Case series of wide diameter (6 mm) implants immediately loaded with posterior single restorations A Immediate loading of implants replacing single molars.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPLANTOLOGY QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
Advertisements

Module 1 | Session 2 Treatment planning and restoring the single posterior implant Please note: It is encouraged that the presentation at hand is adapted.
Presenter Date Time: 20 minutes, 2 Cases Q&A : 10 minites.
Replacing a Congenitally Missing Lateral Incisor using the Skinny 2.4 The case is a 23 year old petite female.
ANTOANELA GARBACEA, DDS, MSD
The School of Dentistry College of Medical & Dental Sciences 'Evaluation of Single-unit Light-cured Composite Temporary Crowns in General Practice' R.J.CRISP.
INTRODUCTION - REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE
32 Removable Prosthodontics. 2 Artificial structures replacing teeth and tissues Restore lost functions –Stabilize arch –Improve aesthetics Additional.
+ ABOI/ID Part II Case Presentation – Template 2016.
Dr.linda Maher. DENTAL IMPLANTS Are surgical components (usually metallic)which are inserted into the bone to support a dental prosthesis (crown or bridge)
Surgical extraction with Immediate Implant Placement These cases are selected only after careful review and preparation These cases are selected only after.
Immediate loading after extraction - implantation
Topic: Basic research Presented at the 23 rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association for Osseointegration September 2014, Rome, Italy.
Interim Analysis of Certain ® PREVAIL ® Implant Clinical Trial Outcomes.
Straumann® Bone Level Implant Surgical Product Portfolio
PowerPoint® Presentation for Dental Materials with Labs
Presenter: Dr. Sana Ehsen Supervisors: Dr. Farhan Raza Khan 1.
Straumann® Bone Level Implant Prosthetic Product Portfolio
Rola Shadid, BDS, MSc, Associate Fellow of AAID
+ ABOI/ID Part II Case Presentation – Template. + Case # Type of Case:
Periodontal Case Study Project
Acrylic partial denture
Dental Implants. Learning Objectives Understand basic terminology and components of a dental implant including: Process Implant materials Advantages of.
報告者:傅超俊 報告日期: 2012/05/15. Introduction  a high incidence of discrepancies in gingival margin levels between an implant crown and the contralateral natural.
NMeanStd. DeviationStd. Error Mean BONE LOSS 4 MONTHS Int Con 19,0893,25863,05783 Ext Con 20,1628,24124,05394 NMeanStd. DeviationStd. Error Mean BONE LOSS.
لثة \ خامس اسنان د. زيد م(3) 3\ 4\ Dental implant.
Candidate number: {AF 0700} Patient: {ABC} Case Type: {Single Tooth}
Introduction & Objective
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Presenter: 施佑昇
Treatment Planning and Surgical Considerations in Implant Therapy for Patients With Agenesis, Oligodontia, and Ectodermal Dysplasia: Review and Case Presentation 
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Calcium sulfate as a bone replacement graft in the management of localized aggressive periodontitis: A 1 year follow up report Leela Subhashini Choudary.
The altered cast technique
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
M. Rapani*, L. Ravera, V. Perrotti, A. Piattelli, L. Ricci, G. Iezzi
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Topic: Implant therapy outcomes, surgical aspects
A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY ON THE IMMEDIATE LOADING OF MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES SUPPORTED BY 4 ONE-PIECE UNSPLINTED DIRECT LASER METAL FORMING (DLMF)
Immediate implant placement and function in the anterior region (cement-retained) – Hands-on presentation Disclaimer: Some products may not be regulatory.
Gingival papillae after single-implant computer guided
Abutment connect radiograph 12 month follow-up radiograph
1D2 Dental Student, School of Dentistry
Locator® Abutment Workflow presentation
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
NobelActive™ Clinical Cases
Snappy™ Abutment – clinical cases
NobelParallel™ CC.
Histological Evaluation Comparing Alloplast and Xenograft in Socket Preservation- A Case Series Lanka Mahesh, BDS, MS (Implant Dentistry), Srinivas A.
Immediate implant placement #15 alone-control group
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Presentation transcript:

case series of wide diameter (6 mm) implants immediately loaded with posterior single restorations A Immediate loading of implants replacing single molars are of high interest as first and second molars are the most commonly missing teeth in posterior jaw. Wide platform (WP) implants offer greater surface area for osseointegration and are more capable of handling higher occlusive forces in the posterior regions of jaw compared to regular diameter implants. Few studies have evaluated 6 mm wide diameter implants for posterior single tooth restorations. AIM The present study aimed at evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes of wide diameter (6 mm) implants used for cement-retained prosthetic restorations of single molars in immediate function. Forty eight consecutive patients were treated between April 2007 and October All patients included in the study underwent a complete preoperative evaluation comprising a detailed medical history, clinical, and radiographic examinations. SURGICAL PROTOCOL A total of 53 NobelSpeedy WP 6 mm implants were placed. A flapless implant surgery was performed on twenty on patients and for the remaining patients, a flap surgery. PROSTHETIC PROTOCOL All provisionals were cement-retained acrylic crowns delivered immediately after surgery (within 48 hours of implant placement). Measures were taken to minimize the intraoral intervention time and to keep the surgical site clean. CLINICAL & RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENTS Patients were followed clinically and radiologically for a minimum of 1 year and up to 3 years. Patients were assessed radiographically for bone level measurements and clinically for occlusion, papilla volume (papilla index), and bleeding on probing (BOP) at the time of implant placement surgery (baseline) and at each follow-up visit, when visual signs of inflammation was also assessed. The mesial and distal marginal bone level change over time was assessed by comparing intra-oral radiographs taken at implant insertion and those up to 3 years later. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version MATERIAL AND METHODS INTRODUCTION RESULTS H. Antoun, P. Cherfane, B. Sojod (Paris, France) CONCLUSION This prospective study demonstrates a good predictability for wide diameter (6 mm) implants when used to replace of single molars. Its use is associated with good outcomes in terms of implant survival, marginal bone changes and soft tissue health at the end of one year. It also confirms effectiveness of use of immediate loading protocol in terms of good 1-year implant stability. A longer follow up study is necessary to evaluate the long term success of this technique. Contact: Table 1 Cumulative Survival Rate (CSR) for Implants Time PeriodImplantsFailedWithdrawnCSR % Placement - 4 weeks weeks - 6 months months - 1 year Table 2 Bleeding on Probing and Inflammation at 12 Months Bleeding on probingSigns of inflammation Number of implant sites% % Yes No Total Table 3: Marginal Bone Remodeling at All Sites Implant insertion to 3 month Implant insertion to 6 month Implant insertion to 12 month 3 month to 6 month 6 month to 12 month Mean (mm) SD (mm) N FrequencyN%N%N%N%N% > Total At the end of 1 year, cumulative survival rate was 98.1% (table 1), and there were no mechanical or biological complications (table 2). The mean marginal bone remodeling was ± 1.84 mm. Marginal bone level changes with distribution frequencies for all sites are presented in table 3. Occlusal view of the Snappy abutment directly after implant placement (Nobel Speedy 6x13) using the flapless technique A temporary light-cured composite resin crown (Protemp) was adjusted in mouth and tightly adapted A prefabricated cap was peformed over the sappy abutment resin was used to achieve properly sealed margins between the cap and the provisional crown and to establish a proper emergence profile. The provisional crown was meticulously polished and perforated to evacuate excess cement Vestibular view at final prosthesis insertion Vestibular view at 3 years follow-up Occlusal view of the povisional crown X-ray at implant insertion X-ray at 3 years follow-up X-ray at 1 year follow-up X-ray at 2 years follow-up This work was supported by a Nobel Biocare grant number Schincaglia GP, Marzola R, Giovanni GF, Chiara CS, Scotti R. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: Calandriello R, Tomatis M. Immediate occlusal loading of single lower molars using Branemark System(R) Wide Platform TiUnite implants: a 5-year follow-up report of a prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13: Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Carinci F. Wide-diameter implants: analysis of clinical outcome of 304 fixtures. J Periodontol 2007; 78: