MANAGING TEACHER EVALUATIONS EFFICIENTLY TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

Training Overview For separate modules:
Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Appoquinimink School District Succession Benefits the staff person, the school and the district A MIND THAT IS STRETCHED BY A NEW EXPERIENCE.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Teacher evaluation in NJ: 2013 PRESENTERS’ NAMES REBUTTAL WRITING TRAINING.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Everyone has been trained on the development of the SIP First draft of the SIP should be entered on the state website,
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Supplemental Salaries. History School Board ask Personnel Policy Committee to look into supplemental pay Personnel Policy Committee formed a Supplemental.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Support School-wide Evaluation Tool January 2007.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Literacy Achievement Plans Adams 12 Five Star Schools A Guide to Initiating, Implementing, and Managing LAPS Revised October 2010.
PAS…. The Second Observation Cycle Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation Cycles for.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Evaluation 101: After School Programs February 1, 2007 Region 3 After School Technical Assistance Center Conference.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Consider this… “Effective leaders see what is essential and ignore the rest…focus on what is vital and eliminate all of the extraneous distractions…stop.
A New Approach to Assessment Based on extensive research that has identified teaching and instructional practices that are most effective in impacting.
Learning Centered Conferencing with the Using the Danielson Framework John Hellwich & Michelle Lewis.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
August Coming to North Tech The Employee Evaluation System includes 9 standards broken down into 36 quality indicators that each employee will be.
Teacher Evaluations Swartz Creek Community Schools.
Teacher Appraisal System Updates by: Dawn Capes, Coordinator for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
EVAL Introduction RIG 2 – Cohort 1 October 29, 2012 Cathey Frederick ESD 189 eVAL Specialist.
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Teacher Evaluation System
Edgewood T-TESS Updates for
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
PoHi TLE information.
Teacher Evaluation Training
Aspiring School Leaders Information Session
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Steps in the TDES Evaluation Process
Presentation transcript:

MANAGING TEACHER EVALUATIONS EFFICIENTLY TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS

DDD - YOUR PRESENTERS Dr. John Demby is the principal of a technical high school. He has been the Delaware Assistant Principal of the Year and has worked with a development coach for over three years. Mrs Deb Denson taught at elementary levels and served as the principal of a charter school for grades 6 thru 12.She was part of the Middle State Association of Schools and Colleges Reaccreditation and Response to Instructional Intervention Teams, Strategic Planning and Future Growth committees. Dr Sue Dutton has over 32 years of public education experience including 17 years as a school and district level administrator. She was Delaware Assistant Principal of the Year and was selected as the Administrator of the Year for the Delaware Administrators of Special Programs in Sue and Deb are currently development coaches with the Delaware Association for School Leadership coaching school principals in the area of teacher evaluation.

OUTCOMES Create an efficient schedule for teacher evaluations to ensure completion by a specific date. Develop a procedure for the efficient completion of teacher evaluations. Learn how to track teacher evaluations to monitor completion, quality, and gather data to inform professional development decisions. Explore prepared data from real teacher evaluations to determine professional development needs for teachers. Explore prepared data from real teacher evaluations to determine the degree of calibration between administrators within a school setting.

AGENDA Introductions Balancing the evaluation load between administrators Maximizing the efficiency of the evaluation process Scheduling the evaluations Tracking evaluations Analyzing the data from the evaluations to make informed decisions about the professional development needs of staff Analyzing the data from evaluations to determine calibration between administrators. Wrap-up

BACKGROUND Race to the Top Development Coach Project 2 years Every district Statewide Current status Results and Benefits Coach perspective Principal perspective

DELAWARE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM Types of Conferences Roster identification / Measures selection Goals conferences Pre-conference (announced) Post-observation (all) Roster verification (spring) Summative Evaluation Improvement Plan as needed Novice teachers – 2 unannounced & 1 announced formative, 1 summative annually Novice specialist – 1 unannounced & 1 announced formative, 1 summative annually Experienced educators – 1 unannounced formative annually, summative ever 2 years All educators – annual growth goal measures related to student performance growth. (fall and spring conferences) Short observations (in some cases)

BALANCING THE LOAD People are not equal in terms of paperwork requirements for observation Same number of observees does not insure same work load Novice teachers – 2 unannounced & 1 announced formative, 1 summative annually Novice specialist – 1 unannounced & 1 announced formative, 1 summative annually Experienced educators – 1 unannounced formative annually, summative ever 2 years All educators – annual growth goal measures related to student performance growth. (fall and spring conferences) Short observations (in some cases)

MAXIMIZING EFFICIENCY Schedule for the year Remember all who need an evaluation. Consider all of the pieces of the process. Look at the big picture. Get all parts on the calendar

EFFICIENCY TIPS Ask for the information before the pre-conference. Encourage the teacher to type the responses, and send them to you electronically. Discuss and clarify during preconference. Cut and paste into document During preconference or during the observation, take pictures of class rules, essential question, procedures, safety issues, daily agenda, etc. Insert the pictures into form, rather than writing about what you saw. If there is “down time” in the classroom (students working independently, etc), check your writing to be sure it is clear. Take 10 extra minutes in the classroom and clean up your writing. Q - Write questions you have right in the form. MO – document missed opportunities while you are gathering evidence. (These become recommendations later.) During post conference, discuss what the teacher thinks s/he could do to improve. This also becomes a source for recommendations. Use the rubrics as the basis for your discussions.

SCHEDULING Figure the number of formatives an administrator needs to complete for the year. Count the number of weeks from when observations will start to when district requires them to be done. If district doesn’t give due date, aim for end of April. Be realistic – don’t count the week before Christmas, etc. Divide the number of formatives by the number of weeks. This results in how many formative need to be COMPLETED each week to meet the deadline. Schedule novices and ineffective teachers early – aim for the first to be done by the end of September. Schedule summatives the same way. (If you have a large number of summatives, move your formative deadline earlier)

MONTHLY SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION MonthWeekAdmin 1Admin 2Admin 3 September 5 12 Ingraham 19Abel Jones Adams Calloway Dukes Jeffries 26JacksonDunning Galloway Appel October 3BrettBufordBrown Conrad 10DavisEdwardsEngel 17Tingle Warwick FranksFreidman Grimes 24 HoustonHarding These dates reflect the due date for the COMPLETED formative. This means they have been observed, conferenced, written, signed, entered into the state system, and filed.

LAY IT OUT

PRACTICAL TIPS AND TIMELINES Schedule the pre-conference at least 2 weeks before the formative due date. If the final due date is September 26, schedule the pre-conference on or before September 12. Write as you go. Have staff send pre-observation form, lesson plans, professional responsibilities form, etc. by . Cut and paste this information into form prior to pre-conference. Type onto form during observation Clean up notes from observation within one day of observation (and before post) Go into post-observation with questions to ask based upon notes from observation (TIP: use embedded comments in Word to put questions right onto form.) Type on form during post-observation. It’s OK to share screen with teacher. Complete form within one day of post. Don’t observe another teacher until you have written the previous one.

MONITOR WHAT’S DONE Track Completion of Formatives Expectations Completion of Expectations Improvement Plans Ratings Evaluations of non-credentialed staff Summatives Additional required forms Your secretary would be a great person to do this for you. S/he can also schedule the pre- observations and observations, and send out notices to staff for you.

THE DATA

USING THE DATA Track as you go. Use your secretary to do the data entry. If ratings are not used, develop rating based upon evidence. Share results with leadership teams and staff. Focus professional development on identified needs. Check on calibration. Use the data to identify where the administrators need professional development.

WRAP-UP Questions Comments Thank you