10/19/2005 ACGSC Fall Meeting, Hilton Head SC Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © 2005 James D. Paduano 1 NTC ACTIVITIES 2005 Outline 1)Activities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Company Presentation.
Advertisements

Georgia Tech Aerial Robotics Dr. Daniel P Schrage Jeong Hur Fidencio Tapia Suresh K Kannan SUCCEED Poster Session 6 March 1997.
MicroCART Micro processor C ontrolled A erial R obotics T eam Abstract MicroCART is a group of EE/CprE students tasked with developing an autonomous helicopter.
Design Presentation Spring 2009 Andrew Erdman Chris Sande Taoran Li.
Aerial Surveillance Drone Design Review Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Colin Donahue Samantha Kenyon Jason Lowden Benjamin Wheeler.
ODS3F –Observation and Detection Systems For Forest Fire Monitoring
Gilbert Islas Feb. 25, 2012 SYSM  A micro air vehicle (MAV) is a class of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). unmanned aerial vehicles  Size restrictions.
Luis Mejias, Srikanth Saripalli, Pascual Campoy and Gaurav Sukhatme.
Concept of Operations UAV and UGV team provides dual perspectives on the target Autonomous transit from base of operations, to surveillance zone, and back.
Autonomous Cargo Transport System for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, using Visual Servoing Noah Kuntz and Paul Oh Drexel Autonomous Systems Laboratory Drexel.
TCSP – Patent Liability Analysis. Project Overview Overall Objectives Create an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) which is capable of the following: Create.
Range (nm) Payload (kg) Payload (lb) Endurance (hr) As a total system, Vigilante.
INNOCON Innovative solutions to the modern real time Arial surveillance challenges.
The European Project sFly: Swarm of Micro Flying Robots EU FP7,
MASKS © 2004 Invitation to 3D vision Lecture 11 Vision-based Landing of an Unmanned Air Vehicle.
Automatic Control & Systems Engineering Autonomous Systems Research Mini-UAV for Urban Environments Autonomous Control of Multi-UAV Platforms Future uninhabited.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Image Processing of Video on Unmanned Aircraft Video processing on-board Unmanned Aircraft Aims to develop image acquisition, processing and transmission.
Dr. Shankar Sastry, Chair Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley.
STARMAC The Stanford Testbed of Autonomous Rotorcraft for Multi-Agent Control Gabe Hoffmann, Haomiao Huang, Vijay Pradeep, Steven Waslander Aeronautics.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P09122 Final Project Review Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Aeronautics & Astronautics Autonomous Flight Systems Laboratory All slides and material copyright of University of Washington Autonomous Flight Systems.
Jason Li Jeremy Fowers Ground Target Following for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.
INTEGRATED PROGRAMME IN AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING Coordinated Control, Integrated Control and Condition Monitoring in Uninhabited Air-Vehicles Ian Postlethwaite,
Team Phoenix March 15, Project Goal Our team will develop an air vehicle that will not only navigate a course autonomously while providing real.
Aurora Flight Sciences proprietary Aurora Overview James D. Paduano Presented to the ACGSC October Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation 9950 Wakeman.
W w w. a r c a a. a e r o AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR AEROSPACE AUTOMATION Overview of Activities at the Australian Research Centre for Aerospace Automation.
Unmanned aerial systems, what they are and what is available? Professor Sandor M Veres University of Sheffield.
Concept Design Review THE DUKES OF HAZARD CAMILLE LEGAULT, NEIL KENNEDY, OMAR ROJAS, FERNANDO QUIJANO, AND JIMMY BUFFI April 24, 2008.
Transition of UAV Technologies from MIT Aeronautics & Astronautics to Nascent Technology Corporation James D. Paduano Eric Feron Presented to the ACGSC,
1 Development of a Programmable Ultrasonic Receiver Chris Allen
October 2006 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Williamsburg, VA October 2006 John Bosworth (661)
1.  The Autonomous Helicopter Navigation System 2010 is focused on developing a helicopter system capable of autonomous control, navigation and localising.
David Gitz, EE, ICARUS Lead Engineer Senior Design.
“Landing unmanned VTOL systems: Issues in control and navigation ” AEROSPACE CONTROL AND GUIDANCE SYSTEMS COMMITTEE Eric Feron Dutton/Ducoffe Professor.
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
PCA READAPT V&V DARPATech Exhibit Demo Flight Viewer & CSIM PCA Model Screenshots Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories Distributed Processing.
Vision-based Landing of an Unmanned Air Vehicle
o Portable low-cost aerial drone that can be used for reconnaissance o Relay real-time video and data, like location, heading, battery life o Take high-resolution.
Control stations Design of UAV Systems Lesson objective - to discuss
Built in Collision Avoidance for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Outline Previous Accomplishments o Last year's SURG o Mapkin Proposal Concept o Why is this useful? o The MikroKopter platform o Previous work Criteria.
AEM 5333 UAV Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking – Humans on foot – Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver.
Symbiotic Simulation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Autonomous Air & Ground Surveillance Unit Objectives, Preliminary Specifications, and Option Analysis.
Doris Hamill UAV Business Development Lead NASA Langley Research Center and Hampton Roads First Responders.
Design Team # 4 Design of low cost flight computer for unmanned aerial vehicles Status Report # 4 Ryan Morlino Chris Landeros Sylvester Meighan Stephen.
UK Aerial Robotics Team UK IDEA Laboratory Workforce Development: The UK Aerial Robotics Team and the PAX River Student UAV Competition Dale McClure (Matt.
Cooperative Air and Ground Surveillance Wenzhe Li.
Network UAV C3 Stage 1 Final Briefing Timothy X Brown University of Colorado at Boulder Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program Electrical and Computer.
UAV See & Avoid Employing Vision Sensors
Aeronautics & Astronautics Autonomous Flight Systems Laboratory All slides and material copyright of University of Washington Autonomous Flight Systems.
Boeing-MIT Collaborative Time- Sensitive Targeting Project July 28, 2006 Stacey Scott, M. L. Cummings (PI) Humans and Automation Laboratory
1 Center for the Collaborative Control of Unmanned Vehicles (C3UV) UC Berkeley Karl Hedrick, Raja Sengupta.
Design Team # 4 Design of low cost flight computer for unmanned aerial vehicles Status Report # 5 Ryan Morlino Chris Landeros Sylvester Meighan Stephen.
Honeywell Navigation, Communication and Control SAE G&C Committee Meeting Oct 19, 2005
Aeronautics & Astronautics Autonomous Flight Systems Laboratory All slides and material copyright of University of Washington Autonomous Flight Systems.
Light-Portable Synthetic Aperture RADAR
Cloud Cap Technologies
Dr. Marcos Esterman Faculty Guide W. Casolara Project Leader
Unmanned Control & Tracking System (UCATS)
A Vision System for Landing an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Vision Based Motion Estimation for UAV Landing
PAX River Competition UK Aerial Robotics Team University of Kentucky.
UAV Vision Landing Motivation Data Gathered Research Plan Background
Lockheed Martin Challenge
Distributed Sensing, Control, and Uncertainty
Stephen Dade UAV Outback Challenge.
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Presentation transcript:

10/19/2005 ACGSC Fall Meeting, Hilton Head SC Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © 2005 James D. Paduano 1 NTC ACTIVITIES 2005 Outline 1)Activities Joint w/ MIT  ONR STTR Phase II Final Demonstration  AFOSR STTR - Autonomy w/ Imperfect Comms 2)XS-Series Helicopter Development  New flight systems  Aerial photography + other apps 3)Vision in Autonomous Aircraft  HILsim for Optic Flow Sensors  Optical Target for Precision Hover & Land

10/19/2005 ACGSC Fall Meeting, Hilton Head SC Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © 2005 James D. Paduano 2 1) JOINT MIT / NTC ACTIVITIES ONR STTR: Multi-vehicle cooperation in urban environment Final Demonstration: 2-vehicle beyond line-of-sight recon –2 fully autonomous rotorcraft –Real-time coordination by MILP –‘Away’ UAV goes beyond line-of-sight –‘Relay’ UAV maintains LOS w/ ‘Away’ UAV and ground station Aeronautics & Astronautics Flight Data in ‘Suburban’ Terrain: Red=Away, Green=Relay AFOSR STTR: CSAT with Intermittent Communication Capabilities being developed –Robust Distributed Task Assignment –Comm. emulation for multi-vehicle HILsim and flight testing –Communication Health Management –Low-cost on-board planning module Phase II Testbed: MIT Fixed-Wing Fleet RDTA Concept (How, MIT)

10/19/2005 ACGSC Fall Meeting, Hilton Head SC Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © 2005 James D. Paduano 3 2) XS-Series Helicopter Development New airframe, alternator, & 60W UPS Gas power, comms  ~5 mile range Lighter weight avionics & suspension Mount points for cameras & sensors New ground operator console/moving map Automatic take-off, landing, waypoint navigation, and real-time path uplink (for centralized coordination) Fail-safe and reversion modes Aerial photography/videography: –Stable, hovering platform –Higher altitudes than feasible manually –More accurate altitude, heading Testbed: Open architecture for integration of additional sensors “VTUAV surrogate” –< 25 lbs: Lower cost, risk –2 x 0.7 GHz Pentium processors on board for testing autonomy, vision, etc. NEAR-TERM APPLICATIONS

10/19/2005 ACGSC Fall Meeting, Hilton Head SC Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © 2005 James D. Paduano 4 3) Vision in Autonomous Aircraft Optic Flow Sensor Testing (DARPA) –Sensor from Centeye Inc. –HILsim environment with urban terrain Feasibility of See-and-Avoid Using Optic Flow –2 nd ‘Threat’ Vehicle Simulated in HILsim environment –Detection, avoidance tests conducted Algorithms for Dodging / Urban Nav Optical Target for Precision Landing –Patented design using Moire patterns –Prelim. development underway at MIT –Next phase beginning at NTC Features –Position/orientation relative to target derived using passive imagery –Position sensitivity ~1 cm –Low resolution imagery sufficient to deduce relative position Aeronautics & Astronautics