The concept of a Master Sample: Lower Columbia Example An Update Phil Larsen Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission c/o USEPA 200 SW 35 th St. Corvallis,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program

Advertisements

Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Salmonid Natural Production Monitoring & Evaluation Project Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation BPA Project #

U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 1 Effects of Hydropower Operations on Fall Chinook Salmon Spawning Activity Geoffrey.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Native Trout Program Monitoring of Bull Trout Populations in the Columbia Plateau Province using the EMAP Protocol.

Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.

Protect and Restore Little Salmon River Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries/Watershed Program By Chad Fealko.

Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

S trategic S ubwatershed I dentification P rocess Illinois Department of Natural Resources Conservation 2000 Ecosystems Program.

Designs for estimating variability structure and implications for detecting watershed restoration effectiveness David P. Larsen –Western Ecology Division,

Integrated State-Federal Partnership for Aquatic Resource Monitoring in the United States Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.

Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.

A spatial design for monitoring the health of a large-scale freshwater system Melissa Dobbie, Charis Burridge (CMIS) and Bill Senior (Qld Environment and.

Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:

Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.

Wetlands Assessment Virginia Engle, USEPA National Water Quality Monitoring Council March 20, 2007.

WRP and Water Quality Monitoring Council: Synergy April 1, 2015 Josh Collins Chief Scientist, SFEI and ASC Co-Chair, CWMW WRP Science Advisor Jon Marshack.

Robust sampling of natural resources using a GIS implementation of GRTS David Theobald Natural Resource Ecology Lab Dept of Recreation & Tourism Colorado.

"Developing statistically-valid and -defensible frameworks to assess status and trends of ecosystem condition at national scales" "Developing statistically-valid.

Scientific motivation of the CHaMP project: How CHaMP data can be used to answer fish and habitat management questions Chris Jordan – NOAA-Fisheries Brice.

Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.

ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition

Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)

Strategy Rationale Oregon Recovery Plan Washington Recovery Plan NOAA Monitoring Guidance (includes RPAs) Integrated Status & Trends Monitoring (ISTM)

Spatial Survey Designs Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541) Web Page:

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (CRAM) Project and Ambient Assessments.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency WATERS Status Update

1 Cumulative Impact Management: Cumulative Impact Indicators and Thresholds Presented by: Salmo Consulting Inc. and AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd.

Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States

1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.

Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,

Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Linking Field Activities to Budget Processes.

PNAMP Mission Statement PNAMP provides a forum to enhance the capacity of multiple entities to collaborate to produce an effective and comprehensive network.

Habitat Status and Trend in the Upper Columbia ESU Chapter 3 John Arterburn.

REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.

State of the Forest: Data harmonization and management Helping us to know whether we are getting the job done.

Monitoring Challenges for VSP Parameters in the Oregon Portion of the Lower Columbia River Jamie Anthony Monitoring Coordinator.

Evaluating Fish Response to Habitat Restoration Overview of Intensively Monitored Watershed Research in the PNW Rationale for IMW approach Extent of current.

1 National Stream and River Assessment Monitoring Design Anthony R. Olsen 1, David V. Peck 1, Steven G. Paulsen 1, John L. Stoddard 1, and Susan Holdsworth.

SSWD Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA September 15, 2004.

Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.

Amphibians Birds Contaminants/Toxics/Pollutants Environmental Condition Fish Hydrology/Water Quantity Light Macroinvertebrates Mammals Multi-Species Other,

Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,

Integrated Status and Trends Monitoring Demonstration Project Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership Bernadette Graham Hudson, Lower Columbia.

Oregon Steelhead Status, Recovery Planning and Monitoring Kevin Goodson Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting.

October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.

BPA F&W Program Data Management Needs for Monitoring Support and Coordination Coordinated Assessments Workshop, 2011.

The concept of a Master Sample: Lower Columbia Example Phil Larsen Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission c/o USEPA 200 SW 35 th St. Corvallis, OR.

Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.

Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.

Lake Roosevelt Rainbow Trout Habitat/Passage Improvement Project No Jason McLellan Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation January.

What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.

Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.

1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.

The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.

Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.

1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.

Water Census Progress: DRB Focus Area Perspective Bob Tudor Deputy Director Delaware River Basin Commission.

Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)

An Overview of the Flathead Subbasin Planning Process

Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States

National Hydro Data Programs

Five basic objectives of ISTM

Watershed Literacy & Engagement

Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States

Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States

Presentation transcript:

The concept of a Master Sample: Lower Columbia Example An Update Phil Larsen Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission c/o USEPA 200 SW 35 th St. Corvallis, OR Phone:

Spatially Balanced Sampling GRTS: Generalized Random-Tessellation Stratified design –Incorporates randomization –Is spatially balanced –Creates an ordered list of sites See: for details

A Desirable Goal Create a design that allows and facilitates integration up front rather than after the fact. Current GRTS design allows selection of a “master” sample that can be subset to meet specific needs at a variety of spatial scales

LCFRB: Habitat Monitoring Key Entities Federal –5 agencies State –5 agencies Local –At least 12

LC Master Sample

Panel 1: 54 status sites (from table 8)

Panel 2: 18 annual sites (from table 8)

Lewis: 30 special interest

Diagonstic: 30 Germany

ODFW FRAME Based on 1:24 K stream layer (origin?) Trimmed by eliminating traces with < 0.6 sq. km basin size. Spawning and rearing domain defined on 1:100 K (start and end of distribution) Habitat outside spawning and rearing used 1:100 K.

ODFW LC Master sites Approximately 1 site/600 meters Coded by –Population –“Type”: spawning, rearing, habitat –HUC (8-digit) –General ownership –County –S-level (panels, e.g., annual, 3 yr, 9 yr,)

Indicators Coho spawners Coho juveniles Physical habitat Steelhead?

LCFRB FRAME Based on 1:24 K stream layer (origin?) ca sites; 1/ km Coded by: –Subbasin –Tier –Gradient –EDT-Reach

LCFRB: Habitat Status Monitoring (p. 2) Landscape: Census/complete coverage –Watershed –Uplands/Hill slopes –Wetlands Stream Corridor: Sample survey –Channel Conditions –Riparian zone –Floodplain Water: –Quantity ? –Quality

LCFRB: Stratification Scheme Table 6 Ecoregion WRIA Subbasin (different from USGS subbasin?) Physiographic zone (different from ecoregion?) Stream order

LCFRB: Sample Type (p. 21; table 8) Survey: Status –Master sample Index: Trend –Master sample via an index stratum, e.g., Tier 1 sites Diagnostic –Master sample possible if diagnostic strata can be identified Focal: site specific project evaluation Probability vs. judgmental (or hand selected) sites

Stream Habitat Sampling Levels: Table 7 (p. 26) Indicator –Remote/office Reconnaissance –On the ground rapid assessment Inventory –Reach/habitat Intensive –Site Concept of Nested samples

Utility of a Master Sample An exploratory tool to examine different site allocations easily. A framework for an actual integrated, multi-agency state-wide or regional monitoring program.