2012 – 2013 School Year. OTES West Branch Local Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Advertisements

Springboro Community City School District Todd Petrey, Superintendent Jamie Miles, 8 th Grade Science Teacher SEA Vice-President.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
OTES & OPES DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS/CHANGES
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Teacher & Principal Evaluation: As Easy as Doing the Hula.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
Differentiated Supervision
Students Come First Senate Bill 1110 and Trailer Bill
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Update on Teacher Principal Evaluation System (TPEP) Implementation July, 2014.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Overview of SB 736 Legislation Pertaining to Personnel Evaluation Systems and Race to the Top 1.
BEST Standards in Teaching Rubric.  Overview  State Legislation  District Policy  Key Components and Rating Percentiles  Outline the Evaluation Process,
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Duke Ellington “A problem is a chance for you to do your best.”
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Academic Distress Commissions July 14, Outline Introduction to Academic Distress Commissions (ADCs) Integration of Commissions into Statewide System.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES Condensed from ODE Teacher Training.
The Next Chapter of Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as described in the April 15th Draft Regulations.
Factoring Growth Models Into Administrator and Teacher Performance Evaluations -- a presentation for -- Henderson, Mercer, and Warren Counties Regional.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
February 14, For retained 3 rd graders and 3 rd Grade RIMP students in For retained 3 rd graders and K – 3 RIMP students in Applies.
Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 Instructional Collaboration Day II January 3, 2014.
ELECTRONIC TEACHER AND PRINCIPAL EVALUATION SYSTEM eTPES Evaluation Updates and Requirements August/ September 2015.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
HB 153 and the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Association Advocacy for Members and the Learners We Serve 1.
Michele Winship, Ph.D. 2 3  Aligned with the Ohio Standards for the Teaching ProfessionOhio Standards for the Teaching Profession.
1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System. DECISION REQUIRED BY MARCH 2013 Current Evaluation and PD Models The current evaluation plan was last revised.
Legislative Updates for Community School Sponsors August 23, 2013 Sponsor Workshop, Panel Presentation.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
HB 153 and the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System
Five Required Elements
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

2012 – 2013 School Year

OTES West Branch Local Schools

%20library/articulate%20files/folder- 94/document-202/player.html %20library/articulate%20files/folder- 94/document-202/player.html

T/F Pre-Assessment 1. HB 153 requires that all school districts adopt a teacher evaluation policy. Answer:_______ 2. Fifty percent (50%) of the teaching evaluation includes student academic growth. Answer:_______ 3. Only limited contract teachers are required to be evaluated each year initially. Answer:_______ 4. The four performance levels are: ineffective, developing, accomplished, distinguished. Answer:_______ 5. If my students show above average growth, I am permitted to select my credentialed evaluator. Answer:_______

Respond if you teach an even grade level s/MTQ3MDI2MDg0OQ

Respond if you are a specialist

e_polls/MTQ3MDI2MDg0OQ?preview=true e_polls/MTQ3MDI2MDg0OQ?preview=true e_polls/MjgwMjg2ODk?preview=true e_polls/MjgwMjg2ODk?preview=true e_polls/LTkxNDE1NzExMQ?preview=true e_polls/LTkxNDE1NzExMQ?preview=true e_polls/MjAxMzU3MjQ2?preview=true e_polls/MjAxMzU3MjQ2?preview=true e_polls/LTU0NzgxMDAyMA?preview=true e_polls/LTU0NzgxMDAyMA?preview=true

HB 153 (Budget Bill) Requirements : Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Framework On Nov. 15, 2011, the State Board of Education (SBOE) adopted the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES) Framework.

Recent legislation (HB 153) mandates that the board of education of each school district, in consultation with its teachers, adopt a standards-based teacher evaluation policy that conforms to the framework for the evaluation of teachers by July 1, HB 153 Requirements:

Q: Does the local collective bargaining agreement supersede the law? A: SB 316 states, “Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in Chapter 4117, of the Revised Code, the requirements of this section prevail over any conflicting provisions of a collective bargaining agreement entered into on or after the effect date of this amendment.” So, no, the bargaining agreement does not supersede this law.

HB 153 Requirements : Implementation begins during the school year. Evaluation framework must be included in future CBA’s and take effect at that point.

HB 153 Requirements : Framework must include (can’t change): 1.Multiple Evaluation factors: Student Academic Growth (50%) & Teacher Performance (50%) 2.Align with standards 3.Requires at least two formal observations (30 minutes each) and classroom walkthroughs 4.Provide a written report

HB 153 Requirements : 5.Assign a rating 6.Value-added data must be used 7.Provide PD to accelerate growth and provide support for poorly performing teachers

HB 153 Requirements : The board shall conduct an evaluation of each teacher employed by the board at least once each school year, unless an employer elects to evaluate teachers who were rated as “accomplished” on their most recent evaluations every two years. Update: HB 487 Mid Biennium Review: Currently, law requires teachers to undergo two classroom observations per year. As an additional incentive, Gov. Kasich recommends teachers that obtain a top rating be given the option to submit a portfolio of accomplishment in lieu of another classroom observation.

HB 153 Requirements : Develop specific standards and criteria that distinguish between the following levels of performance for teachers and principals for the purpose of assigning ratings on the evaluations: (a) Accomplished; (b) Proficient; (c) Developing; (d) Ineffective.

HB 153 Requirements : Each policy must include procedures for using evaluation results for retention/promotion decisions and for the dismissal of poorly performing teachers. PROHIBITS using seniority as the basis for retaining a teacher, except when deciding between comparable evaluations.

Current Status 50% student growth measures: Value-added plus ODE approved tests/assessments that measure mastery of the course content…may include standardized assessments/industry examinations/end-of-course exams, local BOE approved assessments. Pilot – 139 school districts are currently piloting the OTES..looking at non-core courses for assessments.

Performance Growth measures

OTES Components Teachers with above expected levels of student growth will develop a professional growth plan and may choose their credentialed evaluator for the evaluation cycle. Teachers with expected levels of student growth will develop a professional growth plan collaboratively with the credentialed evaluator and will have input on their credentialed evaluator for the evaluation cycle. Teachers with below expected levels of student growth will develop an improvement plan with their credentialed evaluator. The administration will assign the credentialed evaluator for the evaluation cycle and approve the improvement plan.

Evaluators Evaluators must participate in an ODE training and be CERTIFIED to use the OTES process. (9,000 evaluators) The course will include evaluating videotaped teachers and passing a test to be certified.

T/F Post-Assessment 1. HB 153 requires that all school districts adopt a teacher evaluation policy. Answer:____T___ 2. Fifty percent (50%) of the teaching evaluation includes student academic growth. Answer:____T___ 3. Only limited contract teachers are required to be evaluated each year initially. Answer:___F____ 4. The four performance levels are: ineffective, developing, accomplished, distinguished. Answer:___F____ 5. If my students show above average growth, I am permitted to select my credentialed evaluator. Answer:____T___

The teacher matches strategies, materials, and/or pacing to students’ individual needs, to make learning accessible and challenging for all students in the classroom. The teacher effectively uses independent, collaborative and whole-class instruction to support individual learning goals and provides varied options for how students will demonstrate mastery. Differentiation…Accomplished