Benefit Cost Analysis for Flood Hazard Mitigation: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Method (selected excerpts from FEMA EMI Training Course)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tehran University of Medical Sciences Institute of Public Health Research Health in Emergency & Disaster Department (HE&DD) D isaster: Basic Terminology.
Advertisements

Hazard Mitigation Planning I Session Name: Hazard Mitigation Planning I Coastal Hazards Management Course Signed by the President on October 30, 2000 Amends.
HUD and Disaster Mitigation ASFPM May 22, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Disaster Recovery In response to a Presidentially-declared disaster,
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
Networked Systems Survivability CERT ® Coordination Center Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA © 2002 Carnegie.
State of Montana Hazard Mitigation Plan and Statewide Hazard Assessment – 2013 Update Montana State Hazard Mitigation Coordinator: Kent Atwood
Charles SCAWTHORN Junji KIYONO Kyoto University Earthquake Risk Reduction 3- Mitigation and ERR Program Development 1. Concepts and Terminology 2. Hazard,
Cost-Benefit Analysis. 2 Cost Benefit Analysis Identify & evaluate all costs & benefits Discount Assess project(s) by calculating Benefit/Cost Ratio (B/C)
Update Training Meeting
Prepare + Prevent + Respond + Recover + Mitigate Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) 1.
SEISMIC RISK REDUCTION Stela PETRESCU MDPWH PMU General Director Ministry of Development, Public Works and Housing ICAR FORUM, Bucharest, 1-2 October 2007.
Risk Map Early Demonstration Project Lackawanna County, PA CCO Meeting September 13, 2011.
LEADERS 2006 International Course on Development and Disasters November 20 – December 01, Ocho Rios, Jamaica. RISK REDUCTION Presenter: Aston Brown.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Mitigation Defined Session Name: Mitigation Defined Coastal Hazards Management Course Hazard ….a possible source of danger Slide 16.1 The American Heritage.
Emergency Management Cycle. Planning Regulatory Requirement Per 44 CFR (a) (1) - For all disasters declared on or after November 1, 2004, all states,
Flood Risk Review Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Implementing HAZUS-MH in Pre-Disaster Mitigation
The Diversity of Hazus Uses for Hazus Beyond Planning ASFPM 2011 National Conference Louisville, KY Tuesday, May 17, 2011 ASFPM 2011 National Conference.
National Hurricane Conference Training Session Panel: Decision-Making Tools for Risk Management & Assessment Claire Drury, HAZUS Program Manager.
DEFINITION OF CONCEPTS Disaster: A serious disruption of society, causing widespread human, material or environmental losses that exceed the capacity of.
WMD & Emergency Planning Steps Session 12. Emergency Planning Steps Vulnerability Assessment Mitigation Efforts Emergency Response Planning Recovery.
Benjamin F. Bobzien Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Robert Berry Western Carolina University Research Project.
Mitigation can include structural and nonstructural efforts.
HAZARD MITIGATION 101 Sandusky County Initial Planning Meeting March 11, 2014.
Economics of Extreme Climatic Events By Adil Rasheed (EPFL-ENAC-ICARE-LESO-PB)
Dr. Shane Parson, PE, CFM, URS (RAMPP Team)
HAZUS-MH is a multi-hazard risk assessment and loss estimation software program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (animate on.
Ricardo A. Alvarez IHRC/FIU SHMPAT PDM1 SHMPAT Meeting July 21-22, 2003.
Hazard Mitigation Planning and Project Funding. Agenda Objectives Overview of Hazard Mitigation Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation Project Funding.
Mitigation Focus-Public Assistance Briefing for Hurricane Sandy
Financial Project Metrics in Feasibility Study
Risk Assessment and Management. Objective To enable an organisation mission accomplishment, by better securing the IT systems that store, process, or.
Assessing the benefits from improved hydromet services Orders of magnitude and future research Stéphane Hallegatte The World Bank, Sustainable Development.
State of Louisiana Mitigation Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Governor’s Office of Homeland Security & Emergency Preparedness.
Our Mission MITIGATIONS. MEANING OF MITIGATION MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF THE RISK OF DISASTER MITIGATION IS THE PERMANENT REDUCTION OF.
The Status of NFIP Reform and Floodplain Mapping Mayors’ Water Summit December 8, 2010.
THE LOW DOWN ON RISK ASSESSMENT HOW SAFE ARE OUR CITIES?
Mitigation Update Steve Ferryman, CFM Ohio EMA Mitigation Branch Chief Spring Director’s Seminar
1 Welcome North Dakota State University Emergency Management & Planning Donald Borgen ND Division of Emergency Services ND GIS Users Conference.
Disaster Risk Management Basic Concepts. 31 Dec 2003RJ2 Disasters and Development Major natural hazards have larger consequences in developing countries.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) Cost-benefit analysis exercise RiskCity Cees van Westen
Session 8Slide 8-1 The Mitigation Plan Session 8 Slide Deck.
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.
Hazard Mitigation Funding Programs. Current Florida Mitigation Programs 1.Hazard Mitigation Grant Program* (HMGP) Hazard Mitigation 3.Pre-Disaster.
Certified Protection Officer Program. Chapter 1 Unit 1 Concepts and Theories of Asset Protection Pages 3-11.
Health Emergency Risk Management Pir Mohammad Paya MD, MPH,DCBHD Senior Technical Specialist Public Health in Emergencies Asian Disaster Preparedness Center.
Key Words in disaster Management Dhammika Mahendre.
Information Security Governance and Risk Chapter 2 Part 2 Pages 69 to 100.
THE FINAL SECTION! 5. Adjustments and responses to hazards and disasters.
INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT L ECTURE 8: R ISK M ANAGEMENT C ONTROLLING R ISK You got to be careful if you don’t know where you’re going, because you.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 1 The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Application and Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Training.
Economic Analysis in the Public Sector Benefit/Cost Analysis.
Risks and Hazards to Consider Unit 3. Visual 3.1 Unit 3 Overview This unit describes:  The importance of identifying and analyzing possible hazards that.
Headquarters U.S. Air Force
DISASTER VULNERABILITY, RISK AND CAPACITY
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Risk Assessment.
Risk Assessment.
HIRA This is the lesson objective.
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Risk Analysis and Assessment
SEC 400 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
SEC 400 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
SEC 400 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
LECTURE NO. 2 INTRODUCTION TO HAZARDS
Chapter 7: RISK ASSESSMENT, SECURITY SURVEYS, AND PLANNING
Disaster Mitigation Mitigation reduces the impact of disasters by supporting protection and prevention activities, easing response, and speeding recovery.
Agency Logos. Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Summer 2018 California Wildfires and High Winds DR-4382.
HIRA This is the lesson objective.
Planning Partner Adoption Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
Presentation transcript:

Benefit Cost Analysis for Flood Hazard Mitigation: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Method (selected excerpts from FEMA EMI Training Course)

FEMA does benefit-cost analysis to... Meet the statutory eligibility requirement. Meet the statutory eligibility requirement. Determine whether or not a project is worth doing. Determine whether or not a project is worth doing. Have a common basis on which to compare projects. Have a common basis on which to compare projects. Show that mitigation works. Show that mitigation works.

Section 404 (a) of the Stafford Act: “The President may contribute up to 75% of the cost of hazard mitigation measures which the President has determined are cost-effective and which substantially reduce the risk of future damage, hardship, loss or suffering in any area affected by a major disaster.”

44 CFR Part 206 Section (b) (5) (ii) “The Grantee must demonstrate (that the project is cost effective) by documenting that the project…will not cost more than the anticipated value of the reduction in both direct damages and subsequent negative impacts to the area if future disasters were to occur. Both costs and benefits will be computed on a net present value basis.”

TRUE or FALSE? “All well-designed mitigation projects reduce future damages and losses.”

TRUE or FALSE? “All well-designed mitigation projects reduce future damages and losses.”

TRUE or FALSE? “All well-designed mitigation projects reduce future damages and losses and thus all are cost-effective projects.”

TRUE or FALSE? “All well-designed mitigation projects reduce future damages and losses and thus all are cost-effective projects.”

Is It Worth $1 Million To...? 1. Protect one doghouse or one outhouse? 2. Protect one house that floods infrequently? 3. Protect a flood-prone hospital, city hall, school, and other important buildings? 4. Protect 150 flood- prone houses? Probably Not

Is It Worth $1 Million To...? Probably Not 1. Protect one doghouse or one outhouse? 2. Protect one house that floods infrequently? 3. Protect a flood-prone hospital, city hall, school, and other important buildings? 4. Protect 150 flood- prone houses?

Flood Hazard and Flood Risk x= FLOOD HAZARD (FREQUENCY & SEVERITY) FLOOD HAZARD (FREQUENCY & SEVERITY) Probability of Damaging Floods PROPERTY EXPOSED TO FLOODS PROPERTY EXPOSED TO FLOODS Value and Vulnerability of Property Exposed to Flood Hazard FLOOD RISK (DOLLARS) FLOOD RISK (DOLLARS) Severity of Threat to the Built Environment

Mitigation  Mitigation is an action taken specifically to eliminate or reduce the potential for FUTURE damages and losses from the hazard being addressed.

Cost-Effective  Cost-effective means: The benefits of a hazard mitigation project exceed the costs, or The benefits of a hazard mitigation project exceed the costs, or The benefit-cost ratio is greater than one. The benefit-cost ratio is greater than one.

The Benefit-Cost Model “Model” vs. “Modules” The MODEL is the MATH. The economic theory, hazard and risk assessment methods, and mathematical formulas on which FEMA bases the benefit-cost analysis of hazard mitigation projects. The MODULES are the SOFTWARE. FEMA’s software programs for conducting benefit-cost analysis. The benefit-cost modules are based on the benefit-cost model.

The Benefit-Cost Model B E N E F I T SB E N E F I T SB E N E F I T SB E N E F I T S C O S T SC O S T SC O S T SC O S T S = BC R A T I O

Mitigation Project Benefits: Definition  B E N E F I T S The expected avoided damages and losses over the lifetime of the mitigation project. The expected avoided damages and losses over the lifetime of the mitigation project.

Project Benefits Direct Damages and Losses Avoided Damages to buildings and other facilities such as infrastructure Damages to buildings and other facilities such as infrastructure Damages to contents Damages to contents Loss of function costs Loss of function costs Casualties Casualties Emergency management costs Emergency management costs

Project Benefits Indirect Damages NOT Considered Changes in gross regional economic product, incomes, or employment Changes in gross regional economic product, incomes, or employment Changes in future economic development or tourism Changes in future economic development or tourism Criminal justice system costs for disaster- related crime (e.g., looters) Criminal justice system costs for disaster- related crime (e.g., looters)

Mitigation Project Benefits  The project benefits calculation is based on four key elements: Flood frequency and severity Flood frequency and severity Damages and losses before mitigation Damages and losses before mitigation Damages and losses after mitigation Damages and losses after mitigation Economic factors including the discount rate and the mitigation project useful lifetime Economic factors including the discount rate and the mitigation project useful lifetime

The Benefit-Cost Model Flood Frequency and Severity FFE = 2,300’ 10-year flood = 2,302’ 100-year flood = 2,310’

Mitigation Project Benefits: Damages Before Mitigation Flood Depth (feet) Annual Probability of Flooding Scenario Damages and Losses Expected Annual Damages and Losses $ 6,400$1, $14,300$1, $24,500$2, $28,900$ $32,100$ $36,300$ 123 Total Expected Annual Damages and Losses $6,312

Flood Depth (feet) Annual Probability of Flooding Scenario Damages and Losses Expected Annual Damages and Losses $ $ $ $ $ 6,400$ $14,300$ 49 Total Expected Annual Damages and Losses $112 Mitigation Project Benefits: Damages After Mitigation

Mitigation Project Benefits: Annual Avoided Damages and Losses Flood Depth (feet) Expected Annual Damages Before Mitigation Expected Annual Damages After Mitigation Expected Annual Avoided Damages and Losses 0$1,312$ 0$1,312 1$1,765$ 0$1,765 2$2,124$ 0$2,124 3$ 673$ 0$ 673 4$ 315$63$ 252 5$ 123$49$ 74 Totals $6,312$112 $6,200

The Benefit-Cost Model Economics Terminology and Concepts N E T P R E S E N T V A L U E The value “today” of money that you will receive in the future. D I S C O U N T R A T E An interest rate used to determine the time value of money. For Federally funded mitigation projects, the discount rate is determined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

NEVER NEVER factor inflation into estimates of future damages or benefits. The Benefit-Cost Model Economics Terminology and Concepts

P R O J E C T U S E F U L L I F E T I M E The estimated time period over which the mitigation project will maintain its effectiveness in preventing or reducing damages and losses from future disasters.

The Benefit-Cost Model Economics Terminology and Concepts P R E S E N T V A L U E C O E F F I C I E N T (PVC) The PVC expresses the combined effect of the discount rate and the project useful lifetime on the net present value of future benefits.

Mitigation Project Benefits: Benefit-Cost Analysis Results Expected Annual Benefits Present Value Coefficient Net Present Value of Future Benefits Costs Benefit- Cost Ratio $6, $76,942$20, $6,200 x = (PVC based on a 30-year project life and 7% discount rate)

Benefit-Cost Model Flood Depth (feet) Expected Annual Damages Before Mitigation Expected Annual Damages After Mitigation Expected Annual Avoided Damages and Losses $1,312 $1,765 $2,124 $ 673 $ 315 $ 123 $ 0 $63 $49 $1,312 $1,765 $2,124 $ 673 $ 252 $ 74 Totals$6,312$112$6,200 PVC (7% Discount Rate, 30 years) Net Present Value of Future Benefits$76,942 Costs$20,000 Benefit-Cost Ratio 3.85

The BC Modules  BC Analysis Modules: Full-Data (FD) Full-Data (FD) Limited-Data (LD) Limited-Data (LD) Very-Limited-Data (VLD) Very-Limited-Data (VLD)

The BC Modules Basis Data Required Accuracy LD Module VLD Module FD Module Engineering information and flood hazard data Historic damage data Damage data from 2 or more flood events Most Accurate (When flood hazard data available) Damage data from 1 flood event Accurate (Most accurate when flood hazard data unavailable) Site-specific project data and flood hazard data Least Accurate

Demo

Dr. Shane Parson, PE, CFM Senior Project Associate Virginia Tech Center for Geospatial Information Technology 200 Patton Hall Blacksburg, VA Office: (540) Fax: (540) Website: