Uncertainty Workshop: Sounding attributes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patch Testing HYPACK 2013.
Advertisements

Determination of heights – essential terms 1. Equipotential surface = a surface with the invariable gravity potential (perpendicular to the force of gravity.
A comparison of error budgets for vertical positioning using traditional and RTK GPS approaches USM GPS workshop March 16-18, 2004 R.M. Hare, P.Eng., C.L.S.
HYSWEEP® SURVEY HYPACK 2013.
Application of Post-Processed Navigation, Motion and Tide Data to Multibeam Surveys using Applanix POS/MV Dushan Arumugam Doug Lockhart Carol Lockhart.
Sonar Chapter 9. History Sound Navigation And Ranging (SONAR) developed during WW II –Sound pulses emitted reflected off metal objects with characteristic.
Positional Accuracy February 15, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
GEODETIC CONTROL SURVEYS
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Lawrence H. Haselmaier, Jr. Computer Scientist Naval Oceanographic Office 7 August 2014.
HYPACK® Multibeam Training Seminar
Principles of Sea Level Measurement Long-term tide gauge records  What is a tide station?  How is sea level measured relative to the land?  What types.
Lineage February 13, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
Spatial data quality February 10, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
Copyright, © Qiming Zhou GEOG1150. Cartography Quality Control and Error Assessment.
Comparison of LIDAR Derived Data to Traditional Photogrammetric Mapping David Veneziano Dr. Reginald Souleyrette Dr. Shauna Hallmark GIS-T 2002 August.
9. GIS Data Collection.
GPS for NOAA Hydrographic Surveying CDR Gerd F. Glang & Jack L. Riley National Ocean Service, NOAA NOAA GNSS Workshop 2007.
Data Quality Data quality Related terms:
Tide coordinated shoreline mapping using THEOS /ALOS imagery Apisit Kongprom Geo-Informatics Scientist Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development.
V. Rouillard  Introduction to measurement and statistical analysis ASSESSING EXPERIMENTAL DATA : ERRORS Remember: no measurement is perfect – errors.
Multibeam echosounders: error modeling evolution Multibeam sonar workshop, 3-4 April 2005 St. Andrews, NB Rob Hare, P. Eng., C.L.S. Canadian Hydrographic.
Positioning with LiDAR Lucia Scimone, 31 st May 2011 GMAT9205 – Fundamentals of Geo-Positioning School of Surveying and Spatial Information Systems The.
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
New IHO Manual on Hydography
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
Performance Testing What can you achieve with your MB System?
Expanding Our Global Opportunities Techniques for Mapping In-River Geomorphology, Sediment Transport and River Bank Structures Robert Feldpausch,
Data input 1: - Online data sources -Map scanning and digitizing GIS 4103 Spring 06 Adina Racoviteanu.
REFERENCE SURFACE LTJG Anthony Klemm and Prof. Shachak Pe’eri LAB 3.
Civil Engineering Surveying Prepaid by:
Why Is It There? Getting Started with Geographic Information Systems Chapter 6.
HYSWEEP® PATCH TESTING.
Model Construction: interpolation techniques 1392.
30 July 2004USM 2004 Upper Pearl Survey1 Vertical Uncertainty Total Propagated Error –Error budget using Excel spreadsheets created for NAVOCEANO by Rob.
1 POS MV Vertical Positioning March Where we fit in! “Other sensors (notably modern heave-pitch-roll sensors) can contribute to achieving such.
Forward-Scan Sonar Tomographic Reconstruction PHD Filter Multiple Target Tracking Bayesian Multiple Target Tracking in Forward Scan Sonar.
An Introduction to CUBE and the Navigation Surface R.M. Hare July 2004.
Naval Oceanographic Office Charting Products Division (N43) Naval Oceanographic Office Hydrography Department upgrades to its Positioning Systems and Hopes.
Providing Uncertainty: Mariner ’ s Perspective CAPT Lee Alexander, USNR (ret)
Ayman F. Habib, 2010 LiDAR Calibration and Validation Software and Processes Department of Geomatics Engineering University.
Determination of Sample Size: A Review of Statistical Theory
GPS Workshop 2004 RTK-GPS Activity at the University of New Hampshire.
STATISTICS.
U.S. HYDRO 2007 TIDES WORKSHOP May 17, 2006 UNCERTAINTY WORKSHOP SKGILL SLIDES.
The Navigation Surface A New Approach to Multiple Product Creation from Hydrographic Surveys LT Shepard M. Smith, NOAA University of New Hampshire CCOM/JHC.
University of Southern Mississippi Canadian Hydrographic Service
National Ocean Service NGS, NOS, NOAA Real-Time GPS Positioning of Ships To Integrate Navigation Services Real-Time GPS Positioning of Ships To Integrate.
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
Interferometric Sounder
Session III GPS DEPTH-FINDER UNITS. F GPS positions are not error free –User and/or Satellite clock bias. –Satellite signal can be blocked. –Atmospheric.
October 02, st IHOP_2002 Water Vapor Intercomparison Workshop Status of intercomparisons and the next steps  Characterize moisture measuring techniques.
Processing Single Beam Data
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
HYSWEEP® SURVEY.
RTK TIDES.
A Framework and Methods for Characterizing Uncertainty in Geologic Maps Donald A. Keefer Illinois State Geological Survey.
S-44 evolution Multibeam sonar workshop, 3-4 April 2005 St. Andrews, NB Rob Hare, P. Eng., C.L.S. Canadian Hydrographic Service Chris Howlett UK Hydrographic.
Patch Testing. HYSWEEP ® Calibration of a Multibeam System Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam Systems. Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam.
Unit 2.b. Phases of a Hydrographic Survey Captain M K Barritt RN.
Civil Engineering Surveying Roy Frank. Planning A Survey  Planning requires a well rounded understanding of surveying practices  Process: 1. Choice.
U.S. Coast & Geodetic Survey/NOAA Steps to Creating a Nautical Chart Historic types of surveys required – Astronomical Observations – Land survey (triangulation)
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Visualizing Uncertainty of Bathymetric Data and Under Keel Clearance
SUR-2250 Error Theory.
Satellite Derived Bathymetry as Source Data for Navigational Charts
Cloud Optimized Processing for Hydrographic Data
Survey Networks Theory, Design and Testing
Real-time Uncertainty Output for MBES Systems
Presentation transcript:

Uncertainty Workshop: Sounding attributes Rob Hare Manager, Hydrographic Surveys Canadian Hydrographic Service, Pacific Region CHC2004 May 24, 2004

Abstract A discussion of attributes on soundings, sources of error and computation of sounding error. Plus a whole lot more An error prediction tool along with the characteristics and capabilities of (a few) sounding systems will be reviewed.

Data Quality Elements Completeness Logical consistency Positional accuracy Has horizontal and vertical components Sub-elements: absolute accuracy, attribute completeness, shape fidelity, time accuracy, topologic consistency Temporal accuracy Thematic accuracy

Estimation of Quality metrics Direct and indirect methods Require absolute coordinate reference frame (e.g. WGS-84) Most direct methods impractical source inter-comparison is an exception Indirect methods require validation e.g. deductive error estimation (forward error prediction)

Statistical estimators Measures of central tendency Sample mean Median, Mode Measures of dispersion (1-D and 2-D) Standard deviation (or variance), RMS CEP, MSEP, drms Total Propagated Error (TPE) CAUTION - many hydrographic measurements are correlated (e.g. H&V components of soundings)

Why estimate error/uncertainty? Preanalysis Will my system meet specifications? Do I purchase a new … C/B analysis? Real-time QA Am I collecting enough data to meet specifications? Do I modify my sampling/processing strategy, discard outer beams, increase overlap, take more sound speed profiles, etc.? Post-mission assessment Did I meet specifications? Classification - what Order did I achieve? Provide metadata for informed decision making/risk assessment Data attribution for integration/validation/comparison of different data sets Assessment of historic sources Initialization of CUBE estimator? Create Source Classification or Reliability Diagrams or ZOCs

Part 1 - The VERTICAL

Absolute Vertical Accuracy Estimates of vertical precision Errors common to all vertical measurements Errors common to GPS vertical measurements Depth soundings Shoal examinations Drying heights Elevations and clearances

Depth soundings Leadline, sounding pole, rod Single-beam echosounder - SBES analogue sounders digital sounders Sweep (multi-transducer) Lidar Swath (multibeam echosounder - MBES) Other – e.g. TIBS, wire or bar sweep, diver

Sources of error - water levels gauge measurement precision method of filtering sea surface waves timing synchronisation of gauge and measurement vertical datum precision spatial extrapolation to the location of the vertical measurement, or in the case of predictions, quality of constituent set (length/quality of observations) correction for environmental effects

Other sources of vertical error Draft and squat or settlement Antenna to transducer offset (GPS) Datum separation model (GPS) Sounding measurement Heave Sound speed

Traditional sounding reduction D = d + draft – WL d = r cos (θ+R) cos P r = range Θ = beam angle R = Roll angle P = Pitch angle Dynamic draft Charted Depth, D Chart datum Measured Depth, d Tide, WL θ r

RTK GPS sounding reduction D = d + K – Z – M K = Δx sinP + Δy cosP sinR + Δz cosP cosR Dynamic draft Charted Depth, D Chart datum Measured Depth, d Tide, WL θ r Ellipsoid GPS RTK, Z Separation Model, M Antenna Height, K

Vertical error propagation

SBES error sources depth measurement sound speed correction method algorithm, frequency, beamwidth, pulse length sound speed correction method draft (and squat if applied) heave (measured) tides manual trace reading, resolution, recording and reduction method

Lidar error sources Depth measurement Refraction correction (calibration) Sea-surface modelling Tides Footprint spreading

MBES error sources Range and beam angle measurement detection method (amplitude or phase) Refraction correction Dynamic draft includes squat, settlement, change of trim Heave (measured and induced) Tides or water levels Roll, pitch, heading Calibration (patch test) offsets Roll, pitch, heading, sensor latency Positioning system

Alignment errors

MBES coordinate systems

Mapping depth errors

Confidence levels For a normal distribution, the probabilities of univariate random errors of a single measurement falling within a certain level of error (number of standard deviations, ) are given in the following table.

Depth error estimates

Additional vertical corrections sounding datum adjustments metric conversion may include generation of metric contours sound speed corrections

Potential limitations heave estimation (manual) phase lag or latency sound speed changes manual trace reading vertical display resolution stepped vertical datum zones shoal biasing datum separation models

Part 2 - The HORIZONTAL

Absolute Horizontal Accuracy Estimates of horizontal precision Field sheet processes Soundings Shoal examinations Other data types Heights, elevations, clearances Navigational Aids Shoreline Bathymetric contours Cartographic processes (including digitizing)

Sounding Position Equations

Estimates of precision Rigorous - error ellipses HDOP MSEP CEP CSE drms

Errors in Multibeam soundings GPS or POS/MV position error transducer - antenna offsets sounder measurement error range, beam angle, detection method refraction correction error transducer shape, orientation, roll-modulation roll, pitch and heading error latency between systems GPS, sounder, VRU

Mapping position errors

Confidence levels

Position error estimates

Field Sheet processes Horizontal datum Manual processes Data types Materials and construction Horizontal control Station plotting Data types Soundings Shoal examinations, drying heights Contours Navigational aids Shoreline (natural and man-made) Seafloor samples Topography, elevations, clearances These are scale-dependent errors

Soundings - sources of error Positioning system/method Sounding system including offsets in space and time Plotting Inking Digitizing

Positioning systems/methods Manual/Optical Sextant (eccentric circle LOP) Subtense (eccentric circle LOP) Range poles (straight-line LOP) Azimuth (straight-line LOP) Electronic positioning systems (EPS) Range-bearing (hybrid - circle and line) Two-range or range-range (later multi-range) - concentric circle LOP Hyperbolic (2 and later multi-hyperbola) LOP Transit satellite (Doppler) - spherical LOP GPS (spherical LOP) DGPS OTF

Plotting, Inking, Digitizing errors 3-arm protractor lattices collector registration fixes and ‘tweeners’ Inking on collector on field sheet registration Digitizing digitizer resolution registration (rms of fit on HCP) - transformation used datum shift projection These are scale-dependent errors

Systematic error sources (safety biasing) Generalization Line smoothing Symbolization Feature displacement soundings bottom samples (more for clarity than safety)

Drafting (from final compilation manuscript) Control points Linework (shoreline) Soundings Symbols Contours Bottom samples

Digitizing Registration/rectification method Digitizer precision, resolution Optical centre recognition Line-following ability QC tolerances (chart specifications)

Sources, products and points of digitization

Data inter-comparisons: validating error prediction assumptions Methods compare same data set at different process stages difference DTM (soundings) inter-comparison of point features (shoal examinations, drying heights) linework comparisons (HWL, LWL, contours) validate inference methods (expected vs. actual) Limitations small statistical sample is it the same feature? separation of depth from position error

Quality Implementations Data collection - ASCII, Simrad, Hypack, NMEA Data processing - HIPS (Quality flag, coverage, standard deviation), CUBE (stochastic surface, etc.) Data storage - Caris ASCII, GSF, SDS, … Paper Charts - Source Classification/Reliability Diagrams, Explanations in Sailing Directions/Pilots ENC - S-57 objects and meta-objects (M_QUAL, M_ACCY, CATZOC, CATQUA, QUASOU, TECSOU, POSACC) Raster Charts?

Summary Depth and position errors can be estimated using forward error prediction These estimates can be validated by inter-comparison of data sets Estimates can be used: To make decisions regarding equipment selection and purchase To determine if specifications can be/have been met To adapt your sampling strategy As an input to statistical processing algorithms These are but two of many Quality/Uncertainty Measures