Ashley Blakely Anne-Eliese Raya Shanda Carpenter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 May 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Understanding by Design Day 3 Roosevelt Complex Secondary Science Training.
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
Part II Proficiency Introduce the Backwards Design Process Summer Institute (SI) 2012.
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Ackward esign. Teachers are designers. The effectiveness of their designs corresponds to whether they have accomplished their goals for the end users.
Information from Van de Walle (2004) And Wiggins and McTighe (2005)Jamar Pickreign, Ph.D Planning a Problem-Based Lesson John Van de Walle, offers.
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
Understanding By Design Stage 3 BestPrep TIW Thursday, August 2, 2012 Can I finish my UbD unit plan already?
Stage 1: Identify desired results. Stage 2: Determine acceptable evidence. Stage 3: Plan learning experiences and instruction. Wiggins, G & McTighe. J,
Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.
WHERETO Paragraph for our Service Design W Each of our guides provide a concise introduction that provides the direction of WHERE each of the lessons are.
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Drama and Literacy Drama is an effective learning medium to teach literacy.
46th Annual MPESA Fall Conference
Parkway School District Day 2 Evidence of Understanding And Teaching for Understanding Understanding by Design THINK DIALOGUE COLLABORATE TEACH Authentic.
Understanding By Design (UbD) An overview Excerpted in large part from Making the Most of Understanding by Design By John L. Brown.
Kimberly Skeadas Vision and Philosophy of Curriculum Development.
Understanding By Design A Contemporary Approach to Curriculum Design.
MI/MIS PDU April 2013 Agenda: 4:30-5:00 Deep Dive in LEAP Indicator I.8 5:00-5:15, Networking, Feedback on AT and Special Olympics 5:30 – 6:30 Stage 2.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
The big ideas of UbD UbD big idea Why important? If not… ‘Backward’
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Teaching a Lesson (and Researching!)  Available online at  Examples and supplemental information in BLUE.
Standards-Based Planning Essential Question: What is good teaching? Rigor, Consistency and Cohesiveness in Unit Planning.
Jacque Melin, Facilitator 1.
Using Understanding by Design
Stage 3: Learning Activities and Performance Tasks Thursday, August 4th, 2010.
Understanding Backwards Design – U. S. History Dr. Sarah Mathews Florida International University
The Backward Design Process
CASD Librarians: Do You Speak SAS? What We Need to Know October 25, 2011.
Understanding by Design a.k.a. Backward Design
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Lesson Planning in Backwards Planning DO NOW 1) Divide into two groups.  One group will make a list of answers to this question: What inspires student.
Applying Instructional Strategies to Backward Design.
UbD - Stage 3 Planning for Learning. Review Stage 1 : Identify Desired Results –Big Idea: Teach so that others may understand –Essential Question: Do.
Understanding By Design
Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD Copyright: 2002, Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins.
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
McWilliams, 2007 Unit Design to Lesson Design Following through and achieving expectations Chuck McWilliams, MRH School District June 6th and 7th, 2007.
Backwards Design. Activity-Oriented Teaching Many teachers engage in “activity-oriented” teaching.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
Session One  Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and introduced in Understanding by Design (1998).
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 1 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Understanding Backwards Design - Civics Dr. Sarah Mathews Florida International University
Backward Mapping... beginning with the end in mind... NSW Department of Education & Training NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way With.
HOW IS “WHERETO” LIKE AMERICAN IDOL? All rights reserved. This PowerPoint is intended for use in face- to-face presentation for Parkway School District,
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 Session VI.
1 Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21st Century Teaching and Learning December 8, 2009 HOMEROOM 3 Fair Assessment & Materials and Resources.
Collaborative Lesson Planning 共同備課. Students-cooperative learning Teachers- collaborative lesson planning (CLP)
Adapted from ASCD Materials.  Is a framework for developing units  Begins with looking at the end.  What do we want students to know?  How will they.
Understanding by Design Stage 3 Based on the work of: Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins Copyright (C) 1998 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum.
Designing curriculum for “understanding” with the case of upcoming 2015 revised national curriculum in Korea Presenter : J.D. Ohn.
Curriculum: The Art & Science of Teaching
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
Find Your Group! Middle School (7-8) High School (9-12) Math Science
Understanding by Design
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
Understanding by Design “Backwards Design”
Understanding By Design
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Backward Mapping beginning with the end in mind . . .
Instructional Program Alignment
Presentation transcript:

Ashley Blakely Anne-Eliese Raya Shanda Carpenter

“We are moving from thinking only about what we want to accomplish as the designer to thinking about who the learners – the end- users of our design – are and what they will need, individually and collectively, to achieve the desired results of Stage 1 and to perform well at the tasks proposed in Stage 2.” (Wiggins & McTighe, 191)

Essential Questions: What do learners need, given the desired results. What is the best use of time spent in and out of the classroom, given the performance goals?

The best designs are Engaging and Effective ENGAGING EFFECTIVE Thought provoking Fascinating Energizing Pulls the students in Meaningful It is NOT dry academic content The learners: Are more competent and productive Perform to high standards Develop greater skill and understanding Develop a greater self reflection

The WHERETO elements in instructional planning W – make sure the students know WHERE the unit headed and why. H – HOOK them in the beginning and HOLD their attention. E – EQUIP them with the experiences, tools, knowledge, and know- how to reach goals R – Provide opportunities for the students to RETHINK big ideas, REFLECT on progress, and REVISE their work E – Let students EVALUATE progress and self-assess T – Be TAILORED to reflect individual talents, interests, styles, and needs. O – Be ORGANIZED for optimal effectiveness WHERETO is not a way to build lessons and units, but a way to test them.

Reference Page Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2006) Understanding by Design. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Person Merrill Prentice Hall.