Max Craglia (JRC) and Stefano Nativi (CNR) FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting 24 September 2010, GEO Secretariat Outcome of EuroGEOSS Multi-disciplinary Interoperability:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot Water Information Services with GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium.
Advertisements

George Percivall, OGC and Ingo Simonis, OGC-E
High level summary and recommendations from AIP-3 George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium Task lead AR-09-01B ADC-16, May 2011.
Successful Implementations for SBAs using GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements George Percivall The Open Geospatial Consortium Jay Pearlman, IEEE Nadine.
United Nations Spatial Data Infrastructure Dr Kristin Stock Social Change Online and Centre for Geospatial Science, University of Nottingham.
EuroGEOSS Implementing the GEOSS Data Sharing Action Plan: Drought.
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs
EuroGEOSS Implementing the GEOSS Data Sharing Action Plan: Biodiversity.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI): status and evolution EC Side Event - GEO Plenary IX Foz do Iguacu, November 2012 Mirko Albani Earth Observation.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
INSPIRE Service Architecture
Digital Earth Communities GEOSS Interoperability for Weather Ocean and Water GEOSS Common Infrastructure Evolution Roberto Cossu ESA
Integrating NOAA’s Unified Access Framework in GEOSS: Making Earth Observation data easier to access and use Matt Austin NOAA Technology Planning and Integration.
Multidisciplinary interoperability To build Operating Capacity Initial (IOC): extend current GEO IP3/AIP-2 interoperability systems in Forest, Biodiversity,
e-Framework Components and Responsibilities.
OneGeology-Europe - the first step to the European Geological SDI INSPIRE Conference 2010, Session Thematic Communities: Geology Krakow, June 24 th 2010.
GEOSS Architecture Describes how components fit together for providing data and information that will be better …than the individual components or systems.
C ITIZENSE Proposal preparation meeting Laxenburg, January 2012 WP3 (Architectural Design)
Crossing the Digital Divide
1 EnviroGrids: Building Capacity for a Black Sea Catchment Observation and Assessment System supporting Sustainable Development Nicolas.
The Multi-disciplinary Interoperability research challenges: EuroGEOSS and EGIDA projects Stefano Nativi National Research Council of Italy (CNR ) GEPW-5.
EuroGEOSS Implementing the GEOSS Data Sharing Action Plan: Forestry.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure: A practical tour Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey September 2008.
Update on INSPIRE: INSPIRE maintenance and implementation and INSPIRE related EEA activities on biodiversity CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting.
A Global Agriculture Drought Monitoring and Forecasting System (GADMFS) Meixia Deng and Liping Di.
THEME[ENV ]: Inter-operable integration of shared Earth Observation in the Global Context Duration: Sept. 1, 2011 – Aug. 31, 2014 Total EC.
Architectural enhancements for GEOSS Douglas Nebert February 2011.
Crossing the Digital Divide Presented by: Fernando R. Salas David Maidment, Enrico Boldrini, Stefano Nativi, Ben Domenico OGC Technical Meeting – Met/Occean.
Vision and architecture of GEOSS Information System GEOSS Design and Evolution George Percivall The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) GEO Task IN-05 coordinator.
GEOSS Task AR-09-01b Architecture Implementation Pilot Phase 6 (AIP-6) Bart De Lathouwer Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) GEO-X Plenary, Geneva, Switzerland.
GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot AIP February 2011 GeoViQua First Workshop George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium Task Lead AR-09-01B - AIP.
Digital Earth Communities GEOSS Interoperability for Weather Ocean and Water GEOSS Common Infrastructure Evolution Roberto Cossu ESA
AIP-2 Kickoff Workshop End-to-end use case: Discovery, access, and use with variations Doug Nebert GEOSS AIP-2 Kickoff September 2008.
ENV proposal meeting, Geneva, Sep. 24, GCI Presentation Joost van Bemmelen, ESA
Data discovery and data processing for environmental research infrastructures Roberto Cossu ENVRI WP4 leader ESA.
ENV proposal meeting, Geneva, Sep. 24, Proposal Objectives Joost van Bemmelen, ESA
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs Siri Jodha S. Khalsa Steve Browdy.
Managing and communicating uncertainty in geospatial web service workflows Richard Jones, Dan Cornford, Lucy Bastin, Matthew Williams Computer Science,
Stefano Nativi (CNR) The EuroGEOSS Project.
Interoperability between INSPIRE, GMES, and GEOSS: What has been learned? Stefano Nativi CNR-IIA and EuroSIF.
GEOSS Clearinghouse GEO Web Portal GEOSS Common Infrastructure Components & Services Standards and Interoperability Best Practices Wiki User Requirements.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Internal Structure and Standards Steven F. Browdy (IEEE)
ESDIN - the geospatial reference data and services for INSPIRE David Overton – Project Coordinator EuroGeographics Project Manager
® GEOSS AIP 5 Water SBA Update HDWG June 2012 Matt Austin NOAA Stefan Fuest KISTERS Jochen Schmidt NIWA.
1 Using the GEOSS Common Infrastructure in the Air Quality & Health SBA: Wildfire & Smoke Assessment Prepared by the GEOSS AIP-2 Air Quality & Health Working.
1 WS-GIS: Towards a SOA-Based SDI Federation Fábio Luiz Leite Júnior Information System Laboratory University of Campina Grande
Presentation to GEO ADC Brazil March The Challenge Information systems need to provide simple access to multi-scale, multi-discipline data sets.
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) R.Shibasaki (ADC, Japan)
Task IN-03 GEO Work Plan Symposium 2014 GEOSS Common Infrastructure IN-03.
1 ISO WAF Community Catalog Product Access Servers Registry Clearinghouse(s) GEO Portals Community Portals Users Client Apps GetCapabilities ISO
1 Using the GEOSS Common Infrastructure in the Air Quality & Health SBA: Wildfire & Smoke Assessment Prepared by the GEOSS AIP-2 Air Quality & Health Working.
Semantics in Web Service Composition for Risk Management Michael Lutz European Commission – DG Joint Research Centre Ispra, Italy EcoTerm IV, Vienna,
Implementing GEOSS architecture with-and-for Users George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium Task lead AR-09-01B.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Access to Priority Earth Observations Data “ Sprint to Plenary” Group on Earth Observations Eighth Plenary Session - GEO-VIII.
Model Web initiative Stefano Nativi 1 and Gary Geller 2 1 (National Research Council of Italy) 2 (NASA JPL) GEOSS Future Products Workshop March.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure: A Practical Tour Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey AIP-3 Kickoff March 2010.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) The GEOSS Common Infrastructure allows Earth Observations users to search, access and use the data, information, tools.
GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot AIP-3 Engineering Use Cases Nadine Alameh & Josh Lieberman AIP-3 kickoff Frascati, Italy March
© 2007, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Implementing the GEOSS Architecture using open standards Implementing the GEOSS Architecture using open standards.
GCI Architecture GEOSS Information System Meeting 20 September 2013, ESA/ESRIN (Frascati, Italy) M.Albani (ESA), D.Nebert (USGS/FGDC), S.Nativi (CNR)
Genève, 06 April GEOSS KNOWLEDGE BASE Towards a Knowledge-driven Access Stefano Nativi National research Council of Italy (CNR)
ESA-FAO GEOPortal STATUS & PLANS
Paul Eglitis [IEEE] and Siri Jodha S. Khalsa [IEEE]
Brokering Agreement process Stefano Nativi and Mattia Santoro ESSI-lab of CNR-IIA San Petersburg (Russia), 07 Nov 2016.
Geospatial Knowledge Base (GKB) Training Platform
The GEO DAB possible contributions
GEOSS Future Products Workshop March 26-28, 2013 NOAA
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Brokering as a Core Element of EarthCube’s Cyberinfrastructure
Air Quality Data Systems and the GEOSS Architecture
Presentation transcript:

