Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Programs for Drug Offenders.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: What Works with Offenders?
Advertisements

Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health Partnerships Review of projects recognizing the needs of and providing treatment supports to DUI offenders Nisha.
Integrating Risk/Needs Assessment Into Drug Court
Treatment of Substance Involved Offenders in Criminal Justice Settings – Challenges & Outcomes Igor Koutsenok, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Psychiatry,
INCENTIVES, and Sanctions How to help folks steer themselves in the right direction Based on the work of Judge Bill Meyer, Douglas Marlowe, Jane Pfeifer,
Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview. OBJECTIVES  Define Best Practices Standards  Identify the need for Best Practices Standards  Briefly.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
Community-Oriented Defense Performance Indicators A Conceptual Overview Michael Rempel Center for Court Innovation Presented at the Community-Oriented.
SENTENCING FOR CRIME CONTROL Mark Kleiman National Association of Sentencing Commissions Chicago August 7, 2012.
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions
Targeting Dispositions by Risk, Need, Responsivity Modeling If / Then Decisions Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania Effective Use of Rewards & Sanctions.
Managing drug- involved offenders with HOPE Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD October 22, 2010 ACJRCA.
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Use of Rewards & Sanctions.
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Frank Schmalleger Criminal Justice Today 13 th Edition.
Assessment of Risk and Need
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
Offender Supervision Control and Public Safety Issues.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Presented by: Cary Heck, Ph.D. University of Wyoming
Risk/Needs Assessment Within the Criminal Justice System.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D.
National Association of Drug Court Practitioners Anaheim, CA June 2009.
Adult Drug Courts: The Effect of Structural Differences on Program Retention Rates Natasha Williams, Ph.D., J.D., MPH Post Doctoral Fellow, Morgan State.
Community Sanctions in Croatia Neven Ricijaš, Ph.D. Department of Behavior Disorders Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Science University of Zagreb.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Treatment is the Key: Addressing Drug Abuse in Criminal Justice Settings Redonna K. Chandler, Ph.D. Branch Chief Services Research Branch Division of Epidemiology,
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
Criminal Sentencing in N.C.. Structured Sentencing In 2011, N.C. passed the Structured Sentencing law to organize the punishment of criminals. – Sentencing.
The Need For Evidence Based Sentencing Chief Justice William Ray Price, Jr.
Intensive Supervision Probation (or Parole) Initial Rise to Prominence Research on First Gen ISP Programs Finding Something Useful in ISP.
Assessment of Alcohol-Involved Offenders Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals Treatment Research Institute.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Program Components and Key Concepts for Drug Court Services Matrix Institute on Addictions Rancho Cucamonga, California – 2001.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
What Makes Drug Courts Effective? Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction.
Targeting Participants for Adult Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
Targeting Participants for Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania Evidence-Based Dispositions for Drug Offenders.
Nonresidential Intermediate Sanctions
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Targeting Dispositions by Risks &
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Targeting Dispositions by Risks &
Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections. JUSTIFICATION Reintegration Preparing offenders to return to the community unmarred by further criminal.
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Targeting Participants for Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
C11: Probation and Corrections  Sean Taylor:  What was his crime?  What was his sentence?  Do you think he received special treatment?
Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations Janelle Prueter Illinois TASC Presented to RSAT West VA Conference July 21, 2011.
Performance Evaluation of Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction.
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Community Corrections Alternative Program
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D., FCPP
Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Reform
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Problem Solving Courts in the Federal System
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Annals of Research and Knowledge (ARK)
Key Moments in NADCP History
Presentation transcript:

Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Programs for Drug Offenders

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts $$$$$$ Costs $$$$$$$$$ Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Public Safety Risks Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Psychosocial Functioning Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Psychosocial Functioning $$$$$$ Costs $$$$$$$$$ Public Safety Risks Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions Over-reliance

Prison Criminal Recidivism in 3 Years 68% re-arrested 47% convicted 50% re-incarcerated Relapse to Drug Abuse in 3 Years 95% relapse TRI science addiction

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions Over-reliance

Intermediate Sanctions No effect Boot camp House arrest “Worse” effect Anklet monitoring Scared Straight Intensive Supervised Probation (ISP) Slight improvement Restitution TRI science addiction

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions Over-reliance

Diversion to Treatment 50% - 67% don’t show for intake 40% - 80% drop out in 3 months 90% drop out in 12 months 70% of probationers and parolees drop out within months Attrition TRI science addiction

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions Over-reliance

Effects of Proposition 36 TRI science addiction 30% never showed for treatment 40% attended 90 days of treatment 24% completed treatment 20% probation revocations 60% parole revocations Increased recidivism Decreased costs

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions Reliance

60% complete > 12 months of treatment 50% graduate Reduced recidivism and drug use Serves ~ 5% of eligible population TRI science addiction Effects of Drug Courts

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions  50% success rate  5% eligible pop.

