Prompt J/  and b ➝ J/  X production in pp collisions at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 7 Dec 2010 For the LHCb Collaboration KRUGER 2010 Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8/10/2010 LHC Days, Split Silvia Goy Lopez (CIEMAT) 1 B Physics in CMS Silvia Goy López (CIEMAT) For the CMS collaboration LHC2010, October 4 th -9 th.
Advertisements

Open beauty production in pp collisions at 7 TeV with CMS Kajari Mazumdar Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India. on behalf of CMS Collaboration,
Status of the LHCb Experiment 杨振伟 Tsinghua Group on LHCb 2010 高能物理学术年会.
NA60 results on charm and intermediate mass dimuon production in In-In 158 GeV/A collisions R. Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon) on behalf of the NA60 collaboration.
Studies of open heavy flavour production at LHCb Artur Ukleja (The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration.
Open Charm and Charmonium Production: First Results from LHCb Zhenwei Univ. on behalf of the LHCb collaboration 21-24, October, 2010 IHEP,
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
12/14/021 Measurements of the Branching Fractions and Helicity Amplitudes in B  D*  Decays Authors: Guangpei Chen, Roy A. Briere Intended for: PRD (RC)
B tagging as a key to New Physics (Physics TDR report) Valery Andreev UCLA October 9-10, 2006 DOE review, task L.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
Ji Hyun Kim Korea University. Introduction Results of Trigger Study – Event generation – Trigger efficiency Trigger rates and Statistics 25 – 26 Sep.
Measurement of CP violation with the LHCb experiment at CERN
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
Quarkonium and heavy flavour physics with ALICE at the LHC M. Gagliardi (INFN Torino) for the ALICE collaboration 1 Workshop on discovery physics at the.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
1 Perspectives for quarkonium production in CMS Carlos Lourenço, on behalf of CMSQWG 2008, Nara, Japan, December 2008.
Lepton/Photon 2003, Batavia, IL, USA August 11 th – 16 th Measurement of  b Branching Ratios in Modes Containing a  c Why are the  b branching fractions.
Observation of W decay in 500GeV p+p collisions at RHIC Kensuke Okada for the PHENIX collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute February 20, /20/20101.
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
V. Chiochia DIS 2003 Workshop Production of beauty quarks in deep inelastic scattering at HERA XI International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering St.
Darren Price – Production of J/ at ATLAS :: Quarkonium2011, Vienna :: April 18 th ‘11 Page 1 Inclusive, prompt and non-prompt J/  production in pp collisions.
M. Poli Lener XI Spring School - "Bruno Touschek" 1 Luminosity measurements with dimuon and single muon reconstruction of Z 0 and W decays OUTLINE:  LHCb.
J/  production in p+p collisions at PHENIX and gluon distribution QWG meeting at FNAL September Hiroki Sato (Kyoto University) for the PHENIX collaboration.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
Paper on J/  and b production Wenbin Qian, Patrick Robbe for the F-WG, Tsinghua Beijing/LAL Orsay, 2 Dec 2009.
1 Quarkonium production in pp collisions at the LHC, with ALICE Hugo Pereira Da Costa, for the ALICE collaboration CEA/IRFU Quarkonium 2014 – Friday, November.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
Charmonium Production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Interactions Presented by Wolfgang Gradl for the HERA-B
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
Properties of B c Meson On behalf of DØ Collaboration Dmitri Tsybychev, SUNY at Stony Brook, PANIC05, Santa Fe, New Mexico B c is ground state of bc system.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
B Production Cross Sections and Fragmentation Fractions at LHCb Laurence Carson (University of Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the LHCb collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
Поликарпов Сергей, 12 апреля 2012, ИТЭФ Статья принята в Physics Letters B 1 марта 2011.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Moriond QCD March 24, 2003Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D01 b-production cross-section at the TeVatron Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D0 for the CDF and D0 collaborations.
ICSHEP 8, Apr , CMS BOnia physics: J/Psi & Inclusive b(  J/PsiX) production x- Section Xiangwei Meng Guoming Chen Institute of.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
J/  production studies in LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, 18 Apr 2011 For the LHCb Collaboration Quarkonium Production Vienna, Austria April 2011.
1 The use of control channels in the analysis of the B s  μ + μ - decay Tuesday Meeting, 2 June 2009.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Exotic Quarkonium Spectroscopy & Production Jane Nachtman on behalf of the CMS Collaboration University of Iowa, USA Charm 2013, 31 August – 4 Sept, 2013,
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Results and prospects for charm physics at LHCb Philip Hunt 1 on behalf of the LHCb collaboration 1 University of Oxford, Particle Physics Kruger 2010:
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
 (2S) cross section and search for narrow resonances below the Upsilon mesons at CDF Alberto Annovi - INFN Frascati for the CDF collaboration International.
Angular Distributions of Muons from ϒ Decays at CDF Matthew Jones Purdue University for the CDF Collaboration October 4, 2011Quarkonium Working Group
Roberto Covarelli (CERN) on behalf of the CMS collaboration
Muon momentum scale calibration with J/y peak
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Prompt J/  and b ➝ J/  X production in pp collisions at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 7 Dec 2010 For the LHCb Collaboration KRUGER 2010 Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC Kruger National Park – South Africa

The LHCb detector New preliminary results of J/  cross-section measurement with 5.2 pb -1 data at LHCb. Prospects for future LHCb measurements in the quarkonium sector. 2 Outline

Unique acceptance amongst the LHC experiments: can explore production properties in the forward region. 3 The LHCb Detector

4 Level 0: Hardware triggers From Muon system & calorimeters High Level Trigger (HLT) 1: Software triggers Add information from VELO and tracking stations to Level 0 information Find primary vertices, etc. HLT2: Software triggers Use all of the detector information to make inclusive and exclusive selections The LHCb Trigger

5 Data Taking Data used in the J/  cross-section measurement Full data sample (37pb -1 ) will be used for studies for winter conferences.

Double differential cross-section measurement, as a function of the transverse momentum p T and of the rapidity y: – 14 p T bins, p T < 14 GeV/c – 5 y bins, 2<y<4.5 Separately for: – Prompt J/  = direct J/  + J/  from  c feed-down, – J/  from b decays. Use (5.2±0.5) pb -1 of data collected end of September 2010 at LHCb, with two different trigger settings, with pp collisions at center-of- mass energy of 7 TeV: – 2.2 pb -1 with standard muon trigger, – 3 pb -1 with the lifetime unbiased muon trigger lines pre-scaled to cope with instantaneous luminosity increase. 6 J/  cross-section measurement

7 Trigger and Selection Selection: L0 Trigger: Single Muon: Di-Muon: p T >1.4 GeV/c p T,1 >0.56 GeV/c, p T,2 >0.48 GeV/c HLT1 Trigger: Single Muon: Di-Muon: Confirm L0 single Muon and p T >1.8 GeV/c (Pre-scaled in Trigger 2 by 0.2) Confirm L0 Di-Muon and M μμ >2.5 GeV/c 2 HLT1 Trigger:Di-Muon: M μμ >2.9 GeV/c 2 μ tracks: ● well reconstructed tracks identified as muons in muon detector, ● p T > 0.7 GeV/c, ● Track fit quality (χ 2 /nDoF < 4). Reconstructed J/  : ● mass window: 0.15 GeV/c 2, ● vertex fit quality (p(χ 2 )>0.5%). Event: at least one reconstructed Primary Vertex (PV): to compute proper-time

8 J/  Sample N = ± 924 Each mass distributions obtained in the 70 bins are fit with: A Crystal Ball function for the signal to take the radiative tail into account, An exponential function for the background. Crystal Ball function:

Computed as: With: – N(J/  ➝  +  - ): number of reconstructed signal events, separatly prompt and from b. – L: integrated luminosity (5.2 pb -1 ) –  tot : total detection efficiency, including acceptance, reconstruction, selection and trigger efficiencies. – B(J/  ➝  +  - ): (5.94 ± 0.06) % –  y = 0.5,  p T =1: bin sizes. 9 Cross-section Measurement

Fraction of J/  from b is given by fit of t z : 10 Separation prompt J/  / J/  from b PV

11 t z tail Origin of the tail are signal J/  associated with the wrong Primary Vertex. The shape of the tail contribution is determined directly from data, simulating an uncorrelated PV using the one of the next event: Sideband subtracted With “next event” method

12 t z signal and background functions Signal: Convolved by resolution function: Sum of 2 Gaussians Background: fit with function describing the shape seen in the J/  mass sidebands: 3 positive exponentials and 2 negative exponentials.

Fit is performed in all analysis bins to extract number of prompt J/  and of J/  from b. For example, 3<p T <4 GeV/c, 2.5<y<3. 13 t z fit LHCb Preliminary =7 TeV L=5 pb -1

Efficiencies are computed from Monte Carlo and are extensively checked on data, with control samples. Efficiencies are checked in Monte Carlo to be equal for prompt J/  and J/  from b in each (p T,y) bin. Small differences are treated as systematic uncertainties. 14 Efficiencies LHCb Simulation unprescaled trigger prescaled trigger

15 Systematics Source of systematic uncertainties considered:

16 Polarization J/  are not polarized in the LHCb simulation. Different angular distributions because of different polarization lead to very different efficiencies. 3 extreme polarization cases studied, in the helicity frame where the angular distribution of J/  muons is (integrating over  ): Differences between 3% and 30% depending on the bin: quote 3 different results of the prompt J/  cross-section, one for each polarization case. 16  =+1  =0  =-1

Integrated over the acceptance: 17 Results: prompt J/  cross-section Unpolarized J/ 

For the 2 extreme polarization cases considered: 18 Results: prompt J/  cross-section  =+1  =-1

19 Results: J/  from b cross-section Integrated over the acceptance:

Results: bb cross-section From the J/  from b cross-section, extrapolate to the total bb cross-section in 4  :  4  : extrapolation factor computed from P YTHIA 6.4, no uncertainty associated to it. B(b ➝ J/  X  (1.16±0.1)%  measured at LEP, with 9% uncertainty. With Tevatron measured hadronization fractions, we estimate B(b ➝ J/  X  (1.08±0.05)%: assign 2% uncertainty due to hadronization fractions. Result: LHCb published value from b ➝ D 0  X (Phys.Lett.B694 (2010) 209) 20

21 Results: mean p T Mean p T is estimated (for unpolarized prompt J/  ) interpolating the measured cross-section with a cubic B-spline function. J/  from b mean p T 20% higher than prompt J/ .

With full data sample, measure polarization of prompt J/ , in bins of p T and y, taking into account the full angular distribution. Measurement of  c cross-section will be possible (will also allow to know proportion of J/  from feed-down) 22 Prospects for future measurements

With full data sample, measurements of  (2S) and Y(1S), Y(2S) and Y(3S) will be possible, in their decay modes to  +  Other quarkonium states Y(1S), Y(2S), Y(3S)  (2S)

Conclusions New results for J/  cross-section measurement at LHCb with 5 pb -1 of data, as a function of p T and y, extending the range of the first measurement presented at ICHEP Large uncertainties due to unknown J/  polarization: future polarization measurement will address this issue. Measurement of  (2S) and Y(1S), Y(2S), Y(3S) cross- sections will allow to provide a complete picture of quarkonium production in the forward rapidity region. 24