Deficient homologous recombination DNA repair appears to cluster sarcoma patients sensitive to trabectedin (ET-743, Yondelis ® ) Maki RG, Taron M, van.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AbstractSchema Conclusion Pharmacokinetic profile of the base-excision repair inhibitor Methoxyamine-HCl (TRC102; MX) given as an one-hour intravenous.
Advertisements

Immune therapy in NSCLC Presentation – 劉惠文 Supervisor – 劉俊煌教授.
Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Wilson WH et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 686.
Advanced NSCLC Objective response rate -Well defined & widely accepted -Does not correlate well with OS -May be more useful if SD included -Higher RR correlates.
A pooled analysis of the final results of the two randomized phase II studies comparing Gemcitabine (G) vs Gemcitabine + Docetaxel (G+D) in patients (pts)
IMPACT OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN UTERINE SARCOMA (UTS): REVIEW OF 12 CLINICAL TRIALS FROM EORTC INVOLVING ADVANCED UTS COMPARED TO OTHER SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA (STS)
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Wnt signaling is essential for embryonic development, stem cells and tissue regeneration. Colorectal.
Can We Define Tumors That Will Respond to PARP Inhibitors? A Phase II Correlative Study of Olaparib in Advanced Serous Ovarian Cancer and Triple-Negative.
Expression profiles for prognosis and prediction Laura J. Van ‘t Veer The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Unanswered Questions in Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: Controversial Areas Deborah K. Armstrong, M.D. May 29, 2009.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
Phase 1b Study of Iniparib (BSI-201) Combined with Irinotecan for Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 Cell Cycle Effects of Iniparib plus Gemcitabine.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
ERCC 1 isoform expression and DNA repair in NSCLC
What would you recommend as first line therapy for a 68 y/o woman with advanced pancreatic cancer and limited metastatic disease with ECOG-1? Gemcitabine.
Insert Program or Hospital Logo Introduction Melanoma is notoriously resistant to chemotherapy. While surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy can.
ESP1/SARC025 Global Collaboration: A Phase I Study of a Combination of the PARP inhibitor, Niraparib and Temozolomide in Patients with Previously Treated,
A Quantitative Multi-Gene RT-PCR Assay for Prediction of Recurrence in Stage II Colon Cancer (CC): Selection of the Genes in 4 Large Studies and Results.
A Micro RNA Polymorphism (MiRSNP) in 3’UTR of K-ras gene was associated with clinical outcome in mCRC patients treated with either single agent cetuximab.
Mizutomo Azuma 1, Dongyun Yang 2, Marinella Carpanu 3, Ellen Hollywood 3, Michael Lue-Yat 3, Wu Zhang 1, Kathleen D. Danenberg 4, Peter V. Danenberg 5,
High Cereblon Protein Expression Correlates with Improved Response and Survival in Myeloma Patients Treated with Lenalidomide 1 Cereblon Expression Predicts.
Introduction Results Material and Methods Conclusions Genetic variants predict clinical outcome clinical outcome in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal.
Cancer Stem Cell SNPs Have Opposite Prognostic Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer Among Asian and Western Countries Melissa J. LaBonte 1, Takeru Wakatsuki.
O’Shaughnessy J et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 1007.
Outcome of chemotherapy in synovial sarcoma (sys) patients (pts): review of 15 clinical trials from EORTCc involving advanced sys compared to other Soft.
Clinical Case Nº2 Dr. Javier Martín-Broto. Case description 49-year-old man 1 st symptom/sign: Mild pain in right buttock 1 st diagnosis: Core-biopsy:
CHFR METHYLATION AS AN EPIGENETIC MARKER FOR RECURRENCE OF COLON CANCER M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas Motofumi Tanaka, Salil Sethi, Donghui.
Byrd JC et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6508.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Symposium 2: Sarcoma of the Year – Synovial Sarcoma Peter Reichardt HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch / Sarcoma Center Berlin-Brandenburg.
MEASURING CLINICAL EFFICACY IN PHASE II TRIALS Response: Karnofsky, WHO, RECIST Event rate: progression free/survival Time to event: progression/survival.
Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of PD , a Cyclin ‐ Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination with Letrozole vs Letrozole Alone.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Audeh MW et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Clinical Science Symposium)
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
A Comprehensive Genomic Approach to the Identification of Predictive Markers using DNA and Tissue Repair Gene Polymorphisms in Radiation.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 AP23573 Induced Long-term Stability in 2 Patients with Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (#561) Scott Schuetze, Warren.
What is the best approach for a follicular lymphoma patient who achieves CR after frontline chemoimmunotherapy? Radioimmunotherapy! Matthew Matasar,
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the 108 patients included in the biomarker analysis. Objectives.
New Proposals for Lung Cancer Staging Akif Turna, MD, PhD, FETCS Yedikule Teaching Hospital for Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/- cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience.
The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center
Mutated p53 correlates with extreme sensitivity to Yondelis  in low passaged cell lines explanted from chemonaive sarcoma patients 11th Annual CTOS Meeting.
Response, PFS or OS – what is the best endpoint in advanced colorectal cancer? Marc Buyse IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve & Hasselt University
26-30 September 2014, Madrid, Spain esmo.org Trabectedin in patients with BRCA mutated and BRCAness phenotype advanced ovarian cancer (AOC): phase II prospective.
AR-V7 Splice Variant in Prostate Cancer : Taking Centre Stage
PLATINUM RESISTANCE AND SENSITIVITY IN RECURRENT OVARIAN CANCER VANDA SALUTARI UNITÀ DI GINECOLOGIA ONCOLOGICA UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE, ROMA.
XXIV Riunione Nazionale MITO Ginecologia Oncologica: dai geni alla terapia Cristiana Sessa Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona MECCANISMI.
R2 김재민 / Prof. 정재헌 Journal conference 1.
Belani CP et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA8000. (Oral Presentation)
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) of high grade serous ovarian tumors from the NOVA Phase III clinical study Keith Wilcoxen,1 Christopher Neff,2.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
ASCO Recap Palak Desai, MD.
Genetic variants of kinases suppressors of Ras (KSR)in KRAS-BRAF
Abstracts Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Phase II study on the combination of trabectedin and olaparib for advanced, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer Dr Giorgio Valabrega University of Torino,
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab: The.
Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
CXCL14-positive CAFs induce overexpression of LINC00092 in ovarian cancer. CXCL14-positive CAFs induce overexpression of LINC00092 in ovarian cancer. A,
Presentation transcript:

Deficient homologous recombination DNA repair appears to cluster sarcoma patients sensitive to trabectedin (ET-743, Yondelis ® ) Maki RG, Taron M, van Oosterom AT, Schöffski P, Tercero JC, Fernandez Sousa-Faro JM, Jimeno JM, Rosell R Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, SPAIN UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, BELGIUM PharmaMar Research and Development, Madrid, SPAIN

2 E. turbinata Introduction ET-743 (trabectidin, Yondelis ® ) is a marine-derived compound in phase II-III development for solid tumors Binds to the minor groove of DNA Interacts with transcription factors and DNA binding proteins Disorganizes of the microtubule network Perturbs the cell cycle Interferes with DNA repair pathways Van Kesteren et al. Anticancer Drugs. 2002; 13:381

3 ET-743 induces long-lasting responses and tumor control in a clinically relevant proportion of patients. 26%29%OS > 2 years (percent) MEDIAN OS (months) 22%20%PFS > 6 months 15 (24%)41 (22%)TUMOR CONTROL 5 (8%)13 (7%)SD 4 (6%)14 (8%)MR 6 (10%)14 (8%)PR Dox / Ifos Resistant (n=63) Full Cohort (n=183) PARAMETER JA López et al. Proc. ASCO 2003; Abstr A. Le Cesne et al, JCO 2005; 23:576 ET-743 sarcoma program: combined phase II results

4 Supervivencia Global–ET-743 STS Median Survival 10.3 months 29% of pts alive > 2 yrs ET-743 phase II sarcoma program: Overall survival

5 Identify and validate molecular markers that correlate with sensitivity or resistance to ET-743 –Select the group of STS patients who will most benefit from ET-743 Marker + Marker - Objective

6 Human STS cell lines explanted from chemotherapy-naïve patients 12 low passage sarcoma cell lines sensitive or resistant to ET-743 underwent gene expression profile (CNIO Oncochip; > 6700 cancer related genes) STS cell lines 10nM ET-743 0h 6h12h24h72h MOLECULAR PROFILE OF ET-743 I. Identification of genes in vitro associated with ET-743 sensitivity or resistance

7 51EWING SARCOMASR OSTEOSARCOMASR LIPOSARCOMASR2103/B 450.7LIPOSARCOMASR2103/A >3000.5LIPOSARCOMASW872 >3009LEIOMYOSARCOMALS not done > Doxorubicin (nM) >100WILMS TUMORRS0306 1EWING SARCOMAA673 > ET-743 (nM) MPNST FIBROUS TUMOR LEIOMYOSARCOMA TUMOR HISTOLOGY SR0406 SR2410 SR2205 CA1010 CELL LINE Chemotherapy sensitivity profile of low passage sarcoma cell lines

