Measurement of small beam size by SR interferometer By Prof. Dr.Toshiyuki MITSUHASHI KEK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observation of beam halo with corona graph
Advertisements

Interference and Diffraction
Light and Telescopes Please pick up your assigned transmitter
Chapter 31 Images.
OPTICS. I. IMAGES A. Definition- An image is formed where light rays originating from the same point on an object intersect on a surface or appear to.
Lecture 24 Physics 2102 Jonathan Dowling EM waves Geometrical optics.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Evan Walsh Mentors: Ivan Bazarov and David Sagan August 13, 2010.
The Origin of Modern Astronomy Chapter 4:. Isaac Newton 1689.
Optics in Astronomy - Interferometry - Oskar von der Lühe Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik Freiburg, Germany.
Exam II Review. Review of traveling wave interference Phase changes due to: Optical path length differences sources out of phase General solution.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 32 Light: Reflection and Refraction.
PERFORMANCE OF THE DELPHI REFRACTOMETER IN MONITORING THE RICH RADIATORS A. Filippas 1, E. Fokitis 1, S. Maltezos 1, K. Patrinos 1, and M. Davenport 2.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Chapter 23: Reflection and Refraction of Light.
Slide 1 Light and telescopes Just by analyzing the light received from a star, astronomers can retrieve information about a star’s 1.Total energy output.
Two-dimensional and wide dynamic range profile monitor using OTR/fluorescence screens for diagnosing beam halo of intense proton beam Y. Hashimoto, T.
Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
This Set of Slides This set of slides deals with telescopes. Units covered: 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30.
WAVES MEDIUM VIBRATES PERPENDICULARLY TO THE WAVE DIRECTION IF f IS THE WAVE FREQUENCE AND λ IS THE WAVELEGTH THEN c, THE WAVE VELOCITY, IS GIVEN BY: c.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Chapter 5 Telescopes: “light bucket”. Telescopes have three functions 1.Gather as much light as possible: LGP ∝ Area = πR 2 LGP ∝ Area = πR 2 Why? Why?
The wave nature of light Interference Diffraction Polarization
Lecture 15 Interference Chp. 35 Topics –Interference from thin films –Due to the wave nature of light –Change in wavelength and phase change in a medium.
Dr. Andrew Tomasch 2405 Randall Lab
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
WAVE OPTICS - I 1.Electromagnetic Wave 2.Wavefront 3.Huygens’ Principle 4.Reflection of Light based on Huygens’ Principle 5.Refraction of Light based on.
Light Chapter 16.
Refraction is the change of direction of a light wave caused by a change in speed as the wave crosses a boundary between materials.
Optics and Telescopes. Optics and Telescopes: Guiding Questions 1.How do reflecting and refracting telescopes work? 2.Why is it important that professional.
Thus, the image formed by lens 2 is located 30 cm to the left of lens 2. It is virtual (since i 2 < 0). 30 The magnification is m = (-i 1 /p 1 ) x (-i.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
Chapter 24 Wave Optics. General Physics Review – waves T=1/f period, frequency T=1/f period, frequency v = f velocity, wavelength v = f velocity, wavelength.
Optical diagnostics for beam halo (I) Coronagraph (II) OTR halo monitor for J-PARC T. Mitsuhashi, KEK.
1 Light Chapters 36 – 39 2 Wave or Particle? Newton -- particles. In the early 19 th century, Young, Fresnel, and others -- wave. In 1860 Maxwell --
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
Interference in Thin Films, final
Lecture 27-1 Thin-Film Interference-Cont’d Path length difference: (Assume near-normal incidence.) destructive constructive where ray-one got a phase change.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano An application of the.
Lecture 26-1 Lens Equation ( < 0 )  True for thin lens and paraxial rays.  magnification m = h’/h = - q/p.
1.Stable radiation source 2.Wavelength selector 3.Transparent sample holder: cells/curvettes made of suitable material (Table 7- 2) 4.Radiation detector.
WAVE OPTICS - I Electromagnetic Wave Wave front Huygens’ Principle
The Nature of Light. Light Can Act Like Waves or In 1801 Thomas Young an English scientist did an experiment. –Double slit experiment Passed a beam of.
Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University Fall 2003 July 2003
Refraction P 7.2 LIGHT TELESCOPES AND IMAGES. You should understand that the wave speed will change if a wave moves from one medium into another a change.
Lens to interferometer Suppose the small boxes are very small, then the phase shift Introduced by the lens is constant across the box and the same on both.
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
Chapter 22 Reflection and Refraction of Light Herriman High AP Physics 2.
DISPERSIVE POWER OF A GRATING Dispersive power of a grating is defined as the ratio of the difference in the angle of diffraction of any two neighbouring.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35-Diffraction.
Lecture 26-1 Lens Equation ( < 0 )  True for thin lens and paraxial rays.  magnification m = h’/h = - q/p.
July © Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG105/ECEU646 Optics for Engineers Course Notes Part 4: Apertures, Aberrations Prof.
Light & Optics Physics I By Lynn Johnson.
17. Electromagnetic waves
Light.
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Coronagraph for beam halo observation for the HL LHC
Lens Equation ( < 0 ).
A. WAVE OPTICS B. GEOMETRIC OPTICS Light Rays
3. SR interferometer.
WAVE OPTICS - I Electromagnetic Wave Wavefront Huygens’ Principle
Light Through a Single Slit
Mirrors and Lenses Images can be formed by reflection from mirrors.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Observational Astronomy
Bell Work: Optical Applications III
Refraction and Lenses.
T. Mitsuhashi, John Flanagan G. Mitsuka
Presentation transcript:

Measurement of small beam size by SR interferometer By Prof. Dr.Toshiyuki MITSUHASHI KEK

Let us consider one single mode of photon (in the wavepocket) will be emitted from single electron as a pencil of light? Simple physics of SR

Physical story of Schwinger’s theory for SR Vector potential Introducing temporal squeezing factor Then, t’ in the exponential is To consider relativistic effect, spatial part in phaser represented by plane wave 1, then

Since Schwinger’s theory is focused into integration in temporal domain to get spectrum, Spatial domain integral is also another possible way to discuss the spatial distribution of radiation. According to single-valued function property of potential A, spatial integral result must give same result from temporal integral at same spatial point (as described in textbook for electromagnetic theory by Jackson).

Understanding for single mode of photon in bending radiation (according to K.J.Kim’s paradigm) by limiting the range of the integration.  x≈    y≈    ≈    ≈   eheh at’+bt’ 3 negligible  

Understanding for single mode of photon in bending radiation (according to K.J.Kim’s paradigm) by limiting the range of the integration.  x≈    y≈    ≈    ≈   eheh The window emits a plane wave, and it propagates with the diffraction at’+bt’ 3 negligible  

Another approach Schwinger’s approach: introducing relativistic effect by temporal squeezing factor. Relativistic effect integrate the exponential Radiation integration of the expnential Radiation Lorenz traslation Relativistic effect

1/  Power distribution of dipole radiation

Power distribution as a function of  is given by; P(  ) be 0 at  0 ;

In the case of undulator        2 =  2 +(  r t’+  ) 2

Understand of instantaneous opening through a simple diffraction from squair mask in experiment using ATF Beam sizes in ATF Vertical beam size 5  m Horizontal beam size 32  m Both size is smaller than diffraction limited size (coherent volume size) at 500nm. Diffraction pattern is determined only by generalized pupil function of incident beam.

Question in horizontal instantaneous distribution. Two dips at ±1/  mast have no wavelength dependence. We can observe effect of three peeks in the horizontal distribution?

1/  Power distribution of dipole radiation If the instantaneous horizontal intensity distribution has sharp cone as in figure in below, horizontal diffraction pattern will be determined by this distribution. In the ATF 1/  opening angle is 0.4mrad and corresponding slit width is about 2.7mm. To measure the diffraction pattern by changing the slit width in both of the horizontal and the vertical, we may have a different diffraction pattern for the both direction.

1/  mm Vertical intensity distributionHorizontal intensity distribution? Vertical diffraction patternHorizontal diffraction pattern ?

2mmx2mm 3x3 4x4 5x5 6x67x7 ATF SR Profile 1.28GeV, 1.5x10e10 single bunch

8x8 9x9 10x10 11x11 12x12 14x14

15x15 16x16 17x17 18x18 19x1920x20

21x21 22x22 23x23 24x2425x25 26x26

27x27 28x28 29x29 30x30 (Tshutter=30ms)

Experimental results shows diffraction pattern in the vertical and horizontal are quite same until the slit width of 12mm x 12mm. Beyond 12mm, in the horizontal direction, the curvature effect of field depth will be superimposed, and diffraction pattern will be smeared by this effect. We can conclude not special difference between diffraction pattern in the vertical and the horizontal directions. This means instantaneous intensity distribution seems same in the both directions.

How we can understand conclusion from diffraction experiment?

n(T=t-  t) n(T=t) Observation of two wavepockets from single electron those are radiated at T=t-  t and T=t.

n(T=t-  t) n(T=t) Observation of two wavepockets from single electron those are radiated at T=t-  t and T=t. Cross section of such phenomena is proportional to  

n(T=t-  t) n(T=t) Two independent electrons irradiate two independent wavepockets. Cross section of such phenomena will proportional to 2  electron1 electron 2

Consider again time advance and observation   t’          t’+   This term in the parenthesis seems strange, because this term means observation direction must be depend to time advance By which reason we could not set detectors for simultaneous observation?? Why we must do observations as a function of the time???

  t’ detector2    detector1    detector2 detector1 Source point t-  t

  detector1 The term   t’+   must be replaced by   t’ 2 +   Same as vertical direction, temporal squeezing factor in horizontal must be given by

As a result, we reach same result for instantaneous angular distribution in horizontal direction as vertical one. where, But there exists no  mode in horizontal direction, because electric vector points same direction in right and left.

Understanding for single mode of photon in bending radiation (according to K.J.Kim’s paradigm) by limiting the range of the integration.  x≈    y≈    ≈    ≈   eheh The window emits a plane wave, and it propagates with the diffraction at’+bt’ 3 negligible  

ring floor under ground SR beam electron beam orbit Optical beamline for SR monitor extraction mirror (Be) mirror lens for imaging 2900 source point image X-rays ~ few 100 W 500 very hot radioactive environment

Beryllium extraction mirror Photon Factory E=2.5GeV,  8.66m Water cooling tube Beryllium mirror 2mm Photon energy (keV)

Beryllium extraction mirror for the B-factory E=3.5GeV,  65m

Surface deformation for Be mirror of type used at KEKB 200W (ten times intencer) beam will come in Supper KEKB. X-ray

Development of Diamond mirror

ANSYS simulation of temperature distribution of diamond mirror in copper holder, heated in a 2-mm horizontal ribbon on the mirror’s face. Shape deformation of simulated mirror and holder under heating. (Colors represent deformation in z direction, perpendicular to mirror surface.)

Surface deformation of 1-mm thick single crystal diamond mirror due to 400 W applied over 20 mm width of mirror.

( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) General design of the glass window. In this figure, (a): metal O-ring, (b): vacuum-side conflat flange, (c): optical glass flat, (d): air- side flange. The <  glass window for the extraction of visible SR

Metal O-ring Delta seal Glass window

Mirror with its holder used for the optical path

Installation of optical path ducts and boxes at the KEK B-factory

Uncertainty principal in imaging.   ·  x≥1  So, large opening of light will necessary to obtain a good spatial resolution. 

General introduction of imaging

Aberration-free lens Apochromat f=500 to 1000mm Entrance aperture Glan-tayler prism Band-pass filter  nm,  nm Magnification lens Imaging system

Typical beam image observed by 500nm at the Photon factory (1992)

Decomvalution with MEM method by using the Wiener inverse filter Fourier transform of blurred image G(u,v) in spatial frequency domain (u,v) is given by, where H(u,v) is thought as a inverse filter (Fourier transform of PSF), F(u,v) is a Fourier transform of geometric image, and N(u,v) is a Fourier transform of noise in the image). The Wiener inverse filter H w is given by, where asterisk indicates the complex conjugate of H,  n is a power spectra of the noise, and  f is a power spectra of the signal.

Original image Image after decomvolution

SR interferometer

To measure a size of object by means of spatial coherence of light (interferometry) was first proposed by H. Fizeau in 1868! This method was realized by A.A. Michelson as the measurement of apparent diameter of star with his stellar interferometer in This principle was now known as “ Van Cittert- Zernike theorem” because of their works; 1934 Van Cittert 1938 Zernike.

Spatial coherence and profile of the object Van Cittert-Zernike theorem According to van Cittert-Zernike theorem, with the condition of light is 1 st order temporal incoherent (no phase correlation), the complex degree of spatial coherence  (  x  y  is given by the Fourier Transform of the spatial profile f(x,y) of the object (beam) at longer wavelengths such as visible light. where  x  y are spatial frequencies given by;

Typical interferogram in vertical direction at the Photon Factory (1994). D=10mm

Result of spatial coherence measurement (1994)

Phase of the complex degree of spatial coherence vertical axis is phase in radian

Vertical beam profile obtained by a Fourier transform of the complex degree of coherence. Reconstruction of beam profile by Fourier transform (1996) Beam size (mm)

Beam profile taken with an imaging system Comparison between image

Vertical beam profile obtained by Fourier Cosine transform

Vertical and horizontal beam size at the Photon Factory

±3  m Horizontal beam size measurement

±1  m Vertical beam size measurement

 ≈    ≈   Incoherent field depth in horizontal beam size measurement

Longitudinal depth effect in horizontal beam size measurement electrons in the longitudinal depth emits the photons at different times and different positions independently CCD observes a temporal average of interferogram Observation axis

An example of simulation of horizontal spatial coherence in KEK B factory. A solid line denotes a spatial coherence with the longitudinal depth effect, and a dotted line denotes that of without longitudinal depth effect. A beam size is 548  m and bending radius is 580m. Without depth effect With depth effect

Longitudinal field depth effect in horizontal beam size measurement at ATF Without field depth With field depth

Theoretical resolution of interferometry Uncertainty principle in phase of light

Mode 1 Mode 2 Measure the correlation of light phase in two modes Function of the 1 st order interferometer    2 fog modes of single photon

Uncertainty principal in imaging.   ·  x≥1  So, large opening of light will necessary to obtain a good spatial resolution. 

What is Uncertainty principal in interferometry ?

Mode 1 Mode 2 Measure the correlation of light phase in two modes Function of the 1 st order interferometery    Uncertainty principal in interferometry

Mode 1 Mode 2 Measure the correlation of light phase in two modes Function of the 1 st order interferometery    Uncertainty principal in interferometry Uncertainty in Phase 

The interference fringe will be smeared by the uncertainty of phase.

According to quantum optics, In the large number limit, uncertainty principle concerning to phase is given by   ·  N≥1/2 where  N is uncertainty of photon number.

Using the wavy aspect of photon in small number of photons, Forcibly ; From uncertainty principal  ·  ≥1/2, then,  ≥1/(2·  Even in the case of coherent mode, interference fringe will be smeared by the uncertainty of phase.

Interference fringe with no phase fluctuation

Interference fringe with uncertainty of phase  /2 We can feel the visibility of interference fringe will reduced by uncertainty of phase under the small number of photons. But actually, under the small number of photons, photons are more particle like, and difficult to see wave-phenomena.

theoretical limit due to the phase uncertainty is negligible small Actually, we can have sufficient photons for an interferogram, and theoretical limit due to the phase uncertainty is negligible small. In actual optical component, wavefont error is better than /10, this error corresponds to /50 p-v (0.126rad) over 2mm x 2mm area this systematic error in the phase can introduce a reducing of the visibility by This visibility corresponds to the object size of 0.26  m

In actual case, we cannot observe interference fringe with small number of photons!

Points for small beam size at low ring current 1.Use larger separation of double slit 2. Use shorter wavelength

Points for small beam size at low ring current 1.Use larger separation of double slit limited by opening angle of SR about 10mrad at visible region. 2.Use shorter wavelength limited by aberrations in focusing optics.

In the small ring current range, we use a wider band width (80nm) of band-pass filter to obtain sufficient intensity for the interferogram. The use of wider band width at shorter wave length such as 400nm, the most significant error arises from the chromatic aberration in the refractive optics.

Elimination of chromatic aberration at 400nm is very difficult due to large partial dispersion ratio of glass

Chromatic aberration (longitudinal focal sift in typical achromat design F=600mm

Interferogram with chromatic aberration and without chromatic aberration. =400nm,  =80nm Lens:achromat D=45mm f=600mm  80nm

Results by normal refractive interferometer using =400nm We cannot see any difference In coupling correction!

Under the weak-intensity input, chromatic aberration at 400nm is measure source of error in 5  m range beam size measurement. Use reflective optics! Reflective system has no chromatic aberration.

Possible arrangement for reflective optics for interferometer 1. On axis arrangement

2. Off axis arrangement

Measured interferogram Result of beam size is 4.73  m±0.55  m

The x-y coupling is controlled by the strength of the skew Q at ATF

Remember same results by normal refractive interferometer using =400nm

Not only for beam size measurement in small beam current, but also in the most case. The reflective interferometer is more useful than refractive interferometer especially for shorter wavelength range. Actually, it is chromatic aberration-free, and reflectors are cheaper than lenses in large aperture.

Imbalanced input method for measurement of very small beam size less than 5  m ( )

Beam size (mm) Spatial coherence  =400nm D=45mm 5m5m Spatial coherence (visibility) and beam size

Error transfer from  to  with constant   in  m Let assume we measured  with 1% error, and use a typical conditions for wavelength, distance and separation of double slit. To allow error in beam size 1  m, we can measure at  =0.98

We often have a nonlinearity near by baseline

Convert visibility into beam size. We can see clear saturation in smaller double slit range which has visibility near 1. Saturation is significant in visibility better than 0.9  0.92

Let’s us consider equation for interferogram. In this equation, the term “  ” has not only real part of complex degree of spatial coherence but also intensity factor!

If I 1 =I 2,  is just equal to real part of complex degree of spatial coherence, but if I 1 ≠ I 2, we must take into account of intensity imbalance factor; This intensity factor is always smaller than 1 for I 1 ≠ I 2.

Since intensity factor is smaller than 1 for I 1 ≠ I 2, the “  ” will observed smaller than real part of complex degree of spatial coherence. This means beam size will observed larger than primary size and we know ratio between observed size and primary size. This is magnification!

half ND filter Setup for imbalanced input by half ND filter

Unbalanced

 1 : 1 1 : : 0.01 Visibility in imbalance input

Appropriate magnification is limited by wavefront error of optical components

By balance input interferometer, We can measure the beam size down to 3-5  m. Introducing a magnification using imbalance input for interferometer, We might be can extend this limit down to little bit less than 1  m. Do not forget, imbalance method will not increase information of spatial coherence! It is only for convenience of measurement as well as the magnification in telescope. Do not exceed appropriate range Do not exceed appropriate range!

Thank you very much for your attention.