Georgia Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission 29 TH BIENNIAL INSTITUTE FOR GEORGIA LEGISLATORS TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Campaign Finance Administration & Enforcement Contact Information Campaign Finance Coordinators  Abbey Taylor (317) 
Advertisements

 LDR assess a UET penalty on individual income for underpayment of individual income tax.  The penalty may be imposed if the taxpayer did not pay enough.
The “Blonde” Version of Bankruptcy Verona M Lambert Director, Student Accounts Southeast Missouri State University.
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
Ethics 101 Part II for Lobbyists Connecticut Registered Lobbyists
Deficit District Roles & Responsibilities. MCL A district or intermediate district receiving money under this act shall not adopt or operate.
Northern Michigan SBO March 16, 2011 Jeff Kolb Michigan Department of Education Jeff Kolb Michigan Department of Education.
STATE ELECTIONS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION Lobbyist Contribution and Solicitation Ban.
1 Overview of Ethics Requirements for Employees of Montgomery County This is a summary to help identify issues; it is not the law. Please address ethics.
OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION CURRENT STATE OF DISCOUNT MEDICAL PLAN ORGANIZATIONS (DMPOs) IN FLORIDA FLORIDA OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION.
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
Implementing and Enforcing the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
LOBBYING RULES IN MASSACHUSETTS: ARE YOU A LEGISLATIVE AGENT OR AN EXECUTIVE AGENT? Robert E. Cowden III Casner & Edwards, LLP 303 Congress Street Boston,
Alliance for Community Media Conference Cable Franchise Renewal By Michael R. Bradley Bradley & Guzzetta, LLC Phone: (651) July 8, 2005____________________________.
SHAUN ADAMS, ESQ ASSOCIATE LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR ACCG Ethics Update.
Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 [Chapter VI of Finance Act, 2013] Amnesty Scheme – Updated with Department Clarification.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
TAX ADMINISTRATION ACT, 2011 By Johan Kotze Head of Tax Dispute Resolution.
Title V Fee Committee: Answers to July 2013 Questions September 11, 2013.
When does a Nonprofit have to register as a Charity? Washington Secretary of State Charities Program.
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES EXPEDITED CASE PROCESSING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC ACT
1 An Ethics Update - Campaign Finance Election Law Seminar for County Chairs October 15, 2005.
Implementation Issues of Sarbanes-Oxley CASE Presentation September 23, 2004 By Denise Farnan.
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division133rd SOS Election Law Seminar Election Funds Management Texas Secretary of State Primary Financing.
OHIO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE INCOME TAX SEMINAR JULY 9, 2015 Did Someone Say the State Changed How Municipalities Audit, Assess, Refund & What’s the 30,000 Rule?
Penalty Tax and Tax Offences © National Core Accounting Publications1 Chapter 26.
Pre-action Procedure for Financial Cases. Pre-action Procedure- Financial Cases  Rule 1.05(1)- each prospective party to the case must comply with the.
Kathy Alexander, Ph.D. Technical Specialist Water Availability Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
CONSIDERATION OF STREAMLINED PROCESS FOR STIPULATED WASTE TIRE HAULER AND WASTE TIRE FACILTY ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY CASES CIWMB Board Meeting Agenda Item.
Alabama Department of Revenue Christy Vandevender Tax Policy & Research Division.
CTEA-November 2010Offer-in-Compromise The Capital of Texas Enrolled Agents November 2010 The Offer-in-Compromise.
INTEGRITY COMMISSION OF GUYANA. BACKGROUND The Integrity Commission was established on the 24 th September, 1997 and the Act provides for the appointment.
BRAD KETCHER (314) Missouri Lobbying Law.
Introducing A New Process For Reporting Financial Data to DPI A Revised Format For The PI-1505 AC.
Ethics Matters TRENDS IN THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION.
Financial Aid Workshop September 26,  Prorating TEXAS Grant and TEOG Awards  Exemptions and Waiver Programs  TX College Work Study Program 
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
Presented by: Gary J. Holland, Assistant General Counsel, Department of State Telephone: June 23,
 M EETING A GENDA ◦ Introductions ◦ Review of Section , Florida Statutes ◦ Summary of Activities to Date ◦ Review of First DRAFT ◦ Unresolved Issues.
LOGO BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE Revenue Region 19, Davao City Bolton Ext., Davao City.
Lobbyist Contribution and Solicitation Ban State Elections Enforcement Commission.
Contribution Disclosure Statement State Ethics Commission State Board of Elections.
Orange County Building Safety / Consumer Fraud Unit Unlicensed Contracting Board of County Commissioners January 15, 2013.
Claims Proposed Rulemaking Main Purposes É Applicant Assistance to Improve Focus of Examination n Narrow scope of initial examination so the examiner is.
Oregon Government Ethics Commission Oregon Government Ethics Commission An Overview of Oregon Government Ethics Law An Overview of Oregon Government Ethics.
Contribution Disclosure Form State Ethics Commission and Board of Elections 1.
ATTORNEY’S GUIDE TO OPENING A CIVIL CASE PAYING THE FILING FEE.
Oregon Government Ethics Commission Oregon Government Ethics Commission An Overview of Oregon Government Ethics Law An Overview of Oregon Government Ethics.
The Basics of Lobbying OR. In the words of Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones.
OFFICE OF STATE ETHICS Enforcement Division Primary Functions  Enforcement of Public Official and Lobbyist Codes  Enforcement of Statutory Filing Requirements.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK LOBBYING BUREAU Michael McSweeney City Clerk, Clerk of the Council LOBBYING IN NEW YORK CITY INFORMATION SESSION: AMNESTY.
Public Hearing on the Red Light Camera Ordinance Presented by Dana Crosby, Assistant County Attorney July 13, 2010 Board of County Commissioners.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Failure to properly investigate earnings in a timely manner.
Digital Reporting System for Political Parties
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association
DISTRICT TRAINING ASSEMBLY 2016
Whistleblower Program
Guidelines & Procedures
Primary Financing and Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Funding Update
Alyson Lansdell Floyd County Schools
SECRETARY OF STATE’S OFFICE CAMPAIGN FINANCE MODERNIZATION PROJECT
Certification Phase: PLANNING
Economic Development Department Annual Financial Statements 2011/12
Initial Licensure Process, Survey Types & Licensure Action
Certification Phase: Implementation
Presentation transcript:

