Critical Period Threshold Study Effects of up to Five Years of Consecutive Weed Control Relative to Growth Losses from Delaying Weed Control for Douglas-

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nursery Production Competencies
Advertisements

Riparian Thinning Logic
Integrating the Forestry Reclamation Approach for Reclamation of American Chestnut and Oaks in the Mid-Continent Region 1.
Preparing Cutover Woodland for Longleaf Establishment By Larry J. Such NC Division of Forest Resources.
Forest Biome Forest Climate Forest Plants Forest Animals.
An Envirothon Primer Glenn “Dode” Gladders
Modeling Tree Growth Under Varying Silvicultural Prescriptions Leah Rathbun University of British Columbia Presented at Western Mensurationists 2010.
Module #2 Site Preparation Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast.
Types of Forests. Tropical (Rainforests) Canopy is often closed (little light reaches below) Canopy is often closed (little light reaches below) A canopy.
The Effects of Site and Soil on Fertilizer Response of Coastal Douglas-fir K.M. Littke, R.B. Harrison, and D.G. Briggs University of Washington Coast Fertilization.
Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the.
Wildlife Management Principles. Goals What are some goals related to the management of wildlife habitats?
Forest Ecology  Biomes  All organisms living in a certain climate.
Thinning Impacts on Even-aged Stands of Eucalyptus in Brazil Thinning Impacts on Even-aged Stands of Eucalyptus in Brazil June 21, 2010 Missoula, MT Western.
Use of FVS for a Forest-wide Inventory SPOKANE INDIAN RESERVATION.
Introduction to World Agriculture. Define terms related to forestry. Describe the forest regions of the US. Discuss important relationships among forests,
IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON FORESTRY INDUSTRY Presented by Jude Tabi Forestry Department.
Applying Density Management to Develop Late Successional Features Klaus J. Puettmann Oregon State University.
Predicting Nitrogen Fertilizer Response in Douglas-fir Plantations Kim Littke Rob Harrison.
Climatic and biophysical controls on conifer species distributions in mountains of Washington State, USA D. McKenzie, D. W. Peterson, D.L. Peterson USDA.
Management Options for Lodgepole Pine in Southern Interior British Columbia.
A Young Douglas-fir Plantation Growth Model for the Pacific Northwest Nick Vaughn University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
SMC Fall Policy Mtg NWTIC / SMC Genetic Gains / Type IV Joint Trial Progress Report (GGTIV) David G. Briggs Robert B. Harrison Keith Jayawickrama.
Ecological succession is... Two kinds of Succession: Primary & Secondary Primary succession is… Ecological succession is the sequence of community changes.
Materials and Methods Stand Management Cooperative (SMC) Type 1 Installations Research Plots Six 1 acre Douglas-fir plots per installation were examined.
First Measurements of 2005 GGTIV* Installations Eric C. Turnblom, SMC Keith Jayawickrama, NWTIC SMC Spring Policy Meeting, 25 – 26 Apr 2007 Vancouver,
Christmas Tree Weed Control TREE SCHOOL 2012 Paul Borgen Agronomy Manager Pratum Co-op Salem, OR.
Projected Deliverables: Estimates of N losses due to leaching, volatilization, and uptake by competing understory vegetation Determine the relative efficiency.
Abiotic Factors- The non living factors in an ecosystem that affect the survival chances for an organism in that ecosystem.
Acknowledgments This study is a product of the Sustainable Forestry Component of Agenda 2020, a joint effort of the USDA Forest Service Research and Development.
Evaluating Wildlife Habitats. How are habitats classified?  Tropical areas surround the equator and are characterized by warm temperatures year round.
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
Stem form responses to differing areas of weed control around planted Douglas-fir trees Robin Rose, Douglas A. Maguire, and Scott Ketchum Department of.
The Potential of the Alder Resource: Challenges and Opportunities David Hibbs and Andrew Bluhm Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative Department of Forest Science.
UWUW C. Henry Plant Basics Or. EPS C. Henry Ecological Restoration Handbook By: Chuck Henry & Elena Olsen Chapter 5 from:
Do stem form differences mask responses to silvicultural treatment? Doug Maguire Department of Forest Science Oregon State University.
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning Chapter 7 Forests.
Silvics Analytic Timing of Site Preparation and Post-Plant Weed Control to Optimize Pine Growth Integration of research results from three region-wide.
Projected Deliverables: Estimates of N losses due to leaching, volatilization, and uptake by competing understory vegetation Determine the relative efficiency.
The Four Regions of Texas
Growth and Yield Lecture 6 (04/17/2015). Overview   Review of stand characteristics that affect growth   Basic Stand Growth Terminology Yield curve;
Then… ….and Now. 2 Old growth Second growth Stand age vs. percent of juvenile wood When trees grow rapidly so that they are of harvestable size when.
Thinning mixed-species stands of Douglas-fir and western hemlock in the presence of Swiss needle cast Junhui Zhao, Douglas A. Maguire, Douglas B. Mainwaring,
Controlling Liverworts R Kasten Dumroese, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station Kent Eggleston, USDA Forest Service, Coeur d’Alene Nursery Anthony.
Forest Ecosystem.
Maintenance and Follow-up after Planting Longleaf Pine Bill Pickens Pine Silvicultralist.
Soil and Natural Vegetation CGC1D Fri, Feb 28, 2014.
Natural Vegetation of British Columbia
Looking for the Plateau in Douglas-fir Annual Volume Increment
THE INFLUENCE OF STAND CONDITIONS ON TREE FORM Sean M. Garber and Aaron R. Weiskittel Oregon State University June 21, 2004.
Squamish Forest Ecosystems Ecosystem (noun): a community of species interacting with themselves and the physical environment 1 Ecosystem Controls Squamish.
Forestry In Canada.
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
Stand Development. Site Capability The ability of a forest to grow is related directly to physical site factors. Favourable physical factors create better.
Planting Soil should be at the top of the pot, tap twice to get soil settled Dudes… you have to plant your plant at the right depth! –The crown of the.
Africa: Climate and Vegetation Chapter 1, Section 2.
Forestry. The Arctic Circle is covered in permafrost, yet Point Pelee in southern Ontario is further south than northern California. The soil and water.
Common Trees of the Gulf Islands: Identification and Knowledge.
Leah Rathbun PhD Candidate, University of British Columbia
Robert Hane1, Joshua Adams1, Michael Blazier2
Fir Douglas or cedar red western?
Water and nutrient limitations to tree establishment on slate waste
The Geography of Texas Texas History, Chapters 1 and 2.
Then… ….and Now.
FFA Forestry CDE – Elba High School – Mr. Davis
Forest Grazing: Impacts & Management
Scarification and Fertilization of Western Redcedar
Canada’s Vegetation Regions
Forestry.
Presentation transcript:

Critical Period Threshold Study Effects of up to Five Years of Consecutive Weed Control Relative to Growth Losses from Delaying Weed Control for Douglas- fir and Other PNW Conifer Species

Introduction What is the relative efficacy of continuous weed control through 3, 4 or 5 growing seasons after planting ? What is the relative efficacy of continuous weed control through 3, 4 or 5 growing seasons after planting ? What growth loses, if any, result from delaying vegetation control for a year or two after planting? What growth loses, if any, result from delaying vegetation control for a year or two after planting? Douglas-fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, and grand fir Douglas-fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, and grand fir -Multiple years of vegetation control -Delayed vegetation control -Different sites -Different vegetation types and climatic influences

Methods- Study design Randomized block split-plot with 4 blocks of 8 treatments per conifer species Randomized block split-plot with 4 blocks of 8 treatments per conifer species OOOOO, TOOOO, TTOOO, TTTOO, TTTTO, TTTTT, OTTTT and OOTTT OOOOO, TOOOO, TTOOO, TTTOO, TTTTO, TTTTT, OTTTT and OOTTT Plots- 36 seedlings planted in a grid with 10 ft x 10 ft spacing, surrounded by a row of buffer trees. Plots- 36 seedlings planted in a grid with 10 ft x 10 ft spacing, surrounded by a row of buffer trees. 4 sites representing different geoclimatic zones with different vegetation communities and climatic conditions. 4 sites representing different geoclimatic zones with different vegetation communities and climatic conditions.

Sites 2000 Installation 2000 Installation  Central Coast Range Location  -Starker Forest ground west of Corvallis, OR  -All four species of interest (Douglas-fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, and grand fir)  2001 Installations  Spruce Hemlock Coastal Forest  -Weyerhaeuser ground near Seaside, OR  -(Douglas-fir and western hemlock)  Low elevation western Cascade  Cascade Timber Consulting ground near Sweet Home, OR  (Douglas-fir and western red cedar)  Drier Southern Coast Range  Roseburg Resources ground near Riddle, OR  (Douglas-fir and grand fir)

Zone 3- Riddle (Roseburg) Zone 4- Sweet Home Zone 1-Starker Zone 2- Seaside

Planting Stock All seedlings were large container stock (Styro 15’s ) with fertilizer in media. Grown at Plum Creek Nursery (Cottage Grove) Goal was to plant stock as uniform as possible.

Operational Control Target- No more than 25 % cover Target- No more than 25 % cover Mechanical Site Prep- all sites Mechanical Site Prep- all sites Excavator piling and removal of obvious shrub clumps Excavator piling and removal of obvious shrub clumps All remaining hardwood clumps sprayed until dead. All remaining hardwood clumps sprayed until dead. Chemical Site Prep- T’’’’ Chemical Site Prep- T’’’’ Fall Oust (2oz), Escort (.5oz) and Accord. Other herbicides added if needed. Fall Oust (2oz), Escort (.5oz) and Accord. Other herbicides added if needed. Follow-up Weed Control- Follow-up Weed Control- Spring Atrazine and Transline applications Spring Atrazine and Transline applications

Weed Control

Weed Control Efficacy

Results- Starker Site Douglas-fir Volume growth maximized - TTT’’ or TTO’’ TTT’’ improved third- year volume by over 150% relative to OOO” Either 2-year treatment improved volume growth relative to the best 1- year treatment by 59% No differences— OTT’’ vs. TTO’’ or TOO’’ vs. OOT

Results- Starker site grand fir TTT’’ improved grand fir volume growth by 47% relative to the best 2- year treatment and by 477% relative to OOO’’ (TTO’’) resulted in greater volume than either one-year treatment. No differences – OTT’’ vs. TTO’’ or TOO’’ vs. OOT’’

Results- Starker site- western red cedar No differences—OTT’’ vs. TTO’’ or TOO’’ vs. OOT’’ No differences between TTT’’, OTT’’ and TTO’’ OTT’’ improved volume growth compared (TOO’’) by 107% TTT’’ increased volume relative to OOO’’ by 452% One-year treatments were not statistically different from OOO’’

Results- Starker Site Western Hemlock Again, no differences –OTT’’ vs. TTO’’ or TOO’’ vs. OOT Volume maximized by TTT’’, OTT’’ or TTO TTT’’ increased volume by 142% relative to OOO’’ TTO’’ improved volume growth relative OOT’’ by 73%.

Starker Site Mortality

Seaside Results Douglas-fir No differences in volume or height among treatments. (TT’’’) increased diameter relative to plots that were not treated the first year (OT’’’ and OO’’’). Western hemlock Volume and diameter not significantly affected by weed control TO’’’ and TT’’’ reduced height growth relative to OO’’’.

Seaside Mortality

Sweet Home Results Douglas-fir TT’’’ increased volume, diameter and height relative to all other treatment combinations Western red cedar TT’’’ and TO’’’ increased volume, height and diameter relative to OT’’’ or OO’’’ Both OT’’’ and TO’’’ improved diameter growth relative to OO’’’No differences in any parameter between one-year treatments (OT’’’ vs. TO’’’)

Sweet Home Mortality

Roseburg Results Douglas-fir TT’’’ and OT’’’ increased diameter and volume relative to TO’’’ and OO’’’ Grand fir TT’’’ and OT’’’ increased both diameter and volume relative to TO’’’ and OO’’’ TO’’’ did not differ from OO’’’ in volume, diameter or height.

Roseburg Mortality

Summary of Results Starker, Sweet Home and Roseburg sites- -growth increased with increasing years of weed control. - All other cases- no differences between equivalent-number-of- year treatments. Seaside - few differences in volume, height or diameter apparent after 2 years Comparison of treatments with equal number of years of weed control- TTO’’ vs. OTT’’, OOT’’ vs. TOO’’ and OT’’’ vs. TO’’’ - Western red cedar at Sweet Home- only instance in which the earlier application of weed control benefited volume growth. - Douglas-fir and grand fir at Roseburg- applying weed control the second year rather than the first year resulted in increases in diameter and volume.

Discussion Competing vegetation has been slow to fully colonize some sites Weed Cover on never-treated plots: -Starker- 31 to 36% year 1, 68 to 81% year 2 and 84 to 90% year 3 -Seaside- 20 to 25% year 1 and 53 to 59% year 2 -Roseburg- 39 to 41% year 1 and 46 to 53% weed cover year 2. -Sweet Home- 63 to 70% year 1 and 82 to 83% year vs Rainfall

Results- Starker Site Douglas-fir

Questions Raised Do we need to apply site-prep and/or first-year herbicide treatments in all cases? Do we need to apply site-prep and/or first-year herbicide treatments in all cases? If not, can we develop a model to forecast herbicide efficacy for a given season? If not, can we develop a model to forecast herbicide efficacy for a given season? Is large container stock better suited to compete with first- year weeds than other stock types? Is large container stock better suited to compete with first- year weeds than other stock types?