earth’s surface Moving boundary problems.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 12 – MULTI- DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODELS.
Source Terms Constant Concentration Injection Well Recharge May be introduced at the boundary or in the interior of the model.
National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics Modeling physical and ecological dynamics of channel systems that shape Earth’s surface Moving boundary problems.
Interdisciplinary Modeling of Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop July 18, 2005 Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Greg Pohll Division.
HYDRUS_1D Sensitivity Analysis Limin Yang Department of Biological Engineering Sciences Washington State University.
Juan Carlos Ortiz Royero Ph.D.
Direct and iterative sparse linear solvers applied to groundwater flow simulations Matrix Analysis and Applications October 2007.
Density-Dependent Flows Primary source: User’s Guide to SEAWAT: A Computer Program for Simulation of Three-Dimensional Variable-Density Ground- Water Flow.
BIOPLUME II Introduction to Solution Methods and Model Mechanics.
Finite Differences Finite Difference Approximations  Simple geophysical partial differential equations  Finite differences - definitions  Finite-difference.
Lecture Objectives: -Define turbulence –Solve turbulent flow example –Define average and instantaneous velocities -Define Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes.
Predicting Vapor Intrusion Risks in the Presence of Soil Heterogeneities and Anthropogenic Preferential Pathways Brown University Ozgur Bozkurt, Kelly.
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(11): , 2011 ISSN Monte Carlo Optimization to Solve a Two-Dimensional Inverse Heat.
In-term project presentation by Kanish Jindal Modeling of chlorine contact chamber at West Lafayette treatment plant.
A conservative FE-discretisation of the Navier-Stokes equation JASS 2005, St. Petersburg Thomas Satzger.
1 ELEC 3105 Basic EM and Power Engineering Start Solutions to Poisson’s and/or Laplace’s.
1 CHAPTER 6 HEAT TRANSFER IN CHANNEL FLOW 6.1 Introduction (1) Laminar vs. turbulent flow transition Reynolds number is where  D tube diameter  u mean.
The Governing Equations The hydrodynamic model adopted here is the one based on the hydrostatic pressure approximation and the boussinesq approximation,
Illustration of FE algorithm on the example of 1D problem Problem: Stress and displacement analysis of a one-dimensional bar, loaded only by its own weight,
Groundwater pumping to remediate groundwater pollution March 5, 2002.
Two-Dimensional Mass and Momentum Transport Modeling for PEM Fuel Cells Chunmei Wang Po-Fu Shih Apr 29, 2008 EGEE 520 MATH MODELING.
The Littoral Sedimentation and Optics Model (LSOM)
Dynamic plant uptake modeling Stefan Trapp. Steady-state considerations: simple & small data need However: often emission pattern is non-steady, e.g.:
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Ch 24 pages Lecture 11 – Equilibrium centrifugation.
Tracers for Flow and Mass Transport
Lecture – 3 The Kinetics Of Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions Dr. AKM Shafiqul Islam
Source Terms Constant Concentration Injection Well Recharge May be introduced at the boundary or in the interior of the model.
Urban Water Global water aspects
© 2015 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 34.
Final Project I. Calibration Drawdown Prediction Particle Tracking
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
Quantifying methane hydrate saturation in different geologic settings Gaurav Bhatnagar 1, George J. Hirasaki 1, Walter G. Chapman 1 Brandon Dugan 2, Gerald.
Nguyen Thi Kim Phuong Institute of Chemical Technology
Water Resources Assessment Main Resources – Surface water – Groundwater – Unconventional Tools – Flood routing/delineation models – Runoff models – GIS.
A Fully Conservative 2D Model over Evolving Geometries Ricardo Canelas Master degree student IST Teton Dam 1976.
1 Simulation of the Couplex 1 test case and preliminary results of Couplex 2 H. HOTEIT 1,2, Ph. ACKERER 1, R. MOSE 1 1 IMFS STRASBOURG 2 IRISA RENNES 1.
Clemson Hydro Heat Transport Temperature of a wolf pup.
Mixing Length of Hydrogen in an Air Intake Greg Lilik EGEE 520.
CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT MECHANISMS
Modeling of heat and mass transfer during gas adsorption by aerosol particles in air pollution plumes T. Elperin1, A. Fominykh1, I. Katra2, and B. Krasovitov1.
Objective Introduce Reynolds Navier Stokes Equations (RANS)
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AND REQUIREMENTS
Project 1. Proposal. Describe the problem you propose to analyze. Include Background: describe the problem you intend to analyze, give motivation for.
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology
Hamdache Abderrazaq 1*, Belkacem Mohamed 1, Hannoun Nourredine 2
Free vs. Forced Convection
Fluid Flow Regularization of Navier-Stokes Equations
Modelling tools - MIKE11 Part1-Introduction
Mathematical modeling techniques in the engineering of landfill sites.
Step change in the boundary condition of conduction problems
Presentation transcript:

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 1 ARTIFICIAL WETLAND MODELLING FOR PESTICIDES FATE AND TRANSPORT USING A 2D MIXED HYBRID FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION Part 2/2 Wanko, A., Tapia, G., Mosé, R., Gregoire, C

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 2

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 3 PESTICIDES DYNAMICS MODELING ProcessesModel Flow :Mass Balance Concept / Richards Equation Transport :Tanks (series or parallel) / Convection-dispersion Adsorption : Freundlich isotherm / linear distribution Kinetics :Zero order, first order, Michaelis – Menten.

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 4 PESTICIDES DYNAMICS MODELING 2D Discretization :Triangular meshs Unknown parameters : o Pressure head and solute concentrations (edges, mesh center) o Water and transport fluxes through the edges RT0 Numerical method : Mixte Hybrid Finite Element (MHFE) -Particularly well adapted to the simulation of heterogeneous flow field - The unknown parameters have the same order approximation

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 5 OSCILLATION CONTROL FOR ADVECTION DOMINANT PROBLEM - FLUX LIMITER - Vx,Vz the pore water velocity in x and z directions, respectively (LT -1 ), -  x,  z the grid spacing in the x and z direction, respectively (L), - Dxx, Dzz, Dxz the dispersion coefficients (L 2 T -1 ). In the literature this problem is solve by using : Operator Spliting Technique (OST) + a slope limiting tool (Ackerer et al.,1999 ; Siegel et al., 1997 ; Oltean., 2001; Hoteit et al., 2002 ; Hoteit et al., 2004 ) Advection dominant problem : Pe (Peclet number) = Numerical oscillations

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 6 OSCILLATION CONTROL FOR ADVECTION DOMINANT PROBLEM - FLUX LIMITER Advection dominant problem : A new approche including a flux limiter oTransport fluxes (the previous formulation) oTransport fluxes (the new formulation) The weight of advection is decreased The weight of advection is increased Water fluxes  [0 ; 1]

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 7 One-dimensional Transport verification – The flux limiter rr ss K s (cm/d)   cm -1 ) n h e (cm) Glendale clay loam soil parameter (Kirkland et al., 1992) ConditionHydrodynamicsTransport Initial Boundary Initial and Boundary Conditions

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 8 One-dimensional Transport - Flux limiter effect for different Peclet number a) max Pe=1.02 b) max Pe=1.02x10 3

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 9 b) max Pe=1.02x10 7 One-dimensional Transport - Flux limiter effect for different Peclet number Sensitivity analysis of the  parameter a) max Pe = 10.2 b) max Pe=1.02x10 3 c) max Pe=1.02x10 6

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 10 Two-dimensional Transport - Flux limiter effect for different Peclet number Two dimensional convection-dispersion problem (left) and regular mesh (right) CaseVx (m d -1 ) Vy (m d -1 )  L (m 2 d - 1 )  T (m 2 d - 1 ) Pe x x x 10 4 Parameters used in various cases

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 11 Two-dimensional Transport - Flux limiter effect for different Peclet number a) MHFE numerical solution b) analytical solution Vx (m d -1 ) Vy (m d -1 )  L (m 2 d -1 )  T (m 2 d -1 ) Δx (m) Δ y (m) Pe Case 1 : parameters used X Y

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 12 Two-dimensional Transport - Flux limiter effect for different Peclet number Case 2 : parameters used Vx (m d -1 ) Vy (m d -1 )  L (m 2 d -1 )  T (m 2 d -1 ) Δx (m) Δ y (m) Pe a) MHFE without flux limiting b) MHFE with flux limiting,  = 1 c) Analytical solution Iso-concentration lines: second test case X Y

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 13 Case 3 : parameters used Vx (m d -1 ) Vy (m d -1 )  L (m 2 d -1 )  T (m 2 d -1 ) Δx (m) Δ y (m) Pe Two-dimensional Transport - Flux limiter effect for different Peclet number Iso-concentration lines: second third case a) MHFE without flux limiting b) MHFE with flux limiting,  = 1 c) Analytical solution X Y

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 14 Adsorption model - Verification : the isotherm linear adsorption coefficient C K is solution concentration of the triangular element K [ML -3 ], S K is absorbed concentration of the triangular element K [ML -3 ]. Test case : K d = 2.38 l/kg (Atrazine ; Vryzas et al., 2007 ) Time (day) C(z = 0, t > 0) = 1.0 mg/l C(z, t = 0) = 0.1 mg/l

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 15 Kinetic models - Verification Simple kinetic models Conditions Zero order First order Michaelis – Menten C(t = 0, z), the initial concentration, k 2, the dissipation rate, k 1, the first order rate constant the maximum reaction rate, K m the Michaelis constant X 0 the amount of substrate to produce the initial population density

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 16 Kinetic models – Verification Initial conditions and kinetic parameters of the tested cases Kinetic modelsInitial concentrationKenitic parameters Without kinetic -- Michaelis – Menten Ordre z é ro 1 er ordre Zero order first order Michaelis - Menten

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 17 Lysimeters : Construction and instrumentation - Model Validation Aim: to elaborate a pilot-constructed wetland design based on bioaugmentation-phytoremediation coupling in order to study and improve the biological potentialities concerning the pesticides remediation CONCEPTION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE PILOT-PLANT The pilot-plant consists of 12 lysimeters Depth : 1.5m Ø : 3m 12 storage/collector tanks Depth : 2.55m Ø : 1m tank lysimeter Top view pipe The filtrating media - Coarse gravel (10/14), 25 cm depth, - Fine gravel (4/8), 25 cm depth, - Sediments («80µ), 30 cm depth, Bottom layer Top layer 9 planted bed Phragmites australis, Typha latifolia, Scirpus lacustris

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 18 Lysimeters : Construction and instrumentation - Model Validation INPUT -water + pollutant (glyphosate, diuron, copper) MATERIAL -12 Lysimeters -flexible feeding pipe -12 collector tanks ANALYSES Tests on influents and effluents will be made at different depths Tests on sediments Top view Cross view

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 19 Lysimeters : Construction and instrumentation - Model Validation ANALYSES Tests on influents and effluents will be made at different depths Tests on sediments

Sept 2007Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control 20