Georgia Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission 29 TH BIENNIAL INSTITUTE FOR GEORGIA LEGISLATORS TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2014

Current Case Count Active Cases under Investigation by the Commission: ◦183 cases as of September 30, 2014 ◦193 cases as of December 01, 2014 ◦An increase of 9.5% in 60 days (citizen initiated complaints only). Cases Referred to the Attorney-General’s Office for Prosecution: ◦30 cases as of September 30, 2014 ◦28 cases as of December 01, 2014 Grand Total of All Active Cases: ◦221 cases as of December 01, 2014

Case Management Statistics CASE LOAD INTAKE FROM JULY 1, 2014 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2014: Complaints rejected by the Commission after an initial investigation by Attorneys: 9 Complaints accepted by the Commission for further investigation / prosecution: 10 CASE LOAD INTAKE AS FROM OCTOBER 1, 2014 TO DECEMBER 01, 2014: Complaints rejected by the Commission after an initial investigation by Attorneys: 8 Complaints accepted by the Commission for further investigation / prosecution: 8 Total Complaints filed with the Commission from July 01, 2014 to Present: 35 cases

Case Management Statistics Cont’d CASES RESOLVED BY COMMISSION FROM JULY 1, 2014 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 Cases closed by Consent Order: 8 Cases closed by Administrative Dismissal: 5 Cases presented for Probable Cause: 1 CASES RESOLVED BY COMMISSION FROM OCTOBER 1, 2014 TO DECEMBER 01, 2014 Cases closed by Consent Order: 22 Cases closed by Administrative Dismissal: 11 Cases presented for Probable Cause: 7 Total Cases Resolved by the Commission from July 01, 2014 to Present: 49.

Future Case Management  Officials who have self-reported violations of the Campaign Finance Act: 390 since October 10, 2014  Number of audits conducted since October 10, 2014: 105.  Number of officials who have been properly noticed of outstanding late fees and penalties: 112 (29%).  Number of inquires closed after payment of fees: 46 (12%).  As of December 01, 2014, Commission staff have 101 cases under active investigation or 55 percent of open cases.  The Commission’s current case load represents a 9.5 percent increase in the number of cases under active management from September 30,  Additionally, the Commission is in the process of conducting 17 random audits of officials and candidates to ensure compliance with the Campaign Finance Act (35% Complete).

