March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Building Capacity for Student Learning Brad Fox Paula Vincent March, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Project L.O.F.T. Report May 2007 through October 2007 Creating a design to meet stakeholder desires and dissolve our current set of interacting problems.
School Leadership that Works:
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
PORTFOLIO.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
A School Approach to Designing for Learning Learning Intentions : To know that purposefully designing for learning that is contextually appropriate, strengthens.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Session Materials  Wiki
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Parent Leadership Lisa Brown and Lisa Conlan Family Resource Specialists Technical Assistance Partnership.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Professional Learning Communities BEYOND THE TERM.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
Characteristics of Effective Learning Communities PowerUp Orientation.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
AWCPA PLC Facilitator’s Training AWCPA Leadership Team.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Essential Conditions for Implementation of... Local Professional Development Programming.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Teacher competencies. Professional competence with ICT Draw on appropriate ICT applications to enhance personal and professional effectiveness  Using.
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
School Effectiveness Framework Building effective learning communities together October 2009 Michelle Jones Professional Adviser WAG.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Building Capacity for Student Learning Brad Fox Paula Vincent March, 2010

Clear Creek Amana CSD Background

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Community Involvement Stakeholders expressed a strong desire for an educational experience that is: Personalized Serves the community, not just its children Can change with the times to keep itself current with future needs/challenges

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Selected Design Elements Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum Personalized Learning Distributive Leadership Community Engagement

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Selected Design Elements Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum Personalized Learning Distributive Leadership Community Engagement –Iowa Core/National Standards –District content maps –Instructional Planner

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Instructional Planner Instructional Planner Reflection-(Adapted from The Handbook for Enhancing Professional Practice, Danielson. 2007) The instructional planner is intended as a tool to guide the development of unit plans that demonstrate the following elements: –Your knowledge of content, including knowledge of prerequisite relations, links to other disciplines, and state and district content standards; –Clear criteria and procedures for assessing student learning that enable students to monitor their own learning and that allow the teacher to plan for future instruction; –Your knowledge of students’ backgrounds, skills and interests; –Clear goals for student learning; –A variety of learning activities that promote student engagement in learning and that develop important concepts from simpler to more complex.

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Reflective Questions The questions below may help you as a planning guide in preparing your unit. How did you select the essential questions that your students will be able to understand and answer as a result of this unit? Would another person reading this plan be able to determine how this unit supports the Iowa Core/district content standards? How do you know that this unit is appropriate for the students in your class (es)? How does your plan help students develop understanding of the unit’s important concepts?

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Reflective Questions Questions continued: How does the unit help correct or avoid common student misconceptions about this topic? What strategies have you used to connect this unit to prior learning? What prerequisite knowledge or skill must students have in order to be successful in this unit? What is your evidence that students in your class have this understanding? Is this information reflected in your assessment plan? How will students demonstrate their learning? What will they do to demonstrate engagement with this unit? How have you accommodated the diverse needs of the learners in the assessments you have chosen?

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Selected Design Elements Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum Personalized Learning Distributive Leadership Community Engagement

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Selected Design Elements Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum Personalized Learning Distributive Leadership Community Engagement –Personal Learning Plans Learning to Learn Learning to Do Learning to Be

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Selected Design Elements Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum Personalized Learning Distributive Leadership Community Engagement –Staff Learning Weekly learning time Common prep time Six week instructional planning Classroom implementation protocol

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Selected Design Elements Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum Personalized Learning Distributive Leadership Community Engagement –Professional Learning Teams –Building Leadership Teams –Instructional Services Team –District Leadership Team

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Distributive Leadership Professional Learning Teams –Each certified staff member participates in a collegial work group, facilitated by a teacher leader.

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Distributive Leadership Building Leadership Teams -The teacher leaders not only facilitate the collegial work groups, but also come together with the building administrator to provide building level leadership focused on instruction.

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Distributive Leadership Instructional Services Team -Model characteristics and responsibilities essential to effective leadership; -Provide progress information, feedback, and support for district goals and instructional initiatives; -Engage in professional learning individually and in learning teams; -Serve as a resource to colleagues through: intellectual stimulation, promotion and support of fundamental change, knowledge of curriculum, instruction, and assessment.

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD IST Values We will strive to carry out our work with a/an: assumption of positive intent; belief that our work makes a difference; willingness to commit to high expectations; acceptance of personal responsibility and a future focus. Norms Seek facts prior to judgment Acknowledge each other’s good work and hold each other accountable Take responsibility to prepare for meetings and work assignments in advance Recognize conflict and use it wisely Bring joy and humor to our work

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Distributive Leadership District Leadership Team - The purpose of the DLT is to make recommendations to the board regarding district-wide prioritized needs, possible adjustments to school improvement goals, and the programs and services provided to students.

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Distributive Leadership We have characterized the concept of distributed leadership as a process that collectively merges formal and informal leaders, as well as professional and non-professional staff, into an organization of stakeholders whose primary goal it becomes to improve teaching and learning. Our view of distributed leadership maximizes human capacity within the school and engages multiple sources of guidance, support and direction made coherent through a common set of organizational values around successful learning for all students. The distributed leadership concept relies on inclusive leadership practices and multi- dimensional strategies. Its intent is to create a culture that empowers stakeholders with opportunities to be in a position of leadership that collectively solves a problem, supports a data driven idea, or assists in teaching and learning.

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Distributive Leadership Continued The achievement of a high level of implementation of this process requires: teachers to develop leadership expertise by building skills, engaging in non-traditional tasks and working collaboratively; those in formal leadership positions to share leadership opportunities, bring fragmented pieces of the organization together through the use of individual skills and abilities combined to form productive relationships; and a commitment to the baseline principle of decentralized school leadership where all members subscribe to the view that leadership resides 'not solely in the individual at the top, but within every person who in one way or another, acts as a leader' (Goleman, 2002).

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Distributive Leadership Continued This concept does not suggest that ultimate responsibility for the overall performance of the organization is scattered or ambiguous, nor does it render authority of formal leadership roles redundant. It does however; cause the organization to become transparent by allowing all stakeholders to contribute to decisions regarding teaching and learning. School leaders who practice distributed leadership are transformational leaders who build staff self-esteem, enhance professional competence and give staff the confidence and responsibility to lead, develop and innovate. These school leaders take on many important roles, such as: –Facilitating the development of clear goals; –Building alliances; –Designing innovative professional development and peer exchanges; –Inspiring teaching and learning improvement strategies; –Engaging in the values of the school culture; and –Creating structures that empower others to lead. -a definition adapted from pilot schools in New Jersey, 2007; modified CCA, August 2009

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Building Capacity for Student Learning Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum Personalized Learning Distributive Leadership Community Engagement From schooling From people blame From maintenance of status quo From person dependent From reacting to mandates To learning To system issues To increasingly effective outcomes To system capacity To informing policy

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Building Capacity for Student Learning Resources Implementation Science-Heifetz Systems Design-Ackoff, Gharajedaghi Change Literature-Fullan Adaptive Schools – Wellman Learning Organizations-DuFour All of the above applied to schools-Leddick

March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD “Students can not benefit from interventions they do not experience.” -Dean Fixsen.