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions  50% success rate  5% eligible pop.  25% success rate  Cost savings

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions  50% success rate  5% eligible pop.  25% success rate  Cost savings  10% success rate  Most cost savings

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions  50% success rate  5% eligible pop.  25% success rate  Cost savings  10% success rate  Most cost savings  Low success rate  Public safety

Criminogenic Risks TRI science addiction Age during rehabilitation < 25 yearsAge during rehabilitation < 25 years Criminal onset < 16 yearsCriminal onset < 16 years Prior rehabilitation failuresPrior rehabilitation failures History of violenceHistory of violence Antisocial Personality DisorderAntisocial Personality Disorder PsychopathyPsychopathy Familial history of crimeFamilial history of crime Criminal associationsCriminal associations

Criminogenic Needs Drug Dependence or Addiction Drug Dependence or Addiction TRI science addiction

Criminogenic Needs Drug Dependence or Addiction Drug Dependence or Addiction 1.Binge pattern 2.Cravings or compulsions 3.Withdrawal symptoms TRI science addiction

Criminogenic Needs Drug Dependence or Addiction Drug Dependence or Addiction 1.Binge pattern 2.Cravings or compulsions 3.Withdrawal symptoms TRI science addiction } Abstinence is a distal goal

Criminogenic Needs Drug Dependence or Addiction Drug Dependence or Addiction 1.Binge pattern 2.Cravings or compulsions 3.Withdrawal symptoms Drug Abuse or Misuse TRI science addiction } Abstinence is a distal goal

Criminogenic Needs Drug Dependence or Addiction Drug Dependence or Addiction 1.Binge pattern 2.Cravings or compulsions 3.Withdrawal symptoms Drug Abuse or Misuse TRI science addiction } Abstinence is a distal goal Abstinence is a proximal goal }

Criminogenic Needs Drug Dependence or Addiction Drug Dependence or Addiction 1.Binge pattern 2.Cravings or compulsions 3.Withdrawal symptoms Drug Abuse or Misuse Collateral needs Collateral needs –Dual diagnosis –Chronic medical condition (e.g., HIV+, HCV, diabetes) –Homelessness, chronic unemployment TRI science addiction } Abstinence is a distal goal Abstinence is a proximal goal }

Criminogenic Needs Drug Dependence or Addiction Drug Dependence or Addiction 1.Binge pattern 2.Cravings or compulsions 3.Withdrawal symptoms Drug Abuse or Misuse Collateral needs Collateral needs –Dual diagnosis –Chronic medical condition (e.g., HIV+, HCV, diabetes) –Homelessness, chronic unemployment TRI science addiction } Abstinence is a distal goal Abstinence is a proximal goal } } Regimen compliance is proximal

TRI science addiction High Risk Low Risk HighNeeds LowNeeds Risk & Needs Matrix

TRI science addiction High Risk Low Risk HighNeeds LowNeeds Accountability &Treatment

Risk & Needs Matrix TRI science addiction High Risk Low Risk HighNeeds LowNeeds Accountability &Treatment Treatment

Risk & Needs Matrix TRI science addiction High Risk Low Risk HighNeeds LowNeeds Accountability &Treatment Treatment Accountability

Risk & Needs Matrix TRI science addiction High Risk Low Risk HighNeeds LowNeeds Accountability &Treatment Treatment Prevention Accountability

Practice Implications TRI science addiction High Risk Low Risk HighNeeds LowNeeds Status hearings Status hearings Intensive treatment Intensive treatment Compliance is proximal Compliance is proximal Restrictive consequences Restrictive consequences Positive reinforcement Positive reinforcement Noncompliance hearings Noncompliance hearings Intensive treatment Intensive treatment Treatment is proximal Treatment is proximal Positive reinforcement Positive reinforcement v.o.p. / status calendar v.o.p. / status calendar Abstinence is proximal Abstinence is proximal Restrictive consequences Restrictive consequences Secondary prevention Secondary prevention Abstinence is proximal Abstinence is proximal No AA or MET No AA or MET Individual counseling Individual counseling or stratified groups or stratified groups

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions Low risk Low needs

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions Low risk High needs Low risk Low needs

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions Low risk High needs High risk High needs Low risk Low needs

Programs for Drug Offenders TRI science addiction DiversionIncarceration Probation w/o verdict (Prop 36) Drug Courts Intermediate sanctions Low risk High needs High risk High needs High risk Low needs Low risk Low needs

Ok, Mr. Big Shot... PROVE IT!!!!

“Key Components” Judicial status hearings Graduated sanctions & rewards Urine drug screens Drug abuse treatment Case management Nolle prosse or conditions-served Expunged record (diversion) TRI science addiction (NADCP, 1997)

“Key Components” Judicial status hearings Graduated sanctions & rewards Urine drug screens Drug abuse treatment Case management Nolle prosse or conditions-served Expunged record (diversion) TRI science addiction (NADCP, 1997)

Research Site TRI science addiction 1st Study: New Castle Co. (misdemeanor)

Matching Design TRI science addiction High RiskLow Risk Matched Unmatched Bi-Weekly (n = 42) As Needed (n = 95) As Usual (monthly) (n = 50)(n = 92)

% Drug-free Urines by Group TRI science addiction p <.001

% Drug-free Urines by Group TRI science addiction p <.001

% Drug-free Urines by Group TRI science addiction p <.001

% Drug-free Urines by Group TRI science addiction p <.001

Drug-Positive Urines: 6 Mos. TRI science addiction * * p <.05 * *

Graduation Rates: 12 mos. TRI science addiction * * p <.05 *

“Key Components” Judicial status hearings Graduated sanctions & rewards Urinalyses Drug abuse treatment Case management Nolle prosse or time served Expunged record (diversion) TRI science addiction (NADCP, 1997)

“Key Components” Judicial status hearings Graduated sanctions & rewards Urinalyses Drug abuse treatment Case management Nolle prosse or time served Expunged record (diversion) TRI science addiction (NADCP, 1997)

Months of compliance STANDARD REWARDS Hat or Candle Reduced community service 7 Reduced drug testing 8 Reduced treatment requirements 9 10Reduced status hearings 11 Reduced homework assignments 12 Total Rewards TRI science addiction

Months of compliance STANDARD REWARDS ENHANCED ESCALATING REWARDS 1$5.00 gift certificate 2$10.00 gift certificate 3Hat or Candle$15.00 gift certificate 4$20.00 gift certificate 5$25.00 gift certificate 6 Reduced community service $30.00 gift certificate 7Reduced drug testing$35.00 gift certificate 8 Reduced treatment requirements $40.00 gift certificate 9$45.00 gift certificate 10 Reduced status hearings $50.00 gift certificate 11 Reduced homework assignments $55.00 gift certificate 12$60.00 gift certificate Total $ TRI science addiction Rewards

Months of compliance STANDARD REWARDS ENHANCED ESCALATING REWARDS ENHANCED THINNING REWARDS 1 $5.00 gift certificate $30.00 gift certificate 2$10.00 gift certificate $30.00 gift certificate 3 Hat or Candle$15.00 gift certificate $30.00 gift certificate 4$20.00 gift certificate Eligible for $50.00 gift certificate if compliant one additional month 5 $25.00 gift certificate $50.00 gift certificate 6 Reduced community service $30.00 gift certificate Eligible for $50.00 gift certificate if compliant one additional month 7 Reduced drug testing$35.00 gift certificate $50.00 gift certificate 8 Reduced treatment requirements $40.00 gift certificate Eligible for $75.00 gift certificate if compliant one additional month 9 $45.00 gift certificate $75.00 gift certificate 10Reduced status hearings$50.00 gift certificate Eligible for $ gift certificate if compliant two additional months 11 Reduced homework assignments $55.00 gift certificate Eligible for $ gift certificate if compliant one additional month 12 $60.00 gift certificate $ gift certificate Total $ TRI science addiction Rewards

# Drug-Free Urines (13 mos.) TRI science addiction n=61n=60n=60 p = n.s.

Mean % Sessions Attended TRI science addiction n=61n=60n=60 p = n.s.

Mean % Drug-Free Urines TRI science addiction *p <.05 n=34 n=29 n=34 n=29 n=26 n=24

Summary One size does not fit all!One size does not fit all! Drug courts are best suited for high risk and high needs offendersDrug courts are best suited for high risk and high needs offenders When possible, separate court calendars and treatment tracks should be held for high risk vs. low risk clientsWhen possible, separate court calendars and treatment tracks should be held for high risk vs. low risk clients You may need to be nicest to the clients you might like the leastYou may need to be nicest to the clients you might like the least TRI science addiction