Andrew Moss ASTeC CM32 9t h February 2012 RAL MICE RF System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andrew Moss ASTeC MICE RF workshop 16t h February 2012 Daresbury Laboratory Response to RF review for the MICE RF system.
Advertisements

RF Specification discussion MICE RF workshop 16 th April 2012.
1 paul drumm; Jan’05; MICE RF Needs MICE RF Power Paul Drumm ISIS Facility Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & MICE.
1 RF Workshop 16 th & 17 th April 2012 Design Layout Alan Grant, STFC.
Andrew Moss ASTeC MICE Project Board 28 th June 2011 MICE RF System.
30 th September 2004 High Power RF Couplers James Rogers High Power RF Couplers ELSRF Daresbury Laboratory.
MICE Refurbishment of CERN RF equipment for MICE M. Vretenar, CERN AB/RF.
Collaboration meeting, RAL, 4 th – 7th November 2009 Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting, RAL, 10 th – 13 th november 2009 MICE RF Amplifier Status.
RF systems for MICE Andrew Moss The MICE RF Group and the TIARA WP7 Team Contributions include Daresbury, RAL, CERN, LBNL, LANL, FNAL, Strathclyde & Sheffield.
Andrew Moss Daresbury Laboratory Collaboration Meeting th 19 th October 2012 RAL MICE RF System review.
Andrew Moss Daresbury Laboratory August 2013 Latest results of MICE amplifier testing.
RF Layout 3pi/2 for Discussion. 2 RF Design mtg 14/1/15 Output line from amplifier is lower than the PRY, needs to go high to clear PRY to couple to South.
MICE RF & Controls Paul Drumm. RF Layout 2 MW Amplifier Master Oscillator Controls etc 201 MHz Cavity Module 2 MW Amplifier 201 MHz Cavity Module CERN.
THE MICE RF SYSTEM J.F.Orrett* A.J.Moss, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory, WA4 4AD, UK Accelerator Science and Technology Centre
09 th April 2003 SINGLE SPLIT DRIVE CHAIN TH116 TH116 or TH526 RS2058 ex SPS AMP 7651 ex RAL SOLID STATE DRIVER LEVEL CONTROL AND SOURCE R.F. LEVEL FEEDBACK.
Paul Drumm 30 March 2004 MICE at RF Power System: power source, distribution Paul Drumm RAL Ambitious title!
RF controls for MICE Andrew Moss Sept 06. What we need A flexible easy to use solution to control the amplitude, phase and timing of the MICE RF amplifiers.
RF Stability Working Group Jorn Jacob (ESRF), John Byrd (LBNL) General Issues RF phase and amplitude noise –filtered by cavity and translate into timing.
MuCool RF Status MICE Collaboration Meeting June 7-10, 2006, Fermilab A. Moretti June 9, 2006.
Demonstration of the Beam loading compensation (Preparation status for ILC beam loading compensation experiments at ATF injector in this September) (PoP.
RF Summary Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Andrew Moss ASTeC 7 th December 2011 MICE RF System.
Andrew Moss Daresbury Laboratory Collaboration Meeting th -16 th February 2013 Coseners House MICE RF HP System rprogress.
MICE RF Project & Towards Step VI MICE Project Board - March 8, 2012 Alan Bross 1.
Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 h – 23 h October 2008 Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 th – 23 th October 2008 MICE RF distribution system.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Front End Test Stand Klystron Commissioning Alan Letchford UKNF Plenary Meeting 22 nd April 2009.
201 MHz and 805 MHz Cavity Developments in MUCOOL Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Nufact 2002 Workshop, London,
1 MICE RF Daresbury Laboratory Support Joe Orrett - ASTeC.
MICE: overview K. Long, 18 March, Contents ► Introduction ► Beam line ► Infrastructure ► MICE steps ► Phase II (comment) ► Conclusions.
RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.
MICE RF – TIARA and General Progress Tim Stanley RAL 5 June 2013.
Magnetic Shielding Issues Roy Preece STFC - RAL. Overview Issues Items in harms way – Step IV Step IV mitigation plan –Racks –Compressors Current / Future.
Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting CM29 15 th - 18 th February 2011 MICE RF System.
1 paul drumm, 19 th May 2004 MICE RF By Phone at 16:00 FNAL: Al Moretti LBNL: Derun Li
Electrical & Control Power Supplies Trevor Hartnett.
Status of the MICE Project & Dashboard MICE Project Board 14 th November 2013 Roy Preece.
Challenges of Dual Harmonic RF Systems ISIS Synchrotron Group John Thomason.
MICE RF System Power Supplies, Control and Monitoring Status report February 2012 Chris White, STFC Daresbury Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting CM32,
RAL Muon Beam Line Properties. ISIS 70 MeV H- injection Ring accelerates up to 800 MeV in about 10 ms 50 Hz cycle - Dual Harmonic System ~ 2 x 1.5 MHz;
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
MICE Oversight Committee Meeting RAL, 24 April 2014 Paul Soler on behalf of the MICE Collaboration Status of MICE and Spectrometer Solenoids.
Progress on the MICE RF High Power Drive Systems K Ronald, University of Strathclyde For the MICE RF team 1MICE CM38 RF Parallel Session.
Target tests 1 st – 2 nd Nov. Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th December 2006.
MICE Project Report Alan Bross (for Paul Drumm). Project Issues ● Key dates: – ISIS Synchrotron start-up scheduled for 1st August ● Shielded area around.
1 Collaboration Meeting 33 - Glasgow 26 th June 2012 Design Layout Andrew Moss for Alan Grant, STFC.
A. Bross MICE CM17 February MuCool RF Program 805 and 201 MHz Studies.
High Gradient RF Issues and 88 MHz test results M. Vretenar for the 88 MHz team: R. Garoby, F. Gerigk, J. Marques, C. Rossi, M. Vretenar -The.
Andrew Moss ASTeC TIARA Mid term meeting 12 th 14 th June 2012 CIEMAT ICTF Progress on the MICE RF System.
MICE RF System Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Andrew Moss STFC Daresbury Laboratory MICE UK.
Ingot Niobium Workshop RF Sources Andrew Kimber 4 th December 2015 Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility is managed by Jefferson Science Associates,
RF Review CM37 Andrew Moss. Amplifier results at Daresbury 2MW at 35kV, good efficiency and gain.
MICE RF Power Status Paul Drumm ~ Sunday August 1 st 2004.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Vector Control Algorithm for Efficient Fan-out RF Power Distribution Yoon W. Kang SNS/ORNL Fifth CW.
RF Phase Reference Distribution for the European XFEL Krzysztof Czuba Warsaw University of Technology, ISE For the RF Synchronization Team P. Jatczak,
MICE RF – Installation at RAL Tim Stanley RAL 7 November 2013.
MICE RF – Installation at RAL Tim Stanley, MICE RF Engineer, RAL 2 June 2014.
Project X High Power 325 MHz RF Distribution and Control Alfred Moretti, Nov 12, 2007 Project X Workshop.
Andrew Moss STFC, ASTeC Example amplifier control system Example of current STFC copper cavity in operation –Using SF6 insulated waveguide –Conditioning.
RF Module Integration Colin Whyte University of Strathclyde on behalf of the MICE collaboration 1RF Review 9th & 10th Sept '15 Abingdon.
Linac RF System Design Options Y. Kang RAD/SNS/NScD/ORNL Project – X Collaboration Meeting April , 2011.
325 MHz Superconducting Spoke Cavity Coupler status. T. Khabiboulline Power Coupler design for Superconducting Spoke cavities. Originally.
Andrew Moss ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory October 2010 MICE RF Amplifier Status.
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
Challenges of Dual Harmonic RF Systems
MICE RF System Power Supplies, Control and Monitoring Status report
RF Layout 3pi/2 for Discussion
Status of the CERN chopper.
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Presentation transcript:

Andrew Moss ASTeC CM32 9t h February 2012 RAL MICE RF System

Contents Brief amplifier status Results of RF review and changes –Amplifier system –Hall layout –RF control of cavity filling –Cavity phasing –RF control Conclusion Andrew Moss

RF system components Andrew Moss 2 MW Amplifier Master Oscillator Controls etc 201 MHz Cavity Module 2 MW Amplifier 201 MHz Cavity Module LBNLCERN 300 kW Amplifier HT Supplies Daresbury DL Test System At present Auxiliary Systems Not found

Test system at Daresbury Andrew Moss

RF and power supply testing System pushed to 1MW RF output Relatively quiet: –No evidence of significant X-ray production or microwave radiation Andrew Moss Forward power into load

Review panel concerns over amplifiers Tube lifetime is around 15,000 hours on ISIS at 50 Hz ~ 4MW, MICE will run at 1Hz and 2MW so lifetime should be extended Power output will degrade over time to around 50% of initial level, therefore the effective cavity gradient will also degrade over time Currently no spare tubes, option to purchase 2 more TH116 tubes, however there will be no more, production of glass assemblies has ended, ISIS tubes are removed from service at power level of ~1MW Amplifiers will be difficult to maintain behind shield wall, layout changes suggested to allow access to work on systems 4616 amplifier currently appears above shield wall and may see some magnetic field – no information found on what level is acceptable from manufactures or other lab experiments, however as the tube has a very small electron drift gap - not that concerned at the moment, will have to fix what goes wrong in the hall. Power supplies include many transformers, circuit breakers, PLCs and many other magnetic components Andrew Moss

Review on the coax layout Different layouts of coax were suggested that would improve access to the amplifiers and simplify the coax runs. Equipment to be hung on the inside of shield wall The uses of movable coax phase shifters would cause reliability issues, during the meeting a fixed cavity phase offset was agreed that provided 98% of acceleration for all momentum Fixed phase shifters would be used to make up for any phase imbalance in coax lines to the cavity

Andrew Moss Alternative coax distribution on shield wall

Andrew Moss

These sections can be used to adjust phase length

Andrew Moss View from underneath the false floor showing coax distribution

Reflected power due to cavity filling Cavity filling is done by switching on forward power at maximum to fill the cavity as quickly as possible Cavity reflects forward power during filling for a short time ~50uS This leads to a doubling of effective RF power (at the start of the pulse) in the coax guide = 4 times the voltage In the 4 inch coax and cavity couplers this passes the 700kW breakdown limit (in air) Andrew Moss Reflected power

Cavity filling solution Using a slow fill approach, the forward power is switched on in a ramped way to reduce reflected power effect Can reduce reflected power to a tenth of forward wave Example from FNAL Using digital LLRF this is simple to achieve Nitrogen will be used in the coax guides Andrew Moss Amplitude loop activates Reflected power

Cavity phasing With two cavities being driven by one amplifier, a fixed phase angle will set between the two cavities, there is still some question over the exact number of degrees this should be ~124 degrees, this can be accommodated by putting additional lengths of coax in the distribution system for each second cavity attached to the amplifier The phase angle will change by 16 degrees (for perfect acceleration) for each cavity from MeV/C, however this will have to be a fixed value at the best compromise ~ 8 degrees Andrew Moss Paul Smith, Sheffield

RF phasing Andrew Moss Need to check the fixed phase relationship between cavities

Experiment timing Need to understand the issues for MICE experiment timing and the RF system measurements Timing will be generated from the target system, measurement of cavity gradient and phase as the muon passes though the cavity – need to design a system to do this, need to understand what the issues are Engineers at DL could work on this with help from LBNL and UK Uni effort, if we can understand and define the real tasks Andrew Moss

Summery RF testing to 2MW will be done before the next CM RF review has prompted a new round of optimisation of coax distribution that looks to make things easier in a number of areas, space around the amplifiers, lower transmission loss, easier to install Coax should be filled with N2, slow cavity filling will be needed to avoid breakdown inside the guides, RF tests at the MTA are required to prove this as an acceptable design RF specification is being refined and needs to be approved Discussions about LLRF control/experiment timing need to be understood and build a team to look at solutions Andrew Moss