S MART L ABEL Pilot Program Update Nicole Zinn Office of Pesticide Programs April 14, 2015 1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Documents for GEO & EO Summit II 1.Statement/Communiqué to be agreed by EO Summit II 2.Framework Document to be agreed by EO Summit II 3.GEO Report to.

Advertisements

CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT Modernization of Approvals Project Update July, 2010.

1 Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS): U.S. Update.

EPA’s Label Review Manual Update Chapter 10: Worker Protection Labeling February 7, 2013 Richard Pont Certification and Worker Protection Branch Office.

ECM RFP 101 Presented by: Carol Mitchell C.M. Mitchell Consulting.

Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.

Beyond Federal Standards Nevada Mercury Air Emission Control Program Leo M. Drozdoff, P.E. Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection December.

CFR Index, Thesaurus of Indexing Terms, and Agency List of Subjects

Section 18 and 24c Pilot Projects in Indian Country Western Regions Pesticide Meeting May 18, 2006, Whitefish, MT Scott Downey, EPA Region 10 Pesticides.

Overview and Implementation Schedules Richard Keigwin, Director EPA Pesticide Re-evaluation Division.

Columbia University Dept of Computer Science Center for Research on Info Access University of So. Calif Information Sciences Institute (ISI)

Alaska Contaminated Lands Conveyed to Alaska Native Corporations

THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.

1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Revised PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines Biotech/ChemPharm Customer Partnership.

RPS WG Update March 2015 Open Stakeholder Session Nancy Shadeed Health Canada.

ISO 9001:2015 Revision overview - General users

DRAFT Guidance for Industry: Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – Drug Establishment Registration and Drug Listing Denise Sánchez, J.D.,

Facility Lead Corrective Action Opportunities with Union Carbide RCRA National Meeting May, 2005 Bob Greaves EPA Region 3.

Electronic and Information Resources (EIR) Accessibility in Cooperative Contracts Procurement June 2013.

1 Outdoor Advertising Control Gerald Solomon, Esq., Director, Office of Real Estate Services Office of Planning, Environment, and Realty Federal Highway.

“Integrating Standards in Practice” 10th Open Forum on Metadata Registries July 9-11, 2007 New York City, NY USA An international conference to share and.

Lee Pera and Ethan McMahon Office of Environmental Information July 21, 2010 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Educator Resources.

Government Procurement Reform Agency Procurement Planning June Ralston | Team Leader Agency Briefing Session | 21 April 2010.

The Dun & Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System Generic Pharmaceutical Association SPL Workshop October 28, 2008 Tom Marsden D&B Federal Government.

Federal Trade Commission required to issue and enforce regulations concerning children’s online privacy. Initial COPPA Rule effective April 21, 2000;

Breakout Session 3. EMERGE CRITICAL CAREER SKILLS WITH Lauren Murphy Cengage Learning Ken Baldauf Florida State University.

Enterprise Social Networking Pilot Project April 14, 2010.

© RightNow Technologies, Inc. Measuring and Analyzing Feedback Results Expert Seminar Susie Boyer, RightNow Product Manager Aaron Schubert, RightNow Development.

The Canadian Regulatory View of Insect Resistance Management Entomological Society of America Meeting, Indianapolis, Indiana December 2009 Heather McBrien.

Session I: Unit 2 Types of Reviews September 26, 2007 NCDDR training course for NIDRR grantees: Developing Evidence-Based Products Using the Systematic.

Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,

RIC 2009 Rulemaking Process: “NRC and Industry Perspectives on Improving Quality, Timeliness, and Consistency in 10 CFR 50.55a “A New Approach” Jacob Zimmerman.

Issue Management Group on Sustainable Management, Geneva, February 2010 The UN GHG Inventory Shoa Ehsani SUN Geneva, Palais de Nation, February 2010.

Washington, DC December 6, 2006 Formula and Process for Nonbeverage Product (TTB F ) – Briefing for Automated Form Completion.

IT Implementation Office of Pesticide Programs SFIREG (full) June 1, 2015 Bob Schultz.

OFC291 Microsoft® Office Word XML (part 1 of 3): Introduction Martin Sawicki Lead Program Manager.

New Requirements For Soil Fumigant Pesticide Products EPA - August 2010 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements Training Program Module 1: The EPA Regulatory Process.

ECOS Information Session Draft EPA Quality Documents February 13, 2013 Presented by EPA Quality Staff, Office of Environmental Information For meeting.

C-DERL is an application designed to be a Federal- wide, online repository for data standards, definitions, and context. It was authorized jointly by the.

OptumInsight Training – Provider/Client P PO BOX Solution HEC Manage Provider Information Changes: Billing Provider Address and Pay-To Address.

Environmental Protection Agency 1 The High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Demonstration and Status National Environmental Partnership Summit.

Environmental Management Division 1 NASA EMS Building Blocks to Success Michael DeWit, QEP EMS Lead ICF Consulting Inc. Fairfax, VA Michael J. Green, PE.

CEQA and the Delta Plan Presentation to Delta Stewardship Council February 24, 2011.

Electronic Design Change Process Paul Tobin Jr.- PKMJ Technical Services.

APHIS READINESS UPDATE Automated Commercial Environment US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.

ERM E-Gov Initiative Transfer of Permanent Geospatial Data Records to NARA Briefing for FGDC Coordination Group Bruce Ambacher, NARA September 2, 2003.

EPA’s Water Quality Exchange (WQX) Annual Exchange Network Users’ Meeting April 18-19, 2006.

DRAFT USEPA Office of Compliance Update: 90 CWA Action Plan, State Review Framework, & OECA National Priority Selection Presentation to NACAA Chris Knopes.

AGA Intergovernmental Partnership Steering Committee – DAP Presentation DATA Act - Section 5 Grants Pilot February 25, 2016.

© Copyright IBM 2007DIA ERS SIAC Presentation, January 2008 The HL7 RPS and SPL Standards - A High Level View Terry Hardin Sr. IT Architect Emerging Software.

Import Safety Phase 2 Workgroup 1.

Regulated Product Submission Eileen M. Girten, MS i3 Statprobe 1DIA Education SIAC.

Procedures Manual Reconstruction Presentation to: Georgia WIC Program Presented by: Abeda Hannan, MBA Policy and Compliance Unit Manager Date: December.

Hazardous Waste Import-Export Final Rule Requirements and Implementation December 12, 2016.

FDA's Two New Draft Guidance on Software and Device

OptumInsight Training – Provider/Client

State Regulator in Residence (RIR) Training Program

Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting

Tennessee Longitudinal Data system (TLDS)

Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch

Microsoft Applications

Medical Device Discovery Appraisal Program

One Language. One Enterprise.™

STIR WG IETF-99 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-00) July, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das, and An.

Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA CAG Meeting

Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.

HTML5 Course Review Master a Skill / Learn for Life.

A New Tool for Evaluating Candidate PM FEM and PM2.5 ARM Monitors

Grants Management Solution Suite (GMSS)

Presentation transcript:

S MART L ABEL Pilot Program Update Nicole Zinn Office of Pesticide Programs April 14, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

O UTLINE I. Background II. Pilot Program Overview and Preliminary Feedback III. Next Steps 2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

S MART L ABEL IS … Master pesticide label in a structured format Address label pain points Part of OPP Vision to have instantaneous access to quality information Inclusive of all EPA-registered products Building on previous work (e.g., FDA structured labeling) 3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

L ABEL P AIN P OINTS Manual/time-intensive label review Manual extraction of label information; manual entry into EPA databases Unclear label information; uncontrolled vocabularies Inconsistent EPA reviews/interpretations Limited ability to query across products Diminishing resources 4 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

S TRUCTURED VS. U NSTRUCTURED Unstructured Information 5 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Structured Information Street Address: City: State: Zip Code: 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA S. Crystal Drive Arlington VA 22202

S TRUCTURED VS. U NSTRUCTURED ( CONT.) 6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Structured Master label information Available in EPA database 100% searchable “Meets EPA requirements for killing norovirus. ” “Kills norovirus. ” Unstructured Master label Available in PPLS May be text searchable Note: image above is a conceptual drawing for informational purposes only.

O VERVIEW Purpose: Gather feedback on proposed data model (data elements, labeling sections) and guidance documentation Duration: December 2014 to ~September 2015 Meetings in December, February, TBD Participants: 1. Bayer CropScience 2. Syngenta 3. Dow 4. SePRO 5. Reckitt Benckiser 6. EcoLab 7. Marrone Bio 8. Clorox 9. United Industries Corporation 7 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

F EEDBACK 8 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FeedbackEPA Response Data entry is labor- intensive and not user- friendly The pilot’s purpose is to evaluate the data model concept Certain data fields are not applicable to antimicrobials Data fields may or may not apply to individual products Certain data fields are new or different SmartLabel does not change 40 CFR Overly complicated model Working to simplify Burden to regulated community and benefits are not apparent Expected benefits are presented on slide 9

S MART L ABEL B ENEFITS Pain points Manual/time-intensive label review Manual extraction of label information Unclear label information Inconsistent EPA reviews/interpretations Limited ability to query across products Unlevel playing field Diminishing resources 9 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency SmartLabel Solution Electronic comparison of labels and claims Automated label extraction and entry into EPA databases Improved label quality More consistent EPA reviews Advanced querying ability Level playing field Reduced review time

S MART L ABEL B ENEFITS BenefitRegistrantsEPAStatesPublic Electronic comparison of labels and claims Automated label extraction and entry into EPA databases Improved label quality More consistent EPA reviews Advanced querying ability Level playing field Reduced EPA review time 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

E NGAGING S TATES AAPCO meeting in 2014 SFIREG Updates at SFIREG meetings SFIREG SmartLabel Sub-group Meeting regularly throughout pilot process PREP courses Presented SmartLabel at Compliance and Enforcement PREP course in 2014 SmartLabel session being planned for the Registration and Re-evaluation PREP course in July 11 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

A PRIL 2015 AND BEYOND Continue pilot as EPA develops draft vocabularies, validation rules, database, governance plan Incorporate feedback received during pilot into data model and documentation Continue collaborating with states, industry and FDA Pilot webinar being planned for late April 12 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

C ONTACTS AND R ESOURCES Pilot web page smartlabel-pilot smartlabel-pilot Project leads Patricia Parrot: Marietta Echeverria: Philip Villanueva: 13 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency