FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Debbie Delozier, Stafford County Public Schools Fanya Morton, Stafford County Public Schools Kathryn Munson, Chesterfield.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Number Talks Presented by: Kim Mott, Instructional Coach Beechgrove
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Common Core Math: 2 > 4 Super Week Norms Silence your technology Limit sidebar conversations.
Julie Fredericks Teachers Development Group.  Definition and Purpose  What is a mathematical justification and what purposes does mathematical justification.
Common Core Standards, K – 12 Kentucky Core Academic Standards Mathematics 1.
THE INSTRUCTION Highly Effective Services, Inc
Choosing Tasks that Encourage Students to Use Mathematical Practices.
Congruency to Math Standards How do we successfully monitor and support our teachers when we can’t be an expert in every content area?
Jefferson County Schools K-5 Math Back to School Conference
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011
Math Assessments Increasing Rigor February 20, 2013 & February 21, 2013.
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
2013 Mathematics Standards of Learning Institutes Analyzing and Modifying Assessments Examining How We Assess in K-2.
Math Tasks There is no decision that teachers make that has a greater impact on students’ opportunities to learn and on their perceptions about what mathematics.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Strategies to Promote Motivation in the Mathematics Classroom
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Professional Learning Series Number Sense and Numeration, Grades 4 to 6 (with reference to Volumes 1, 5, and 6) Understanding.
Student Engagement through the use of High-Level Tasks Presented by: Raven Hawes iZone Mathematics.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Grade Band Team Members Vickie Inge, University of Virginia Patricia Robertson, Arlington Public Schools, retired.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
Day Three. What standards were addressed yesterday? MELT wiki: melt-institute-resources.wikispaces.commelt-institute-resources.wikispaces.com.
More Rigorous SOL = More Cognitively Demanding Teaching and Assessing Dr. Margie Mason The College of William and Mary Adapted from
High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1. An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Providing All Students with Access to High Quality Mathematics Instruction: The Role of Tasks in Achieving Equity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
Vacaville USD December 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices Number Talks –Computation.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
CAAT Follow Up Meeting #1 Clay County High School Clay County Middle School.
Bridging Math Practices Welcome back! June 24, 2014 Please return to your original seats. Take your papers out of your folders. Get some coffee.
Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
Laurel County SSA Day 4 High School Breakout Session Jim Moore Jennifer McDaniel
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
Math Fellows January 22, Setting Goals and Selecting Tasks 1.Anticipating 2.Monitoring 3.Selecting 4.Sequencing 5.Connecting The Five Practices.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Five Dimensions of Quality Math Instruction. SD Counts-Mini Foundations Summer Welcome! During today’s session, you will… 1.…develop an understanding.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Purposeful Questioning K-5 September 25, 2015 Vickie Inge The Virginia Council of Mathematics Specialist Conference.
The Mathematics Problem Solving Model A Professional Development Program Presented by Sarah Enoch September 10, 2011.
Materials l Ppt slides (5) as handout Tasks books for principals Form for data collection Form for additional input Outcomes for project by session (Eoline)
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Enacting Instructional Tasks:
CCSSO – Cross-State Mathematics Teacher Leaders: IA, MT, ND, SD Facilitator Name and Location Strategies for Modifying Existing Math Tasks to Increase.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Formative Assessment February Fraction Action.
Improving Mathematical Number Sense & Technology Integration Teacher Quality Grant Peyton Forest Elementary Atlanta Public Schools Atlanta, GA July 23,
Number Talks: A Powerful Math Instructional Practice.
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
MATHEMATICAL TASKS TO SKILLS
Reflecting on Practice: Using Inquiry to Build Thinking Classrooms
2013 Mathematics Standards of Learning Institutes General Session
Presentation transcript:

FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Debbie Delozier, Stafford County Public Schools Fanya Morton, Stafford County Public Schools Kathryn Munson, Chesterfield County Public Schools Karen Watkins, Chesterfield County Public Schools LouAnn Lovin, Ph. D., James Madison University GRADE BAND: K-2

Icebreaker – MAKING Connections! Please introduce yourself to those at your table. Discuss a possible pattern that exists in your group. Examples of possible patterns might be (brown hair, blonde hair, brown hair, blonde hair) or (glasses, no glasses, glasses, no glasses). When it is your table’s turn, please stand up so that the pattern you have selected is visible to the rest of the group. The rest of the group will make conjectures about what the pattern could be. 2

Overview of Day Communication and Reasoning through Number Talks The Teacher’s Role in Mathematical Discourse Mathematics through Problem Solving Looking at Student Communication and Reasoning – The Frog Problem Tasks to Promote Communication and Reasoning Processing and Summarizing 3

Mentally find the sum…

What is the power in having more than one strategy? 5 Think-Pair-Share

Let’s try another one…

NUMBER TALK VIDEO: Grade 2 Watch video Table discussion –What strategies are the students using? –What mathematics do students understand that allows them to be flexible with numbers in this way? 7

Number Talks Quick Jot What is the teacher’s role during a number talk? 8

NUMBER TALK VIDEO: Kindergarten Watch video Table discussion –What student understanding is being assessed through this number talk? –What do you notice about the way the teacher orchestrates the discourse? 9

Number Talks What is the value in implementing number talks? 10 Think-Pair-Share

Key Components of Number Talks Classroom environment and community Classroom discussions Teacher as facilitator, questioner, listener, learner Mental math Purposeful computation problems 11 Parrish, S. (2010). Number talks: Helping children build mental math and computation strategies. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions

Creating the Environment Table Discussion: What do you think a teacher may need to do to create an environment that allows for this kind of math talk? 12

Productive Talk Moves Revoicing - “You used the 100s chart and counted on?” Rephrasing - “Who can share what Ricardo just said, but using your own words?” Reasoning - “Do you agree or disagree with Johanna? Why?” Elaborating - “Can you give an example?” Waiting - “This question is important. Let’s take some time to think about it.” 13 Adapted from: Chapin, S., O’Connor, C. & Anderson, N. (2003). Classroom Discussions Using Math Talks to Help Students Learn, Grades 1-6. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications

NUMBER TALK VIDEO – Watch video Watch video again and record talk moves you notice What kind of math talk currently happens in your classroom? Which talk moves are you already comfortable with? Which ones might you wish to incorporate in future lessons? 14

Mathematics Through Problem Solving “Children need to experience mathematics as problem solving…” Kathy Richardson, 1999 Think-Pair-Share –How do the process standards described in this quote match what you have observed in math classrooms? (yours or others) 15

Mathematics SOL Institutes – Focus Five goals for students: –become mathematical problem solvers that –communicate mathematically; –reason mathematically; –make mathematical connections; and –use mathematical representations to model and interpret practical situations 16

Frog Problem Work with a small group (3 – 5 people). Record your solution on chart paper. Try to solve the problem in at least two different ways. Post your chart paper for a Gallery Walk. 17 Pay attention to the mathematical processes you are using as you solve this problem.

There were 57 frogs in the pond. Some were swimming and some were sunning. There are about twice as many frogs swimming as were sunning. How many frogs were swimming and how many frogs were sunning? Use pictures, numbers, and/or words to prove that your answer makes sense. 18

Frog Problem – First Grade Work Work with a partner Examine the student work samples For each student, discuss and record: –How does this student represent his/her thinking? –What does this student appear to understand (or not understand)? –What would I do next with this student? 19

Frog Problem – First Grade How did this problem provide opportunities for students to reason and communicate? If you were going to choose students to share their solutions, which students would you choose and why? Does the order that you have students share matter? 20

“The level and kind of thinking in which students engage determines what they will learn.” Hiebert, Carpenter, Fennema, Fuson, Wearne, Murray, Oliver, & Human,

Characteristics of Rich Mathematical Tasks High cognitive demand (Stein et. al, 1996; Boaler & Staples, 2008) Significant content (Heibert et. al, 1997) Require justification or explanation (Boaler & Staples, in press) Make connections between two or more representations (Lesh, Post & Behr, 1988) Open-ended (Lotan, 2003; Borasi &Fonzi, 2002) Allow entry to students with a range of skills and abilities Multiple ways to show competence (Lotan, 2003) 22

“Not all tasks are created equal, and different tasks will provoke different levels and kinds of student thinking.” Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver,

Task Sort With your small group, use the collection of tasks provided and discuss whether you think the task requires lower-level thinking or higher-level thinking. Record your group’s sort on the T-chart. Be ready to share the criteria you used to categorize the task. 24

Task Analysis Guide – Lower-level Demands Involve recall or memory of facts, rules, formulae, or definitions Involve exact reproduction of previously seen-material No connection of facts, rules, formulae, or definitions to concepts or underlying understandings Require limited cognitive demand Focused on producing correct answers rather than developing mathematical understandings Require no explanations or explanations that focus only on describing the procedure used to solve 25 Adapted from Stein, M.K., Smith, M.S., Henningsen, M.A., & Silver, E.A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press

Task Analysis Guide – Higher-level Demands Focus on use of procedures for developing deeper levels of understanding of concepts and ideas Suggest broad general procedures with connections to conceptual ideas (not narrow algorithms) Provide multiple representations to develop understanding and connections 26 Adapted from Stein, M.K., Smith, M.S., Henningsen, M.A., & Silver, E.A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press

Task Analysis Guide – Higher-level Demands Require complex, non-algorithmic thinking and considerable cognitive effort Require exploration and understanding of concepts, processes, or relationships Require accessing and applying prior knowledge and relevant experiences to facilitate connections Require task analysis and identification of limits to solutions 27 Adapted from Stein, M.K., Smith, M.S., Henningsen, M.A., & Silver, E.A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press DOING Mathematics

Factors Associated with Impeding Higher-level Demands Shifting emphasis from meaning, concepts, or understanding to the correctness or completeness of the answer Providing insufficient or too much time to wrestle with the mathematical task Letting classroom management problems interfere with engagement in mathematical tasks Providing inappropriate tasks to a given group of students Failing to hold students accountable for high-level products or processes 28 Adapted from Stein, M.K., Smith, M.S., Henningsen, M.A., & Silver, E.A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press

Factors Associated with Promoting Higher-level Demands Scaffolding of student thinking and reasoning Providing ways/means by which students can monitor/guide their own progress Modeling high-level performance Requiring justification and explanation through questioning and feedback Selecting tasks that build on students’ prior knowledge and provide multiple access points Providing sufficient time to explore tasks 29 Adapted from Stein, M.K., Smith, M.S., Henningsen, M.A., & Silver, E.A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press

“There is no decision that teachers make that has a greater impact on students’ opportunities to learn and on their perceptions about what mathematics is than the selection or creation of the tasks with which the teacher engages students in studying mathematics.” Lappan & Briars,

Bumping up the Cognitive Demand Work with a small group Choose task #5 or #11 Think of a way to make this task more cognitively demanding - provide context - make it open-ended - ask for an explanation/justification Rewrite your new task and be ready to share 31

Why use cognitively demanding tasks? More engaging for students Allows students to wrestle with important mathematical ideas and make sense of them Engages students in mathematical processes of reasoning, representation, communication, connections, and problem solving Allows teachers to assess students’ level of mathematical understanding 32

“If we want students to develop the capacity to think, reason, and problem solve then we need to start with high-level, cognitively complex tasks.” Stein & Lane,

Laying the Foundation Vertical Articulation documents As students study higher levels of mathematics, they must draw on the previous understandings they’ve constructed as well as their capacity to reason and problem solve while maintaining the attitude that they can persevere and figure it out! 34

Assessments – Then and Now 35 Grade 3 OLD NEW

Why are the process standards important? Each person writes a few words or short phrases on sticky notes and places them in the middle of the table. As a group, synthesize your ideas to create a bumper sticker to address this question. 36

Standards of Learning and Mathematical Processes “The content of the mathematics standards is intended to support the following five goals for students: becoming mathematical problem solvers, communicating mathematically, reasoning mathematically, making mathematical connections, and using mathematical representations to model and interpret practical situations.” VDOE 2009 Mathematics Standards of Learning (page iv) 37