Max Craglia (JRC) and Stefano Nativi (CNR) FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting 24 September 2010, GEO Secretariat Outcome of EuroGEOSS Multi-disciplinary Interoperability: the EuroGEOSS Operating Capacities

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Outline EuroGEOSS introduction Present GCI shortcomings for SBAs The EuroGEOSS approach/capacities –Multi-disciplinary Interoperability –Mediation and Brokering framework Conclusions

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Three Interoperability phases

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Present GCI shortcomings for SBAs High Entry Barrier –SBAs need to “learn” and develop many IT technologies –which are changing.. –It is difficult to “evaluate” and “use” discovered resources Limited functionalities –Only register and discovery functionalities are implemented –no access and use –Discovery: no distributed query (only harvesting) Limited multi-disciplinary interoperability –Main issues: resources heterogeneity, domain semantics, resources chaining Limited to “traditional” geospatial resources –No “community” resources –No complex resources –workflow, environmental models, thesauri, etc. –No Web 2.0 resources Limited sustainability –Limited scalability: a flat approach to interconnect resources is not sustainable when you have hundreds of thousands of (heterogeneous) entries –Limited flexibility: what about future: systems, specifications, capacities ?

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 EuroGEOSS principles system of systemsImplement a “system of systems” –Consisting of existing and future information systems –Supplementing but not supplanting systems mandates and governance arrangements –Shift from technical interoperability towards conceptual composability existing (autonomous) Resources Interoperability StandardsBuild on existing (autonomous) Resources and Interoperability Standards RegisterRegister existing thematic components, services, and interoperability standards Assure Low Entry Barrier for SBAs (both Users and Providers) MediateMediate (Community standards and capacities) BrokerBroker (harmonize providers heterogeneity and distribute functionalities

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Low Entry Barrier for SBAs The EuroGEOSS multi-disciplinary infrastructure must –implement all the necessary mediation and brokering functionalities to interoperate with SBA systems –Implement necessary semantic services to facilitate multi- disciplinary interoperability SBAs (and CoPs) systems –Remain autonomous –Remain unchanged –no new standard must be implemented, no new component or service must be implemented or deployed SBAs (and CoPs) must use their own standards to: –describe available spatial resources –publish accessible resources

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Cyber-Infrastructure Complexity to manage Complexity to manage Complexity to manage

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Sustainable development For complex (large and heterogeneous) infrastructures, SOA archetype does not scale and is not flexible enough A Brokered-SOA proved to be: –more sustainable (i.e. flexible and scalable) (tens of thousands) Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Server Service Consumer Service Consumer Client Service Registry Service Registry Publish Find (Harvest) Bind Present GCI framewok (hundreds)

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Service Consumer Service Consumer Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider A SOA Broker/Mediator component Service Provider Service Provider Server Service Consumer Service Consumer Client Service Registry Service Registry Publish Find Bind Service Broker(s) Service Broker(s) Mediator Order Harvest (2-3) (tens of thousands) (hundreds) A sustainable approach

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 A Brokering Framework (interoperability arrangements) EuroGEOSS has developed a Brokering Framework for discovery, access, semantics –OGC/ISO Resources e.g. WMS, WFS, WCS, CSW, WPS, etc. –Community Resources e.g. GBIF, CDI, THREDDS/OPeNDAP, GDACS, DIF, netCDF, etc. –Web 2.0 Resources e.g. OpenSearch, GeoRSS, OAI-PMH, Flickr, Twitter, Myspace, Wikipedia, etc –Semantic resources Thesauri (GEMET, SBA categories, etc.)

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Use cases EuroGEOSS multi-disciplinary infrastructure is successfully used for a couple of AIP-3 scenarios –Biodiversity & Climate Change WG e-Habitat & Species Occurrences Use Scenarioe-Habitat & Species Occurrences Use Scenario –A web based decision-making tool for assessing environmental changes due to anthropogenic activities, including climate change –The development of the modeling web service for computing habitat similarities and irreplaceability allows the community to assess possible environmental consequences. –Water (Drought) WG European Drought Observatory (EDO) Use ScenarioEuropean Drought Observatory (EDO) Use Scenario –Assessment of the drought situation in Europe –Multi-scale approach based on subsidiarity that integrates drought information from various scales

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 SCREENSHOT

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 SCREENSHOT

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 ….

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Conclusions EuroGEOSS addresses most of the Interoperability gaps and challenges recognized at the ADC workshop ( Ankara 2010) –Support different levels of interoperability Intra-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary –Support Interoperability standards heterogeneity Adopt international standards and Recognize community standards –Support resources heterogeneity Data, services, processing models, workflows, feeds, thesauri, documents, etc. Extend the SOA architecture –Support advanced functionalities Discover, evaluate, access, use, – transform, harmonize, chain, etc.

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Thank you for your attention !

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 Proposed Contributions 1) Continuity with what has been done already in EuroGEOSS = brokering + semantic searching + access to data across 3 themes (no reinventing the wheel) 2) Extend to the other SBAs (THREDDS) + other mediating services to link to what they have already 3) Support more and more access and use of data cross themes for real analysis 4) Support models and data sharing

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 System of Systems approach conceptual composabilityShift from technical interoperability towards conceptual composability interoperability arrangements –by recognizing and specifying interoperability arrangements low entry-level-barrier resource Users ProducersAssure a low entry-level-barrier for both resource Users and Producers existing infrastructures heterogeneous resourcesBuild incrementally on existing infrastructures (information systems) and incorporate heterogeneous resources distribution and mediation functionalities brokering frameworksIntroduce distribution and mediation functionalities (i.e. brokering frameworks) for heterogeneous resources Discovery, access, processing and chaining

FP7-ENV-2011 Planning Meeting– Geneve, 27 Sept 2010 EuroGEOSS Partners