University of Washington Today Lab 2 due next Monday! Finish-up control flow Switch statements 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fabián E. Bustamante, Spring 2007 Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow Today Condition codes Control flow structures Next time Procedures.
Advertisements

MACHINE-LEVEL PROGRAMMING II: ARITHMETIC & CONTROL.
University of Washington Announcements Lab 1 due last night Lab 2 release soon HW1 due Monday night 1.
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow Today Condition codes Control flow structures Next time Procedures.
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow Sept. 12, 2002 Topics Condition Codes Setting Testing Control Flow If-then-else Varieties of Loops Switch Statements.
Machine-Level Programming II Control Flow Sept. 13, 2001 Topics Condition Codes –Setting –Testing Control Flow –If-then-else –Varieties of Loops –Switch.
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow September 1, 2008 Topics Condition Codes Setting Testing Control Flow If-then-else Varieties of Loops Switch.
Machine-Level Programming 3 Control Flow Topics Control Flow Switch Statements Jump Tables.
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow Topics Condition codes Conditional branches Loops Switch statements CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing”
1 Carnegie Mellon Machine-Level Programming II: Arithmetic & Control : Introduction to Computer Systems 5 th Lecture, Sep. 7, 2010 Carnegie Mellon.
1 Seoul National University Machine-Level Programming II: Arithmetic & Control.
University of Washington x86 Programming III The Hardware/Software Interface CSE351 Winter 2013.
Machine-Level Programming III: Switch Statements and IA32 Procedures Seoul National University.
Machine-Level Programming V: Switch Statements Comp 21000: Introduction to Computer Systems & Assembly Lang Systems book chapter 3* * Modified slides from.
II:1 x86 Assembly - Control. II:2 Alternate reference source Go to the source: Intel 64 and IA32 
1 Bryant and O’Hallaron, Computer Systems: A Programmer’s Perspective, Third Edition Carnegie Mellon Machine-Level Programming II: Control : Introduction.
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow Topics Condition Codes Setting Testing Control Flow If-then-else Varieties of loops Switch statements CS 105.
Machine-Level Programming 3 Control Flow Topics Control Flow Switch Statements Jump Tables.
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow Topics Condition Codes Setting Testing Control Flow If-then-else Varieties of loops Switch statements CS 105.
1 Carnegie Mellon Machine-Level Programming II: Arithmetic and Control Lecture, Feb. 28, 2012 These slides are from website which.
תרגול 5 תכנות באסמבלי, המשך
1 Bryant and O’Hallaron, Computer Systems: A Programmer’s Perspective, Third Edition Carnegie Mellon Machine-Level Programming II: Control Carnegie Mellon.
University of Washington x86 Programming II The Hardware/Software Interface CSE351 Winter 2013.
University of Washington This week Lab 1 due 11pm today  Frustrating? Awesome? Both? Neither? Lab 2 out later today, due 11pm Wednesday July 17  Disassembly,
Lecture 7 Flow of Control Topics Finish Lecture 6 slides Lab 02 = datalab comments Assembly Language flow of control Test 1 – a week from wednesday February.
IA32: Control Flow Topics –Condition Codes Setting Testing –Control Flow If-then-else Varieties of Loops Switch Statements.
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow Topics Condition Codes Setting Testing Control Flow If-then-else Varieties of loops Switch statements CS 105.
Carnegie Mellon Machine-Level Programming II: Arithmetic & Control /18-243: Introduction to Computer Systems 6th Lecture, 5 June 2012 Carnegie Mellon.
1 Binghamton University Machine-Level Programming II: Arithmetic & Control CS220: Computer Systems II.
Assembly תרגול 7 תכנות באסמבלי, המשך. Condition Codes Single bit registers  CF – carry flag  ZF – zero flag  SF – sign flag  OF – overflow flag Relevant.
Machine-Level Programming II Control Flow Sept. 14, 2000 Topics Condition Codes –Setting –Testing Control Flow –If-then-else –Varieties of Loops –Switch.
Machine-Level Programming 2 Control Flow Topics Condition Codes Setting Testing Control Flow If-then-else Varieties of Loops Switch Statements.
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow Topics Condition Codes Setting Testing Control Flow If-then-else Varieties of Loops Switch Statements class06.ppt.
Reading Condition Codes (Cont.)
Machine-Level Programming 2 Control Flow
X86 Assembly, and C-to-assembly
Conditional Branch Example
Machine-Level Programming II: Arithmetic & Control
Machine-Level Programming II Control Flow Sept. 9, 1999
Carnegie Mellon Machine-Level Programming III: Switch Statements and IA32 Procedures / : Introduction to Computer Systems 7th Lecture, Sep.
Machine-Level Programming II: Control
Machine-Level Representation of Programs II
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow
Carnegie Mellon Machine-Level Programming II: Control : Introduction to Computer Systems 6th Lecture, Sept. 13, 2018.
Machine-Level Programming III: Switch Statements and IA32 Procedures
Y86 Processor State Program Registers
Instructors: Majd Sakr and Khaled Harras
Roadmap C: Java: Assembly language: OS: Machine code: Computer system:
Instructor: David Ferry
Condition Codes Single Bit Registers
Machine-Level Programming: Control Flow
Machine-Level Programming 2 Control Flow
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow
Machine-Level Programming 2 Control Flow
Machine-Level Representation of Programs III
Today Control flow if/while/do while/for/switch
Machine-Level Programming 2 Control Flow
x86 Programming III CSE 351 Autumn 2016
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow
X86 Assembly - Control.
Machine-Level Programming II: Control Flow Sept. 12, 2007
Carnegie Mellon Ithaca College
CS201- Lecture 8 IA32 Flow Control
x86-64 Programming III CSE 351 Winter 2019
Presentation transcript:

