Review Workshop - TEQIP-II Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad Date- 24 th August 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN under RUSA
The Five Working Groups Faculty Development Scaling-Up Post-Graduate programmes and 1.Research & Development 2.Innovation 3.Industry - Institute Interaction.
Martin Hart Assistant Director Education Case study on accreditation: the GMC’s perspective.
SEM Planning Model.
SACPO PRESENTATION ON WORK INTEGRATED LEARNING WORKSHOP 19 MARCH 2015.
College Strategic Plan by
Research Issues & Projects On behalf of the Research Team 17 March 2005.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Overview of TEQIP in Kerala
Country Report Developing Professional Competency For UBD Professionals.
The Information Literacy Professional Ellen Breen Sub-Librarian, Head of Information & Public Services IATUL Seminar Munich, November 30 – December 1,
Govt. Engineering College Kozhikode TEQIP –II VII th Review meeting th April 2015.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
PSG COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. 2  There is a wide gap between the educational standards of premier institutes like IITs and other engineering institutions.
South African National Policy Framework for Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality Broad Overview.
RATIONALE SSS plan seeks to improve success in programmes offered in TVET institutions (academic support vehicle) Variety of instructional methods, educational.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
TEQIP Phase II Seventh Review Meeting Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology Kottayam Presented By Dr. K. P. Indiradevi Principal.
Malnad College of Engineering, Hassan TEQIP-II Activities & Impact.
TKM College of Engineering Kollam-5 TEQIP-II VII th Review meeting TEQIP-II VII th Review meeting.
Competitive Funding for Higher Education Richard Hopper Senior Education Specialist The World Bank Baku, Azerbaijan – May 13, 2009.
College of Engineering Trikaripur Cheemeni, Kasaragode Technical Education Quality Improvement Program-Phase II 7 th Review Meeting.
Diversity in Graduate Education: Reflections and Realities UGA Teaching Academy Academic Affairs Faculty Symposium Friday, March 27, 2015 Michelle Cook,
Better Deal for Business Presentation to LSC West Yorkshire Skills Team Pat Lister Better Deal for Business Officer at Yorkshire Forward.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING VADAKARA
Environmental Education: Perspectives from the Tertiary Education.
Staff Development Approaches at The University of Georgia: Philosophy, Models, and Financial Support University of Georgia Institute of Higher Education.
TEQIP Phase II Seventh Review Meeting on 24 th & 25 th April
Government Engineering College Painavu, Idukki. IDP status of Achievement Sl. No DeliverablesTargetCurrent Status 1Number of students registered for (a)
Indirect Cost Recovery Fund Huron Consulting Final Report Jim Rankin Report to Faculty Senate April
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
 Committed and supportive Management  Excellent Infrastructure (civil) & Eco Friendly campus  Increasing Campus placements  Good Laboratories as per.
7th Review Meeting of TEQIP-II on 24th & 25th April 2015 Govt Enginering College, Thrissur Targets of the Institutional development plan and their current.
Efficient, Transparent, and Strategic Management Prof. Venansius Baryamureeba Ag. Vice Chancellor Makerere University
Uganda Health Information Strategy Eddie Mukooyo, MD, MSc Assistant Commissioner Health Services Dublin, Ireland 13 th September 2010.
Transforming Elementary Education Management : a perspective on institutional development Dr Pramila Menon NUEPA, New Delhi.
College of Engineering Trikaripur Cheemeni, Kasaragode Technical Education Quality Improvement Program-Phase II 7 th Review Meeting.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme - Phase II VII th Review Meeting 24 th and 25 th April 2015 College of Engineering Karunagappally Kollam.
TEQIP Phase-II Subcomponent 1.1 SEVENTH REVIEW MEETING COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING THALASSERY THALASSERY
From Cyclical to Continuous Improvement: Assessment Feedback and Program Metrics Derek J. Herrmann, Coordinator of University Assessment Services Kristen.
TECHNICAL EDUCATION QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM – PHASE II – VII th REVIEW MEETING COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING ADOOR.
TEQIP-II (December 09, 2014) 1 FACULTY OF SCIENCE (Sub Component 1.2) KURUSKHETRA UNIVERSITY KURUKSHETRA (‘A’ Grade NAAC Accredited.
Thursday, October 22, 2015 Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute Library Avenue, Pusa, New Delhi – National Information System on Agricultural.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
GOVT. ENGINEERING COLLEGE BARTON HILL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – th Review Meeting : TEQIP -II April 2015.
7th Review Meeting of TEQIP-II on 24th & 25th April 2015  Targets of the Institutional development plan and their current status of achievement. Revised.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING KIDANGOOR TEQIP II 7 TH REVIEW MEETING.
Quality Assurance Project Makerere University Report on Activities of the No Cost Extension Dr Ddembe Williams Project Manager Dr Lillian Tibatemwa-Ekirikubinza.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 Review Meeting on TEQIP-II Activities till 30 th September, 2013 with Special Emphasis on Interim Assessment of Institutional Implementation Performance,
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta Mon. 16 th – Fri. 20 th November, 2015.
7 th JRM Meeting (TEQIP II) April , 2015 LBS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR WOMEN, POOJAPPURA (Estd. 2001) (A Government of Kerala Undertaking)
ORGANIZATION CAPACITY ASSESSMENT (2013) Produced in April 2013.
Ministry of Education and Higher Education Quality Systems for Quality Teachers : Towards the Implementation of the National Strategy for Teacher Education.
Higher Education and Training Awards Council
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Mrs.Dharshana Senanayake Director General
Presentation transcript:

Review Workshop - TEQIP-II Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad Date- 24 th August 2012

2 Goal of Programme: T To improve quality of Technical Education and enhance existing capacities of the Institutions to become dynamic, demand-driven, quality conscious, efficient and forward looking, responsive to rapid economic and technological developments occurring at the local, State, National and International levels. It has a clear focus on the objectives to improve the overall quality of existing Engineering Education.

3 CONCERNS of the project :  Acute Faculty shortage  Poor Industry-academia collaboration  Obsolete learning infrastructure  Lack of research culture  Poor employability of graduates

4 Factors to gauge the success- S.N o Particulars End of TEQIP-I End of TEQIP-II 1 Academically autonomous institutions UG Placement rate76% 95% 3UG start salary (annually)2.8 lakh 5.0 lakh 4 Internationally published research papers Appro PG graduates Appro Ph.D produced Share of programs accredited 93% 100%

5  No. of Patents obtained and filed;  No. of integrated PhD programmes introduced;  Joint research projects undertaken;  Consultancies in collaboration with industry;  Publications, joint conferences, workshops;  Campus wide networking established in all institutions. Other factors to gauge the success-

6 PROJECT STRATEGY :  The Project is designed to bridge the gap in the quality of engineering education between premier institutions & other institutions.  To enable institutions to implement academic and non- academic reforms to achieve the institutional goals.  To impart pedagogical training to all the faculty from Project Institution and also to the faculty from desirous non Project Institutions for effective teaching.  Promote world-class research in emerging areas in Project Institutions.

7 Key Activities to be undertaken: Starting new PG programmes in Engineering disciplines Strengthening of laboratories and establishment of new laboratories and virtual labs Modernization of classrooms and virtual classrooms Updatation of learning resources Modernization and strengthening of libraries so as to convert it in to knowledge centre

8 Contd…  Providing Teaching and Research Assistantships to existing and new PG programmes in Engineering  Enhancement of R&D and institutional consultancy  Faculty and Staff development for improved competence based on TNA  Enhanced interaction with Industry  Pedagogical Training  Implementation of institutional reforms  Academic support for weak students

Expectation from Project Institutes  Obtaining autonomous institution status within 2 years and ensure quality driven utilization of such status  Accreditation of eligible UG+PG programmes  Minimum 4 Board meetings per year  Improved faculty qualifications  Improvements in placement rate and average salary of placement package  Increased transition of weak students from first to second year  Increase in the overall student and faculty satisfaction 9

 Initiation of Technology driven activities such as creating virtual labs and CoEs  Increased number of Masters and Doctoral students enrolled  Increased number of externally funded R&D and consultancy projects  Increase in the number of publications in refereed journals  Increased collaboration with institutions and industry  Implementation of Governing reforms Contd… 10

Immediate Expectations  NBA accreditation for 50% of eligible UG and PG programmes by September-12  20% increase in faculty with masters degree over the baseline by September-12  10% increase in faculty with Ph.D over the baseline by September- 12  Establishing Finishing School for academically weak students by September-12  60% expenditure of total allocation on procurements of goods by March- 13  Assistance to at least 15 M.Tech students by March-13  Assistance to at least 5 Ph.D students by March-13  Training to minimum of 20 faculties by March-13  Training to minimum of 30 Technical staff by March-13  Minimum 2 R & D projects by March-13

Performance of Institutes Sr. No. Parameter Sub Componant- 1.1 CoEKCoEJCoECSPCE BVU CoE SCoE 1 Leadership of Institute and its involvement in the Project BBBBBB 2 Leadership of the TEQIP Coordinator BBBCBB 3 Clarity of amongst all Nodal Officers BBBBBB 4TEQIP Project office available CCCCCC 5Faculty attendance BBBAAA 6Faculty involvement CBBCBB 7Quality of queries from faculty BBBCBB 8Willingness and readiness for faculty/staff training center CCBCAC 12

Performance of Institutes Sr. No Parameter Sub Componant- 1.2 CoEP CoEA bd CoE Amrv ICTVJTI SGGS N WCEBATU GHR CoE RIT 1 Leadership of Institute and its involvement in the Project ABBABAABBB 2 Leadership of the TEQIP Coordinator ACCABABCBB 3 Clarity of amongst all Nodal Officers BBBBBBBBBB 4TEQIP Project office available AACBAABCAB 5Faculty attendance BBCCCCCCCA 6Faculty involvement BCCBCCBCBB 7Quality of queries from faculty BCCBCBBBCB 8Willingness and readiness for faculty/staff training center BCCBCBCBCA 13

EQUITY ACTION PLAN Equity Action Plan is the approach that consists of using extra and different measures to bring equality among the students, staff, faculty etc  Equity under the project is achieved when each student/faculty gains the requisite skills and knowledge needed to access meaningful opportunities.  Benefit the academically weaker students by taking remedial classes, tutorials, demonstration on communication, skill development and curricular development etc to bring these students to required level of proficiency. 14

 To make campuses physically and socially gender friendly; especially by providing adequate and suitable facilities to women students and faculty.  To ensure adherence of Equity Action Plan scrupulously and transparently.  Spend a minimum of 4% of the allocation under Sub- component-1.1 to academic support to weak students. Contd… 15

16 DISCLOSURE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK AND ITS OBJECTIVE  Disclosure Management means making known all information related to Project through website.  Disclosure Management Framework (DMF) policy will ensure transparency and accountability in project implementation and its achievements.  Adherence to DMF is mandatory in TEQIP II.

WHY AN ORGANIZATION REQUIRES A GOOD M&E SYSTEM WHY AN ORGANIZATION REQUIRES A GOOD M&E SYSTEM  To provide information to managers and stakeholders on the extent to which the project is meeting the desired objectives  To provide regular feedback on the status of the project and a clearer basis for decision-making  To guide the evolution of the system in the future based on lessons learnt from the current system MONITORING & EVALUATION (M & E) 17

18 POLICY FOR PROCUREMENT 18  Transparency  Fairness  Fraud Prevention  Equal opportunity to all eligible bidders  Economy and Efficiency  Effectiveness

All institutes are supposed to follow the fund allocation guidelines as per the PIP. Disagreements observed by NPIU in the procurement plans are summarized as follows-  Software Packages are to be procured under LRs only.  Proprietary items and items under DGS & D shall be marked clearly.  Similar type/ common items from various departments shall be combined so as to minimize the number of packages  Procurement of safety/ surveillance systems are not permitted  Brand name of the items are to be strictly avoided  Consultant services shall be hired only for specialized activities and not for basic requirements. Observations of NPIU regarding Procurement Plans

PROCUREMENT PLAN 20 The procurement plan duration is 1 st April 2011 to 31 st march REVISION OF APPROVED PROCUREMENT PLAN Revision ThresholdReviewing AuthorityApproving Authority >= 10%Institution Director/ Head of Institution 30% Director/ Head of Institution SPFU >= 30%SPFUNPIU

THANK YOU 21