Page 1 This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via at:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Federal Civil Rules & Electronic Discovery: What's It to Me? 2007 Legal Breakfast Briefing Presented to Employers Resource Association by Robert Reid,
Advertisements

Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.
The Evolving Law of E-Discovery Joseph J. Ortego, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP New York, NY Jericho, NY.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2004 District Justice Scheindlin Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC Zubulake V.
and Electronic Records Retention: IT Requirements Paul Dworak Office of Compliance
Records Management for UW-Madison Employees – An Introduction UW-Madison Records Management UW-Archives & Records Management 2012 Photo courtesy of University.
Litigation Holds: Don’t Live in Fear of Spoliation Jason CISO – University of Connecticut October 30, 2014 Information Security Office.
Clean-up Days!.
E-Discovery New Rules of Civil Procedure Presented by Lucy Isaki January 23, 2007.
INFORMATION WITHOUT BORDERS CONFERENCE February 7, 2013 e-DISCOVERY AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Frost Brown Todd LLC Seminar May 24, 2007 Frost Brown.
A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO E-DISCOVERY March 4, 2009 Presented to the Corporate Counsel Section of the Tarrant County Bar Association Carl C. Butzer Jackson.
5 Vital Components of Every Custodian Interview David Meadows, PMP, Managing Director – Discovery Consulting, Kroll Ontrack Dave Canfield, EJD, Managing.
E-Discovery for System Administrators Russell M. Shumway.
Project Planning and Management in E-Discovery DAVID A. ELLIS – MAYER BROWN BROWNING E. MAREAN – DLA PIPER.
W W W. D I N S L A W. C O M E-Discovery and Document Retention Patrick W. Michael, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 101 South Fifth Street Louisville, KY
1 ELECTRONIC DATA & DISCRIMINATION INVESTIGATIONS Peter J. Constantine U.S. Department of Labor Office of the Solicitor.
EDiscovery and Records Management. Records Management- Historical Perspective- Paper Historically- Paper was the “Corporate Memory” – a physical entity.
1 Structuring your Information Management to Ensure Litigation Readiness Julian Ackert, Principal Washington DC John Forsyth, HBOS Edinburgh Andrew Haslam,
Developing a Records & Information Retention & Disposition Program:
Electronic Communication “ Litigation Holds” Steven Raskovich University Counsel California State University PSSOA Conference – March 23, 2006.
1 © Copyright 2008 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Litigation Response Planning: eDiscovery Best Practices Stephen O’Leary Sr. eDiscovery and Compliance.
1 E-Discovery Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Concerning Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (ESI) Effective Date: 12/01/2006 October,
Created May 2, Division of Public Health Managing Records What is a Record? What is a Records Retention & Disposition Schedule? Why is this Important?
Electronic Record Retention and eDiscovery Peter Pepiton eDiscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance.
Grant S. Cowan Information Management & eDiscovery Practice Group.
Avoiding the Iceberg Sean Regan October 2008.
By Helen Streck President/CEO Kaizen InfoSource LLC Litigation Readiness: Information Manager’s Role.
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Electronic Communications State Owned System Mandates Presented by: Eileen Goldgeier.
The Sedona Principles 1-7
EDiscovery, Records Management and Records Retention.
Records & Information Management (RIM) Risk: Is Your Company Exposed? March 19, 2013.
Rewriting the Law in the Digital Age
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY RULES The California Electronic Discovery Act Batya Swenson E-discovery Task Force
Dangerous Documents. Legal Compliances State and federal laws Contractual obligations Subject to an affirmative legal duty to establish and maintain certain.
Records Management Is Not an Option Anymore
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 11Slide 1 Production of Documents Scope Scope Includes documents of all types, including pictures, graphs, drawings, videos.
Meet and Confer Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that “parties must confer as soon as practicable - and in any event at least.
P RINCIPLES 1-7 FOR E LECTRONIC D OCUMENT P RODUCTION Maryanne Post.
Avoid Disputes, Not Complaints Presented by: Stuart Ayres and Derek Pullen Stuart Ayres, Scheme Manager Derek Pullen, Scheme Adjudicator.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
Rambus v. Infineon Technologies AG 22 F.R.D. 280 (E.D. Va. 2004)
EDiscovery Preservation, Spoliation, Litigation Holds, Adverse Inferences. September 15, 2008.
CORPORATE RECORDS RETENTION POLICY TRAINING By: Diana C. Toman, Corporate Counsel & Assistant Secretary.
ILTA – Insight 2007 E-Disclosure --Preparing for Compliance-- Moderator: Sally Gonzalez, Director, Navigant Consulting, Inc. Panelists: Oz Benamram, Director.
Defensible Records Retention and Preservation Linda Starek-McKinley Director, Records and Information Management Edward Jones
Digital Government Summit
E-Discovery – Practical Experience from an Agency Perspective Robert Wright Former Chief, Plans and Program Management Unit FBI.
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via at:
Records Management for Paper and ESI Document Retention Policies addressing creation, management and disposition Minimize the risk and exposure Information.
1 1 Building RIM Programs Chattanooga Chapter of ARMA International by Helen Streck President and CEO Kaizen InfoSource LLC.
Enterprise Archiving, Retention and Discovery System Jim Albert Deputy Director Department of Information Services April 19 th 2007.
Legal Holds Department of State Division of Records Management Kevin Callaghan, Director.
E-Discovery And why it matters to a SSA. What is E-Discovery? E-Discovery is the process during litigation of discovering information relevant to litigation.
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
Record Retention to Manage Risk F. Jay Meyer Vice President & Senior Attorney TD Banknorth, N.A. Portland, Maine.
EDiscovery Also known as “ESI” Discovery of “Electronically Stored Information” Same discovery, new form of storage.
Investigations: Strategies and Recommendations (Hints and Tips) Leah Lane, CFE Director, Global Investigations, Texas Instruments, Inc.
#16PACE Preparing For The Inevitable... How To Be Ready When The Lawsuit Comes And Steps To Proactively Limit Corporate Inconvenience And Liability Mitchell.
When the law firm is the client Handling legal holds, document collections and productions of your own firm’s documents.
UW-Madison Guidelines for Managing the Records of Departing Employees*
Leveraging the Data Map – A Case Study November 15, 2016
Data Minimization Framework
Litigation Holds: Don’t Live in Fear of Spoliation
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Information Governance Part 2
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via at: Thank You!

eDiscovery 911: Building a discovery response team for effective legal hold management 26 August 2008 Association of Corporate Counsel

Page 3 Gartner predicts that through 2010, companies that have not adopted formal e- discovery processes will spend twice as much on gathering and producing documents as they will on legal services Recent AIIM survey % of organizations with 10,000 – 50,000 employees have a formal system for preservation and legal holds in place More than 51% have not identified anyone to testify regarding electronically stored information Executive considerations on discovery response planning initiatives … Market Insights: Discovery Response

Page 4 Legal Considerations and Ramifications: Duty Date Determinations Duty to preserve based in statute or regulation Duty to preserve after service of process or notice of investigation Duty because company “reasonably anticipates litigation”

Page 5 Legal Considerations and Ramifications: Repercussions of Mistakes Can Be Severe Spoliation or adverse inference instructions Obstruction of justice charges Monetary sanctions Entry of an adverse judgment Even if these are avoided, loss of credibility and trust

Page 6 Discovery Response Programs A framework of strategies, policies, plans and methodologies Enables a company to define and plan for projects that support the company’s cost- effective and efficient compliance with its discovery obligations Implemented by a Discovery Response Team

Page 7 The courts and regulators are raising the bar… Higher expectations when it comes to providing evidence (records) Courts - and the revised Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - assume that rational and effective internal procedures are being followed Shorter period of time to respond to document requests No excuses for missing records or incomplete responses Raised expectations around the systems to retain and produce responsive records Response Teams: Why Are They Necessary?

