Universal Service and USF Reform: Establishing a Rational and Efficient System Presentation to NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Antonio, TX June 28, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CANADIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS IN TRANSITION Ariane Siegel.
Advertisements

ITU/BDT Arab Regional Workshop For a Universal Service Evolution in Jordan. Luc Savage Chief Strategy Officer Jordan Telecom February 2005.
Universal Service Funding An Overview of the Connect America Fund Marsha Spellman, JD Oregon Connections Conference October 25,
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
CenturyLink Broadband Status Update SEATOA Conference March 21, 2013.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.
Chapter 6 Urban Land Rent.
The SBC Transformation From local service provider to premier communications and entertainment services provider.
Competing For Advantage
1 Keeping Consumers Connected Washington State and Universal Service WUTC Workshop May 5, 2010 John F. Jones CenturyLink Vice President State Government.
1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005
1 USF Reform— Getting It Right, Getting it Fair Dr. Brian K. Staihr Regulatory Economist – Embarq July 16, 2007
Network neutrality is the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It does not matter who is downloading and what is being downloaded.
The Optical Communications Market
Cost sharing models of NGN rollout in rural or remote areas BEREC-EaPeReg-REGULATEL-EMERG Summit Barcelona, 2-3 July 2015.
Click to edit Master subtitle style Overview of Cricket Wireless Lifeline June 2010.
Safe Harbor Statement “Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements in this presentation regarding Aaron.
Customers and Providers Rights & Obligations – Part 2 Joel Dohmeier Director - State Governmental Affairs TDS TELECOM June 16, 2009 MARC.
Lessons from a Broadband Society
FCC Roundtable Presentation P. Kelley Dunne Chief Executive Officer.
1 Special Access “Dispelling the Myths” Wendy M. Moser Vice President Public Policy, Qwest July 14, 2007.
NASUCA Baltimore Meeting November 11-14, 2012 Mark Schuling, Iowa Consumer Advocate.
Rural Utilities Service Telecommunications Program 1400 Independence Ave. Washington, DC Presented by: Roberta D. Purcell.
Defining the Broadband and Technology Future for Your State Transitioning to Internet in Rural America Michael J. Balhoff, CFA July 27, 2012.
Support For Rural America William Maher Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau July 2, 2003 Universal Service and The FCC.
Joint Board Recommendation USF Reform NARUC Winter Meeting February 2008 Ray Baum Commissioner Oregon Public Utility Commission State Chair USJB.
The Value of Electric Transmission NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 25, 2012.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
U.S. Telecommunications Regulation and Market Developments September 2008.
Brant Wolf, EVP Oregon Telecommunications Association.
Introduction to Crown Castle When coverage or capacity gaps are identified by the wireless carriers, Crown Castle will either: – Provide a fix by easily.
The Hybrid Cost Proxy Model: Portugal Edition D. Mark Kennet William W. Sharkey Instituto das Comunicações de Portugal November, 2000.
1. 2 From modest beginnings as a small telephone exchange in Oak Ridge, Louisiana, serving fewer than 100 customers. CenturyTel has grown to become one.
FROM TRADITIONAL LANDLINE TO IP TELEPHONY: A POSSIBLE ANOTHER WAY Bill Levis Colorado Consumer Counsel June 10, 2013.
NASUCA 2012 mid-year meeting
Modernizing Universal Service Dennis Weller Chief Economist VerizonNARUC Summer Meetings July 2007.
Proposal for Reforming the Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Systems CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005.
Financial Considerations in the New World!! GTA Annual Meeting Hilton Head, SC June 19, 2012 Leo Staurulakis – Executive Vice President.
Robert C. Atkinson Ivy E. Schultz December 10, 2009 Broadband in America Where It Is and Where It Is Going (According to Broadband Service Providers)
USF Mission: “Every Pakistani has the right to modern telecommunication services and we strive to provide that” 1 -Parvez Iftikhar CEO USF.
The Texas Universal Service Fund: in Transition Kathy Grant NASUCA Summer Meeting San Antonio June 28, 2011.
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Wireless Telecommunications Overview January 2009.
© 2007 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. Confronting Tough Questions About.
The Nation Broadband Plan & Its Effects on USF and ICC Reform Krista K. Tanner Iowa Utilities Board June 7, 2010.
Summary and State Implications FCC Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CenturyLink February 28, 2012.
USF Reform NARUC Panel Presentation Dale Lehman Director, Executive MBA in Information and Communication Technology Alaska Pacific University
1 Intercarrier Compensation May 27, 2004 Glenn Brown
Modeling Health Reform in Massachusetts John Holahan June 4, 2008 THE URBAN INSTITUTE.
What the New FCC (and other regulators) Can Do To “ Get it Right” MARC - Traverse City, MI Jeff Gardner - President and CEO June 16, 2009.
Welcome. TeraGo Networks Inc. Broadband Wireless World Forum 2001 Wes Semeniuk, Chief Technology Officer, TeraGo Networks Inc.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2006 Annual Report January 17, 2007.
Broadband for Louisa County Building the Future. How Rural is Louisa? Louisa County  34,000 residents  14,000 households  511 square miles  Density.
Competitive Universal Service TC 310 June 5, 2008.
State of Kansas Senate Bill 350 Telecom Reform Bill Overview David Kerr AT&T Kansas.
ATTACHMENT 1 CLEC Collocation Maps CLEC UNE-P Maps PUBLIC.
Structural Separation and Universal Service Conference on “The Enduring Lessons of the Breakup of AT&T: A Twenty-Five Year Retrospective” University of.
FCC USF REFORM Presented by: Gordon Dauchy Vice President - JSI May 11, 2016.
Copyright 2015 FairPoint Communications Municipal Broadband - Economic Development & Community Planning Bar Harbor Program Overview 1.
Disparity in Operations: Comparative Analysis of Small ILEC CHCF-A Carriers to Non-CHCF-A Carriers Communications DivisionJanuary 2010* * Revised as of.
The IP Transition – What is it, and why is it important? Prepared for NASUCA Mid-year meeting, New Orleans, LA June 7, 2016 David C. Bergmann Telecom Policy.
Overview of the FCC’s Rate-of-Return Reforms
Critical Issues.
Marsha Spellman, JD Regulatory Director, WST October 17, 2016
A Total Technology Company
FCC National Broadband Plan (NBP) and Rural Universal Service Reform
Small Rural Providers NTCA’s membership is made up of about 850 independent telecommunications and broadband providers. Small telcos like those in NTCA.
CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005
USF Disaggregation The Big Debate
Chapter 2 – Networks and how they link
Presentation transcript:

Universal Service and USF Reform: Establishing a Rational and Efficient System Presentation to NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Antonio, TX June 28, 2011

2 CenturyLink: Network Map and Service Territory CenturyLink CLEC Service Area Qwest POPS CenturyLink IP / MPLS Core CenturyLink Fiber Network Qwest CenturyLink Qwest Fiber Network Upon Merger Close, Served Approximately:  17 Million Access Lines  >5 Million Broadband Customers  >600,000 Video Subscribers w/ growing facilities base  In 37 States

CenturyLink in Texas 3  286,000 access lines  106 exchanges  6 operating companies  22.9 HH per square mile average density  Largest exchanges served:  Killeen  Porter  Humble  San Marcos  Small, rural exchanges (HH density/square mile)  74 exchanges below 20  47 exchanges below 10  23 exchanges below 5

4 Population Density Matters  ILECs bear expensive COLR obligations to service all customers; a burden unique only this class of provider, and very important in areas of low population density  CenturyLink serves vast tracts of rural America; in addition to urban centers like Denver, Las Vegas, Seattle, Phoenix, and Minneapolis Line Density (loops/sq. mile ): Service Area (sq. miles): AT&T 101 AT&T602,391 Verizon 155Verizon229,569 CenturyLink 29CenturyLink699,521  Much of CenturyLink’s service area has fewer than 10 households per square mile  Competitors routinely avoid serving low density areas  If COLR, ICC & USF reform is not handled properly, there is a real risk of leaving rural areas behind

Historically COLR Costs Have Been Buried Petroleum, IN Monthly Cost: $100 Franklin, IN Monthly Cost: $28 Indy Metro Preble, IN Monthly Cost: $73 Salamonia, IN Monthly Cost: $104  When the entire territory (study area) in a state is averaged, it is assumed that revenues earned in low-cost Franklin can be used to offset the cost incurred in serving high-cost Petroleum.  Migrating USF distributions from a study area basis can better align funding with costs – and (generally) away from competition.  Legacy EQ receives $0 High Cost funding (except IAS access replacement) under the study area system; a wire-center system would fund the higher cost exchanges. * Costs for voice network. Principle holds true for broadband.

6 Sweet Springs, Missouri Investment Overview Distance and Density Drive Costs Wire Center Total Lines Served 1, sq. mi. Investment per Line $6,610 City Center Lines Served 138 per sq. mi. Investment per Line $2,650 Outside City Center Lines Served 2.4 per sq. mi. Investment per Line $17,960

Population Density Example: ILECs Serve Higher Cost Areas  Network deployed deeper into rural markets  Deployment not a choice: subject to state and federal obligations  Continuing service obligations lead to ongoing capital expense requirements  Cost of service far exceeds viable business case parameters Brookneal, Virginia 2,600 Access Lines

Rural Broadband Will Need Support  Broadband has become a necessary component for business, education, health, and in the lives of consumers  Market forces are working for most consumers:  large-scale broadband network development, broadband devices, software development, and application development.  However, consumers in the most rural portions are not served  Universal service funding will be required if national public policy to serve “all” remains in place  Must avoid unfunded mandates and minimize investment risk during transition Principle: Competition in the cities must not deprive the rural areas of needed universal service support

9 Universal Service: 5 Fundamental Questions #1 Determine what “it” is -Define broadband service, speeds, other parameters #2 Determine the areas that need universal service support -Target to high cost areas; given rate comparability policies #3 Determine the cost of achieving universal service -Calculate the total cost of qualifying high-cost areas less expected customer contributions #4 Determine rules for vendors to implement universal service policy -Provide requirements for those who receive funds and deliver on the promise of universal service #5 Determine how to fund the Universal Service Fund -Apply surcharge applicable to all providers to establish a broad, competitively neutral contribution mechanism The government buys jet fighters, computers, light bulbs, etc. It should “buy” universal service similarly.