A Review of 6LoWPAN Routing Protocols Advisor: Quincy Wu Speaker: Kuan-Ta Lu Date: Dec. 14, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wireless Embedded Systems ( x) IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN) Chaiporn Jaikaeo Department of.
Advertisements

6LoWPAN Extending IP to Low-Power WPAN 1 By: Shadi Janansefat CS441 Dr. Kemal Akkaya Fall 2011.
20.1 Chapter 20 Network Layer: Internet Protocol Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
1 Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, nature calls a butterfly. - Anonymous.
6LoWPAN Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (LOAD) Ki-Hyung Kim, S. Daniel Park, G. Montenegro, S. Yoo, and N. Kushalnagar IETF 6LoWPAN WG 66th, Montreal,
Chapter 20 Network Layer: Internet Protocol Stephen Kim 20.1.
MANETs Routing Dr. Raad S. Al-Qassas Department of Computer Science PSUT
1 Spring Semester 2007, Dept. of Computer Science, Technion Internet Networking recitation #4 Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks AODV Routing.
Department of Computer Engineering University of California at Santa Cruz Networking Systems (1) Hai Tao.
ITIS 6010/8010 Wireless Network Security Dr. Weichao Wang.
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) Neil Tang 02/02/2009.
Fault Tolerance in ZigBee Wireless Sensor Networks
Ad Hoc Wireless Routing COS 461: Computer Networks
6LoWPAN Overview, Assumptions, Problem Statement & Goals (draft-kushalnagar-lowpan-goals-assumptions-00) Nandu Kushalnagar & Gabriel Montenegro.
ZigBee. Introduction Architecture Node Types Network Topologies Traffic Modes Frame Format Applications Conclusion Topics.
Zigbee Mesh Networking 16 August 2015 Raoul van Bergen Field Application Engineer Embedded – EMEA Digi International.
ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) Computer Networks By: Saeedeh Zahmatkesh spring.
G64INC Introduction to Network Communications Ho Sooi Hock Internet Protocol.
Lecture 2 TCP/IP Protocol Suite Reference: TCP/IP Protocol Suite, 4 th Edition (chapter 2) 1.
Internetworking Between ZigBee/ and IPv6/802.3 Network
1 Semester 2 Module 10 Intermediate TCP/IP Yuda college of business James Chen
Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking By Jared Roberts. Overview What is a MANET? What is a MANET? Problems with routing in a MANET Problems with routing in a MANET.
Advisor: Quincy Wu Speaker: Kuan-Ta Lu Date: Aug. 19, 2010
Speaker:Yi-Jie Pan Advisor:Dr. Kai-Wei Ke 2014/04/28
1 Spring Semester 2009, Dept. of Computer Science, Technion Internet Networking recitation #3 Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks AODV Routing.
Mobile Adhoc Network: Routing Protocol:AODV
Ad hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing Protocol ECE 695 Spring 2006.
Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) and simulation in network simulator.
© 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved..
RFC 3561 AODV Routing Protocol Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Working Group Charles E. Perkins INTERNET DRAFT Nokia Research Center 19 June 2002 Elizabeth M.
Routing Protocols of On- Demand Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) Ad-Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV)
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Electrical Engineering Department EE400 PROJECT Personal Area Networks Instructed by Dr.AlGhadbanPresenters.
Ad Hoc Routing: The AODV and DSR Protocols Speaker : Wilson Lai “Performance Comparison of Two On-Demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks”, C. Perkins.
20.1 Chapter 20 Network Layer: Internet Protocol Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Speaker : Junn-Keh Yeh Date : 2010/7/2 1.  IEEE  Forming, Joining, and Rejoining ZigBee Networks ◦ Forming Networks ◦ Joining Networks ◦ Rejoining.
1 RFC Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE Networks Speaker: Li-Wen Chen Date:
CSC 600 Internetworking with TCP/IP Unit 7: IPv6 (ch. 33) Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
AODV: Introduction Reference: C. E. Perkins, E. M. Royer, and S. R. Das, “Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing,” Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-aodv-08.txt,
SRL: A Bidirectional Abstraction for Unidirectional Ad Hoc Networks. Venugopalan Ramasubramanian Ranveer Chandra Daniel Mosse.
Speaker: Li-Wen Chen Date: FAULT-TOLERANCE MECHANISMS FOR ZIGBEE WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Skender Ben Attia, André Cunha, Anis Koubâa, M ário.
Speaker: Yi-Lei Chang Advisor: Dr. Kai-Wei Ke 2012/05/15 IPv6-based wireless sensor network 1.
ICMPv6 Error Message Types Informational Message Types.
Ad-hoc On Demand Distance Vector Protocol Hassan Gobjuka.
Intro DSR AODV OLSR TRBPF Comp Concl 4/12/03 Jon KolstadAndreas Lundin CS Ad-Hoc Routing in Wireless Mobile Networks DSR AODV OLSR TBRPF.
ZyXEL Confidential ICMPv6 Feng Zhou SW2 ZyXEL Communications Corp. 03/27/2006.
Integration of Wireless Sensor Networks to the Internet of Things using a 6LoWPAN Gateway Integration of Wireless Sensor Networks to the Internet of Things.
Doc: IEEE Submission July 2012 Hernandez,Li,Dotlić (NICT)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
6LoWPAN Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing Introduction Speaker: Wang Song-Ferng Advisor: Dr. Ho-Ting Wu Date: 2014/03/31.
Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) ietf
Mesh Routing Optimization for 6LoWPAN Ki-Hyung Kim (Ajou University) and S. Daniel Park (SAMSUNG Electronics) IETF 6LoWPAN WG 65th, Dallas, Tx.
Doc.: IEEE /0174r1 Submission Hang Liu, et al. March 2005 Slide 1 A Routing Protocol for WLAN Mesh Hang Liu, Jun Li, Saurabh Mathur {hang.liu,
Lecture 13 IP V4 & IP V6. Figure Protocols at network layer.
20.1 Chapter 20 Network Layer: Internet Protocol Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Author:Zarei.M.;Faez.K. ;Nya.J.M.
Internet of Things Amr El Mougy Alaa Gohar.
Chapter 19 Network Layer Protocols
Department of Computer Science Southern Illinois University Carbondale CS441-Mobile & Wireless Computing Zigbee Standard Dr.
Lecture 28 Mobile Ad hoc Network Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
Internet Networking recitation #4
A comparison of Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols
任課教授:陳朝鈞 教授 學生:王志嘉、馬敏修
Extending IP to Low-Power, Wireless Personal Area Networks
Mobile and Wireless Networking
Chapter 20 Network Layer: Internet Protocol
Department of Computer Science Southern Illinois University Carbondale CS441-Mobile & Wireless Computing IEEE Standard.
Net 323 D: Networks Protocols
Overview: Chapter 3 Networking sensors
Vinay Singh Graduate school of Software Dongseo University
A Routing Protocol for WLAN Mesh
NET 323D: Networks Protocols
Presentation transcript:

A Review of 6LoWPAN Routing Protocols Advisor: Quincy Wu Speaker: Kuan-Ta Lu Date: Dec. 14, 2010

Outline Introducton 6LoWPAN Overview 6LoWPAN adaptation layer LOAD DYMO-low HiLow Comparisons of existing 6LoWPAN routing protocols Reference 2

Introduction Wireless sensor network (WSN) is one of the fastest growing segments in the ubiquitous networking today. In order to morph WSN from personal area network (PAN) into low power personal area network (LoWPAN), IEEE standard is introduced. Currently some sensor network protocols have non-IP network layer protocol such as ZigBee, where TCP/IP protocol is not used. However, future WSNs consisting of thousands of nodes and these networks may be connected to others via the internet. Hence, IPv6 over LoWPAN (6LoWPAN) is defined by Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) as a technique to apply TCP/IP into WSN. 3

Introduction (cont.) 6LoWPAN provides a WSN node with IP communication capabilities by putting an adaptation layer above the IEEE link layer for the packet fragmentation and reassembly purpose. There have been a few developments on routing protocols for 6LoWPAN. LOAD (6LoWPAN Ad-Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing)  It is a simplified on-demand routing protocol based on Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance (AODV). DYMO-low (Dynamic MANET On-demand for 6LoWPAN Routing)  The significant feature in DYMO-low is it can support either 16-bit link layer short address or IEEE 64-bit extended address (EUI-64). HiLow (Hierarchical Routing)  It use dynamically assigned 16-bit unique short address as device’s interface identifier. 4

6LoWPAN Overview 6LoWPAN is a simple low cost communication network that allows wireless connectivity in applications with limited power and relaxed throughput requirements as it provides IPv6 networking over IEEE networks. 5

6LoWPAN Overview (cont.) The PHY layer specification dictates how the IEEE devices may communicate with each other over a wireless channel. The basic tasks provided by the MAC layer are beacon generation and synchronization, supporting PAN association and disassociation, managing channel access via Carriers Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA) mechanism, and etc. 6

6LoWPAN Overview (cont.) IEEE standard defined 4 frame structures for MAC layer: beacon frame  A beacon frame is used by a PAN coordinator to transmit beacons. data frame  A data frame is used for data transfers. acknowledgement frame  It use for confirming successful frame reception. MAC command frame  It’s handling all MAC peer entity control transfers respectively. 7

6LoWPAN Overview (cont.) 8

6LoWPAN adaptation layer In order to implement the seamless connection of MAC layer and IPv6 network layer, 6LoWPAN working group suggested that adding an adaptation layer between MAC layer and the network layer to achieve the header compression, fragmentation and layer-two forwarding. In header compression, 6LoWPAN defined HC1 encoding as an optimized compression scheme for link-local IPv6 communication. Some IPv6 header fields such as IPv6 length fields and IPv6 addresses are eliminated from a packet as long as the adaptation layer can derive them from the headers in the link-layer frame or based on simple assumption of shared context. 9

6LoWPAN adaptation layer (cont.) 10

6LoWPAN adaptation layer (cont.) When the IPv6 packets cannot fit into the MAC frame payload size (102 bytes of payload), the packets are fragmented into multiple link-layer frames to accommodate the IPv6 minimum MTU requirement for reassembling them at the other end. Figure 4 shows the First Fragmentation Header (4 bytes) that used in the 6LoWPAN fragmentation mechanism. The Subsequent Fragmentation Header (5 bytes) includes an extra byte for offset field. 11

6LoWPAN adaptation layer (cont.) To accomplish the multi-hop packet forwarding, 6LoWPAN defined Mesh Header (4 - 5 bytes) as shown in Figure 5. Basically, the Mesh header is used to standardize the way to encode the hop limit and the link layer source and destination of the packets. Since the standard support for 16-bits or 64-bits addressing mode, the value of originator (O) and the final destination (F) are one if the address is 16 bits or zero if the address is 64 bits. 12

6LoWPAN adaptation layer (cont.) As different mechanisms in adaptation layer require different types of headers, the first two bits of the headers is used to identify the header type. bit pattern 11 is used to identify the fragmentation header bit pattern 10 is used to identify the mesh header bit pattern 00 is reserved to identify these non-6LoWPAN frames bit pattern 01 is used to identify the Dispatch Header 13

6LoWPAN adaptation layer (cont.) 14

6LoWPAN adaptation layer (cont.) Basically, there are two routing scheme categories in 6LoWPAN: mesh-under  The mesh-under approach performs its routing at adaptation layer and performs no IP routing within LoWPAN whereby it is directly based on the IEEE MAC addresses (16-bit or 64-bit logical address). route-over  The route-over approach performs its routing at network layer and performs IP routing with each node serving as an IP router. 15

LOAD 6LoWPAN Ad-Hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing It is defined to be operating on top of the adaptation layer instead of the transport layer. It creates a mesh network topology underneath and unbeknownst to IPv6. IPv6 sees a 6LoWPAN as a single link. LOAD does not use the destination sequence number that used in AODV. For ensuring loop freedom, only the destination of a route should generate a Route Reply (RREP) in reply. 16

LOAD (cont.) LOAD does not use the precursor list of AODV in order to simplify the routing table structure. In LOAD, when there is a link break, the upstream node of the link break may try to repair the route locally by using route discovery mechanism in LOAD whereby broadcasted Route Request (RREQ) and unicast RREP message are used. If the repairing node unable to repair to link, it unicasts a RERR with an error code that indicates the reason of the repair failure to the originator of the failed data message only. 17

LOAD (cont.) Unlike AODV, LOAD uses the link layer acknowledgements instead of Hello messages to save energy while keeping track of route connectivity. It requests MAC layer acknowledgement for every sent data message and is termed as Link Layer Notification (LLN). 18

DYMO-low Dynamic MANET On-demand for 6LoWPAN Routing Like AODV, DYMO performs route discovery and maintenance by using RREQ, RREP and RERR messages. Unlike AODV, the DYMO protocol does not use local repair although it uses Hello message to keep track of the link connectivity. However, DYMO cannot be directly applied in 6LoWPAN routing due to its increased memory and power consumption. Thus, DYMO-low is proposed in to suit DYMO into the 6LoWPAN environment. 19

DYMO-low (cont.) Instead of using the IP layer, DYMO-low operates on the link layer directly to create a mesh network topology of 6LoWPAN devices unbeknownst to IP, such that IP sees the WPAN as a single link. DYMO-low uses 16-bit link layer short address or IEEE 64-bit extended address (EUI-64). All of the features that discussed in LOAD above are used in DYMO-low except that the 16-bits sequence numbers are used in DYMO-low to ensure loop freedom. Local repair and route cost accumulation that used in LOAD are no used as well in DYMO-low. 20

HiLow Hierarchical routing In order to increase the network scalability, HiLow is proposed for 6LoWPAN. HiLow use 16-bit unique short address as interface identifier for memory saving and larger scalability. Every child node receives a short address by the following equation C = MC*AP+N (0 < N ≤ MC)  C is the child node address  MC is the maximum number of children a parent can have  AP is the address of the parent  N is the nth child node 21

HiLow (cont.) For the routing operation in HiLow, it is assumed that every node knows its own depth. When a node receives an IPv6 packet, it is called the current node. For the routing operation, the following symbols are defined.  D : the destination  C : the current node  AC : the address of the current node  AP : the address of the parent of the current node  SA : the set of the ascendant nodes of the destination  SD : the set of the descendant nodes of the destination  AA (D, k) : the address of the ascendant node of depth D of the node k  DD : the depth of the destination  DC : the depth of the current node 22

HiLow (cont.) The current node determines first whether it is either the ascendant or descendant nodes of the destination. When the current node receives a packet, the next hop node to forward the packet can be calculated by the following three cases. If C is the member of SA: The next hop node is AA(DC+1, D). If C is the member of SD: The next hop node is AA(DC-1, C). Otherwise: The next hop node is AA(DC-1, C). 23

HiLow (cont.) However, when there is a link break in a route, HiLow does not support any recovery path mechanism as AODV and LOAD. 24

Comparisons of existing 6LoWPAN routing protocols 25

Reference 1. Protocols.pdfhttp://ms11.voip.edu.tw/~jryan/ref/Wireless_Reviewof6LoWPANRouting Protocols.pdf 2. vs mesh-under routing in 6LoWPAN.pdfhttp://ms11.voip.edu.tw/~jryan/ref/Route-over vs mesh-under routing in 6LoWPAN.pdf 3. Review of 6LoWPAN Routing Protocols.pdfhttp://ms11.voip.edu.tw/~jryan/ref/A Review of 6LoWPAN Routing Protocols.pdf 4. routing-01http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-daniel-6lowpan-hilow-hierarchical- routing-01 26

Thanks for listening~ 27