Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Anderson localization: from single particle to many body problems.
Advertisements

Theory of the pairbreaking superconductor-metal transition in nanowires Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu.
Quantum Critical Behavior of Disordered Itinerant Ferromagnets D. Belitz – University of Oregon, USA T.R. Kirkpatrick – University of Maryland, USA M.T.
Low frequency noise in superconducting qubits
Theory of Slow Non-Equilibrium Relaxation in Amorphous Solids at Low Temperature Alexander Burin Tulane, Chemistry.
Superinductor with Tunable Non-Linearity M.E. Gershenson M.T. Bell, I.A. Sadovskyy, L.B. Ioffe, and A.Yu. Kitaev * Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Noisy Qubits Mohammad Amin D-Wave Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Coherent Quantum Phase Slip Oleg Astafiev NEC Smart Energy Research Laboratories, Japan and The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Japan.
Quantum decoherence of excited states of optically active biomolecules Ross McKenzie.
LPS Quantum computing lunchtime seminar Friday Oct. 22, 1999.
PCE STAMP Physics & Astronomy UBC Vancouver Pacific Institute for Theoretical Physics QUANTUM GLASSES Talk given at 99 th Stat Mech meeting, Rutgers, 10.
Quantum charge fluctuation in a superconducting grain Manuel Houzet SPSMS, CEA Grenoble In collaboration with L. Glazman (University of Minnesota) D. Pesin.
Josephson Junctions, What are they?
14. April 2003 Quantum Mechanics on the Large Scale Banff, Alberta 1 Relaxation and Decoherence in Quantum Impurity Models: From Weak to Strong Tunneling.
“Quantum computation with quantum dots and terahertz cavity quantum electrodynamics” Sherwin, et al. Phys. Rev A. 60, 3508 (1999) Norm Moulton LPS.
Semiconductors n D*n If T>0
Low temperature universality in disordered solids In collaboration with: Philip Stamp (UBC) Alejandro Gaita-Arino (UBC) Moshe Schechter Gaita-Arino and.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Coherence and decoherence in Josephson junction qubits Yasunobu Nakamura, Fumiki Yoshihara, Khalil Harrabi Antti Niskanen, JawShen Tsai NEC Fundamental.
A semiclassical, quantitative approach to the Anderson transition Antonio M. García-García Princeton University We study analytically.
A1- What is the pairing mechanism leading to / responsible for high T c superconductivity ? A2- What is the pairing mechanism in the cuprates ? What would.
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
Single atom lasing of a dressed flux qubit
Dressed state amplification by a superconducting qubit E. Il‘ichev, Outline Introduction: Qubit-resonator system Parametric amplification Quantum amplifier.
1/f noise in devices 전광선.
Fluctuation conductivity of thin films and nanowires near a parallel-
P. Bertet Quantum Transport Group, Kavli Institute for Nanoscience, TU Delft, Lorentzweg 1, 2628CJ Delft, The Netherlands A. ter Haar A. Lupascu J. Plantenberg.
Two Particle Response in Cluster Dynamical Mean Field Theory Rosemary F. Wyse, Aspen Center for Physics, PHY/DMR Dynamical Mean Field Theory is.
Electron coherence in the presence of magnetic impurities
Dynamic response of a mesoscopic capacitor in the presence of strong electron interactions Yuji Hamamoto*, Thibaut Jonckheere, Takeo Kato*, Thierry Martin.
Charge Carrier Related Nonlinearities
Radiation induced photocurrent and quantum interference in n-p junctions. M.V. Fistul, S.V. Syzranov, A.M. Kadigrobov, K.B. Efetov.
V. Brosco1, R. Fazio2 , F. W. J. Hekking3, J. P. Pekola4
A deterministic source of entangled photons David Vitali, Giacomo Ciaramicoli, and Paolo Tombesi Dip. di Matematica e Fisica and Unità INFM, Università.
Experimental Approach to Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling of Magnetization in Single Domain Nanoparticles H. Mamiya, I. Nakatani, T. Furubayashi Nanomaterials.
By Francesco Maddalena 500 nm. 1. Introduction To uphold Moore’s Law in the future a new generation of devices that fully operate in the “quantum realm”
Ch ; Lecture 26 – Quantum description of absorption.
Meet the transmon and his friends
Michael Browne 11/26/2007.
Noise and decoherence in the Josephson Charge Qubits Oleg Astafiev, Yuri Pashkin, Tsuyoshi Yamamoto, Yasunobu Nakamura, Jaw-Shen Tsai RIKEN Frontier Research.
Quantum computation with solid state devices - “Theoretical aspects of superconducting qubits” Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos, Varenna 5-15 July.
Introduction to Josephson Tunneling and Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling
Entanglement for two qubits interacting with a thermal field Mikhail Mastyugin The XXII International Workshop High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory.
Collaborations: L. Santos (Hannover) Former members: R. Chicireanu, Q. Beaufils, B. Pasquiou, G. Bismut A.de Paz (PhD), A. Sharma (post-doc), A. Chotia.
Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Noisy Qubits M.H.S. Amin D-Wave Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
16722 We: noise51+1 noise We: noise51+2 noise: signal you don’t want technical noise: sources we can control.
Quasi-1D antiferromagnets in a magnetic field a DMRG study Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Lausanne Switzerland G. Fath.
Measuring Quantum Coherence in the Cooper-Pair Box
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
M. Ueda, T. Yamasaki, and S. Maegawa Kyoto University Magnetic resonance of Fe8 at low temperatures in the transverse field.
Non classical correlations of two interacting qubits coupled to independent reservoirs R. Migliore CNR-INFM, Research Unit CNISM of Palermo Dipartimento.
On Decoherence in Solid-State Qubits Josephson charge qubits Classification of noise, relaxation/decoherence Josephson qubits as noise spectrometers Decoherence.
Chapter 7 in the textbook Introduction and Survey Current density:
Thermodynamics and Transport in Iron-based superconductors Maxim G. Vavilov, University of Wisconsin-Madison, DMR Recent discovery of novel iron-pnictide.
Charge-Density-Wave nanowires Erwin Slot Mark Holst Herre van der Zant Sergei Zaitsev-Zotov Sergei Artemenko Robert Thorne Molecular Electronics and Devices.
Per Delsing Chalmers University of Technology Quantum Device Physics Interaction between artificial atoms and microwaves Experiments: IoChun Hoi, Chris.
Raman Effect The Scattering of electromagnetic radiation by matter with a change of frequency.
Circuit QED Experiment
Spin-orbit interaction in a dual gated InAs/GaSb quantum well
Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Analogies to the Higgs-Mechanism
Coherent interactions at a distance provide a powerful tool for quantum simulation and computation. The most common approach to realize an effective long-distance.
Electrical Properties of Materials
dark matter Properties stable non-relativistic non-baryonic
Coupled atom-cavity system
all Cooper pairs must behave in the same way
Mario Palma.
Decoherence at optimal point: beyond the Bloch equations
Marco Polo, Daniel Felinto and Sandra Vianna Departamento de Física
Dynamics and decoherence of a qubit coupled to a two-level system
Dynamics of a superconducting qubit coupled to quantum two-level systems in its environment Robert Johansson (RIKEN, The Institute of Physical and Chemical.
Presentation transcript:

Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)

Outline Decoherence in superconducting qubit [ experimental state of the art ]: low frequency noise (1/f noise) high frequency noise (f noise) We discuss two possible microscopic mechanisms for the fluctuators weakly interacting quantum Two Level Systems (TLSs) environment made by Kondo-like traps TLSs model: significant source of noise detailed characteristics of the noise power spectrum are in a qualitative and quantitative disagreement with the data Kondo-like traps model: significant source of noise agreement with most features observed in the experiments

What are the sources of noise? There are several experiments in different frequency regimes but the dominant source of noise is yet to be identified! Electromagnetic fluctuations of the circuit (gaussian) Discrete noise due to fluctuating background charges (BC) trapped in the substrate or in the junction

? Experimental picture of the noise power spectrum Zimmerli et al Visscher et al Zorin et al Kenyon et al Nakamura et al Astafiev et al Wellstood et al T Origin of both types of noise are the same ?

Low frequency noise ( 1/f ) 1/f spectrum up to frequency ~ Hz. [ where is the upper cut-off ??? ] The intensity is in the range of at f=10Hz some samples clearly produce a telegraph noise but 1/f spectrum points to numerous charges participating in generating the noise. This noise dominates and it is greatly reduced by echo technique. - Temperature dependence of the noise high frequency noise ( f )

Theoretical analysis Upper level: use a proper model to study decoherence. “fluctuators model” and not spin boson model Paladino, Faoro, Falci and Fazio (2002) Galperin, Altshuler, Shantsev (2003) Lower level: understanding which is the microscopic mechanism of decoherence that originate the fluctuators Faoro, Bergli, Altshuler and Galperin (2004) Faoro and Ioffe (2005)

Quantum TLSs model with The effective strength of the interactions is controlled by and it is always very weak. Many TLSs interacts via dipole-dipole interactions: interaction with low energy phonons T>100 mk Relaxations for TLSs

Dipole and qubit interaction Each dipole induces a change in the island potential or in the gate charge i.e. barrier substrate Charge Noise Power Spectrum: Rotated basis:

Dephasing rates for the dipoles pure dephasing: The weak interaction causes a width in each TLS at low frequency some of the TLSs become classical Effective electric field N.B: density of thermally activated TLSs enough (Continuum)

Relaxation rates for the dipoles Fermi Golden Rule But in presence of large disorder, some of TLSs: These dipoles become classical and will be responsible for 1/f noise

at high frequency white!

In the barrier... The density of TLSs ~ too low! Astafiev et al Strongly coupled TLS

In the substrate... Comparison with experiments : Astafiev et al. 2004

at low frequency it has a 1/f dependence for it has only linear dependence on Temperature it has intensity in agreement with experimental data

What did we learn from the dipole picture? dependence Search for fluctuators of different nature... Number of thermally activated TLSs dependence

Andreev fluctuators model qubit correlations are short range amplitude of oscillations increases with increasing  Faoro, Bergli, Altshuler and Galperin (2004) dependence

Kondo-like traps model Kondo Temperature

Properties of the ground state and the localized excited state Weak coupling Strong coupling

“Physics” of the Kondo-like traps Slow processes Fast processes barrier superconductor Superconductor coherence lenght Density of states close to the Fermi energy bare density weight of the Kondo resonance Transition amplitude:

at high frequency This noise is dominated by fast tunneling processes between traps effectively the motion of electrons between trap acts as resistor R From the conductance G we calculate the resistance R The noise power spectrum raises linearly with the frequency! NB: Andreev fluctuators have the same but … and

at low frequency in the barrier : experimental value: estimates :

We have discussed a novel microscopic mechanism (Kondo-like traps) that might be the dominant source of noise for dephasing But the “physics” of the device is complex : Kondo-like + TLSs TLSs are “killed” by the T-dependence! Our analysis cannot be done in greater details, due to the lack of an analytical theory of kondo-like impurites with superconductor Try to measure 1/f noise after suppressing the superconductivity. We expect reduction of 1/f noise Reasonable level of noise even only in the barrier. Different substrates no changes in the intensity of the noise (NEC) relevant for phase qubit. Conclusions