University of Washington Today Lab 2 due next Monday! Finish-up control flow Switch statements 1

University of Washington Typical control flow code in assembly 2 cmpl %eax,%ebx je label … label:

University of Washington Condition Codes (Explicit Setting: Compare) Single-bit registers CF Carry Flag (for unsigned) SF Sign Flag (for signed) ZF Zero Flag OF Overflow Flag (for signed) Explicit Setting by Compare Instruction cmpl/cmpq Src2,Src1 cmpl b,a like computing a-b without setting destination  CF set if carry out from most significant bit (used for unsigned comparisons)  ZF set if a == b  SF set if (a-b) < 0 (as signed)  OF set if two’s complement (signed) overflow (a>0 && b 0 && (a-b)>0) 3

University of Washington Condition Codes (Explicit Setting: Test) Single-bit registers CF Carry Flag (for unsigned) SF Sign Flag (for signed) ZF Zero Flag OF Overflow Flag (for signed) Explicit Setting by Test instruction testl/testq Src2,Src1 testl b,a like computing a & b without setting destination  Sets condition codes based on value of Src1 & Src2  Useful to have one of the operands be a mask  ZF set if a&b == 0  SF set if a&b < 0  testl %eax, %eax  Sets SF and ZF, check if eax is +,0,- 4

University of Washington Jumping jX Instructions  Jump to different part of code depending on condition codes jXConditionDescription jmp1 Unconditional jeZF Equal / Zero jne~ZF Not Equal / Not Zero jsSF Negative jns~SF Nonnegative jg~(SF^OF)&~ZF Greater (Signed) jge~(SF^OF) Greater or Equal (Signed) jl(SF^OF) Less (Signed) jle(SF^OF)|ZF Less or Equal (Signed) ja~CF&~ZF Above (unsigned) jbCF Below (unsigned) 5

University of Washington Conditional Branch Example int absdiff(int x, int y) { int result; if (x > y) { result = x-y; } else { result = y-x; } return result; } absdiff: pushl %ebp movl %esp, %ebp movl 8(%ebp), %edx movl 12(%ebp), %eax cmpl %eax, %edx jle.L7 subl %eax, %edx movl %edx, %eax.L8: leave ret.L7: subl %edx, %eax jmp.L8 Body1 Setup Finish Body2 6

University of Washington Conditional Branch Example (Cont.) int absdiff(int x, int y) { int result; if (x > y) { result = x-y; } else { result = y-x; } return result; } 7 int goto_ad(int x, int y) { int result; if (x <= y) goto Else; result = x-y; Exit: return result; Else: result = y-x; goto Exit; } C allows “goto” as means of transferring control  Closer to machine-level programming style Generally considered bad coding style

University of Washington Conditional Branch Example (Cont.) int goto_ad(int x, int y) { int result; if (x <= y) goto Else; result = x-y; Exit: return result; Else: result = y-x; goto Exit; } absdiff: pushl %ebp movl %esp, %ebp movl 8(%ebp), %edx movl 12(%ebp), %eax cmpl %eax, %edx jle.L7 subl %eax, %edx movl %edx, %eax.L8: leave ret.L7: subl %edx, %eax jmp.L8 8 int x%edx int y%eax

University of Washington C Code val = Test ? Then-Expr : Else-Expr ; Goto Version nt = !Test ; if (nt) goto Else; val = Then-Expr ; Done:... Else: val = Else-Expr ; goto Done; General Conditional Expression Translation  Test is expression returning integer = 0 interpreted as false  0 interpreted as true  Create separate code regions for then & else expressions  Execute appropriate one  How might you make this more efficient? result = x>y ? x-y : y-x; 9 if ( Test ) val = Then-Expr ; else val = Else-Expr ;

University of Washington Conditionals: x86-64 Conditional move instruction  cmovC src, dest  Move value from src to dest if condition C holds  Why is this good? absdiff: # x in %edi, y in %esi movl %edi, %eax # eax = x movl %esi, %edx # edx = y subl %esi, %eax # eax = x-y subl %edi, %edx # edx = y-x cmpl %esi, %edi # x:y cmovle %edx, %eax # eax=edx if <= ret int absdiff( int x, int y) { int result; if (x > y) { result = x-y; } else { result = y-x; } return result; } 10

University of Washington Conditionals: x86-64 Conditional move instruction  cmovC src, dest  Move value from src to dest if condition C holds  More efficient than conditional branching (simple control flow)  But overhead: both branches are evaluated absdiff: # x in %edi, y in %esi movl %edi, %eax # eax = x movl %esi, %edx # edx = y subl %esi, %eax # eax = x-y subl %edi, %edx # edx = y-x cmpl %esi, %edi # x:y cmovle %edx, %eax # eax=edx if <= ret int absdiff( int x, int y) { int result; if (x > y) { result = x-y; } else { result = y-x; } return result; } 11

University of Washington PC Relative Addressing 0x100 cmp r2, r3 0x1000 0x102 je 0x70 0x1002 0x104 … 0x1004 … … … 0x172 add r3, r4 0x1072 PC relative branches are relocatable Absolute branches are not 12

University of Washington How can we do loops with jX instructions? 13

University of Washington Compiling Loops How to compile other loops should be straightforward  The only slightly tricky part is to be sure where the conditional branch occurs: top or bottom of the loop 14 while ( sum != 0 ) { } loopTop: cmpl $0, %eax je loopDone jmp loopTop loopDone: Machine code:C/Java code:

University of Washington C Code int fact_do(int x) { int result = 1; do { result *= x; x = x-1; } while (x > 1); return result; } Goto Version int fact_goto(int x) { int result = 1; loop: result *= x; x = x-1; if (x > 1) goto loop; return result; } “Do-While” Loop Example Use backward branch to continue looping Only take branch when “while” condition holds 15

University of Washington Goto Version int fact_goto(int x) { int result = 1; loop: result *= x; x = x-1; if (x > 1) goto loop; return result; } “Do-While” Loop Compilation Registers: %edxx %eaxresult fact_goto: pushl %ebp# Setup movl %esp,%ebp# Setup movl $1,%eax# eax = 1 movl 8(%ebp),%edx# edx = x.L11: imull %edx,%eax# result *= x decl %edx# x-- cmpl $1,%edx# Compare x : 1 jg.L11# if > goto loop movl %ebp,%esp# Finish popl %ebp# Finish ret# Finish Assembly Translation? 16

University of Washington Goto Version int fact_goto(int x) { int result = 1; loop: result *= x; x = x-1; if (x > 1) goto loop; return result; } “Do-While” Loop Compilation Registers: %edxx %eaxresult fact_goto: pushl %ebp# Setup movl %esp,%ebp# Setup movl $1,%eax# eax = 1 movl 8(%ebp),%edx# edx = x.L11: imull %edx,%eax# result *= x decl %edx# x-- cmpl $1,%edx# Compare x : 1 jg.L11# if > goto loop movl %ebp,%esp# Finish popl %ebp# Finish ret# Finish Assembly 17

University of Washington C Code do Body while ( Test ); Goto Version loop: Body if ( Test ) goto loop General “Do-While” Translation Body: Test returns integer = 0 interpreted as false  0 interpreted as true { Statement 1 ; Statement 2 ; … Statement n ; } 18

University of Washington C Code int fact_while(int x) { int result = 1; while (x > 1) { result *= x; x = x-1; }; return result; } Goto Version int fact_while_goto(int x) { int result = 1; goto middle; loop: result *= x; x = x-1; middle: if (x > 1) goto loop; return result; } “While” Loop Translation Used by GCC for both IA32 & x86-64 First iteration jumps over body computation within loop straight to test 19

University of Washington int fact_while(int x) { int result = 1; while (x > 1) { result *= x; x--; }; return result; } # x in %edx, result in %eax jmp.L34 # goto Middle.L35: # Loop: imull %edx, %eax # result *= x decl %edx # x--.L34: # Middle: cmpl $1, %edx # x:1 jg.L35 # if >, goto # Loop “While” Loop Example 20

University of Washington “For” Loop Example: Square-and-Multiply Algorithm  Exploit bit representation: p = p 0 + 2p p 2 + … 2 n–1 p n–1  Gives: x p = z 0 · z 1 2 · (z 2 2 ) 2 · … · (…((z n –1 2 ) 2 )…) 2 z i = 1 when p i = 0 z i = x when p i = 1  Complexity O(log p) /* Compute x raised to nonnegative power p */ int ipwr_for(int x, unsigned int p) { int result; for (result = 1; p != 0; p = p>>1) { if (p & 0x1) result *= x; x = x*x; } return result; } n–1 times Example 3 10 = 3 2 * 3 8 = 3 2 * ((3 2 ) 2 ) 2 21

University of Washington ipwr Computation /* Compute x raised to nonnegative power p */ int ipwr_for(int x, unsigned int p) { int result; for (result = 1; p != 0; p = p>>1) { if (p & 0x1) result *= x; x = x*x; } return result; } before iteration resultx=3p= = = = =

University of Washington “For” Loop Example for ( Init ; Test ; Update ) Body int result; for (result = 1; p != 0; p = p>>1) { if (p & 0x1) result *= x; x = x*x; } General Form Init result = 1 Test p != 0 Update p = p >> 1 Body { if (p & 0x1) result *= x; x = x*x; } 23

University of Washington “For”  “While” for ( Init ; Test ; Update ) Body Init ; while ( Test ) { Body Update ; } Init ; goto middle; loop: Body Update ; middle: if ( Test ) goto loop; done: While Version For Version Goto Version 24

University of Washington For-Loop: Compilation for ( Init ; Test ; Update ) Body Init ; goto middle; loop: Body Update ; middle: if ( Test ) goto loop; done: For Version Goto Version for (result = 1; p != 0; p = p>>1) { if (p & 0x1) result *= x; x = x*x; } result = 1; goto middle; loop: if (p & 0x1) result *= x; x = x*x; p = p >> 1; middle: if (p != 0) goto loop; done: 25

University of Washington Quick Review Complete memory addressing mode  (%eax), 17(%eax), 2(%ebx, %ecx, 8), … Arithmetic operations that do set condition codes  subl %eax, %ecx # ecx = ecx + eax  sall $4,%edx # edx = edx << 4  addl 16(%ebp),%ecx # ecx = ecx + Mem[16+ebp]  imull %ecx,%eax # eax = eax * ecx Arithmetic operations that do NOT set condition codes  leal 4(%edx,%eax),%eax # eax = 4 + edx + eax 26

University of Washington Quick Review x86-64 vs. IA32  Integer registers: 16 x 64-bit vs. 8 x 32-bit  movq, addq, … vs. movl, addl, …  movq -> “move quad word” or 4*16-bits  x86-64: better support for passing function arguments in registers Control  Condition code registers  Set as side effect or by cmp, test  Used:  Read out by setx instructions ( setg, setle, …)  Or by conditional jumps ( jle.L4, je.L10, … )  Or by conditional moves ( cmovle %edx, %eax ) %rax %rbx %rcx %rdx %rsi %rdi %rsp %rbp %eax %edx %ecx %ebx %esi %edi %esp %ebp %r8 %r9 %r10 %r11 %r12 %r13 %r14 %r15 %r8d %r9d %r10d %r11d %r12d %r13d %r14d %r15d CFZFSFOF 27