Case Management Summary Total Cases under Active Management:  January 1, 2014 to July 1, 2014: 0 cases under active management / investigation.  July 1, 2014 to September 30, 2014: 96 cases or 52% under active management / investigation.  September 30, 2014 to December 1, 2014: 101 cases or 55% under active management / investigation.

Random Audits Commencing January 1, 2015, the Commission will conduct random audits of elected officials and candidates for public office. The random audits will initially focus on officials and candidates with outstanding late fees, who have failed to self-report. Elected officials and candidates will be selected at random by a variable algorithm with an initial goal of screening five percent of all filings.

FY2015 Fee Collection Late Fees (CCDR and PFDS): Lobbyist Registration Fees: Civil Penalties: $6, (All Remitted to Treasury). Miscellaneous Retained Revenue:$ Total CollectedRemitted to TreasuryRetained July 1 – Sept. 30$10,070.00$8,170.00$1, Oct. 1 – Dec. 30$33,030.00$2, $6, Total CollectedRemitted to TreasuryRetained July 1 – Sept. 30$4,700.00$ $ Oct. – Dec. 30$1,780.00$ $450.00

How is a Case Managed by the Commission’s Attorneys? 1.The Commission receives a Complaint (or Commission initiated audit) which identifies a candidate/official as having potentially violated the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Act. 2.The Commission’s attorneys are assigned the case and a preliminary investigation is commenced. 3.During the course of the preliminary investigation, the Commission’s attorneys will identify: ◦Alleged violations of the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Act; ◦Un-alleged violations of the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Act; and, ◦Technical Defects (Accounting Errors) 4.Once new violations and/or technical defects are identified, the Commission’s attorneys provide the Respondent with statutorily required notice of the new violations / technical defects. 5.Upon expiration of the statutorily imposed period to respond to new violations (14 days) or to correct technical defects (60 days), the Commission’s attorneys will attempt to resolve a case by a mutually agreed upon Consent Order. 6.If the Commission is unable to come to an agreement (after 30 to 60 days) with the Respondent, cases are referred to a Preliminary Hearing before the full Commission.

Common Issues for State-Level Filers Declaration of Intention to Accept Contributions ◦Accepting contributions before filing a DOI Exceeding Maximum Contribution Limits ◦$2,500 Primary Election/ $1,300 Primary Run-Off ◦$2,500 General Election/ $1,300 General Run-Off Failing to Choose Option of Separate Accounting (COOSA) ◦Must file an Option to Choose Separate Accounting ◦Must notate the election for which the contribution is accepted Improper Expenditures ◦Donations: Is the non-profit really a non- profit? Anonymous Contributions Election Year Reporting Schedule ◦Reporting period ends October 25 th not October 30 th ◦December 31 st CCDR still required in Election Year

Common Issues for State-Level Filers Failing to properly fill out a Personal Financial Disclosure Statement (PFDS) when there are no changes from the preceding PFDS. Failing to include fiduciary positions No grace period for PFDS Non-Election Year: Must be filed between January 1 st and July 1 st Election Year: Must be filed within 15 days of qualifying

Late Fees ◦Untimely filing of Campaign Contribution Disclosure Report (CCDR). ◦Untimely filing of Personal Financial Disclosure Statement (PFDS). ◦Untimely filing of Lobbyist Disclosure Reports. Initial Late FeeAfter 15 DaysAfter 45 Days CCDR$125.00$375.00$1, Initial Late FeeAfter 15 DaysAfter 45 Days PFDS$125.00$375.00$1, Reports due when General Assembly is NOT in session Initial Late Fee: $ th Day After Due: Additional $1, th Day After Due: $10,000 Reports due when General Assembly is in session Initial Late Fee: $275 7 th Day After Due: Additional $1, st Day After Due: $10,000

Hardship Waivers Commission has authority to waive or suspend late fees when: 1.The imposition of such fee would pose an undue hardship, or 2.If there are no items to be included in the report. Undue Hardship: 1.Filer’s current financial circumstances make paying a late fee an undue hardship. 2.Filer suffered an undue hardship at the time of the filing. Personal circumstances are the cause of or reason for the late fee. Criteria will be proposed at December 10 th Commission Meeting to ensure uniformity in granting waivers

Hardship Waiver Stats 213 Hardship Waivers Submitted in Denied (However, many lobbyist late fees were reduced to initial late fee.) 16 Granted 6 Partially Granted and Denied 2 Unnecessary 81 Currently Pending

Contact Phone: Robert Lane: Bethany Whetzel: