Measure 25 Short Term Parking Scheme Katerina Oktabcova Usti nad Labem Municipality

Measure 25 Background and Objectives Increasing number of vehicles in the city Critical parking conditions, primarily in the city centre and in densely build-up residential areas New parking strategy for the city is required Objectives:  Improve conditions for parking in the city with regard to future development  Reduce negative impacts of individual transport and improve living environment in the city

Measure 25 Measure overview Tasks Parking Strategy Research –Finished in M18 –RTD task –Analysis of current conditions of parking in the city and future development 3.7 Short Term Parking scheme –Finished in M40 –DEMO task –Feasibility of a proposal for a parking scheme in the city centre and in residential areas

Measure 25 Task Parking strategy research General background –current state of traffic and parking conditions in the city Analysis of the existing parking policy in Ústí nad Labem – for the city centre and for residential areas Overview of tools suitable for parking management Baseline field survey Identification of problems Proposal for appropriate solutions Measure generalised to allow application in other areas in the city

Measure 25 Baseline Survey Assessing various criteria of parking supply –number of parked vehicles –type of parking place (parking lanes, strips, bays, garages or other) –capacity of parking space (field detected or calculated from the official data of the city road network according to dimensional dispositions) –photo documentation –characteristic of parking and typical issues Conducted on different week-days and at different times during May – June 2009 Utilising data from previous surveys in the city and from official records Parking demand caclulated from the number of buildings and character of the commune multiplied by the motorisation index Parking deficit caclulated – difference between supply and demand paidunpaidreserved parking on roadways parallel diagonal perpendicular car parks parking garages893*0768* Total individualyards, gardens281 garages225 total506 Total parking places3964

Measure 25 Identification of problems Major problems: –serious deficit in the number of available parking places –cars parked everywhere, on places inappropriate for parking Frequently occurring issues: –parked vehicles creating road bottlenecks –parking in the driving lane of the street –disregard of road signs –longitudinal parking disregarding insufficient width of the road –parking within crossroads causing traffic risks –commercial vehicles parked in the residential area –insufficient space disables transit of larger vehicles, such as fire trucks, garbage trucks and ambulance

Measure 25 Typical parking issues – insufficient capacity stání v křižovatcenerespektování SDZ nedostatečná šířka jízdních pruhůstání uprostřed jízdního pásu

Measure 25 Proposed solutions Regulation of existing legal parking spaces –Indication of parking lanes and parking bays on urban road –Indication of areas with forbidden parking by both road marking and signing, especially near crossroads –Modification of selected streets to one-way roads to allow longitudinal parking on one side or on both sides. Implementation of new parking places Development of public garages Police enforcement of traffic laws and monitoring Implementation of paid parking zones

Measure 25 Task 3.7 – New parking scheme Transport policy –Principles of parking management, parking policy and its effectiveness –Parking fees –Influencing behaviour of drivers –Specifics of the city centre –Specifics of residential areas Instruments suitable for parking restrictions –Reducing transit traffic, encouraging greater take-up of PT, P&R facilities, paid parking Best practice from other cities Parking scheme solutions –Long-term and short-term parking

Measure 25 Results in the city centre situation in the city centre analysed by the field survey occupancy as parking demand for parking places cannot be reliably determined - practically all parking places permanently occupied, many vehicles park illegally, numerous drivers are not able to park Parking demand was derived from the methodology based on the Czech standard (ČSN – Designing local roads) and on general technical requirements for construction in the capital city overall parking deficit calculated proposed solutions for the new parking scheme: implementation of paid parking zones and establishing P&G premises on the perimeter of the city centre after-data calculated through the transport model

Measure 25 Results in residential areas Typical residential area Dobětice surveyed total number of legal parking places is 1,649, which covers 76% of the parking demand, significant lack of parking spots. The total number of parking places available after implementing measures for parking improvements will be 2,362, which covers the demand for parking by 108.9% overall improvement of the parking status is 32.9% Not sufficient for future development of motorisation prognosed by the Directorate of Roads and Highways of the CR (2%/year) parking reserve exhausted within four years more complex long-term solution requires significant investments into collective garages and implementation of charged parking on public roads. section new parking places solution 310 Shift to one-way roads New parking places Longitudinal parking in new parking bays along the road Collective garages two-storied Collective garages three-storied total713

Measure 25 Conclusion The parking scheme issue is quite extensive Numerous existing parking methods but only few are suitable for the situation in Usti nad Labem Suitable parking strategy must fulffil compromis between the parking scheme, city traffic, public transportation and public opinion. It involves technical solution and conveying information to the public - organising intensive advertising information campaign Requires cooperation with the Police of the Czech Republic and the Municipal Police (control) It is not possible to cover the present and future parking demand entirely, but the parking deficit can be at least minimised.

Measure 25 Support Parking information leaflets overview of the existing parking scheme and parking possibilities basic information about payment methods and rates lucid map displaying the parking facilities for visitors, commuters and residents Sample places for delivery vehicles 6 parking places implemented in the city centre designated only for vehicles supplying local shops identified by vertical and horizontal markings shopkeepers instructed on the regulations parking discs distributed among suppliers as a support.

Measure 25 Evaluation Final results in progress Gathering after data from the transport model Indicators: Capacity reserve –traffic survey –number of spaces according to valid legislation –occupancy -> demand for parking Perception of accessibility –determined by expert estimation based on demand for parking (subjective opinions of drivers not decisive) Modal split –constant in residential area –in the centre – determination by transport model / expert estimation –Proposal of P&G – the model does not enable calculation of pedestrian flaws

Measure 25 Budget and costs Purchases: implementation of sample parking places for supply vehicles in the city centre production and distribution of parking brochures production and distribution of parking clocks to local businesses Budget17 000€ Actual costs cca 5 000€ Subcontract: Field survey of parking conditions in the city and development of suitable paid parking scheme for the city Budget60 000€ Actual costs €

Measure 25 Thank you! Katerina Oktabcova CIVITAS Archimedes Ústí nad Labem Municipality