University of Washington Quick Review Do-While loop While-Do loop C Code do Body while ( Test ); Goto Version loop: Body if ( Test ) goto loop While version while ( Test ) Body Do-While Version if (! Test ) goto done; do Body while( Test ); done: Goto Version if (! Test ) goto done; loop: Body if ( Test ) goto loop; done: goto middle; loop: Body middle: if ( Test ) goto loop; or 28

University of Washington Summarizing C Control  if-then-else  do-while  while, for  switch Assembler Control  Conditional jump  Conditional move  Indirect jump  Compiler  Must generate assembly code to implement more complex control Standard Techniques  Loops converted to do-while form  Large switch statements use jump tables  Sparse switch statements may use decision trees (see text) Conditions in CISC  CISC machines generally have condition code registers 29

University of Washington Switch Statement Example Multiple case labels  Here: 5, 6 Fall through cases  Here: 2 Missing cases  Here: 4 Lots to manage, we need a jump table long switch_eg (unsigned long x, long y, long z) { long w = 1; switch(x) { case 1: w = y*z; break; case 2: w = y/z; /* Fall Through */ case 3: w += z; break; case 5: case 6: w -= z; break; default: w = 2; } return w; } 30

University of Washington Jump Table Structure Code Block 0 Targ0: Code Block 1 Targ1: Code Block 2 Targ2: Code Block n–1 Targn-1: Targ0 Targ1 Targ2 Targn-1 JTab: target = JTab[x]; goto *target; switch(x) { case val_0: Block 0 case val_1: Block 1 case val_n-1: Block n–1 } Switch Form Approximate Translation Jump Table Jump Targets 31

University of Washington Jump Table Structure switch(x) { case 1: break; case 2: case 3: break; case 5: case 6: break; default: } Jump Table Code Blocks Memory We can use the jump table when x <= 6: if (x <= 6) target = JTab[x]; goto *target; else goto default; C code: 5 6

University of Washington Jump Table.section.rodata.align 4.L62:.long.L61 # x = 0.long.L56 # x = 1.long.L57 # x = 2.long.L58 # x = 3.long.L61 # x = 4.long.L60 # x = 5.long.L60 # x = 6 Jump table switch(x) { case 1: //.L56 w = y*z; break; case 2: //.L57 w = y/z; /* Fall Through */ case 3: //.L58 w += z; break; case 5: case 6: //.L60 w -= z; break; default: //.L61 w = 2; } 33

University of Washington Switch Statement Example (IA32) Setup: switch_eg: pushl %ebp# Setup movl %esp, %ebp# Setup pushl %ebx# Setup movl $1, %ebx# w = 1 movl 8(%ebp), %edx# edx = x movl 16(%ebp), %ecx# ecx = z cmpl $6, %edx# x:6 ja.L61# if > goto default jmp *.L62(,%edx,4)# goto JTab[x] long switch_eg(unsigned long x, long y, long z) { long w = 1; switch(x) {... } return w; } Translation? 34 Jump table.section.rodata.align 4.L62:.long.L61 # x = 0.long.L56 # x = 1.long.L57 # x = 2.long.L58 # x = 3.long.L61 # x = 4.long.L60 # x = 5.long.L60 # x = 6

University of Washington Switch Statement Example (IA32) Setup: switch_eg: pushl %ebp# Setup movl %esp, %ebp# Setup pushl %ebx# Setup movl $1, %ebx# w = 1 movl 8(%ebp), %edx# edx = x movl 16(%ebp), %ecx# ecx = z cmpl $6, %edx# x:6 ja.L61# if > goto default jmp *.L62(,%edx,4)# goto JTab[x] Indirect jump Jump table.section.rodata.align 4.L62:.long.L61 # x = 0.long.L56 # x = 1.long.L57 # x = 2.long.L58 # x = 3.long.L61 # x = 4.long.L60 # x = 5.long.L60 # x = 6 35 long switch_eg(unsigned long x, long y, long z) { long w = 1; switch(x) {... } return w; }