Page 8 Saves time and money Decisions made in the heat of the moment will be second guessed later Not only paper documents, but electronically stored information (ESI) must be preserved Proper handling worth less if not accompanied by proper documentation Legal Considerations and Ramifications: Advantages of a Response Team

Page 9 Establishing a Framework for Governance: An Example

Page 10 Response Teams: Building the Team GCO/Legal Develop scope of the matter, oversee legal hold project, assist in identification of relevant ESI, supervise outside counsel Records Management Assist with ESI mapping, define data retention policies and schedules Program Management Document, supervise and coordinate all elements of response team and plan, oversee third party vendors, work with Compliance for plan improvements IT & Other Departments Assist with ESI mapping, implement legal holds, assist in maintaining data retention policies and schedules, assist with any document collection and/or productions, have information relevant to identification of custodians and ESI Business Unit Leaders Provide insight on the BU structure, operations and component business processes to identify potentially relevant information Compliance Perform internal audits, evaluate discovery response plans for areas to improve

Page 11 The Development of a Discovery Response Program Record Coordinators Office and Officer of Record Systems of Record Implement Hold Plan Identify Relevant Data/Record Types Identify Custodians Update Classification Scheme Train Records Coordinators Update Retention Schedule Update Data Maps Train 30(b)(6) Witnesses Review Tools Revise Response Plan Classification Scheme Retention Schedule Continuous Improvement Execution Discovery Event

Page 12 Legal Considerations and Ramifications: The Scope of ESI Ask yourself: Without a team ready in advance, could my company timely lock down documents in all formats and locations? Even if so, would the documentation of those efforts withstand scrutiny? ESI includes not only the expected , word processing files, and spreadsheets ESI also includes instant messages, text messages, voice mails, PowerPoint or other presentation slides, pictures, and web pages – but that’s not all! ESI includes the metadata for all of the above For multinational corporations, the paper documents and ESI may exist in foreign lands and languages, with attendant cultural, language, and logistical considerations And it’s not only in file drawers anymore: it’s on phone machines (desktop and cell); laptops; Blackberries, Palms and other hand held devices; hard drives (desktop and free standing); CDs; and thumb drives

Page 13 What Tools Does the Discovery Response Team Use?  Current ESI map  Communication protocol  Hold tracking/reporting tool  Escalation protocol  Compliance process  Documentation templates

Page 14 What Process Should Your Discovery Response Team Follow?  Scope and approach established  Response team activated  Custodians notified  In scope ESI identified and preserved  Existing holds cross-referenced  Compliance monitored according to case discovery plan  Case documentation developed, reviewed and updated  Exceptions investigated and resolved  ESI disposition when hold is lifted

Page 15 Records and Information Management Risks The Response Team May Consider Situation Lack of developed records retention schedules Legal Holds preserve too much or too little Lack of a coordinated and communicated discovery response plan Inadequate Records Management infrastructure and policies Strategy Prioritize business lines with high discovery risk Develop a data preservation plan Communicate and monitor standardized procedures Preservation plan Process for collection and review Define production protocol Uniform approach for records management

Page 16 Technology Risks Your Response Team May Consider Situation Inconsistent internal response to discovery requests Inadequate electronic information inventory No plan for preserving and collecting emerging data sources Difficulty retrieving data from obsolete systems or media Strategy Develop standard response to data interrogatories Centralized electronic information repositories Identify data sources at risk of discovery Evaluate ability of systems to support discovery

Page 17 Monitor for understanding and compliance Employees do what you inspect, not what you expect Periodically review discovery efforts and develop feedback to improve the discovery response plan Demonstrate that the company takes discovery seriously Compliance The Response Team’s Role In Monitoring Compliance

Page 18 Question & Answer Session

Page 19 Please contact with any questions: David Wetmore Ernst & Young LLP Executive Director Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services Forensic Technology & Discovery Services Minneapolis, MN Ben Hawksworth, PMP CFE Ernst & Young LLP Senior Manager Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services Forensic Technology & Discovery Services Washington, DC Monica J. Palko, Esq. BearingPoint, Inc. Associate Corporate Counsel – Litigation Office of the General Counsel McLean, VA

Thank you for attending another presentation from ACC’s Desktop Learning Webcasts Please be sure to complete the evaluation form for this program as your comments and ideas are helpful in planning future programs. You may also contact Lillian Moyano Yob at or Karen Palmer at This and other ACC webcasts have been recorded and are available, for one year after the presentation date, as archived webcasts at You can also find transcripts of these programs in ACC’s Virtual Library at