SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Understanding Roles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 2 of 8 Background and Legal Context.
Advertisements

Special Education Continuum of Services Oswego City School District October 9, 2009.
Evaluation of Special Education Teachers
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
M eeting the Needs of All Students in a Collaborative Model: Co-Teaching The School District of Philadelphia A Collaborative Effort Office of Empowerment.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
Understanding the IEP Process
Education for All Education for All A Human Rights Issue.
Chapter 39 Nursing in Long-Term Care Facilities. Factors Contributing to Emerging Dynamic Long-Term Care Settings Increasing complex resident population.
Continuum of Services. Foundations of Inclusion Why Inclusion? Human potential movement General systems theory Principle of Normalization Self-determination.
Continuum of Special Education Services for School Age SWD
2/16/12 Marilyn Bertolucci Coordinator of Special Education Services.
Copyright (c) 2003 Allyn & Bacon Teaching Exceptional, Diverse and At- Risk Students in the General Education Classroom Third Edition Sharon Vaughn Candace.
Copyright © 2007 by Allyn & Bacon Teaching Exceptional, Diverse and At- Risk Students in the General Education Classroom Fourth Edition Sharon Vaughn Candace.
Adapted Physical Education 6 Service Delivery Options Available in Physical Education and the Role of the Adapted Physical Education Specialist.
Exceptionality and Special Education
Johns Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education Principles of Effective Collaboration Success Strategies in the Inclusive Classroom Module.
NTIP Nov 10, 2009 Judi Kochanka Kim Slomka Special Education: Secondary Panel.
LRE, Inclusion, & Co-Teaching
7 Major Principles Under IDEA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS.
8301 Stateline Rd, Suite 204 Kansas City, MO / / Understanding the IEP Process for Parents.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
1 Special Education for Students with Disabilities in NYC Public Schools This presentation was prepared for CIDNY by Jaclyn Okin Barney, Esq. Center for.
True or False A student’s need for AT must be considered at every ARD.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 5 Individuals with Disabilities This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The.
Successful Strategies for Sp-Ed Co-Teaching. Objectives 1. What is co-teaching? 2. What does co-teaching look like? 3. What collaboration skills do teachers.
Education Mainstream Education Home School Special ED
ED 315 Inclusive Practices for Students with Learning Problems Spring 2013.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
Special Education in Context: People, Concepts, and Perspectives
Inclusion What is it? What does it mean to you? What is your philosophy?
What does progressing in general curriculum mean?  Assessing student progress?  Progress is what the fed promotes and requires  Progress in the general.
What does progressing in general curriculum mean?  Assessing student progress?  Progress is what the fed promotes and requires  Progress in the general.
Chapter 1 AN OVERVIEW OF SPECIAL EDUCATION Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Program Guidelines for Students who are Visually Impaired PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
School Placement Options General Education Collaborative Classroom One-to-One Paraprofessional Mainstreaming Inclusion Resource Room Home School Boarding.
The IEP: Individual Education Plan. The IEP Team  (1) The parents of the child;  (2) At least one regular education teacher of the child (if the child.
Chapter 11 Referring and Evaluating for Special Education.
Office of Special Education: Vision Statements Parent Advisory Council – Specialized Services November 05, 2012 Gina Ross - Elementary Megan McCullough.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
School Placement Options Early Intervention General Education Collaborative Classroom Self Contained Classroom Home Schooling Residential School Talented.
School districts are required to educate students with disabilities in regular classrooms with their nondisabled peers, in the school they would attend.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Placement ARC Chairperson Training 1 Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
Special Education in Context: People, Concepts, and Perspectives
SCHOOL PLACEMENT OPTIONS
SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Definitions and Dimensions of the Interactive Team.
Inclusive Practices: Co- Teaching Indiana IEP Resource Center.
Board of Education Meeting September 10, Special Education Quality Review - Monitor compliance related to programs and services provided to students.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
Chapter Four Educational Settings and the Role of Parents/Family.
 Federally-funded project  Hands-on science classrooms.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Adapted Physical Education and Sport 1 Introduction to Adapted Physical Education and Sport Joseph P. Winnick C H A P T E R.
Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education,9th Edition ISBN X © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Planning.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Adapted Physical Education and Sport 1 Introduction to Adapted Physical Education and Sport Joseph P. Winnick C H A P T E R.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
General Education Related Services Self Contained Early Intervention Co- Teaching Residential Home School Vocational Teacher’s Assistant (Para) Hospital.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
Special Education Tier 4 Levels of Support Inclusive Services Educational Support Services 2015.
SCHOOL PLACEMENT OPTIONS
Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services
CHAPTER 6: WORKING WITH FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILIES
Daphne Knight, Susan Writ, Debra Scruggs
Leadership Academy Special Education.
1:1 Aides 1/29/2016.
Presentation transcript:

SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Understanding Roles

React to these statements in Chapter 3 “These examples are but a few of the many related to the scope and magnitude of changes in health care systems, which continue to impact methods of service delivery for students with special needs” (p.99). Comment on each of the three listed. “Research is clearly supportive of family-school collaborations, indicating that they result in improved academic performance, reduced absenteeism, and improved discipline” (p.121). Do you have examples?

What teams exist? IEP teams Teacher Assistance Teams School Improvement Committees Parent-Teacher Associations

Direct v. Indirect Service Teacher support in the mainstream classroom Teacher support in a consultative manner between special education and general education Justify the benefits and/or the situations surrounding both options

Working with High-Incidence Teams (Correa et al, 2005) Primary functions: –Student assessment –Program evaluation –Provision of instruction Responsible for explicit instruction in a structured program Many professors believe that NCLB is correct in not permitting special educators a dominant role in content instruction. Thoughts?

Low-incidence Teams (Correa et al, 2005) Responsible for teaching students with physical and sensory disabilities and cognitive and neurological impairments Primary functions: (to be critiqued) –Positioning, lifting, and transporting students –Monitoring use of medications and prosthetics –Managing seizures –Modifying aberrant behaviors. Major function is to teach students to synthesize their special related services.

General Educator’s role (Correa et al, 2005) Brings content knowledge Observe students interactions with peers who show appropriate behaviors Most important role is to provide students with appropriate learning experiences Set up an effective classroom environment Should focus on the group

Related Service’s role (Correa et al, 2005) The nature of each person’s role with the child depends on the school and community environment but most importantly the student. Principals and administrators oversee organization, funding, and legal matters as well as program planning and evaluation. Roles of each person may overlap with other person’s roles.

Services (with whom do we collaborate) Audiology Counseling Medical services Occupational therapy Orientation and mobility services Parent counseling and training Physical Therapy Bilingual specialist Vocational educator Psychological services Recreation Rehabilitation counseling School health / Nurse Social Work Speech pathology Transportation ELL or ESOL Vision [Assistive tech services] from Rowley case (1982)

Coteaching options complementary: special education teacher rotates parallel: divided class for more personal interaction station: small groups on specific components alternative: special education reinstructs whole class shared: teachers share equally and instruct interchangeably One teach, one assist (or one teach and one observe)

Continuum of Services LD %ages Regular class42.4 (outside of general ed. class less than 21% of day) Resource Room39.3 (outside of general ed. class between 21 and 60% of day) Separate Class17.4 (outside of general ed. class more than 60% of day) Separate School0.6 (in a private or public separate day school at public expense) Residential Facility0.1 (in a public or private residential facility at public expense) Homebound / Hospital0.2

Inclusion debate from Zigmond & Baker (1995) and McLeskey and Waldron (1995) Instruction is the key issue not the placement (Martin) Special education is sacrificing essential components so that students can be in the company of age peers (Scruggs and Mastropieri) No tailored education plans (Gerber) Serious disabilities still left untouched (Z & B) Students deserve full access to mainstream curriculum (McLaughlin) 2/3 of students with disabilities succeeded across various models Successes cannot be based upon test scores especially for secondary students who have already peaked. Few successes exist in segregated settings (M & W)

Questions Why is it imperative to know each team member’s role and to understand their responsibility and even their supporting theories? How do the coteaching options reflect the roles within the group?