Crop Mapping in Stanislaus County using GIS and Remote Sensing Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September 5, 2013 Tyler Jones Research Assistant Dept. of Geology & Geography Auburn University.
Advertisements

Establishing GIS for Management in the Sauvie Island Wildlife Management Area, Oregon Jeremy Hruska Masters Degree in GIS Candidate Penn State University.
Lacy Smith Geog /13/2010. Project Sites & Background.
The Impact of 2004 Hurricane Season on Beach Erosion in Volusia County, Florida Valentina David Bethune-Cookman College Daytona Beach, FL NASA Summer.
Urbanization and Land Cover Change in Dakota County, Minnesota Kylee Berger and Julia Vang FR 3262 Remote Sensing Section 001/002.
Use of Remote Sensing and GIS in Agriculture and Related Disciplines
Application Of Remote Sensing & GIS for Effective Agricultural Management By Dr Jibanananda Roy Consultant, SkyMap Global.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Developing a Cooperative Wetland Condition Assessment for the Nanticoke Watershed The Research Stage David Bleil MD Department of Natural Resources.
An Overview of RS Image Clustering and Classification by Miles Logsdon with thanks to Robin Weeks Frank Westerlund.
GIS Support For Water Resource Management in the Tecate, California and Tecate, Baja California Section of the United States – Mexico Border.
JIBRAN KHAN 1* &TAHREEM OMAR 2 JIBRAN KHAN&TAHREEM OMAR IMPACTS OF URBANIZATION ON LAND SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF KARACHI.
Land Use/Land Cover Assessment of Dane County, Wisconsin: Contemporary Trend and Future Projections By Eric Fabian.
Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior GFSAD30m Global Cropland Extent Products of Nominal 250 m (GCE V2.0) Updates Pardhasaradhi.
Ten State Mid-Atlantic Cropland Data Layer Project Rick Mueller Program Manager USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service Remote Sensing Across the.
W. Dean Hively 1, Ali Sadeghi* 1, Megan Lang 1, Varaprasad Bandaru 2, and Greg McCarty 1 * (301) ; 1 USDA-ARS Hydrology.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
CALIFORNIA’S WATER WAR: PART II Balancing Agricultural and Domestic Water Demands Sharon Liu Urban Planning M206A – Intro to GIS February 13, 2012.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
Conversion of Forestland to Agriculture in Hubbard County, Minnesota By: Henry Rodman Cory Kimball 2013.
Using spectral data to discriminate land cover types.
Seto, K.C., Woodcock, C.E., Song, C. Huang, X., Lu, J. and Kaufmann, R.K. (2002). Monitoring Land-Use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM.
Josiah Emerson, Majory Silisyene, Cynthia Ratzlaff FR 3262 Section 1.
National Mapping Division EROS Data Center U. S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Operation Systems (EROS) Data Center World Data.
ASPRS Annual Conference 2005, Baltimore, March Utilizing Multi-Resolution Image data vs. Pansharpened Image data for Change Detection V. Vijayaraj,
Lu Liang, Peng Gong Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley And Center for Earth System Science,
Hurricane Katrina Damage Analysis Alex Stern and William Tran.
Selection of Multi-Temporal Scenes for the Mississippi Cropland Data Layer, 2004 Rick Mueller Research and Development Division National Agricultural Statistics.
 Up to what level of classification can we perform on LISSIII/LISSIV data?  Is any advantage of high spectral resolution of LISSIII over LISSIV. If.
Mapping Crops Using Hyperspectral Data Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Ramesh Gautam, Scott Hayes, Mohammad Mostafavi, Tom Hawkins Land Use Program California.
Land Use / Land Cover Change in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area Lori Krider & Melinda Kernik
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management California Department of.
By: Katie Blake and Paul Walters.  To analyze land cover changes in the Twin Cities Metro Area from 1984 to 2005 Image difference and Thematic Change.
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Explosion
Wetlands Investigation Utilizing GIS and Remote Sensing Technology for Lucas County, Ohio: a hybrid analysis. Nathan Torbick Spring 2003 Update on current.
Digital Image Processing
Land cover mapping of Asia , Central Asia, and Middle East for GLC2000 project Ryutaro Tateishi, Hiroshi Sato, and Zhu Lin Center for Environmental Remote.
What’s the Reference?. Applying the Technique: 6 Steps 1. Identify the Evaluation Area 2. Obtain or develop Reference Worksheet 3. Obtain or develop Evaluation.
Object-oriented Land Cover Classification in an Urbanizing Watershed Erik Nordman, Lindi Quackenbush, and Lee Herrington SUNY College of Environmental.
Object-Based Crop Identification for Collecting Reference Data from VHRI RHSeg and Ecognition Software Kamini Yadav and Russ Congalton.
An Analysis of Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Population Growth in the Pedernales River Basin Kelly Blanton-Project Manager Paul Starkel-Analyst Erica.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Citation: Zhang Z.Y.,Kazakova A.N. and Moskal L.M Integrating LIDAR with Hyperspectral Data for Tree Species Classification in Urban Ecosystems.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Mapping Canada’s Rangeland and Forage Resources using Earth Observation Emily Lindsay MSc Candidate – Carleton University Supervisors: Doug J. King & Andrew.
Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Chandra Giri Ying Zhong 7/15/2015 Cropland Extent Mapping in South America.
GIS: The Systematic Approach to Precise Farm Management Robert Biffle Precision Agriculture April,
Part 4: Contextual Classification in Remote Sensing * There are different ways to incorporate contextual information in the classification process. All.
LANDSAT EVALUATION OF TRUMPETER SWAN (CYGNUS BUCCINATOR) HISTORICAL NESTING SITES IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK Laura Cockrell and Dr. Robert B. Frederick.
Emmalee Allen 1 with Ramesh Sivanpillai 2 1. Department of Plant Sciences/Agroecology program and 2 Department of Botany University of Wyoming.
CLASSIFICATION OF RIPARIAN BUFFERS IN OREGON USING SEVERAL OBJECT BASED IMAGE ANALYSIS PLATFORMS Troy Wirth MGIS Capstone Project Proposal Advisor: Dr.
LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS Maryia Bakhtsiyarava FNRM 5262.
Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas Sarah Belcher & Grant Cooper December 8, 2014.
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 Assumptions and Estimates Report.
Josh Knopik, WRS Jessica Campbell, MGIS FR Outline Background and Objectives Data and Materials Methods Results Discussion.
Christopher Steinhoff Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming Ramesh Sivanpillai Department of Botany, University of Wyoming Mapping Changes.
Geographical Data Mining Thales Sehn Korting
Quantifying Analyst Bias in Mapping Flooded Areas from Landsat Images
Jakobshavn Isbrae Glacial Retreat
Mapping Variations in Crop Growth Using Satellite Data
Quantifying Urbanization with Landsat Imagery in Rochester, Minnesota
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
Campus Natural Resources
Corn and Soybean Differentiation Using Multi-Spectral Landsat Data
Bailey Terry1 & Benjamin Beaman2 with Ramesh Sivanpillai3
Presentation transcript:

Crop Mapping in Stanislaus County using GIS and Remote Sensing Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management California Department of Water Resources

Usefulness of Land Use Mapping  Quantify crop acreage based on crop types  Estimate evapotranspiration  Determine urban landscape acreage  Input for groundwater and surface water models  Verify fields fallowed for water transfers  Map urban growth patterns  Estimate economic impacts of flooding

Why Remote Sensing Based Crop Mapping is Needed  Reduce the extent of required field mapping by identifying permanent crops  Accurately assess crop acreage  Estimate annual crop water use for the California Water Plan  Accurately estimate evapotranspiration on a field level  Determine the annual extent of fallowing  Verify fields fallowed for water transfers

Study Area Stanislaus County Area: 1,515 sq mile Population: 515,000

Overall Crop Mapping Strategy All Crops Decision Tree Based Classification Orchards Non-Orchards LCRAS Based Classification Time series based Vegetation Index Analysis Corn, Mixed Pasture, Fallow, Dry Beans, Tomato, Melons Alfalfa Autocorrelation & LIDAR Vineyards

 Classify orchards from non-orchard crops  Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix Algorithm was used to classify orchards  Textural patterns distinguish orchards from other crops  eCognition Developer software was used to develop the algorithm Decision Tree Classification Technique

Data Processing Textural parameters are analyzed to evaluate the fields having coarse texture versus fine texture

First Level of Classification: Results Recently planted orchards were classified in next level as shown in next slide Non-orchards Orchards Bare land and new orchards Farmsteads Urban area Poultry farms Highways/Roads LEGEND

How recently planted orchards have been captured in second level of classification Non-orchards Orchards Bare land and new orchards Farmsteads Urban area Poultry farms Highways/Roads LEGEND Second Level of Classification: Results

Non-orchards Orchards Bare land and new orchards Farmsteads Urban area Poultry farms Highways/Roads LEGEND Final Classification

Mapping Orchards in Stanislaus County

Mapping Non-Orchards using Lower Colorado River Accounting System (LCRAS) Ground Truth Survey Collect Crop Attributes (12% of Total Fields) QC Ground Truth Data Update Field Border Database Develop Personal Geo-database of Ground-truth data in ArcGIS Randomly Select Training Data (60%) Perform Image Segmentation in eCognition Developer for Training Data Create Signatures in Erdas Imagine

Data Processing Using eCognition Developer software, crop fields are segmented into polygons of similar spectral characteristics.

LCRAS Classification Method Cont’d… LANDSAT-5 Image Bands 1-5 and 7 Perform Supervised Classification of Spectral Characteristics Identify Crops at the Field Level Based on Classification Perform Accuracy Assessment Re-evaluate signature sets Identify Mislabeled Fields Based on Ground Truth Overall Classification ≥ 90%? Yes End No

Year 2010 Crop Map, Stanislaus County, California

Staff Time Requirements for Crop Classification

Questions?