8 Genes differentially expressed in ET-743 sensitive and resistant cell lines Cell cycle control –TP53 Inhibition of transcription and the DNA damage response –JUNB, ATF3, CS-1, SAT, ID2, GADD45B DNA repair –BRCA1, XPD, RAD17, p31, p53DINP1

9 Takebayashi Y. et al. Nature Med 2001; 7:961 II. DNA repair genes appear central to the function of ET-743: gene deletion experiments Intact nucleotide excision repair increases cytotoxicity Deficient double stranded break repair increases cytotoxicity

10 III. Examining genes involved in DNA repair and how they are implicated in patient responses to ET-743 Source material: tumor samples from 45 heavily pre- treated STS patients, subsequently treated with ET-743 Analyze genes important in DNA repair by mRNA expression and / or analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (a) NER pathway: ERCC1 and XPD mRNA expression and SNP analysis (b) BRCA1 mRNA expression

11 # PtsPRMR SD (*) PD patients, 8 not evaluable; Median Duration of PR or MR: 13.3 months (*) 4 / 14 SD achieved PFS > 6 mo 10 / 45 PD achieved PFS > 6 mo Best ET-743 response in patients providing tumor samples

12 Overall survivalProgression-free survival Median: 11.8 monthsMedian: 1.6 months PFS > 6 months: 26 % 73% of this group were compassionate use patients: Histology: Leiomyosarcoma31% Osteogenic sarcoma22% Synovial sarcoma16% Prior chemo: Median # RegimensMedian # Agents 2 (0-6)2 (0-10) Comparison of this cohort to the larger cohort of analyzed patients

13 Paraffin embedded tumor tissue RNA extractionDNA extraction Quantitation of RNA expression level Identification of polymorphic DNA alleles Reverse transcription Q-RT-PCR Allele discrimination RT-PCR Gln NTC Gln/G ln Lys/G ln Lys/Ly s Lys Gln XPD 751 Gln Lys XPD 751 Gln Lys XPD 751 Lys Experimental design

14 Polymorphism Patients PR Lys751Lys 14 3 Asp312Asp 15 3 Gln751Gln 5 0 Asn312Asn 7 0 There is a trend in the association between Lys751Lys and Asp312Asp genotypes in XPD gene and better clinical response to ET-743 in sarcoma patients (but p=NS by Fisher’s exact test). XPD polymorphisms associated with responses to ET-743

15 high low high low Cut-off expression level = 5.86Cut-off expression level = 1.95 Patients with high levels of expression of both ERCC1 and XPD show trend toward better tumor control rates ( PFS > 6 months ) p=NS by Fisher’s exact test PFS by ERCC1PFS by XPD High or low ERCC1 and XPD expression and their association with overall survival

16 Parameter ERCC1 mRNA Expression Levels < median > median PR + MR / Total (%) 2 / 19 (11%) 4 / 19 (21%) PFS > 6 months 3 / 19 (16%) 6 / 19 (32%) Patients with high levels of ERCC1 expression showed a trend toward better RR (21% vs. 11%) and a higher rate of patients achieving PFS > 6 months (32% vs 16%) (p = NS by Fisher exact test) ERCC1 expression and sensitivity to ET-743

17 Parameter BRCA1 expression levels < median > median PR + MR (%) PFS > 6 months (%) 4 / 17 (24%) 6 / 17 (35%) 1 / 17 (6%)* 1 / 17 (6%) ++ Patients with low BRCA1 mRNA expression levels demonstrated a trend towards higher PR+MR and tumor control rates *p = p = 0.08 BRCA1 expression and ET-743 sensitivity

18 Median survival: BRCA1 < median: 16.8 months BRCA1 > median: 6.0 months Total population: 11.8 months Phase II pivotal: 10.3 months PFS > 6 month rate: BRCA1 < median: 41 % BRCA1 > median: 6 % Total population : 26 % Phase II pivotal: 20 % p = 0.02p = 0.06 Low SurvivalPFS High Kaplan-Meier survival curves by BRCA1 expression

19 Conclusions Preclinical analysis of cell lines sensitive or resistant to ET-743 identifies a set of genes that underscores the importance of DNA repair (intact NER) in the mechanism of action of ET-743. Low expression of BRCA1 is associated with better objective response, higher rate of progression free survival at 6 months, and a statistically significant improved median survival of sarcoma patients treated with ET-743. High expression levels of XPD or ERCC1 may be associated with improved clinical outcome on ET-743 Lys751Lys and Asp312Asp genotypes in the XPD gene also appear to be associated with a higher rate of response to ET-743. Analysis of a larger group of tumors from patients sensitive and resistant to ET-743 will be necessary to confirm the relationship between DNA repair genes and ET-743 sensitivity.

20 Positano, Italy Thank you for the opportunity to present.