University of Washington Assembly Setup Explanation Table Structure  Each target requires 4 bytes  Base address at.L62 Jumping: different address modes for target Direct: jmp.L61  Jump target is denoted by label.L61 Indirect: jmp *.L62(,%edx,4)  Start of jump table:. L62  Must scale by factor of 4 (labels are 32-bits = 4 bytes on IA32)  Fetch target from effective address. L62 + edx*4  target = JTab[x]; goto *target; (only for 0  x  6).section.rodata.align 4.L62:.long.L61 # x = 0.long.L56 # x = 1.long.L57 # x = 2.long.L58 # x = 3.long.L61 # x = 4.long.L60 # x = 5.long.L60 # x = 6 Jump table 36

University of Washington Code Blocks (Partial).L61: // Default case movl $2, %ebx # w = 2 movl %ebx, %eax # Return w popl %ebx leave ret.L57: // Case 2: movl 12(%ebp), %eax # y cltd # Div prep idivl %ecx # y/z movl %eax, %ebx # w = y/z # Fall through.L58: // Case 3: addl %ecx, %ebx # w+= z movl %ebx, %eax # Return w popl %ebx leave ret switch(x) {... case 2: //.L57 w = y/z; /* Fall Through */ case 3: //.L58 w += z; break;... default: //.L61 w = 2; } 37

University of Washington Code Blocks (Rest).L60: // Cases 5&6: subl %ecx, %ebx # w –= z movl %ebx, %eax # Return w popl %ebx leave ret.L56: // Case 1: movl 12(%ebp), %ebx # w = y imull %ecx, %ebx # w*= z movl %ebx, %eax # Return w popl %ebx leave ret switch(x) { case 1: //.L56 w = y*z; break;... case 5: case 6: //.L60 w -= z; break;... } 38

University of Washington IA32 Object Code Setup  Label.L61 becomes address 0x  Label.L62 becomes address 0x080488dc : : 77 0c ja : ff dc jmp *0x80488dc(,%edx,4) switch_eg:... ja.L61# if > goto default jmp *.L62(,%edx,4)# goto JTab[x] Assembly Code Disassembled Object Code 39

University of Washington IA32 Object Code (cont.) Jump Table  Doesn’t show up in disassembled code  Can inspect using GDB gdb asm-cntl (gdb) x/7xw 0x080488dc  Examine 7 hexadecimal format “words” (4-bytes each)  Use command “ help x ” to get format documentation 0x080488dc: 0x x x a 0x x x

University of Washington Disassembled Targets : bb mov $0x2,%ebx : 89 d8 mov %ebx,%eax : 5b pop %ebx : c9 leave : c3 ret a: 8b 45 0c mov 0xc(%ebp),%eax d: 99 cltd e: f7 f9 idiv %ecx : 89 c3 mov %eax,%ebx : 01 cb add %ecx,%ebx : 89 d8 mov %ebx,%eax : 5b pop %ebx : c9 leave : c3 ret : 29 cb sub %ecx,%ebx b: 89 d8 mov %ebx,%eax d: 5b pop %ebx e: c9 leave f: c3 ret : 8b 5d 0c mov 0xc(%ebp),%ebx : 0f af d9 imul %ecx,%ebx : 89 d8 mov %ebx,%eax : 5b pop %ebx : c9 leave a: c3 ret 41

University of Washington Matching Disassembled Targets : bb mov : 89 d8 mov : 5b pop : c9 leave : c3 ret a: 8b 45 0c mov d: 99 cltd e: f7 f9 idiv : 89 c3 mov : 01 cb add : 89 d8 mov : 5b pop : c9 leave : c3 ret : 29 cb sub b: 89 d8 mov d: 5b pop e: c9 leave f: c3 ret : 8b 5d 0c mov : 0f af d9 imul : 89 d8 mov : 5b pop : c9 leave a: c3 ret 0x x x a 0x x x

University of Washington Would you implement this with a jump table? Question switch(x) { case 0: break; case 10: break; case 52000: break; default: break; } 43

University of Washington Would you implement this with a jump table? Probably not:  Don’t want a jump table with entries (too big) Question switch(x) { case 0: break; case 10: break; case 52000: break; default: break; } 44