Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/2004 90 students have left the county or state 243.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.
Advertisements

NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 28, 2008.
AYP UPDATE Rachelle Tome Maine Department of Education
Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
- 0 - Update: Recommended school interventions in response to loss of enrollment, academic under-performance, and NCLB Oakland Unified School District.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
The Freshman On-Track Rate: A Leading Indicator of High School Graduation John Q. Easton Consortium on Chicago School Research July 2, 2008.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
RATIONALE Why should we raise student achievement? EXTERNAL MANDATES Indiana Public Law 221 Federal No Child Left Behind Act.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Information Session Juliane Dow, Associate Commissioner Accountability & Targeted Assistance Massachusetts Department of.
Overview of MCAS Results and Adequate Yearly Progress Determinations 2006 Brockton School Committee November 21, 2006.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Implementing the 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate. Projected Four-Year Dropout Rate – A measure of the cumulative proportion of the 9 th grade class that.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
The New Age: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) By Don Bertucci, Chaffey Unified School District ROP.
DECEMBER 10, 2014 MARK SASS EDUCATION REFORM. GOALS FOR TODAY Overview of three main pieces of legislation that impact our practice NCLB RTT SB 191 Philosophical.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008.
1 Differentiated Accountability. 2 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability Model On July 28, 2008, Florida was named one of six states to pilot a differentiated.
2011 School Improvement Technical Assistance Meeting Dr. Reginald Eggleston Assistant Superintendent Division of Federal and Special Programs October 27,
Highlights of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver Renewal Application.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Title I Faculty Presentation (Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation) 1 Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Community Partnership Presentation September 3, 2010.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Elements School Improvement District.
Appoquinimink School District A Bright Horizon for MHS Corrective Action Plan 3 Year Plan December, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
From the Board Room To the Classroom PDK Panel Discussion September 19, 2002.
GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK David.
NCLB: The Trojan Horse of the 21 st Century Opinions and Thoughts of Robert C. McCracken.
Adequate Yearly Progress By Allyson, Brette, and Riley.
Springs 2006 and 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress Results Potential Challenges with 2008 Annual Measurable Objectives & District Corrective Action.
Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.
 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). About AYP  Initiated by NCLB  Student performance and participation rates on ISTEP+ in English/language arts and mathematics.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
School Report Card and Identification Progression
General Supervision and School Improvement: Utilizing all relevant data to inform statewide efforts for scaling up David Guardino Manager, School Improvement.
Proposed Revision to Standards of Accreditation Regarding Locally Awarded Verified Credits, According to Criteria and Procedures Dr. Cynthia A. Cave Assistant.
Graduating Class of 2020 and 2021
‘A Nation at Risk’ and No Child Left Behind
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
EDN Fall 2002.
Presentation transcript:

Ware County High School State of the school

12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243 students have not passed at least one part of the graduation test 140 have passed all parts of the test

What does this mean? To improve on our graduation rate we need: 57 more students to receive a diploma (must have passed all 4 parts of graduation tests)

11 th grade 136 students who started school in 04/05 are in 9 th or 10 grade homerooms 18 have 5 or less total credits 32 have 6-9 total credits 76 have 10 total credits or more 60% of these students must graduate in the 07/08 school year

10 th grade 180 students failed last year after attending summer school 108 are failing one or more core classes now Of the 108 –14 have 4 or less credits –16 have 3 or less credits –58 have.5 or less credits

1st time 9 th graders 160 students currently failing one or more core classes. 53 failing English 42 failing Science 59 failing Math 59 failing Social Studies

Survey results of reasons for failing 40%- will not make up work 37% will not do homework and or class work 21% have poor test grades 9% are discipline problems

AYP Sanctions Needs Improvement- when a school has not made AYP for 2 straight years in the same area We have not made it in Math, English, or Graduation Rate for 2 years

Year One School Improvement Students are offered School Choice School must develop or revise a school improvement plan. Plan must incorporate researched –based strategies. 10% of title money set aside ($250,000)

Year 2 School Improvement Supplemental Services Continue with the plan from step one

Year Three Corrective Action Must do at least one of the following Replace school staff responsible for the continued failure to make AYP Implement new curriculum based on scientific research. Decrease management authority at the school level Extend the school year or day Appoint outside expert to advise the school on its progress toward making AYP. Reorganize the school internally.

Year Four: Restructuring Must prepare a plan to carry out at least one of the following: Reopen as a Charter School Replace the Principal and staff Contract for private management company to demonstrate effect. State takeover Any other major restructuring of school governance

Year Five Implement alternative governance plan no later that the first day of school.

Are we in a state of emergency at WCHS?